Opportunities For Vaccination Research Articles

Routine Vaccination During Pregnancy Among People Living With HIV in the United States

Pregnancy represents a window of opportunity for vaccination due to established maternal and fetal benefits of vaccination. Little is known about receipt of routinely recommended vaccines in pregnancy, specifically tetanus, diphtheria, plus acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza, among pregnant people living with HIV (PLHIV). To estimate prevalence of vaccination receipt among pregnant people with HIV (PLHIV) and identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with vaccination. This multicenter cohort study included women participating in Women's Health Study (WHS) of the Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) Study of the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. The network has been enrolling pregnant PLHIV at 22 US sites since 2007. Participants for this study enrolled between December 2017 and July 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022. Data on vaccination in pregnancy were collected through medical record abstraction. Vaccination receipt was defined as Tdap vaccination received at less than 36 weeks' gestation and influenza vaccination at any gestational age, based on current guidelines. Log-binomial and modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were fit to identify factors associated with successful receipt of (1) Tdap, (2) influenza, and (3) both vaccinations. A total of 310 pregnancies among 278 people participating in the WHS were included (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [6.1] years; 220 [71%] Black, 77 [25%] Hispanic, and 77 [25%] race and ethnicity other than Black; 64 [21%] with perinatally acquired HIV). Less than one-third of pregnancies were vaccinated as recommended (Tdap, 32.6% [95% CI, 27.4%-38.1%]; influenza, 31.6% [95% CI, 26.5%-37.1%]; both, 22.6% [95% CI, 18.0%-27.6%]). People living with perinatally acquired HIV, those who did not identify as Black, or those who were multiparous had adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) less than 1, while older PLHIV had aRRs greater than 1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (perinatally acquired HIV: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; race other than Black: aRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-1.08; multiparous: aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-1.00; age 24-29 years: aRR, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.92-4.48). In this diverse, multicenter cohort of pregnant PLHIV, receipt of recommended vaccinations was low. Identifying and addressing barriers to vaccination receipt is urgently needed for pregnant people with HIV.

Missed opportunities for human papillomavirus vaccination using Iowa's Immunization Registry Information System.

Adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates continue to remain lower than other adolescent vaccines, both nationwide and in Iowa. This study examined predictors of missed opportunities for first-dose HPV vaccine administrations in Iowa in order to conduct more targeted outreach and improve adolescent HPV vaccine uptake. A retrospective study was conducted to identify predictors of missed opportunities for first-dose HPV vaccination in Iowa adolescents using Iowa's Immunization Registry Information System. The study population included 154,905 adolescents aged 11-15 years between 2019 and 2022. Missed opportunity for first-dose HPV vaccination was defined as a vaccination encounter where an adolescent received a Tdap and/or MenACWY vaccine but did not receive the first-dose HPV vaccine during the same encounter. Over a third of the study population experienced a missed opportunity for HPV vaccination between 2019 and 2022. Missed opportunity for vaccination was most common among individuals living in a rural county (aOR = 1.36), underinsured adolescents (aOR = 1.74), males (aOR = 1.12), teens 13-15 years of age (aOR = 1.76), and White race and non-Hispanic ethnicity. This study builds on previously reported predictors of missed opportunity for HPV vaccination in adolescents. Increased understanding of provider needs and barriers to administering HPV vaccination and further analysis of how the Vaccines for Children Program can play a role in HPV vaccination uptake is necessary to improve HPV vaccination rates among adolescents in Iowa and more specifically in rural communities.

Factors Influencing Missed Opportunities in Infant Vaccination Among Children Aged 0-23 Months Within the Hohoe Municipality in The Volta Region, Ghana: A Facility-Based Study

Background Immunization is a vital public health strategy to enhance child survival by addressing significant diseases that cause child mortality. Annually, over 31 million children under five in sub-Saharan Africa are affected by vaccine-preventable conditions, with more than half a million dying due to lack of access to necessary vaccines. This study explored the factors contributing to Missed Opportunities for Vaccination (MOV) among caregivers of children aged 0-23 months in the Hohoe municipality. Methods The study employed a cross-sectional design. Structured questionnaires were administered to caregivers of children aged 0-23 months in selected health facilities in the Hohoe municipality. Three hundred seventy-eight caregivers aged 18 years and above participated in the study. Results The prevalence of MOV was found to be 22.2%. Factors predicting MOV included respondent’s age, marital status, parity status, knowledge and attitude. Younger mothers were more likely to have missed opportunities in infant vaccination [aOR=0.20(0.09,0.43) p<0.001]. Being unmarried and having a large family size also contributed to missed opportunities in infant vaccination [aOR=2.0(1.12,3.44) p= 0.019] and [aOR=5.80(2.67,12.6) p=<0.001] respectively. Conclusion MOV is prevalent in many settings and hinders immunization coverage. Age, number of children and family size were found predictors inhibiting infant vaccination. Furthermore, caregivers’ knowledge and attitudes were associated with missed opportunities for vaccination, indicating a need for strategies to enhance their understanding and combat missed opportunities in the Hohoe municipality

Identifying and addressing barriers and opportunities for bovine respiratory disease complex vaccination: a consensus paper on practical recommendations for best practise vaccination.

Many questions are raised, and challenges faced in the new era of (intranasal) bovine respiratory disease complex vaccination. An increase in vaccination rate is expected, due to its positive impact on cattle health, reduction of antimicrobial use and economic factors. However, engagement of farmers and veterinarians with regard to vaccination is often affected by limitations, resulting in the development of barriers to vaccination, but also opportunities to overcome these. The objective of the report is to provide practical recommendations and a consensus on best practises for BRDC vaccination, addressing barriers faced by veterinarians and farmers. The report combines an evidence review with expert opinions and includes discussions on different vaccination approaches, such as intranasal and systemic protocols. As result of the discussions, several barriers to BRDC vaccination were identified, including a lack of knowledge or visibility of the disease's impact, the preference for blanket antibiotic use over vaccination, resistance to change, the need for visible success, uncertainty about the best time to vaccinate, and concerns about adverse reactions and vaccine efficacy in the presence of maternal antibodies. While these barriers seem substantial, they provide opportunities for the veterinary sector. Indeed, veterinarians are encouraged to use the argumentation presented, along with local case studies and diagnostic testing to highlight the impact of disease, while conducting calf health audits, ensuring expectations are managed to achieve visible success. Overall, this consensus paper aims to provide practical recommendations and support for veterinarians and farmers to overcome barriers and increase BRDC vaccination rates in cattle.

Cervical Cancer and a History of Incarceration: Examining a Social Determinant of Health.

Females who are incarcerated are disproportionately burdened by cancer, particularly cervical cancer. We measured the odds of cervical cancer compared with nonscreenable cancers for females who were incarcerated before diagnosis. By comparing a cancer for which screening and vaccination are available with cancers for which neither are available, we aimed to assess the relationship of incarceration with diseases for which preventive care mitigates risk. We created a novel data set combining cancer data from a large cancer center with incarceration data from the state department of corrections. We then estimated the odds of cervical cancer relative to nonscreenable cancers for those with and without a history of incarceration. Females with a history of incarceration had greater odds of being diagnosed with cervical cancer compared with nonscreenable cancers (odds ratio = 7.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.4-11.0) relative to those who had not been incarcerated. Adjusting for race and age, the odds of cervical cancer remained significantly greater for those with a history of incarceration (adjusted odds ratio = 3.86; 95% CI: 2.3-6.3). Our findings support the need for expanded cervical cancer screening and vaccination opportunities for incarcerated females and increased access to preventive health care after release.

History of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination with a Focus on Italy

The Italian National Immunization Plan (NIP) states that public health today aims at immunizing adolescents of both sexes for maximum protection against all HPV-related vaccine-preventable diseases. Nowadays, the vaccination offer to primary cohorts is reaffirmed with continued free vaccination up to at least 26 years of age for females and up to at least 18 years of age for males. The Italian NIP 2023–2025 recommends HPV vaccination for at-risk categories, including individuals with HIV, men who have sex with men (MSM), women treated for intermediate- or high-grade lesions, and travelers. Catch-up vaccination is recommended for women at least up to 26 years of age, also using the appropriate occasion of the call for the first screening for the prevention of cervical cancer as an opportunity for vaccination, and for men at least up to and including 18 years of age if they have not been previously vaccinated or have not completed the vaccination cycle. In summary, the Italian vaccination offer has been extended to additional cohorts in order to reduce the burden of HPV-related diseases and to improve vaccination coverage of the Italian population.

Trends of non-vaccination, under-vaccination and missed opportunities for vaccination (2003-2014) amongst children 0-23 months in Kenya.

Vaccines are effective and cost-effective. Non-vaccination, under-vaccination, and missed opportunities for vaccination (MOV), have contributed to incomplete vaccination coverage in Kenya. Analyzing their trends is essential for targeting interventions and improvement strategies. This study aimed to assess trends of non-vaccination, under-vaccination, and MOV among children aged 0-23 months in Kenya using data obtained from the Kenya Demographic and Health Surveys (KDHS) conducted in 2003, 2008/09, and 2014. A two-stage, multi-stage, and stratified sampling technique was used. Weighted analysis was conducted to ensure generalizability to the full population. Using the KDHS sample size estimation process, the sample size was estimated for each indicator, with varying standard error estimates, level of coverage and estimated response rates. Final sample size was 2380 (2003), 2237 (2008/09) and 7380 (2014). To determine the level of non-vaccination, under-vaccination and MOV among children aged 0-23 months, a weighted descriptive analysis was used to estimate their prevalence, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each year. MOV was defined using an algorithm as a binary variable. Data coding and recoding were done using Stata (version 14; College Station, TX: StataCorp LP). Trends in proportions of non-vaccination, under-vaccination and MOV were compared between 2003, 2008/09, and 2014 using the Cochrane-Armitage trend test. All results with P≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Trends in proportion of non-vaccination among children aged 0-23 months in Kenya was 13.2%, 6.1% and 3.2% in 2003, 2008/09 and 2014, respectively (P = 0.0001). Trends in proportion of under-vaccination among children aged 0-23 months in Kenya was 54.3%, 50% and 51.3% in 2003, 2008/09 and 2014, respectively (P = 0.0109). The trends in proportion of children who experienced MOV was 22.7% in 2003, 31.9% in 2008/09 and 37.6% in 2014 (P = 0.0001). In the study duration, non-vaccination decreased by 10%, under-vaccination remained relatively stable, and MOV increased by ~15%. There is need for the Government and partners to implement initiatives that improve vaccine access and coverage, particularly in regions with low coverage rates, and to address missed opportunities for vaccination.

Pharmacist impact on pneumococcal vaccination rates through incorporation of pharmacist‐led opportunistic inpatient vaccination intervention

AbstractBackgroundPneumococcal disease continues to be a large source of morbidity and mortality despite the availability of effective prevention via immunisation and treatment measures.AimTo assess the impact of a pharmacist‐led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccination intervention on overall 13‐valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13vPCV) rates in eligible hospitalised subacute patients, aged 70 years and above.MethodThis study was a pre‐ and post‐intervention study conducted across two study sites at Monash Health, a large metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia. Phase 1 (pre‐intervention, August–October 2022) involved auditing the vaccine‐eligibility of patients on admission and subsequent administration during inpatient stay. Phase 2 (intervention phase, October–December 2022) implemented the pharmacist‐led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccine intervention. Following screening, identified vaccine‐eligible patients were recommended to the treating physician via verbal discussion and Microsoft Teams for consideration of vaccination administration in hospital. The proportion of eligible patients vaccinated was compared between the pre‐intervention and intervention groups. This project was exempt for ethics approval due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Monash Health Human and Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: RES‐22‐0000‐454Q). The justification for this ethics exemption was as follows: the project complies with the National Health and Medical Research Council's Ethical considerations in quality assurance and evaluation activities; auditing the percentage of vaccine‐eligible and non‐vaccinated patients did not require written consent per local requirements; and it is standard practice to obtain verbal consent, followed by documentation on electronic medical records, for inpatient vaccinations. Informed consent was obtained from participants via verbal consent after the distribution of written medical information on the 13vPCV, as well as verbal information provided by the medical team.ResultsA total of 360 patients were included in the study. Overall, 139 (77.2%) patients in the pre‐intervention and 143 (79.4%) patients in the intervention phase were eligible for vaccination (non‐vaccinated with age indication). The proportion of patients receiving inpatient 13vPCV was higher in the intervention group compared to the pre‐intervention group (43.4 vs 2.2%, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe results indicate that incorporating a pharmacist‐led opportunistic inpatient pneumococcal vaccination intervention can significantly increase pneumococcal vaccination in hospital.

Suboptimal MMR Vaccination Coverages-A Constant Challenge for Measles Elimination in Romania.

Measles is targeted for elimination since 2001, with a significant reduction in cases recorded worldwide, but outbreaks occur periodically due to immunization gaps. This study analyzes the evolution of vaccination coverage rates (VCRs) in Romania, a EU country with large measles epidemics during the last two decades, including an ongoing outbreak in 2023. Vaccination against measles has been part of the National Immunization Program since 1979, initially as a single dose, and from 1994 onwards it has had two doses. The initially high national VCRs of >97% gradually declined from 2010 onward and remained constantly under 90%, with further decreases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lowest VCRs for both vaccine doses in the last decade were recorded in 2022 and were 83.4% for the first dose and 71.4% for the second dose, with significant differences among Romania's 42 counties. Several factors contributed to this decline, including failure to attend the general practitioners' offices, increased number of children lost to follow-up due to population movements, missed vaccination opportunities due to temporary medical contraindications, a surge in vaccine hesitancy/refusal, a decreasing number of general practitioners and discontinuities in vaccine supply. The persisting suboptimal VCRs in Romania threaten the progress toward measles elimination.

Fixing a Hole: a retrospective cohort study evaluating HAV, HBV, tetanus screening, and vaccination during hospitalization in persons who use substances.

Rates of serious injection-related infections in persons who use drugs have increased. Resulting admissions are an opportunity for screening and vaccination of preventable infections such as hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and tetanus. We conducted a retrospective review of adults with documented substance use admitted for bacterial infection between July 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccination status at admission, along with screening for HAV and HBV infection and immunity. We identified the proportion of patients at risk for infection who received HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccines during admission and patient-level factors associated with vaccination. We identified 280 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Of the 198 (70.7%) patients at risk for HAV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 21 (10.6%) and 15 (7.6%) received HAV vaccine. Of the 174 (62.1%) patients at risk for HBV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 32 (18.3%) and 25 (14.4%) received HBV vaccine. A large proportion of patients (31.4%, 88) had no documentation of prior tetanus vaccination, and infectious disease providers recommended tetanus vaccination for three (1.1%) and five patients (1.8%) received a tetanus booster. Infectious disease consult vaccine recommendations were statistically significantly associated with HAV or HBV vaccination prior to discharge. Over 70% of our population is at risk for one or more of these preventable infections. Efforts are needed to maximize inpatient screening and vaccination for HAV, HBV, and tetanus in patients with barriers to care.

Interplay of missed opportunity for vaccination and poor response to the vaccine led to measles outbreak in a slum area of Eastern Mumbai, India.

In the third week of September 2022, an outbreak of measles was reported from a slum in Eastern Mumbai, India. We sought to investigate whether failure to vaccinate or vaccine failure was the cause. We constructed an epidemic curve, drew a spot map, and calculated the attack rate and case-fatality ratio. We calculated vaccine effectiveness (VE) for one and two doses of measles vaccine in an unmatched case-control study and did stratified analysis by sex, availability of vaccination card, and migrant status. We identified 358 cases and four deaths with a 11.3% attack rate and 1.1% case fatality, both being highest among 0-24-month-old boys. The epidemic curve suggested a propagated mode of spread. The VE for two doses was 64% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23-73%) among under-5-year-old children and 70% (95% CI: 28-88%) among 5-15-year-old children. Failure to vaccinate, consequent to the COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccine hesitancy might have led to the accumulation of susceptible children in the community. Additionally, the occurrence of case-patients among vaccinated suggests reduced VE, which needs further investigation into humoral and cell-mediated immunity as well as contributory factors including nutritional status. Outbreak response immunization to complete immunization of missed and dropout children was carried out to control the outbreak.

Integrating Human-Centered Design in Tertiary Care Hospitals to Reduce Missed Opportunities for Vaccination: Uplifting Voices for Sustainable Solutions

Integrating Human-Centered Design in Tertiary Care Hospitals to Reduce Missed Opportunities for Vaccination: Uplifting Voices for Sustainable Solutions

COVID-19 vaccination strategies in settings with limited rollout capacity: a mathematical modelling case study in Sierra Leone

BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccine coverage in low- and middle-income countries continues to be challenging. As supplies increase, coverage is increasingly becoming determined by rollout capacity.MethodsWe developed a deterministic compartmental model of COVID-19 transmission to explore how age-, risk-, and dose-specific vaccine prioritisation strategies can minimise severe outcomes of COVID-19 in Sierra Leone.ResultsPrioritising booster doses to older adults and adults with comorbidities could reduce the incidence of severe disease by 23% and deaths by 34% compared to the use of these doses as primary doses for all adults. Providing a booster dose to pregnant women who present to antenatal care could prevent 38% of neonatal deaths associated with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. The vaccination of children is not justified unless there is sufficient supply to not affect doses delivered to adults.ConclusionsOur paper supports current WHO SAGE vaccine prioritisation guidelines (released January 2022). Individuals who are at the highest risk of developing severe outcomes should be prioritised, and opportunistic vaccination strategies considered in settings with limited rollout capacity.

Understanding household-level risk factors for zero dose immunization in 82 low- and middle-income countries

Introduction In 2021, an estimated 18 million children did not receive a single dose of routine vaccinations and constitute the population known as zero dose children. There is growing momentum and investment in reaching zero dose children and addressing the gross inequity in the reach of immunization services. To effectively do so, there is an urgent need to characterize more deeply the population of zero dose children and the barriers they face in accessing routine immunization services. Methods We utilized the most recent DHS and MICS data spanning 2011 to 2020 from low, lower-middle, and upper-middle income countries. Zero dose status was defined as children aged 12–23 months who had not received any doses of BCG, DTP-containing, polio, and measles-containing vaccines. We estimated the prevalence of zero-dose children in the entire study sample, by country income level, and by region, and characterized the zero dose population by household-level factors. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine the household-level sociodemographic and health care access factors associated with zero dose immunization status. To pool multicountry data, we adjusted the original survey weights according to the country’s population of children 12–23 months of age. To contextualize our findings, we utilized United Nations Population Division birth cohort data to estimate the study population as a proportion of the global and country income group populations. Results We included a total of 82 countries in our univariate analyses and 68 countries in our multivariate model. Overall, 7.5% of the study population were zero dose children. More than half (51.9%) of this population was concentrated in African countries. Zero dose children were predominantly situated in rural areas (75.8%) and in households in the lowest two wealth quintiles (62.7%) and were born to mothers who completed fewer than four antenatal care (ANC) visits (66.5%) and had home births (58.5%). Yet, surprisingly, a considerable proportion of zero dose children’s mothers did receive appropriate care during pregnancy (33.5% of zero dose children have mothers who received at least 4 ANC visits). When controlled for other factors, children had three times the odds (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 2.72, 3.30) of being zero dose if their mother had not received any tetanus injections, 2.46 times the odds (95% CI: 2.21, 2.74) of being zero dose if their mother had not received any ANC visits, and had nearly twice the odds (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.70, 2.05) of being zero dose if their mother had a home delivery, compared to children of mothers who received at least 2 tetanus injections, received at least 4 ANC visits, and had a facility delivery, respectively. Discussion A lack of access to maternal health care was a strong risk factor of zero dose status and highlights important opportunities to improve the quality and integration of maternal and child health programs. Additionally, because a substantial proportion of zero dose children and their mothers do receive appropriate care, approaches to reach zero dose children should incorporate mitigating missed opportunities for vaccination.

Vaccine Hesitancy in Central Switzerland: Identifying and Characterizing Undervaccinated Children in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Vaccinations play an important role in the prevention of potentially fatal diseases. Vaccine hesitancy has become an important problem both in the public discourse and for public health. We aimed to identify and characterize this potentially unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated group of children presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED) of the tertiary children's hospital in central Switzerland, a region that has anecdotally been claimed as a hotspot for vaccine hesitancy. All patients presenting to the PED (N = 20,247) between September 2018 and September 2019 were screened for their vaccination status and categorized as incomplete, unvaccinated, or fully vaccinated in a retrospective cohort study. Some 2.6% (n = 526) visits to the PED were not or incompletely vaccinated according to age, or their vaccination status was unknown. Most of the children in the cohort were not critically ill, and the minority had to be hospitalized. Undervaccinated patients were overrepresented in rural areas. Of all cohort visits, 18 (3.4%) patients received opportunistic vaccination in the PED. No cases of vaccine-preventable diseases were observed. In summary, incompletely vaccinated and unvaccinated status was less frequent than initially expected. The PED may play a role in increasing vaccination coverage by providing opportunistic vaccinations.

Trends in Vaccine Completeness in Children Aged 0-23 Months in Cape Town, South Africa.

We have previously determined that the occurrence of missed vaccination opportunities in children in Cape Town, South Africa, is shaped by both individual and contextual factors. These factors present valuable openings for enhancing quality and implementing broader strategies to enhance the delivery of routine Immunisation services. Here, we are further reporting regional-level data on the coverage and factors influencing vaccination completion within a similar study population, based on extensive data analysis from the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey. The study reveals commendable vaccination coverage for most vaccines within recommended schedules, with high rates of initial vaccinations at birth and during the primary vaccination schedule. However, there are notable areas for improvement, particularly in ensuring complete coverage for the second measles vaccine and the 18-month vaccine. Socio-demographic factors also play a role, with maternal education and caregiver awareness campaigns showing the potential to positively influence vaccination completeness. This study emphasises the importance of timely vaccinations during the early months of life and underscores the need for interventions to maintain coverage as children age. Specific sub-districts, such as Tygerberg, may require targeted efforts to enhance vaccination completeness. Additionally, assessing caregiver knowledge about child vaccination is deemed vital, as it can impact vaccination decisions and adherence. The findings provide valuable insights for public health interventions in Cape Town, aimed at reducing the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases and ensuring the health of the region's youngest population.

Missed opportunities for vaccination at point of care and their impact on coverage and urban–rural coverage inequity in the Gambia

IntroductionIdentifying actionable targets is crucial to improve overall and equity in vaccination coverage, and in line with the global Immunization Agenda 2030. Therefore, this study seeks to assess the prevalence of missed opportunities for simultaneous vaccination (MOSVs) and their impact on vaccination coverage and urban–rural inequity in The Gambia. MethodsWe used data of children aged 12–23 months from The Gambia 2019/2020 demographic and health survey (weighted n = 1355) with seen vaccination cards. We analyzed: the frequency of MOSVs; percentage point coverage reduction attributable to MOSVs for 18 vaccine doses and full basic vaccination; and MOSVs' contribution to urban–rural coverage inequity through Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. ResultsSixty percent of children experienced MOSVs, in both urban and rural areas, but urban MOSVs were more seldom corrected (35.9 % vs 45.3 %). All eighteen vaccine doses assessed could have achieved between one to eleven percentage points higher coverage if MOSVs had been avoided, with full basic vaccination gaining even more. While MOSV correction did not impact overall urban–rural coverage inequity, it did exacerbate (explained coefficient = -0.1007; P = 0.002) inequities among children who experienced MOSVs, explaining 95 % of the observed difference. ConclusionOur study highlights the prevalence and negative impact of MOSVs on overall vaccination coverage. Although MOSVs did not contribute significantly to the total urban–rural inequity in coverage, they have detrimental effects on vaccination coverage and urban–rural inequity among children who had experienced MOSVs. Addressing MOSVs, can enhance coverage and reduce the risk of under-vaccination, aligning with global initiatives.

EGS P13 Adherence to Guidelines for Post-Splenectomy Patients in a Primary Care Practice in North West England

Abstract Background Splenectomy is indicated in haematological, oncological disorders and occasionally during emergency (trauma) surgery. Given the spleens role in the immunological response, overwhelming infection remains an area of concern for post-splenectomy patients with low prevalence (0.1-0.5%) but high mortality (∼50%). Strep pneumoniae, H influenzae Type B and Neisseria meningitidis are common bacterial perpetrators. At present, Public Health England and the British Society for Haematology recommends regular influenza, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccinations for patients with asplenia or hyposplenism. They should also be on lifelong prophylactic antibiotics. This audit aimed to assess the adherence to vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines for post-splenectomy patients. Methods 19 patients post splenectomy patients were identified at a primary care practice in North West England. Data was retrospectively collected from the last 10 years with two researchers manually searching through their GP records. Parameters collected included both compliance and timeliness with vaccinations and antibiotic prophylaxis as per national guidance. Where there was a deviation from the guidance, the records were again searched to identify any cause. Results 109/162 (67.3%) ‘vaccination opportunities’ for the recommended yearly influenza vaccination were successfully delivered. 17/19 (89.4%) patients had no documented initial pneumococcal vaccination at time of splenectomy. 23/162 (14.2%) influenza and 22/37 (56.4%) pneumococcal vaccination opportunities were missed with no documentation explaining why. Only 1 patient received the recommended MenACWY/MenB vaccination at diagnosis, 5 received delayed vaccinations and 13/19 (68.4%) patients received no meningitis vaccination. 7/19 (37%) patients were not on prophylactic antibiotics as recommended with no documented explanation. 2 of those patients were issued one-off antibiotic prescriptions and 1 had their prescription stopped due to non-compliance. Conclusions Significant improvement is needed with regards to antibiotic prophylaxis, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccinations with over 50% of vaccinations being missed. Poor documentation and a shift to electronic health records are possible factors that have affected data collection, particularly as a significant number of the splenectomies performed were prior to 2000. Recommendations include routine reviews for asplenic patients, encouragement for opportunistic vaccination and increasing awareness of the risks of post-splenectomy sepsis and the benefits of vaccinations. Future scope could include looking at the same guidelines for other hyposplenic/asplenic conditions.

Pediatric influenza vaccination in the perioperative setting: A quality improvement project.

Unmet need for seasonal influenza vaccination administration to pediatric patients exists at national and local levels. Vaccination during the perioperative period remains controversial, though opportunity exists to meet vaccination need through perioperative programs. The initial SMART Aim of this quality improvement initiative was to establish and increase seasonal influenza vaccination rate in eligible patients during in person preoperative clinic visits in a pediatric perioperative surgical home (PSH) to 10%. Informed by each prior season's experience, we increased our SMART Aim target for vaccinations in seasons two and three to 15 and 18%, respectively. Following the Model for Improvement methodology, the PSH team developed and implemented a perioperative pediatric influenza vaccination program. Across three influenza seasons, key interventions included updates to organizational perioperative vaccination policy, obtaining material influenza vaccination supplies, development of EHR tools, PSH staff education, and communication with patient-families. Rate of eligible patients receiving influenza vaccination at their PSH clinic appointment was tracked over time. Influenza vaccination rates were reported monthly during Season 1, then weekly during seasons two and three. The balancing measure was same day surgery case cancellations related to influenza vaccination given at PSH clinic appointment. Statistical analysis methods utilized include Shewart's control chart and statistical process control (SPC) standards. Special cause variation was determined by eight or more consecutive data points above or below the centerline. The influenza vaccination rates in each of the three influenza seasons exceeded vaccination rate goals of 10, 15, and 18%, respectively. A total of 695 vaccines have been administered since program inception. No same day surgical case cancellations were observed as balancing measure. Over three consecutive influenza vaccination seasons, we safely established and met vaccination rate goals of 10, 15, and 18% to eligible patients during preoperative clinic visits within a pediatric PSH system. Through iterative PDSA cycles, we continue to identify opportunities for future improvement. This suggests that the perioperative period presents opportunity for seasonal influenza vaccination with potential program expansion to include routine vaccines of childhood.

The faces behind vaccination: unpacking the attitudes, knowledge, and practices of staff of Cameroon’s Expanded program on Immunization

BackgroundImmunization is regarded as one of the most cost-effective public health interventions in global health. However, its cost-effectiveness depends greatly on the knowledge and skills of vaccinators. With the growing complexity of immunization programs, the need for a well-trained vaccination workforce cannot be overemphasized. In this study, we assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices among vaccination staff in Cameroon.MethodsThrough a descriptive cross-sectional design, we used structured questionnaires and observation guides to collect data from vaccination staff in health facilities that were selected by a multistage sampling method. Data were analyzed using STATA 13 software.ResultsOverall, we collected data from Expanded Program on Immunization focal staff in 265 health facilities across 68 health districts. Over half (53%) of the surveyed facilities were found in rural areas. Nearly two-thirds of health facilities had immunization focal staff with knowledge gaps for each of the four basic immunization indicators assessed. In other words, only 37% of staff knew how to estimate coverages, 36% knew how to inteprete the EPI monitoring curve, 35% knew how to prepare vaccine orders, and 37% knew how to estimate vaccine wastage. In terms of practices, staff waited for more than ten children to be present before opening a 20-dose vaccine vial in 63% of health facilities, and more than five children to be present before opening a 10-dose vaccine vial in 80% of surveyed facilities. Provision of vaccine-specific information (informing caregiver about vaccine received, explanation of benefits and potential side effects) during immunization sessions was suboptimal for the most part.ConclusionThis study suggests marked deficits in immunization knowledge among vaccination staff and exposes common attitudes and practices that could contribute to missed opportunities for vaccination and hinder vaccination coverage and equity in Cameroon. Our findings highlight the urgent need to invest in comprehensive capacity building of vaccination staff in Cameroon, especially now that the immunization program is becoming increasingly complex.