ABSTRACT As digital platforms are increasingly incorporated within the digital apparatus of states in Europe, platformisation (Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425; van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.) needs to be analysed in further detail with reference to both the specificities of the field that is affected (Seibt, D. (2024). Platform organizations and fields: Exploring the influence of field conditions on platformization processes. Critical Sociology, 50(7-8), 1323–1342. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231221444), but also the practices of the companies that provide the platforms. This paper, in line with the special issue's focus of data integration and analysis platforms, maintains a two-fold focus on the US-based company Palantir. On the one hand, the paper critically discusses the company's discursive and material practices. Said practices include the construction of a company profile as a supporter and protector of Western values and the provision of their product for “free” for short periods, which both function as an effective entry strategy into sensitive state-run institutions, which are in principle highly regulated (Ozalp, H., Ozcan, P., Dinckol, D., Zachariadis, M., & Gawer, A. (2022). “Digital colonization” of highly regulated industries: An analysis of big tech platforms' entry into health care and education. California Management Review, 64(4), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221094307). On the other hand, the paper seeks to position data integration platforms in the platformisation discussion, with reference to their peculiar characteristics. Finally, the paper seeks to contribute into a finer breakdown of what is often referred to as “Big Tech” into singular actors, with differentiated practices and strategies on their transformation into quasi-public actors (Taylor, L. (2021). Public actors without public values: Legitimacy, domination and the regulation of the technology sector. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 897–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00441-4).
Read full abstract