Rate Of Thromboembolic Events Research Articles

Omission of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device has decreased thromboembolic events and minimized the risk of pump thrombosis. However, bleeding complications due to combined antithrombotic therapy with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin remain high. Only limited data on the safety of VKA monotherapy in HM3 patients are available. A systematic search on the main databases was performed. Observational data and randomized trials were eligible for this analysis. As primary endpoint, we analyzed hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAE). As secondary endpoints, we investigated the individual components of the primary endpoint. The analysis was carried out using the odds ratio (OR) as outcome measure. A random-effects model was fitted to the data. Five manuscripts fulfilled the inclusion criteria. These trials included 785 patients (381 on VKA monotherapy, 404 on VKA and aspirin). VKA monotherapy significantly reduced HRAE (OR: 0.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02-0.59], p = 0.01, I2 = 87%). The reduction was driven by a decrease in bleeding complications (OR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.02-0.62], p = 0.01, I2 = 86%) without increasing the rates of thromboembolic events (OR: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.26-1.81], p = 0.45, I = 0%). Vitamin K antagonist monotherapy is associated with a significant reduction of bleeding events without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications in HM3 patients.

Safety of tranexamic acid in surgically treated isolated spine trauma.

Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic antifibrinolytic drug, effectively reduces blood loss by inhibiting plasmin-induced fibrin breakdown. This is the first study in the United Kingdom to investigate the effectiveness of TXA in the surgical management of isolated spine trauma. To assess the safety of TXA in isolated spine trauma. The primary and secondary outcomes are to assess the rate of thromboembolic events and to evaluate blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusion, respectively. This prospective observational study included patients aged ≥ 17 years with isolated spine trauma requiring surgical intervention over a 6-month period at two major trauma centers in the United Kingdom. We identified 67 patients: 26 (39%) and 41 (61%) received and did not receive TXA, respectively. Both groups were matched in terms of age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and mechanism of injury. A higher proportion of patients who received TXA had a subaxial cervical spine injury classification or thoracolumbar injury classification score > 4 (74% vs 56%). All patients in the TXA group underwent an open approach with a mean of 5 spinal levels involved and an average operative time of 203 min, compared with 24 patients (58%) in the non-TXA group who underwent an open approach with an average of 3 spinal levels involved and a mean operative time of 159 min. Among patients who received TXA, blood loss was < 150 and 150-300 mL in 8 (31%) and 15 (58%) patients, respectively. There were no cases of thromboembolic events in any patient who received TXA. Our study demonstrated that TXA is safe for isolated spine trauma. It is challenging to determine whether TXA effectively reduces blood loss because most surgeons prefer TXA for open or multilevel cases. Further, larger studies are necessary to explore the rate, dosage, and mode of administration of TXA.

On-X aortic valve replacement patients treated with low dose warfarin and low dose aspirin.

To assess if warfarin targeted to INR 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) is safe for all patients with an On-X aortic mechanical valve. This prospective, observational registry follows patients receiving warfarin targeted at an INR of 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) plus daily aspirin (75-100 mg) after On-X aortic valve replacement. The primary end-point is a composite of thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, and major bleeding. Secondary end-points include the individual rates of thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, and major bleeding, as well as the composite in subgroups of home or clinic-monitored INR and risk categorization for thromboembolism. The control was the patient group randomized to standard-dose warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) plus daily aspirin 81 mg from the PROACT trial. A total of 510 patients were enrolled at 23 centers in the UK, United States, and Canada. Currently, the median follow-up duration is 3.4 years, and median achieved INR is 1.9. The primary composite end-point rate in the low INR patients is 2.31% vs 5.39% (95% confidence interval 4.12%-6.93%) per patient-year in the PROACT control group, constituting a 57% reduction. Results are consistent in subgroups of home or clinic-monitored, and high-risk patients, with reductions of 56%, 57%, and 57%, respectively. Major and total bleeding are decreased by 85% and 73%, respectively, with similar rates of thromboembolic events. No valve thrombosis occurred. Interim results suggest that warfarin targeted at an INR of 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) plus aspirin is safe and effective in patients with an On-X aortic mechanical valve with or without home INR monitoring.

Neoplastic pathologic hip fractures are associated with a higher risk of post-operative bleeding and thromboembolic events

IntroductionSurgical treatment of hip fractures leads to significant post-operative complications. Although pathologic fractures (PF) are associated with worse outcomes, most studies do not differentiate between etiology (neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF). We seek to compare 30-day complication rates between 1) native hip fractures and neoplastic PF, and 2) neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF. Materials and methodsA total of 127,819 patients with hip fractures and 5104 with PF diagnosed from 2005 to 2021 were retrieved from the NSQIP database. We included 1843 patients with neoplastic PF and 3261 with non-neoplastic PF. Demographics, pre-operative labs and co-morbidities, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. Propensity-score matching was conducted to control for confounders. ResultsPatients with a neoplastic PF had a significantly higher rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (4 % vs 1.2 %, p = 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (2.4 % vs 0.7 %, p < 0.001), than native hip fractures. Rates of post-operative bleeding were significantly higher in the neoplastic PF group (29.3 % vs 23.9 %, p < 0.001) than non-neoplastic PF. No differences in soft tissue complications were found. When comparing neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF, the former had a higher rate of PE (2.5 % vs 1.0 %, p = 0.015) and post-operative bleeding (27.6 % vs 22.0 %, p = 0.009). Unplanned readmission rates and 30-day mortality rate were also higher in the neoplastic PF group. ConclusionNeoplastic PF of the hip are associated with higher risk of thromboembolic event rates and post-operative bleeding than both native hip fractures and non-neoplastic PF. No differences in rates of soft tissue complications were found between groups.

Thromboembolic events after major bleeding events in patients with mechanical heart valves: a 13-year analysis.

Anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves (MHV) is associated with a risk of major bleeding episodes (MBE). In case of MBE, anticoagulant interruption is advocated. However, there is lack of data regarding the thrombo-embolic events (TE) risk associated with anticoagulant interruption. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the rate and risk factors of 6-months of TEs in patients with MHV experiencing MBE. This observational study was conducted over a 13-year period. Adult patients with a MHV presenting with a MBE were included. The main study endpoint was 6-month TEs, defined by clinical TEs or an echocardiographic documented thrombosis, occurring during an ICU stay or within 6-months. Thromboembolic events were recorded at ICU discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Seventy-nine MBEs were analysed, the rate of TEs at 6-months was 19% CI [11-29%]. The only difference of presentation and management between 6-month TEs and free-TE patients was the time without effective anticoagulation (TWA). The Receiver Operator Characteristic curve identified the value of 122 h of TWA as a cut-off. The multivariate analysis identified early bleeding recurrences (OR 3.62, 95% CI [1.07-12.25], p = 0.039), and TWA longer than 122h (OR 4.24, 95% CI [1.24-14.5], p = 0.021), as independent risk factors for 6-month TEs. A higher rate of TE was associated with anticoagulation interruption longer than 5 days and early bleeding recurrences. However, the management should still be personalized and discussed for each case given the heterogeneity of causes of MBE and possibilities of haemostatic procedures.

In Nordic countries 30-day mortality rate is half that estimated with EuroSCORE II in high-risk adult patients given aprotinin and undergoing mainly complex cardiac procedures

Objectives. To describe current on- (isolated coronary arterty bypass grafting, iCABG) and off-label (non-iCABG) use of aprotinin and associated safety endpoints in adult patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery in Nordic countries. Design. Data come from 10 cardiac surgery centres in Finland, Norway and Sweden participating in the European Nordic aprotinin patient registry (NAPaR). Results. 486 patients were given aprotinin between 2016 and 2020. 59 patients (12.1%) underwent iCABG and 427 (87.9%) non-iCABG, including surgery for aortic dissection (16.7%) and endocarditis (36.0%). 89.9% were administered a full aprotinin dosage and 37.0% were re-sternotomies. Dual antiplatelet treatment affected 72.9% of iCABG and 7.0% of non-iCABG patients. 0.6% of patients had anaphylactic reactions associated with aprotinin. 6.4% (95 CI% 4.2%–8.6%) of patients were reoperated for bleeding. Rate of postoperative thromboembolic events, day 1 rise in creatinine >44μmol/L and new dialysis for any reason was 4.7% (95%CI 2.8%–6.6%), 16.7% (95%CI 13.4%–20.0%) and 14.0% (95%CI 10.9%–17.1%), respectively. In-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality was 4.9% (95%CI 2.8%–6.9%) and 6.3% (95%CI 3.7%–7.8%) in all patients versus mean EuroSCORE II 11.4% (95%CI 8.4%–14.0%, p < .01). 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery for aortic dissection and endocarditis was 6.2% (95%CI 0.9%–11.4%) and 6.3% (95%CI 2.7%–9.9%) versus mean EuroSCORE II 13.2% (95%CI 6.1%–21.0%, p = .11) and 14.5% (95%CI 12.1%–16.8%, p = .01), respectively. Conclusions. NAPaR data from Nordic countries suggest a favourable safety profile of aprotinin in adult cardiac surgery.

Andexanet alfa therapy showed No increased rate of thromboembolic events in spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage patients: A multicenter electronic health record study

•Intracranial hemorrhage accounts for two out of every three major intracranial hemorrhages.•Systemic anticoagulation is routinely prescribed for prevention of cerebrovascular accidents.•The FDA approved Andexanet alfa to treat life-threatening bleeding.•Andexanet alfa relationship to outcomes requires further investigation.

Impact of infective versus sterile transvenous lead removal on 30-day outcomes in cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Transvenous lead removal (TLR) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. This study sought to evaluate the impact of TLR on in-hospital mortality and outcomes in patients with and without CIED infection. From January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020, we utilized the nationally representative, all-payer, Nationwide Readmissions Database to assess patients who underwent TLR. We categorized TLR as indicated for infection, if the patient had a diagnosis of bacteremia, sepsis, or endocarditis during the initial admission. Conversely, if none of these conditions were present, TLR was considered sterile. The impact of infective vs sterile indications of TLR on mortality and major adverse events was studied. Out of the total 25,144 patients who underwent TLR, 14,030 (55.8%) received TLR based on sterile indications, while 11,114 (44.2%) received TLR due to device infection, with 40.5% having systemic infection and 59.5% having isolated pocket infection. TLR due to infective indications was associated with a significant in-hospital mortality (5.59% vs 1.13%; OR = 5.16; 95% CI 4.33-6.16; p < 0.001). Moreover, when compared with sterile indications, TLR performed due to device infection was associated with a considerable risk of thromboembolic events including pulmonary embolism and stroke (OR = 3.80; 95% CI 3.23-4.47, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the conversion to open heart surgery (1.72% vs. 1.47%, p < 0.111), and infection was not an independent predictor of cardiac (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.97-1.29) or vascular complications (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.73-1.72) between the two groups. Higher in-hospital mortality and rates of thromboembolic events associated with TLR resulting from infective indications may warrant further pursuing this diagnosis in patients.

Effects of gender affirming hormone therapy with testosterone on coagulation and hematological parameters in transgender people assigned female at birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundHormone replacement therapy is associated with an increased thromboembolic risk. The effects of testosterone (T) on coagulation markers in people assigned female at birth (AFAB) under gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) are not well described. MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis on English-language articles retrieved from PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library up to April 2023 investigating T therapy in AFAB people. Coagulation parameters included international normalized ratio (INR), fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin clotting time (aPTT), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1); hematological variables included hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (HCT). We also reported the rate of thromboembolic events. Data were combined as mean differences (MD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of pre- vs post-follow-up values, using random-effects models. ResultsWe included 7 studies (6 prospective and 1 retrospective) providing information on 312 subjects (mean age: 23 to 30 years) who underwent GAHT with variable T preparation. T therapy was associated with a significant increase in INR values [MD: 0.02, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.01–0.03; p = 0.0001], with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 4 %). T therapy was associated with increased Hb (MD: 1.48 g/dL, 95%CI: 1.17 to 1.78; I2 = 9 %) and HCT (4.39 %, 95%CI: 3.52 to 5.26; I2 = 23 %) values. No effect on fibrinogen, aPTT and PAI-1 was found. None of the study reported thromboembolic events during the follow-up. ConclusionTherapy with T increased blood viscosity in AFAB men. A slight increase in INR values was also found, but the clinical relevance and mechanism(s) of this finding needs to be clarified.

Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?

Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors. Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA. Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications. Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.

Comparison of Thromboembolic Events Between Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) Shield and PED/PED Flex: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

The pipeline embolization device (PED) Flex with Shield technology is a third-generation flow diverter used for intracranial aneurysm treatment designed to decrease thrombogenicity through a phosphorylcholine coating. Herein, we aim to compare the rate of thromboembolic events in PED with Shield technology and PED without it through propensity score matching. We conducted a retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED first-generation/PED Flex and PED with Shield between 2013 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Patients were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, smoking history, diabetes, previous subarachnoid hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale pretreatment, location, aneurysm size, previous treatment, and clopidogrel or aspirin resistance. After matching, we evaluated for periprocedural and postoperative thromboembolic events. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14. A total of 543 patients with 707 aneurysms treated in 605 procedures were included in the analysis. From these, 156 aneurysms were treated with PED with Shield (22.07%) and 551 (77.93%) without Shield technology. Propensity score matching resulted in 84 matched pairs. The rate of thromboembolic events was 3.57% for PED Shield and 10.71% for PED first-generation/PED Flex (P = .07), while retreatment rates were 2.38% for PED Shield and 8.32% for PED Flex (P = .09). Complete occlusion at first (P = .41) and last imaging follow-up (P = .71), in-stent stenosis (P = .95), hemorrhagic complications (P = .31), and functional outcomes (P = .66) were comparable for both groups. This is the first study in the literature performing a propensity scored-matched analysis comparing PED with PED with Shield technology. Our study suggests a trend toward lower thromboembolic events for PED Shield, even after controlling for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, and a trend toward lower aneurysm retreatment rates with PED Shield, without reaching statistical significance.

Amplatzer or Figulla Flex II Occluder: a comparative study of outcomes after transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure.

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) for the prevention of recurrent paradoxical thromboembolic events has been shown to be safe and effective in randomized controlled trials. However, it remains uncertain if differences in the structure and design of the occluder devices impact the outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare results of percutaneous PFO closure using 2 widely used double-disc occluders. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure with the Abbott Amplatzer occluder (APO) or the Occlutech Figulla-Flex-II occluder (OPO) at the Heart Center Lucerne between February 2017 and December 2022 were included in a registry. The primary endpoint was effective closure of the PFO, defined as a residual shunt grade 0 or 1, assessed by contrast echocardiogram at 6-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural efficacy/safety and major adverse cardiovascular events during the hospital stay and at 6-month follow-up. One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients (mean age 51.7 ± 12.5 years; 39% women; Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score = 7, IQR = 6-8) underwent percutaneous PFO closure with the APO (120 patients, 62.2%) or the OPO (73 patients, 37.8%). Main indications for closure were crypotogenic stroke in 168 patients (87.1%) and peripheral embolism in 13 patients (6.7%). At baseline, right-to-left shunt (RLS) greater than or equal to grade 2 was present in 189 patients (97.9%). Immediate procedural success was 99.5%. In 1 patient, an air embolism occurred during positioning of the APO occluder with transient chest pain and electrocardiogram changes, but without further sequelae to the patient. At 6-month follow-up, effective closure was achieved in 185 patients (95.8%; APO: 96.6% vs OPO: 94.5%, P = .30). Rates of atrial fibrillation and recurrent thromboembolic events were 4.2 and 0.5%, respectively. PFO closure is safe and effective when performed with either the self-expanding Abbott Amplatzer or Occlutech Figulla Flex II PFO occluder.

Twice-daily rivaroxaban after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation.

Background and aim: Rivaroxaban is an emerging oral anticoagulant for postoperative anticoagulation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Because a once-daily dosing regimen of rivaroxaban causes fluctuations in the drug plasma concentration, we studied the feasibility and safety of twice-daily rivaroxaban as a postoperative anticoagulation regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing LAAC. Methods: This study involved patients with AF who underwent LAAC and took rivaroxaban postoperatively. A total of 326 patients who received a standard total dose (15 or 20mg) of rivaroxaban based on their creatinine clearance rate were divided into the twice-daily (BID) rivaroxaban group (n = 208) and once-daily (QD) rivaroxaban group (n = 118) according to their anticoagulation strategy. Transesophageal echocardiography was recommended at 3-6months postoperatively to check for device-related thrombosis (DRT). Clinical outcomes were evaluated during postoperative anticoagulation. Results: The median CHA2DS2-VASc score (4 [3, 5] vs. 4 [3, 5], p = 0.28) and HAS-BLED score (2 [2, 3] vs. 2 [2, 3], p = 0.48) were not significantly different between the groups. During the anticoagulation period (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9 months, p = 0.58), 148 (71.2%) patients in the BID group and 75 (63.6%) in the QD group underwent follow-up transesophageal echocardiography. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of DRT (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.60), minor bleeding (8.2% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.39), thromboembolic events (1.0% vs. 0.8%, p = 1.00), major bleeding (0.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 1.00), or death. Conclusion: A short course of twice-daily rivaroxaban following LAAC is a feasible alternative regimen with a low rate of major bleeding events, DRT, and thromboembolic events for patients with AF.

Abstract 98: Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Antiseizure Medications for Atrial Fibrillation and Epilepsy: Risk of Thromboembolic and Major Bleeding Events

Rationale: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed with antiseizure medications (ASMs) due to concurrency and causal links between atrial fibrillation (AF) and epilepsy. However, enzyme-inducing-ASMs (EI-ASMs) may reduce absorption and accelerate metabolism of DOACs, potentially lowering DOAC levels and elevating thromboembolism risk. Methods: We leveraged large-scale healthcare data to conduct an emulated target trial among a nationally representative cohort with AF and epilepsy. Thromboembolic and bleeding event rates were contrasted between adults on DOACs + EI-ASMs versus active comparators on DOACs + non-enzyme inducing ASMs. Data-adaptive high-dimensional propensity score matching was employed to control for observed confounders and proxies for unobserved confounders. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models with robust variance estimators to account for clustering within matched pairs. Results: Among incident ASM + DOAC users, we identified 14,078 and 14,158 episodes that met eligibility criteria for assessment of thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes, respectively. Incidence per 1,000 person-years was 88.5 for thromboembolic events and 68.3 for major bleeding events. Compared with use of non-enzyme inducing ASMs, use of EI-ASMs with DOACs was not associated with a difference in thromboembolic events (aHR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.82-1.46), but was associated with a reduction in major bleeding events (aHR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.89). Conclusions: EI-ASMs were not associated with alteration in DOAC efficacy. These real-world data are reassuring for the care of adults with epilepsy who require anticoagulation, particularly across a larger global community where EI-ASMs remain mainstays. Further research is needed on the reduction in bleeding risk with EI-ASMs, as this may be suggestive of pharmacokinetic interactions lowering DOAC levels without negating therapeutic effects.

Perioperative complications of arteriovenous tirofiban administration versus oral dual antiplatelet therapy for stent-assisted embolization treated aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective, controlled cohort analysis.

Major perioperative complications of stent-assisted embolization treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients include the formation of thromboembolic events (TEs) and hemorrhagic events (HEs), for which antiplatelet protocols play a key role. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to compare the differences between arteriovenous tirofiban administration with traditional oral dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). A total of 417 consecutive patients were enrolled. General clinical characteristics, as well as the perioperative ischemic and hemorrhagic events, were retracted in digital documents. Logistic regression was conducted to identify both risk and protective factors of perioperative TEs and HEs. Perioperative TEs occurred in 21 patients, with an overall perioperative TEs rate of approximately 5.04%; among these patients, the incidence of perioperative TEs in the tirofiban group was less than that in the DAPT group. Additionally, 66 patients developed perioperative HEs, with an incidence of approximately 15.83%; among these patients, the incidence of perioperative HEs was less than that in the DAPT group. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in terms of the mRS score at the time of discharge. This study indicated that an improved perioperative antiplatelet drug tirofiban was an independent protective factor for perioperative TEs in stent-assisted embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, but it did not impart an elevated risk of perioperative HEs and had no significant effects on the near-term prognosis of the patients.

Health-related complications during follow-up and their impact on blood cancer survivors - results from the 'Aftercare in Blood Cancer Survivors' (ABC) study.

Introduction Blood cancer survivors are at increased risk for medical complications. Methods Our questionnaire-based study involved 1,551 blood cancer survivors with a ≥3-year interval since the last intense treatment. Its goal was to quantify health-related complications during follow-up and assess their impact on the patients' lives. Results 20.4% of responding survivors reported a disease relapse, most often in indolent lymphomas. Second primary malignancies occurred in 14.1%, primarily in lymphoma and allogeneic transplantation survivors. The most frequent malignancy was basal cell carcinoma of the skin, but myeloid malignancies, melanoma, bladder, head-and-neck, and thyroid cancer also appeared disproportionately frequent. An increased infection rate was reported by 43.7%, most often after allogeneic transplantation. New cardiovascular diseases were reported by 30.2%, with a high rate of thromboembolic events in multiple myeloma and myeloproliferative diseases. Polyneuropathies were reported by 39.1%, most often by survivors with a history of multiple myeloma or aggressive lymphoma. Disease relapse was perceived as the highest burden, followed by second primary malignancy, increased infection frequency, and polyneuropathy. In each area investigated, the range of perceived severities was wide. Conclusions Health-related complications are frequent during blood cancer follow-up, with significant repercussions on the patients' lives.

Periprocedural thromboembolic complications of LEO baby stent in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Experience in 149 patients.

To report periprocedural thromboembolic complications of LEO Baby stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms and to analyze the possible influencing factors. We retrospectively identified 149 patients with aneurysms who underwent LEO Baby stent-assisted embolization between October 2018 and March 2022. Clinical and radiographic data of patients were reviewed to determine whether a thromboembolic event had occurred. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify significant factors associated with thromboembolic events. Successful stent deployment of the stent was achieved in all patients in the target artery. There were 66 patients (44.3%) with acutely ruptured aneurysms and 83 patients (55.7%) with unruptured aneurysms. Fourteen (9.4%, 95% confidence interval: 4.7%-14.1%) patients were confirmed to have developed a thromboembolic event, including nine patients with acute intraoperative thrombosis and five patients with postoperative thromboembolic events. The rate of thromboembolic events was 6.0% (5/83) in patients with unruptured aneurysms and 13.6% (9/66) in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms. There was a trend toward an increased rate of thromboembolic events in patients with acute ruptured aneurysms (p = 0.087). Thromboembolic events were significantly associated with the parent-artery diameter (p = 0.010). Our study demonstrates a low rate of thromboembolic complications in unruptured aneurysms treated with LEO Baby stent. Thromboembolic events appear to be more common in ruptured aneurysms. A small diameter of the parent artery is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, and more relevant studies are still needed.

Minimally invasive epicardial surgical left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation patients at high risk for stroke and for bleeding

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk for stroke and for bleeding may be unsuitable for either oral anticoagulation or endocardial left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. However, minimally invasive, epicardial left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) may be an option. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of LAAE in high-risk AF patients not receiving oral anticoagulation. MethodsA retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data was conducted to evaluate thromboembolic events in AF patients who underwent LAAE compared to a 1:4 propensity score–matched group of patients who did not receive LAAE (control). Neither group was receiving any oral anticoagulation at baseline or follow-up. Fine-Gray models estimated hazard ratios and evaluated between-group differences. Bootstrapping was applied to generate 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsThe LAAE group (n = 243) was 61% male (mean age 75 years). AF was nonparoxysmal in 70% (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.4; mean HAS-BLED score 4.2). The matched control group (n = 972) had statistically similar characteristics. One-year adjusted estimates of thromboembolic events were 7.3% (95% CI 4.3%–11.1%) in the LAAE group and 12.1% (95% CI 9.5%–14.8%) in the control group. Absolute risk reduction was 4.8% (95% CI 0.6%–8.9%; P = .028). Adjusted hazard ratio for thromboembolic events for LAAE vs non-LAAE was 0.672 (95% CI 0.394–1.146). ConclusionIn AF patients not taking oral anticoagulation who are at high risk for stroke and for bleeding, minimally invasive, thoracoscopic, epicardial LAAE was associated with a lower rate of thromboembolic events.

Net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation based on a CHA2DS2-VASc score

BackgroundThis study was conducted to assess the net clinical benefit (NCB) for oral anticoagulant (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score.MethodsPatients with AF were prospectively recruited in the COOL AF Thailand registry from 2014 to 2017. The incidence rate of thromboembolic (TE) events and major bleeding (MB) was calculated. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the TE and MB rate in patients with and without OACs in CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0–1 and ≥ 2, respectively. The survival analysis was performed based on CHA2DS2-VASc score. The NCB of OACs was defined as the TE rate prevented minus the MB rate increased multiplied by a weighting factor.ResultsA total of 3,402 AF patients were recruited. An average age of patients was 67.38 ± 11.27 years. Compared to non-anticoagulated patients, the Kaplan Meier curve showed anticoagulated patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or more had the lower thromboembolic events with statistical significance (p = 0.043) and the higher MB events with statistical significance (p = 0.018). In overall AF patients, there were positive NCB in warfarin patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or more while there were positive NCB in DOACs patients regardless of CHA2DS2-VASc score. Females with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or more had a positive NCB regardless of OACs type. Good anticoagulation control (TTR ≥65%) improved an NCB in males with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or more.ConclusionsAF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or more regardless warfarin or DOACs had a positive NCB. The NCB of OACs was more positive for DOACs compared to warfarin and for females compared to males.

A comprehensive deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis regimen in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

ObjectivesDeep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a known surgical complication that can lead to pulmonary embolism with subsequent morbidity and mortality. The incidence of DVT following coronary artery bypass grafting is unclear. Prophylaxis regimens vary and some guidelines advocate against use of routine chemoprophylaxis in patients at low-moderate risk for venous thromboembolism. We utilized postoperative lower extremity venous ultrasound to determine the incidence of DVT following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with low- to moderate-risk of venous thromboembolism receiving aggressive postoperative DVT prophylaxis. MethodsThis is a single-center, retrospective study of all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between April 2022 and January 2023. All patients who completed postoperative venous ultrasound of the bilateral lower extremities were initially included. Patients who underwent concurrent valve or aortic surgery, were at high risk of venous thromboembolism, or were receiving anticoagulation therapy for nonvenous thromboembolism indications were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital incidence of DVT. Secondary outcomes were rates of mortality, postoperative bleeding, and thromboembolic events from discharge to 30 days postoperatively and from 30 days to 3 months postoperatively. ResultsNo DVTs were observed in 211 included patients. In hospital, there were 3 significant bleeding events and 1 stroke. Following discharge there were 3 additional bleeding events, 1 death, 1 transient ischemic attack, and 1 pulmonary embolism. ConclusionsWe observed a 0% rate of DVT in low- to moderate-risk patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and receiving a comprehensive DVT prophylaxis regimen. In hospital bleeding and other thromboembolic event rates were 2.84% and 0.47% respectively.