Progression-free Survival Time Research Articles

A real-world experience of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents vs. monotherapy hypomethylating agents in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients

Introduction:Current clinical research has reported the effectiveness and safety of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (VEN-HMA) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Thus, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of VEN-HMA therapy in patients with MDS and CMML and compared its short-term and long-term therapeutic effects with HMA monotherapy.Method:We analyzed data from our center, comprising 19 patients with MDS and CMML who received VEN-HMA therapy, compared to 32 patients treated with HMA monotherapy.Results:The overall response rate (ORR) in the VEN-HMA group was 73.7%, compared to 59.4% in the HMA group. The survival analysis revealed that the median overall survival (mOS) time in the VEN-HMA group was 16 months, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) time of 9 months, both of which were longer than those observed in the HMA group (p < 0.05). Key adverse events (AEs) included grade 3–4 neutropenia (89.5% in VEN-HMA group vs. 87.5% in HMA group), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (73.7% vs. 71.9%), and anemia (73.7% vs. 90.6%). Infection of grade 3 or higher occurred in 63.2% of patients in the VEN-HMA group and 65.6% of patients in the HMA group.Discussion:Our study has confirmed the effectiveness and safety of the combined treatment of HMAs and venetoclax, which offers significant advantages to patients due to the relatively high and rapid response rates.

Abstract PO2-04-10: Effect of Alpelisib Dose Modification for AE Management on Progression-Free Survival and Treatment Duration in SOLAR-1 and BYLieve Clinical Trials

Abstract Background: Alpelisib (ALP) is an α-selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor and degrader approved with fulvestrant (FUL) for patients (pts) with phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)-mutated, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on/after endocrine therapy-based treatment (tx). Toxicity limited ALP exposure in some pts in the SOLAR-1 and BYLieve studies. On-target effects of PI3K inhibitors, including hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea, are among the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with ALP. During SOLAR-1, median onset times were 15 and 13 days for grade ≥3 hyperglycemia and rash and 46 days for grade 2/3 diarrhea. ALP dose modification can help manage AEs. We report efficacy of ALP + FUL as second-line (2L) tx in pts who underwent ALP dose reduction (DR). Methods: Pts with PIK3CA mutations from SOLAR-1 and BYLieve, treated with ALP + FUL in 2L, were included. Landmark (LM) analyses were performed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mo after tx initiation to evaluate the association between DR status (yes, no) with progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of tx (DoT), respectively. Pts with PFS or exposure time less than each LM time point were excluded from each LM analysis; pts were then grouped by DR (yes, no) before each LM time point. Median PFS and DoT were obtained using a modified Kaplan-Meier method. Alternatively, Cox regression analysis was used to assess the effect of DR on PFS and DoT, where 2 time-dependent variables were included separately in the model as a covariate: 1) DR status, and 2) DR groups (300 to 250 mg [1 DR] vs no DR, 300 to 250 to 200 mg [2 DR] vs no DR). Association between AEs and DR was evaluated descriptively. A matched analysis of AEs will be presented. Results: In all, the analysis included 212 pts in 2L: 77 from SOLAR-1, and 95 and 40 from BYLieve Cohorts A and C, respectively. Of these pts, 92 (43.4%) had no DR and 120 (56.6%) had DRs: 70 (58.3%) had 1 DR, 43 (35.8%) had 2, and 7 (5.8%) had other types of DR. 25 of 92 pts (27.2%) with no DR and 40 of 120 pts (33.3%) with DR had ≥12-mo exposure to ALP. Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and DoT in DR status for the LM analysis are shown (Table). HRs (95% CI) for PFS from the time-dependent covariate analyses were 1.28 (0.94-1.74) with DR status as the covariate, and 1.24 (0.88-1.76) and 1.21 (0.79-1.84) with DR group (1 DR vs no DR, 2 DR vs no DR) as the covariate, respectively; for DoT, these were 1.34 (1.00-1.79) for DR status, and 1.30 (0.93-1.80) and 1.30 (0.87-1.93) for DR group, respectively. During the treatment period, the incidence rate for grade ≥3 AEs was the highest for pts with 2 DR and lowest for those with no DR. Similarly, incidence of AEs leading to DR or tx discontinuation was higher in pts with 2 DR than 1 DR. The post-DR incidence rate for grade ≥3 AE was similar for pts with 2 DR or 1 DR. A matched analysis will assess the relationship between DR group and AE. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis, regardless of if/when DR occurred, PFS was similar and DoT may be sustained with ALP + FUL. ALP DR can potentially reduce AEs, which may allow pts to remain on tx. Using DR as an AE management strategy may enable pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2− ABC to optimize tx duration and clinical benefit of ALP in the 2L. Landmark Analyses of PFS and Tx Duration by DR Group (Yes vs No; Pooled FAS) Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Alessandra Gennari, Stephen Chia, Dejan Juric, Neil Vasan, Sherko Küemmel, Patrick Neven, Florence Lerebours, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Pedram Razavi, Jyotika Singh, Yogesh Chattar, Murat Akdere, Eva Ciruelos. Effect of Alpelisib Dose Modification for AE Management on Progression-Free Survival and Treatment Duration in SOLAR-1 and BYLieve Clinical Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-04-10.

Abstract PO1-15-07: Subtyping-directed precision treatment refines traditional one-size-fits-all therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a sub-study of the MULAN umbrella trial

Abstract Background: The standard approach of using one-size-fits-all endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancers has faced significant challenges due to variations in treatment response among individuals. Consequently, there is still an urgent need to understand the molecular biology of HR+/HER2- breast cancer and explore precision treatment strategy. Methods: We established a multiomics cohort (n = 351), multicenter real-world clinical cohorts (n = 643), a prospective clinical cohort (MULAN trial), and a drug-testing platform containing patient-derived organoids (n = 126) and patient-derived tumor fragments (n = 49) of HR+/HER2- breast cancers. Integrating "bench" and “bedside” data, we conducted comprehensive preclinical and clinical translational research on precision strategies in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Results: We implemented a comprehensive classification system for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, comprising four distinct subtypes. We further demonstrated the efficacy and mechanisms of subtyping-directed precision treatment strategies through clinical cohort studies, omics analysis and functional assays: endocrine therapy alone for the canonical luminal subtype; the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitor and PARP inhibitor for the proliferative subtype; the immunotherapy for the immunogenic subtype; and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the receptor tyrosine kinase-driven subtype. Using clinically applicable subtyping methods, we validated that matched precision treatment strategies outperformed unmatched approaches in a real-world cohort, almost doubling the median progression-free survival time for patients with refractory advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer (9.83 months [95% CI, 5.74-13.93] vs 4.77 months [95% CI, 3.35-6.18]; hazard ratio 0.64 [95% CI, 0.41-0.99]). Importantly, the first-stage analysis of the MULAN phase II umbrella clinical trial (NCT04355858) verified the higher objective response rate (88.9%, 95%CI: 51.7%-99.7%) of the subtyping-directed precision treatment. Conclusion: Our study emphasizes the superiority of subtyping-directed precision treatment strategies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, refines traditional “one-size-fits-all” therapy, and facilitates the translation of precision treatment strategies from bench to bedside. Overall study design Part 1 Subtype Molecular Characteristics: Molecular features of the four subtypes of HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Part 2 Multidimensional Efficacy Validation: Integrating data from a multiomics cohort, real-world study, drug testing platform and prospective clinical research to validate the subtyping-directed precision treatment strategy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Part 3 Subtyping-directed Precision Treatment Strategy: Integrating clinical cohort studies, omics analysis and functional assays revealed the heterogeneity of treatment response in HR+/HER2- breast cancer, and proposed a subtyping-directed precision treatment strategy. CIN, chromosomal instability; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; CNA, copy-number alteration; ER, estrogen receptor; HR, hormone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Citation Format: Xiu-Zhi Zhu, Xi Jin, Hu-Yun-Long Zhang, Xiyu Liu, Yi-Fan Zhou, Yi-Yu Chen, Tong Fu, Ming-Liang Jin, Ya-Xin Zhao, Yi-Fan Xie, Ruo-Xi Wang, Zhong-Hua Wang, Lei Fan, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao. Subtyping-directed precision treatment refines traditional one-size-fits-all therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a sub-study of the MULAN umbrella trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-15-07.

Abstract PO2-14-09: Baseline genomic alterations and the activity of lasofoxifene (LAS) plus abemaciclib (Abema) in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC): the ELAINE 2 study

Abstract Introduction: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancers commonly acquire constitutively active mutations in the ERα-encoding gene (ESR1), resulting in endocrine therapy (ET) resistance. In the phase 2, ELAINE 2 study (NCT04432454), LAS (a breast ER antagonist) combined with Abema provided a median progression-free survival (PFS) of ~13 months (mos) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 66% in patients with endocrine-resistant, ER+/HER2- mBC and ESR1 mutations (mESR1; Damodaran. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:suppl16;1057). Our objective was to describe baseline genomic alterations co-occuring with mESR1 and treatment responses to LAS plus Abema in patients with these concurrent genomic alterations. Methods: Women (age ≥18 yrs) with ER+/HER2- mBC that progressed after prior ET and CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with an mESR1 detected in blood using the Sysmex-Inostics SafeSeq circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test were enrolled in ELAINE 2. Oral LAS 5 mg/day and Abema (provided by Eli Lilly and Co) 150 mg BID were taken until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. The Guardant360 CDx test was used to identify and describe baseline genomic alterations in ctDNA (including mESR1). Median PFS and CBR were assessed in patients with mESR1 and co-existing baseline genomic alterations. For patients who withdrew before disease progression, their last observation time was used as the progression time for PFS estimation. Data were summarized descriptively with no formal hypothesis testing. Results: Of the 29 patients (median age 60 yrs) enrolled, mutations in ESR1 were identified in 26 by Guardant360; all these 26 patients had received prior CDK4/6i, 21 (81%) prior fulvestrant, and 12 (46%) prior chemotherapy for mBC. Alterations in 39 genes were concurrently identified with mESR1, including TP53 mutations (n=11), PIK3CA mutations (n=8), CCND1 amplifications (n=6), and FGFR1 amplifications (n=5); co-amplification of CCND1 and FGFR1 was identified in 3 patients. LAS plus Abema treatment was associated with a CBR of 73% and a median PFS of 12.9 mos in the 26 patients with mESR1 (Table). CBRs were 63% in the co-occurring PIK3CA mutation subgroup and 64% in the TP53 mutation subgroup; median PFS times were 7.8 and 8.3 mos, respectively. All patients in the CCND1 and FGFR1 amplification subgroups achieved clinical benefit (CBR 100%) and the median PFS was 16.6 mos for both subgroups. In patients with mESR1 and co-alterations in ≥2 other genes of interest (PIK3CA, FGFR1, CCND1, TP53, ERBB2, CCNE1, or RB1), CBR was 83% and median PFS was 16.6 mos. Conclusion: Using Guardant360 ctDNA profiling from patients in ELAINE 2, we demonstrate that other baseline genomic alterations are frequently detected concurrently with mESR1 in the endocrine resistant setting, but without apparent compromise on the efficacy of LAS plus Abema. These results should be interpreted with caution considering the small numbers of patients and the exploratory nature of the analysis. The ELAINE 2 study suggests the potential of LAS plus Abema for treating ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- mBC in the post-CDK4/6i setting. This will be further evaluated in the larger, registrational, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study (NCT05696626) that compares LAS plus Abema with fulvestrant plus Abema. Table. Treatment response by genomic alterations concurrent with ESR1 mutations (n=26). aFor patients who withdrew before disease progression, the last observation time was used as the progression time for PFS estimation. bOther genes of interest include PIK3CA, FGFR1, CCND1, TP53, ERBB2, CCNE1, or RB1. CBR, clinical benefit rate; mPFS, median progression-free survival. Citation Format: Senthil Damodaran, Massimo Cristofanilli, Matthew Goetz, Ciara O'Sullivan, Gary Riordan, Hope Rugo, Daniel Stover, Seth Wander, Dominic Carroll, Paul V. Plourde, David J Portman, Einav Nili-Gal Yam. Baseline genomic alterations and the activity of lasofoxifene (LAS) plus abemaciclib (Abema) in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC): the ELAINE 2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-14-09.

Simultaneous boost radiotherapy versus conventional dose radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multi-institutional analysis

We compared survival outcomes of high-dose concomitant boost radiotherapy (HDCBRT) and conventional dose radiotherapy (CRT) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB). Patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed GB were included. In HDCBRT, specific targets received 69, 60, and 51 Gy in 30 fractions, while 60 Gy in 30 fractions was administered with a standard radiotherapy method in CRT. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the Log-rank test, followed by multivariate Cox analysis. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was also applied to each analysis. Among 102 eligible patients, 45 received HDCBRT and 57 received CRT. With a median follow-up of 16 months, the median survival times of OS and PFS were 21 and 9 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS or PFS in the Kaplan–Meier analyses. In the multivariate analysis, HDCBRT correlated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.90; P = 0.021), and this result remained consistent after IPTW adjustments (P = 0.028). Conversely, dose suppression due to the proximity of normal tissues and IMRT field correlated with worse OS and PFS (P = 0.008 and 0.049, respectively). A prospective study with a stricter protocol is warranted to validate the efficacy of HDCBRT for GB.

The safety and use of perioperative dexamethasone in the perioperative management of primary sporadic supratentorial meningiomas

ObjectiveDespite the lack of prospective evidence for the perioperative use of dexamethasone in meningioma surgery, its use is well established in the daily routine of several centers. The present study evaluates the effect of dexamethasone on postoperative complications, peritumoral T2/FLAIR hyperintensity, and progression-free survival in patients with supratentorial meningiomas undergoing resection.MethodsA total of 148 patients who underwent resection of a primary sporadic supratentorial meningioma at the authors’ institution between 2018 and 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort. Safety criteria were side effects of dexamethasone (e.g. hyperglycemia), surgical morbidities, length of stay, and mortality. The individual Karnofsky Performance Scales (KPS) were evaluated regarding the individual development and the delta of KPS at 3- and 12-months compared to baseline KPS was calculated. Longitudinal assessment of the peritumoral T2-/FLAIR hyperintensity changes was performed.ResultsThe use of both pre- and postoperative dexamethasone did not influence the incidence rates of wound infections, infarctions, postoperative seizures, pulmonary embolism, postoperative hemorrhage, mortality, length of stay, new-onset hyperglycemia and new neurological deficits. Perioperative Dexamethasone use was associated with an improved Karnofsky performance development at 3- (delta of KPS 3.3 vs. -1.9, p=0.001) and 12-months (delta of KPS 3.8 vs. -1.1, p=0.008) compared to the preoperative Karnofsky performance status. Multivariable analysis revealed that perioperative dexamethasone use enhances the KPS improvement (OR: 3.65, 95% CI: 1.01-13.18, p=0.048). Persistent peritumoral T2/FLAIR hyperintensity changes were observed in 35 cases of 70 patients with available follow-up images and a baseline edema (50.0%). Perioperative dexamethasone use enhanced the reduction of the preoperative peritumoral T2-/FLAIR hyperintensity changes (mean reduction of maximum diameter: 1.8 cm vs. 1.1 cm, p=0.023). Perioperative dexamethasone use was independently associated with a lower risk for persistent peritumoral T2-/FLAIR hyperintensity changes (OR: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.05-13.54, p=0.042) The perioperative use of dexamethasone did not influence the progression-free survival time in Simpson grade I or II resected WHO grade 1 meningiomas (log-rank test: p=0.27).ConclusionPerioperative dexamethasone use seems to be safe in surgery for primary supratentorial meningiomas. Dexamethasone use might enhance the functionality by reducing postoperative peritumoral T2-/FLAIR hyperintensities. These findings highlight the need for prospective data.

Evaluation of clinical response and prognostic factors in canine multicentric lymphoma treated with first rescue therapy.

Despite an initial strong response in most dogs with multicentric lymphoma treated with chemotherapy, relapse remains common. There is no clearly superior first rescue protocol described either for resistant or relapsed canine multicentric lymphoma. The objectives of this study were to assess clinical response and outcomes for canine multicentric lymphoma treated with first rescue protocols. The secondary objective was to assess prognostic variables for dogs undergoing these protocols. This was a bi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Two hundred and sixty-five dogs were treated with first rescue chemotherapy, including anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy (CHOP-like, n = 50), nitrosourea alkylating agent-rich chemotherapy (n = 45), anthracycline-based or related compound chemotherapy (n = 34), or nitrosourea single-agent chemotherapy (n = 136). The overall median progression free survival time of first rescue protocol was 56.0 days (0-455 days). Important prognostic factors identified for first rescue protocol included the attainment of a complete response to the first rescue chemotherapy (p < .001), the use of a CHOP-like first rescue protocol (p = .009), duration of first remission (HR 0.997, p = .028), and if prednisolone was included in the first rescue protocol (HR 0.41, p = .003). Adverse events (AE) were common, with 81.1% of dogs experiencing at least one AE during first rescue chemotherapy. This study highlights the need for improved first rescue therapies to provide durable remission in canine resistant or relapsed lymphoma.

Alternating rabacfosadine and doxorubicin for treatment of naïve canine lymphoma.

The current standard of care treatment for canine lymphoma is a multi-agent, CHOP-based chemotherapy protocol. Single agent doxorubicin (DOX) is less burdensome; however, multi-agent chemotherapy protocols are often superior. The recently approved drug rabacfosadine (RAB, Tanovea) provides an attractive option for combination therapy with DOX, as both drugs demonstrate efficacy against lymphoma and possess different mechanisms of action. A previous study evaluating alternating RAB/DOX reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 84%, with a median progression-free survival time (PFS) of 194 days. The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate the same protocol in an additional population of dogs. Fifty-nine dogs with treatment naïve lymphoma were enrolled. RAB (1.0 mg/kg IV) was alternated with DOX (30 mg/m2 IV) every 21 days for up to six total treatments (3 cycles). Response assessment and adverse event (AE) evaluation were performed every 21 days using VCOG criteria. The ORR was 93% (79% CR, 14% PR). The median time to maximal response was 21.5 days; median PFS was 199 days. T cell immunophenotype and lack of treatment response were predictive of inferior outcomes. AEs were mostly gastrointestinal. Six dogs developed presumed or confirmed pulmonary fibrosis; four were grade 5. One dog experienced grade 3 extravasation injury with RAB that resolved with supportive treatment. These data mirror those of the previously reported RAB/DOX study, and support the finding that alternating RAB/DOX is a reasonable treatment option for canine lymphoma.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation for medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma: insufficient ablation is associated with intrahepatic distant metastasis and extrahepatic metastasis.

To compare the prognosis of complete and insufficient ablation of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to explore the differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups. Patients´ medical records and imaging data of patients with confirmed HCC from January 2014 to January 2022 were collected. These patients were divided into 2 groups: complete ablation (n=172) and insufficient ablation (n=171). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve and the log-rank test was used to compared. Fisher's exact test was used to compare recurrence patterns between the two groups. The median OS time was 72.8 months (95%CI:69.5-76.1) and 62.0 months (95%CI: 55.3-68.7) in the complete and insufficient ablation groups, respectively. The median PFS time in the complete ablation group was 67.8 months (95% CI: 65.2-70.4) and 38.6 months (95%CI: 29.8-47.4) in the insufficient ablation group. The OS and PFS rates of the complete ablation group were significantly better than those of the insufficient ablation group (P<0.001). In the complete ablation group, 25(41%) patients experienced local tumor progression(LTP), 36(59%) experienced intrahepatic distant progression(IDP), and 0(0%) experienced extrahepatic progression (EP). In the insufficient ablation group, 51 (32.1%) patients experienced LTP, 96 (60.4%) experienced IDP, and 12 (7.5%) experienced EP. The progression patterns of the two groups were statistically significant (P=0.039). Insufficient ablation indicates a poor survival outcome of TACE combined with RFA for medium and large HCC and can promote intrahepatic distant and extrahepatic metastasis.

First-Line Anlotinib Treatment for Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Chemotherapy-Ineligible Patients: An Open-label, Single-arm, Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (LA/M STS) is chemotherapy based on anthracyclines, but patient tolerance of chemotherapy is limited. The present trial (NCT03792542) investigated the use of anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced STS, in particular liposarcoma (LPS). Eligible patients were previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, unresectable LA/M STS cases. Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily from day 1 to day 14 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs) occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints overall survival (OS), the objective response rate and the disease control rate (DCR). The safety profile was also evaluated. Forty patients were enrolled from April 2019 to Jun 2022 and are included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median PFS was 6.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.17-8.71] and the median OS 27.40 months (95% CI: 16.43-not evaluable); 1 patient reached partial response and 26 attained stable disease, with a DCR of 67.5% (27/40). Median PFS and OS times for LPS patients were 8.71 and 16.23 months, respectively. Ten (25.0%) patients had treatment-related AEs ≥ grade 3, with in particular a higher incidence of hypertension (15.0%) and proteinuria (7.5%). The findings suggest a potential benefit in employing front-line anlotinib to treat patients with STS, who are not eligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of note, the clinical outcomes for the LPS subgroup of patients were encouraging.

[Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Containing Regimens in the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma].

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ixazomib-containing regimens in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of 32 MM patients treated with a combined regimen containing ixazomib in the Hematology Department of the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from January 2020 to February 2022. Among the 32 patients, 15 patients were relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM) (R/RMM group), 17 patients who responded to bortezomib induction therapy but converted to ixazomib-containing regimen due to adverse events (AE) or other reasons (conversion treatment group). The treatment included IPD regimen (ixazomib+pomalidomide+dexamethasone), IRD regimen (ixazomib+lenalidomide+dexamethasone), ICD regimen (ixazomib+cyclophosphamide+dexamethasone), ID regimen (ixazomib+dexamethasone). Of 15 R/RMM patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 53.3%(8/15), among them, 1 achieved complete response (CR), 2 achieved very good partial response (VGPR) and 5 achieved partial response (PR). The ORR of the IPD, IRD, ICD and ID regimen group were 100%（3/3）, 42.9%（3/7）, 33.3%（1/3）, 50%（1/2）， respectively， there was no statistically significant difference in ORR between four groups (χ 2=3.375, P =0.452). The ORR of patients was 50% after first-line therapy, 42.9% after second line therapy, 60% after third line therapy or more, with no statistically significant difference among them (χ2=2.164, P =0.730). In conversion treatment group, ORR was 88.2%(15/17), among them, 6 patients achieved CR, 5 patients achieved VGPR and 4 patients achieved PR. There was no statistically significant difference in ORR between the IPD（100%， 3/3）, IRD（100%， 6/6）, ICD（100%， 3/3） and ID（60%， 3/5） regimen groups (χ2=3.737，P =0.184). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time of R/RMM patients was 9 months (95% CI : 6.6-11.4 months), the median overall survival (OS) time was 18 months (95% CI : 11.8-24.4 months). The median PFS time of conversion treatment group was 15 months (95% CI : 7.3-22.7 months), the median OS time not reached. A total of 10 patients suffered grade 3- 4 adverse event (AE). The common hematological toxicities were leukocytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia. The common non-hematological toxicities were gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, nausea and vomit), peripheral neuropathy, fatigue and infections. Grade 1-2 peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in 7 patients. The ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens are safe and effective in R/RMM therapy, particularly for conversion patients who are effective for bortezomib therapy. The AE was manageable and safe.

Targeted DNA Sequencing Reveals Molecular Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Recurrent Glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic significance of molecular alterations in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains unclear. METHODS: 121 consecutive glioblastoma (GBM) patients who underwent re-resection at a single institution from 2016-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) at time of initial diagnosis. DNA mutations from re-resection samples were assessed with a CLIA certified next-generation targeted DNA sequencing assay. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from re-resection were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Median age at first recurrence was 57 years (range, 27-78), and median follow up from re-resection was 11 months. Salvage therapy comprised re-irradiation (n = 52, 43%), temozolomide (TMZ) (n = 39, 32%), lomustine (n = 47, 39%), and/or bevacizumab (n = 22, 18%). Median OS and PFS times were 12.1 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 4 mut/Mb (range, 1-650), microsatellite instability (MSI) was 1.16% (range, 0-20), and MGMT methylation was present in 71 (59%) patients. Longer OS was found after postoperative TMZ (19.1 vs. 9.1), KPS &gt;70 (13.6 vs. 11.1), and/or re-irradiation (12.6 vs. 8.4) (p &lt; .05 for each). On multivariate analysis, TMZ (HR 0.2, 0.079-0.48), re-irradiation (HR 0.27, 0.12-0.58), and mutations in the PDGFRA (HR 0.24, 0.067-0.83) or PTEN (HR 2.3, 1.1-4.8) genes on targeted sequencing were associated with longer OS after re-resection (p &lt; .05). Multivariate predictors of re-irradiation response included MSI &gt; 1.16 (HR 0.25, 0.084-0.75), and mutations in PDGFRA (HR 0.04, 0.005-0.33), TERT (HR 0.16, 0.033-0.78), or PIK3R1 (HR 0.18, 0.041-0.8) genes. In the 46 matched primary/recurrent tumors, 40 (46%) had a longitudinal change in a mutation and 9 (24%) demonstrated hypermutation, of which 4 (57%) had simultaneous mismatch repair deficiencies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies molecular factors associated with survival and response to re-irradiation in rGBM.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined With Lenvatinib With or Without PD-1 Inhibitors as Initial Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical benefit and safety of the triple combination of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), lenvatinib and programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with the dual combination of SBRT and lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods and MaterialsPatients with uHCC who received SBRT in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors or SBRT in combination with lenvatinib alone as first-line treatment from October 2018 to July 2022 were reviewed in this study. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were intra-hepatic PFS (IHPFS), extra-hepatic PFS (EHPFS) and objective remission rate (ORR). In addition, safety profiles were assessed by analyzing treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the two groups to assess safety profiles. ResultsIn total, 214 patients with uHCC who received combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 146 patients received triple combination therapy of SBRT, lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (SBRT-L-P group), and 68 patients received dual therapy of SBRT and lenvatinib (SBRT-L group). The median OS times of the two groups were 31.2 months and 17.4 months, respectively (P<0.001). The median PFS time was significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than that in SBRT-L group (15.6 months vs. 8.8 months, p<0.001). Additionally, the median IHPFS (17.5 vs. 9.9 months, p<0.001) and EHPFS (20.9 vs. 11.6 months, p<0.001) were significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than that in SBRT-L group. The ORR in the SBRT-L-P group was higher than that in the SBRT-L group (63.0 vs. 39.7%, p=0.002). The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the SBRT-L-P group were comparable to those in the SBRT-L group. ConclusionThe use of both lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors with SBRT in patients with uHCC was associated with improved overall survival compared to lenvatinib and SBRT alone with a manageable safety profile.

Clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis.

Advanced pancreatic cancer is resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs, resulting in limited treatment efficacy and poor prognosis. Combined administration of the chemotherapeutic gemcitabine and erlotinib is considered a potential first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, their comparative benefits and potential risks remain unclear. To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with other chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Literature on the clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer was retrieved through an online search. The retrieved literature was subjected to a methodological qualitative assessment and was analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Ten randomized controlled trials involving 2444 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapeutic treatment, erlotinib combined with chemotherapy significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time of pancreatic cancer patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.66-0.92, P = 0.003]. Meanwhile, the overall survival (HR= 0.99, 95%CI: 0.72-1.37, and P = 0.95) and disease control rate (OR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.45-0.91, P = 0.84) were not significantly favorable. In terms of safety, the erlotinib and chemotherapy combination was associated with a significantly higher risk of diarrhea (OR = 3.59, 95%CI: 1.63-7.90, P < 0.05) and rash (OR = 3.63, 95%CI: 1.64-8.01, P < 0.05) compared with single-agent chemotherapy. Moreover, the risk of vomiting (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 0.62-2.59, P = 0.51), regurgitation/anorexia (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 0.25-10.31, P = 0.62), and infection (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.28-1.87, P = 0.50) were not significant in either group. Compared with a single chemotherapeutic modality, erlotinib combined with gemcitabine can prolong progression-free survival in pancreatic cancer, but does not improve survival benefit or disease control rate, and can increase the risk of diarrhea and rash.

Treatment pattern and outcomes of re-induction therapy prior to stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Germany.

There are limited data guiding choice of re-induction therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) prior to stem cell transplantation (SCT). We performed a retrospective medical chart review of 171 patients with RRMM in Germany who received re-induction therapy in second line (78%; n = 134) or third line (22%; n = 37) prior to re-SCT. Index therapy was defined as first completed re-induction therapy for planned myeloablative conditioning and SCT in second/third line within the eligibility period (1/2016-12/2019). Most common pre-index first line and maintenance therapy used were bortezomib-based combinations (91%; n = 155/171) and lenalidomide (55%; n = 29/53), respectively. Median duration of index therapy line was 9 months; carfilzomib-based combinations were the most widely used in second/third line re-induction therapy (49%; n = 83/171), followed by daratumumab-based combinations (21%; n = 36/171). Overall response rates in second/third line were 87% after re-induction and 96% after SCT; median time to next treatment line after start of index therapy was 31 months; median progression-free survival (PFS) was 29 months; and median overall survival after index date was not reached. Based on these data, re-induction therapy with salvage SCT appears to be beneficial in selected patients with RRMM in clinical practice in Germany, translating into deep responses, long PFS and prolonged time to next treatment.

Palliative primary tumor resection may not offer survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms, one multicenter retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe efficacy of palliative primary tumor resection (PTR) in improving prognosis for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has not been fully explored.MethodsWe performed one retrospective cohort study and recruited 68 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal NENs from two Chinese medical centers between 2000 and 2022. All patients were assigned to PTR group and no PTR group. The clinicopathological manifestation data were carefully collected, and the survival outcomes were compared between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize confounding bias. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 32 patients received PTR, and the other 36 patients did not. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 4 and 22 months in the whole cohort, respectively. For patients who received no PTR, the median OS was 16 months, and the 1-year OS rate and 3-year OS rate were 56.4% and 39.6%, respectively. For patients who received PTR, the median OS was 24 months, and the 1-year OS rate and 3-year OS rate were 67.9% and 34.1%, respectively. However, the Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank test demonstrated no significant survival difference between the two groups (P = 0.963). Moreover, palliative PTR was also not confirmed as a prognostic factor in subsequent univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses in both the original and matched cohorts. Only histological differentiation was identified as an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–3.41, P = 0.043] and OS [HR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.09–12.48, P = 0.035] in the original cohort.ConclusionsPalliative PTR may not offer survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal NENs.

[Correlation of 1p/16q loss of heterozygosity and 1p gain with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in Wilms tumor].

Objective: To investigate the relationship between 1p/16q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and 1p gain in Wilms tumor and their clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis. Methods: A total of 175 Wilms tumor samples received from the Department of Pathology, Beijing Children's Hospital from September 2019 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The histopathologic type and presence of lymph node involvement were evaluated by two pathologists. The clinical data including patients'gender, age, tumor location, preoperative chemotherapy, and tumor stage were summarized. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was done to detect 1p/16q LOH and 1p gain and their correlation with the clinicopathological features and prognosis were analyzed. Results: Among the 175 samples, 86 cases (49.1%) were male and 89 (50.9%) were female. The mean age was (3.5±2.9) years, and the median age was 2.6 years. There were 26 (14.9%) cases with 1p LOH, 28 (16.0%) cases with 16q LOH, 10 (5.7%) cases of LOH at both 1p and 16q, and 53 (30.3%) cases with 1q gain. 1q gain was significantly associated with 1p LOH (P<0.01) and 16q LOH (P<0.01). There were significant differences (P<0.01) between 1q gain, 1p LOH and 16q LOH among different age groups. The rate of 16q LOH in the high-risk histopathological subtype (50.0%) was significantly higher than that in the intermediate-risk subtype (13.6%, P<0.05). The frequency of 1q gain, 1p LOH, and 16q LOH in children with advanced clinical stages (Ⅲ and Ⅳ) was significantly higher than that in children with early clinical stages (Ⅰ and Ⅱ). 1q gain, 1p LOH, and 16q LOH showed no significant correlation with gender, unilateral or bilateral disease, chemotherapy, or lymph node metastasis. The progression-free survival (PFS) time for patients with 1q gain and 1p LOH was significantly shorter than those without these aberrations (P<0.05). Additionally, the PFS time of patients with 16q LOH was slightly shorter than those with normal 16q, although the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with stage Ⅲ to Ⅳ disease exhibiting 1q gain or 1p LOH had a significantly higher relative risk of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. Conclusions: 1p/16q LOH and 1q gain are associated with age, high-risk histological type, and clinical stage in Wilms tumor. 1q gain and 1p LOH are significantly correlated with the prognosis of Wilms tumor.

Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (YPB-001).

The present multicenter prospective observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and those with RPC contacting major vessels, with respect to a historical control of upfront surgery. Patients with BRPC and RPC contacting major vessels were prospectively registered and administered NAC with durations and regimens determined by the corresponding treating physician. Our primary aim was to assess the R0 resection rate, and secondary aim was to evaluate safety, resection rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and response rate. Fifty of 52 enrolled patients were analyzed; 2 with serious comorbidities died during treatment. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with R0 resection being achieved in 26 (52% of total and 84% of all resected cases). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated age (≥75 years) as the only independent predictor of nonresection. Median progression-free survival and median survival time were longer in the prospective cohort than in the historical cohort. Overall, NAC for BRPC in real-world setting might yield R0 resection rates similar to those reported in previous clinical studies. Development of safe regimens and management strategies that can maintain treatment intensity in geriatric patients is warranted.

Integrating Navigation-Assisted Ablation in the Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

With the increasing prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ablative therapy is a critical treatment option to achieve a cancer-free state. The anatomic location of the tumor can be a challenge, and select hepatic locations of a tumor require laparoscopic-assisted strategies to safely reach and treat the lesion. To assess the association of real-time ultrasonography-augmented navigation for HCC ablation with patient survival, operative time, and rate of incomplete ablations. This retrospective case-control study was conducted among a prospectively collected database of more than 750 patients with HCC who were treated with ablation therapy with and without the use of navigation at a single quaternary medical center from June 2011 to January 2021. Data were analyzed from October 2022 through June 2023. Real-time ultrasonography-augmented navigation. The primary outcome was rate of incomplete ablations in patients undergoing HCC ablation with vs without navigation. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and operative time. The analytic cohort included 467 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [7.8] years; 355 male [76.0%]; 21 Hispanic [4.5%], 67 non-Hispanic Black [14.5%], and 347 Non-Hispanic White [75.0%] among 463 patients with race and ethnicity data). The most common etiology of liver disease was hepatitis C infection (187 patients with etiology data [40.0%]), and 348 of 458 patients with TMN staging data (76.0%) had TNM stage 1 disease. There were 187 individuals treated with navigation and 280 individuals treated without navigation. Patients who underwent navigation-assisted ablation were more likely to have stage 2 disease based on TNM staging (62 of 183 patients [33.9%] vs 47 of 275 patients [17.1%] with TMN data; P < .002) and had a higher mean (SD) number of lesions (1.3 [0.5] vs 1.2 [0.5] lesions; P = .002) and a longer mean (SD) operation time (113.2 [29.4] vs 109.6 [32.3] minutes; P = .04). Patients who underwent navigation were also more likely to have tumors in segment 8 (59 patients [32.1%] vs 53 of 275 patients with segment data [19.3%] with segment data; P = .005) and less likely to have tumors in segment 4 (20 patients [10.9%] vs 54 patients with segment data [19.6%]; P = .005). Overall mean (SD) time to recurrence after treatment was 10.0 (12.5) months, with similar rates for patients with navigation vs no navigation. There were no differences in incomplete ablation rate (10 patients [9.2%] vs 10 patients [10.5%]; P = .32), OS, or PFS between patients undergoing ablation with and without navigation. In this study, use of navigation was associated with comparable outcomes to undergoing ablation without navigation, although patients with navigation had more locally advanced disease. These findings suggest that use of real-time navigation in laparoscopic-assisted ablation of liver cancer should be considered as a useful tool for treating challenging tumors.

Efficacy of adding levofloxacin to gemcitabine and nanoparticle-albumin-binding paclitaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial (T-CORE2201)

BackgroundAdvanced pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. For patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-binding paclitaxel (nabPTX) combination (GEM/nabPTX) therapy is one of the recommended first-line treatments. Several retrospective studies have suggested that the addition of levofloxacin improves the efficacy of GEM/nabPTX therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the addition of antibiotics improves the treatment efficacy of GEM/nabPTX as a first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.MethodsThis multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial will included 140 patients. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the GEM/nabPTX therapy group or the GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin group. The primary endpoint for the two groups is median progression-free survival time (mPFS) for the full analysis set (FAS). The secondary endpoints for the two groups are median overall survival (mOS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse event (AE) for the FAS and mPFS, mOS, RR, DCR, and AE for the per-protocol set. This study will enroll patients treated with GEM/nabPTX as the first-line chemotherapy for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.DiscussionGEM/nabPTX is a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recently, the superiority of 5-fluorouracil, liposomal irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (NALIRIFOX) to GEM/nabPTX as first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer has been reported. However, the efficacy of NALIRIFOX is inadequate. Based on previous retrospective studies, it is hypothesized that treatment efficacy will improve when levofloxacin is added to GEM/nabPTX therapy. If the AEs (such as leukopenia, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy) that occur at an increased rate with levofloxacin and GEM/nabPTX combination therapy can be carefully monitored and properly managed, this simple intervention can be expected to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Trial registrationThis study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; registry number: jRCTs021230005).