Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

Outcomes of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation

Previous studies have rarely investigated the role of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and warfarin in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In this study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of NOAC and warfarin for secondary prevention in Korean ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Based on the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, this study included 21,064 oral anticoagulants-naïve acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2015 and June 2019. The main study outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death. During the observational periods, NOAC users had a significantly decreased risk of ischemic stroke + systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–0.95), ischemic stroke (aHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.99), major bleeding (aHR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68–0.89), and all-cause death (aHR 0.87; 95% CI 0.81–0.93). Standard-dose NOAC users had a lower risk of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding events than warfarin users. In contrast, low-dose NOAC users did not differ in risk from warfarin users for all outcomes. In conclusion, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of secondary thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in Korean ischemic stroke patients with NVAF than warfarin.

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus.

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Conventional treatment comprises warfarin-mediated anticoagulation; it is unclear whether non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) exhibit comparable efficacy and safety. Limited data are available for Asian patients. This study compared NOACs with warfarin in terms of clinical efficacy and safety for managing LVT. Clinical and echocardiographic records were retrieved for all adult patients with echocardiography-confirmed LVT at a major regional centre in Hong Kong from January 2011 to January 2020. Discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was recorded. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving NOACs and those receiving warfarin. Primary outcomes were cumulative mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACEs). Secondary outcomes were complete LVT resolution and percentage reduction in LVT size at 3 months. Forty-three patients were included; 28 received warfarin and 15 received NOACs, with follow-up periods (mean ± standard deviation) of 20 ± 12 months and 22 ± 9 months, respectively (P=0.522). Use of NOACs was associated with significantly lower NACE risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.111, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.012-0.994; P=0.049) and a tendency towards lower cumulative mortality (HR=0.184, 95% CI=0.032-1.059; P=0.058). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Considering LVT resolution, discontinuation of anticoagulation by 1 year was not significantly associated with different outcomes. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants may be an efficacious and safe alternative to warfarin for LVT management. Future studies should explore the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation discontinuation by 1 year as an overall strategy.

Appropriate vs inappropriate dosing of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACS) in older persons with atrial fibrillation: Characteristics and outcomes

Appropriate vs inappropriate dosing of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACS) in older persons with atrial fibrillation: Characteristics and outcomes

Global Research Hotspots in Venous Thromboembolism Anticoagulation: A Knowledge-Map Analysis from 2012 to 2021.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cardiovascular disease that seriously threatens human lives. Anticoagulant therapy is considered to be the cornerstone of VTE treatment. An increasing number of studies has been updated in the VTE anticoagulation field. However, no bibliometric analyses have assessed these publications comprehensively. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze the global status, hotspots, and trends of anticoagulant therapy for VTE. The relevant literature on VTE anticoagulation published between 2012 and 2021 was retrieved and collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database. VOSviewer, Cooccurrence Matrix Builder, gCLUTO, and some online visualization tools were adopted for bibliometric analysis. A total of 15,152 related articles were retrieved. In recent years, the research output of VTE anticoagulation gradually increased. The United States was the most productive country. International cooperation is concentrated in North America and Europe; the most influential documents, journals, authors, and organizations were also from these two continents. Research hotspots mainly focus on clinical guidelines, VTE in special populations, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and parenteral anticoagulation. The research frontiers and trends include the assessment of NOACs and the antithrombotic management of VTE complicated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This bibliometric analysis provides a systematic overview of the VTE anticoagulation research, which will facilitate researchers to better understand the situation of VTE anticoagulation. Future studies should be dedicated to NOACs application and VTE-combined COVID-19 patients.

Anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and active cancer

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among cancer patients. Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) is important to prevent stroke in AF patients, but active cancer may also predispose to bleeding. Current knowledge on the use of OAT among AF patients with active cancer is scarce. Purpose To assess the influence of active cancer on the initiation of OAT in patients with AF and to explore cancer features predicting withholding OAT. Methods The nationwide FinACAF registry linked data from several registries covering all levels of care as well as drug purchases and included all 123 618 patients diagnosed with incident AF in Finland during 2011- 2018 with an indication for OAT (≥1 non-sex CHA2DS2-VASc point). Patients were considered to have active cancer if they had received a new cancer diagnosis or treatment for cancer during the preceding year from AF diagnosis. The primary outcome was the initiation of OAT (including non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and warfarin) and the secondary outcome the initiation of any anticoagulation therapy (AAT; including OAT and low molecular-weight heparin) during the first year from AF diagnosis. Results The mean age of the patients was 73.9 (standard deviation 11.5) years and 62 955 (50.9%) of them were women. Altogether, 7015 (5.7%) patients had active cancer at AF diagnosis. The median CHA2DS2-VASc (3 [interquartile range 2-4] for both groups) and HAS-BLED (2 [interquartile range 2-3] for both groups) scores were similar in patients with active cancer and those without cancer history. Patients with active cancer, compared to those without cancer history, less often initiated OAT (47.7% vs. 70.5 %) or AAT (61.8% vs. 71.8%) (Figure). In Fine-Gray regression analyses with all-cause mortality as a competing risk, after adjusting for confounding factors, active cancer remained associated with lower likelihood of OAT (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (aSHR 0.501) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.485-0.518), p<0.001) as well as AAT (aSHR 0.745 (95%-CI 0.723-0.769, p<0.001) initiation. Among cancer patients, metastases, gastrointestinal cancer and radiotherapy were associated with lower likelihood of OAT initiation, while only metastases predicted lower likelihood of AAT initiation (Table). Among patients initiating OAT, active cancer was associated with lesser likelihood of choosing a NOAC over warfarin compared to those without cancer (36.0% vs. 39.2%; adjusted hazard ratio 0.712 (95%-CI: 0.640-0.792), p<0.001). Conclusion AF patients with active cancer are less likely to initiate anticoagulation therapy, and those starting OAT are less likely to initiate with NOACs, compared to patients without cancer history. Metastases are the most important predictor of withholding anticoagulation therapy among AF patients with cancer.

Safety and efficacy of apixaban for the prevention of thromboembolism in adults with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias: a prospective cohort study with historical control comparison

Abstract Introduction In adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), atrial arrhythmias (AA) confer an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Data regarding treatment with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) of patients with ACHD and AA are limited. Methods A prospective, multicenter, observational study of ACHD patients with AA (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia) treated with apixaban from 2019 to 2022 was performed (PROTECT-AR, NCT03854149). Comparisons were made with a historical vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) treatment cohort from 2002 to 2014. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke or thromboembolism. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Results The apixaban-treated cohort consisted of 215 patients (median follow-up 28 months) and the historical VKA-treated ­cohort consisted of 229 patients with ACHD and AA (median follow-up 48 months). The burden of age and comorbidities was higher in the apixaban versus the VKA treatment group (Table). Comparing the apixaban with the VKA treatment group yielded no significant differences in the annualized rate of stroke or thromboembolism (1.2% vs. 1.4%, respectively; p=0.24) and major bleeding (1.2% vs. 4.4%, respectively; p=0.08) (Figure). Conclusion In ACHD patients with AA treated with apixaban as part of routine care, the risk of major thromboembolic and bleeding events was low. This risk was comparable with historical cohort data on VKA. Prospective studies directly comparing NOAC and VKA-treated patients are needed.

Abstract 15341: A Prospective Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban for the Prevention of Thromboembolism in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease and Atrial Arrhythmias: The PROTECT-AR Study

Introduction: In adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), atrial arrhythmias (AA) confer an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Limited data exist on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment for ACHD. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban in ACHD patients with AA. Methods: PROTECT-AR (NCT03854149) was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted from 2019 to 2023. ACHD patients with atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia, who were routinely treated with apixaban, were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of stroke or thromboembolism. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Patients who were previously on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) before transitioning to apixaban served as a historical control group. Results: In total, 218 patients with ACHD and AA on apixaban (previous VKA users 34.9%) were included (mean age 51±17 years; 45.9% male; predominantly moderate complexity). Over a mean follow-up of 2.4±1.3 years, the rate of stroke or thromboembolism was 0.57% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-1.55] and the rate of major bleeding was 1.52% [95%CI: 0.71-2.88] per patient-year, respectively. In the subset of patients who were previously on VKA, the risk of the primary endpoints did not differ significantly between apixaban and VKA-treatment periods (Figure). Conclusion In ACHD patients with AA on routine apixaban treatment, the risk of major thromboembolic and bleeding events was low. Among prior VKA users, the risk of adverse events during the apixaban-treatment period was comparable to that during the VKA-treatment period. Prospective studies directly comparing NOAC and VKA-treated patients are needed.

Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Edoxaban or Vitamin K Antagonists After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Post Hoc Analysis from the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF Trial

ENVISAGE-TAVI AF (Edoxaban versus Standard of Care and Their Effects on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Having Undergone Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Atrial Fibrillation; NCT02943785) was a prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The effect of edoxaban- or VKA-based therapy on patient-reported outcomes remains unknown, as most studies focus on efficacy and safety. Pre-TAVR patient-reported expectations and post-TAVR Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience with edoxaban or VKA treatment (at months 3 and 12) were analyzed using the Perception of Anticoagulation Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q). This analysis included randomized and dosed patients with an evaluable PACT-Q1 assessment at baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessment (PACT-Q2). Subanalyses included patients stratified by pre-TAVR anticoagulant (NOAC, VKA, no NOAC/VKA). Edoxaban- (n = 585) and VKA-treated (n = 522) patients had similar baseline characteristics and treatment expectations. Pre-TAVR anticoagulant use did not affect treatment expectations. After TAVR, edoxaban-treated patients had significantly higher Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience scores compared with VKA-treated patients at all time points (p <0.001 for all). Among edoxaban-treated patients, those who received VKAs pre-TAVR were significantly more satisfied with treatment than those who received NOACs (p <0.001) or no NOACs/VKAs (p = 0.003); however, there was no significant difference in the perception of convenience (p = 0.927 and p = 0.092, respectively). Conversely, among VKA-treated patients, the type of anticoagulant used pre-TAVR did not affect Treatment Satisfaction or Convenience scores post-TAVR. In conclusion, patients with atrial fibrillation who received edoxaban post-TAVR reported significantly higher Treatment Satisfaction and Convenience scores compared with those who received VKAs, resulting in a clinically meaningful difference between treatment groups.

Clinical Outcomes in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF Registry

BackgroundOral anticoagulants (OAC) are underutilized in older patients with atrial fibrillation, despite proven clinical benefits. Our objective was to investigate baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and impact of anticoagulation upon clinical outcomes with respect to age. MethodsAdults with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation were recruited into the prospective observational registry, GARFIELD-AF, and followed up for 24 months. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained via Cox proportional-hazards models with applied weights, to quantify the association of age with clinical outcomes. Comparative effectiveness of OAC vs No OAC and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were assessed using a propensity score with an overlap weighting scheme. ResultsOf 52,018 patients, 32.6% were 65-74 years of age, 29.3% were 75-84 years, and 7.9% were ≥85 years. OAC treatment was associated with a numerical reduction in all-cause mortality among those aged 65-74 years (HR; 95% confidence interval) (0.86; 0.69-1.06) and aged 75-84 years (0.89; 0.75-1.05) and a significant reduction in patients ≥85 years (0.77; 0.63-0.95) vs no OAC. Similarly, OACs were associated with a decrease in stroke: 65-74 (0.51; 0.35-0.76) and ≥85 years (0.58; 0.34-0.99) and a numerical decrease in 75-84 years (0.84; 0.59-1.18). No increase in major bleeding was observed in patients aged ≥85 treated with OACs. Compared with VKA, NOACs were associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality in patients aged <65 and 65-74, with numerical reductions in those aged 75-84 and ≥85 years. ConclusionsOlder patients using OACs saw lower all-cause mortality and stroke risk; NOACs had less mortality and major bleeding compared with VKAs.

Early or late initiation of dabigatran versus vitamin-K-antagonists in acute ischemic stroke or TIA: The PRODAST study.

The optimal timing of initiating or resuming anticoagulation after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is debated. Dabigatran, a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC), has shown superiority against vitamin K antagonists (VKA) regarding hemorrhagic complications. In this registry study, we investigated the initiation of dabigatran in the early phase after AIS or TIA. PRODAST (Prospective Record of the Use of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Stroke or TIA) is a prospective, multicenter, observational, post-authorization safety study. We recruited 10,039 patients at 86 German stroke units between July 2015 and November 2020. A total of 3,312 patients were treated with dabigatran or VKA and were eligible for the analysis that investigates risks for major hemorrhagic events within 3 months after early (⩽ 7 days) or late (> 7 days) initiation of dabigatran or VKA initiated at any time. Further endpoints were recurrent stroke, ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, death, and a composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, life-threatening bleeding and death. Major bleeding event rates per 10,000 treatment days ranged from 1.9 for late administered dabigatran to 4.9 for VKA. Early or late initiation of dabigatran was associated with a lower hazard for major hemorrhages as compared to VKA use. The difference was pronounced for intracranial hemorrhages with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-2.21) for early dabigatran use versus VKA use and an adjusted HR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-13.11) for late dabigatran use versus VKA use. No differences were found between early initiation of dabigatran versus VKA use regarding ischemic endpoints. The early application of dabigatran appears to be safer than VKA administered at any time point with regards to the risk of hemorrhagic complications and in particular for intracranial hemorrhage. This result, however, must be interpreted with caution in view of the low precision of the estimate.

Prescriptive behavior of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients affected by atrial fibrillation in general practice

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and in recent years the pharmacological approach has been strongly implemented; in Italy, the prescription of the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) was also extended to General Practitioners (GPs) since 2020. The aim of the present study was to investigate the GPs prescribing behaviour of NOACs. An observational study was performed by using the computerized medical record of 14 GPs in Sicily: patients affected by AF were selected and stratified according to the prescribed antithrombotic drugs. Patients were considered inadequately managed if antithrombotic treatment was not adherent to recent ESC guidelines. A total of 467 (2.7 %) patients were affected by AF, 276 (59.1 %) were treated with an oral anticoagulant (OAC) regardless the high stroke risk (OR 1.64; 95 %CI 0.74–3.62; p = 0.226). The NOAC users were 236 patients as follow: Rivaroxaban 33.5 %, Apixaban 33,1 %, Dabigatran 17,4 %, Edoxaban 16.1 %. In 7 patients an inappropriate NOAC treatment was observed. Among Vitamin-K antagonist users, 25.0 % were considered inappropriate. Patients not treated with OAC were 191, of them 81.7 % were at high stroke risk and did not receive any OAC despite the indication to treat. In addition, the probability to be not properly managed significantly increased in older and in patients with atherosclerosis. Conversely, patients with at least one reported cardiology counselling significantly reduced the likelihood to be not properly managed (OR 0.38, 95 %CI 0.25–0.58; p 0.01). Our results suggest the need to optimize the management of real-life AF patients by improving prescribing adherence to ESC guidelines.

Non-vitamin k oral antagonists versus aspirin for primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma on outpatient chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e20041 Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is further increased in patients receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Current guidelines suggest that non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may be an alternative to low-dose aspirin (ASA) for primary thromboprophylaxis in this population. However, there is limited data comparing these two antithrombotic therapies among MM patients undergoing treatment with IMiDs. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare NOACs with ASA for primary thromboprophylaxis in individuals with newly-diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM undergoing outpatient chemotherapy with an IMiD-based regimen. PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials were included when comparing NOACs versus aspirin for thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4.1. Results: We included 10 randomized controlled trials and observational studies comprising 1026 MM patients who underwent primary thromboprophylaxis with NOACs (33%) or ASA (67%). Thromboprophylaxis with NOACs was associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE compared with ASA (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.68; p &lt; 0.001; I² = 0%). Each group had one major bleeding event, with no statistically significant difference between NOACs and ASA (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.05-35.51; p = 0.86; I² = 51%). Similarly, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.12-2.70; p = 0.47; I² = 0%) and minor bleeding (OR 1.48; 95% CI: 0.42-5.24; p = 0.54; I² = 0%) event rates did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that NOACs may be superior to ASA for VTE prophylaxis among MM patients receiving IMiD-based chemotherapy, with no significant difference in the overall bleeding risk between the two groups.

Effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants use by drug type in Asian patients.

Although widely used in clinical fields, real-world data on the role of warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce. This retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of NOAC and warfarin in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, we included 16,762 oral anticoagulants-naive acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2016 and June 2019. The main outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause of death. In total, 1717 warfarin and 15,025 NOAC users were included in the analysis. After 1:8 propensity score matching, during the observation period, all types of NOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin (edoxaban: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.93, rivaroxaban: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96, apixaban: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91, and dabigatran: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Edoxaban (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), apixaban (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90), and dabigatran (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) had lower risks of major bleeding and all-cause of death. All NOACs were more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Except for rivaroxaban, most NOACs demonstrated a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause of death than warfarin.

Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials evaluating non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are subject to bias if they lack methodological quality. Furthermore, optimal and transparent reporting of RCT findings aids their critical appraisal and interpretation. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the report quality of RCTs of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and to analyze the factors influencing the quality.MethodsBy searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases RCTs published from inception to 2022 evaluating the efficacy of NOACs on AF were collected. By using the 2010 Consolidated Standards for Reporting Tests (CONSORT) statement, the overall quality of each report was assessed.ResultsSixty-two RCTs were retrieved in this study. The median of overall quality score in 2010 was 14 (range: 8.5–20). The extent of compliance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials reporting guideline differed substantially across items: 9 items were reported adequately (more than 90%), and 3 were reported adequately in less than 10% of trials. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the higher reporting scores were associated with higher journal impact factor (P = 0.01), international collaboration (P < 0.01), and Sources of trial funding (P = 0.02).ConclusionsAlthough a large number of randomized controlled trials of NOACs for the treatment of AF were published after the CONSORT statement in 2010, the overall quality is still not satisfactory, thus weakening their potential utility and may mislead clinical decisions. This survey provides the first hint for researchers conducting trials of NOACs for AF to improve the quality of reports and to actively apply the CONSORT statement.

PO-03-005 BEST ANTICOAGULATION STRATEGY FOR STROKE PROPHYLAXIS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS WITH AMYLOIDOSIS

A considerable proportion of elderly patients are known to have coexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and amyloidosis. Both conditions increase stroke risk. We evaluated the best anticoagulation strategy in a series of AF patients with amyloidosis. Consecutive AF patients with coexistent amyloidosis undergoing catheter ablation at our center were included in the analysis. Based on the stroke-prophylaxis approach they were divided into 2 groups; group 1: left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with Watchman and group 2: oral anticoagulation. Following LAAO, all patients remained on half dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for 3 months. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed at 45 days to assess completeness of closure. If the occlusion was complete, patients were kept on aspirin, 81 mg/day starting after the 3rd month for long-term. In case of ‘smoke’ in the left atrium (LA) or enlarged LA, they were prescribed half-dose NOAC (figure 1). NOACs included apixaban and rivaroxaban. Group 2 patients remained on full-dose NOAC during the 3-year study period. All patients were prospectively followed up for 3 years. A total of 96 patients were included in the analysis; group 1: 61 and group 2: 34. CHA2DS2-VASc score was comparable between the groups (gr. 1: 3.4±1.8 and gr. 2: 3.7±1.6, p=0.18). The most commonly used NOACs were apixaban (53, 55.2%) and rivaroxaban (38, 39.6%). After the 45-day TEE, 37 patients from group 1 remained on baby-aspirin and 34 on half-dose NOAC. Of the 34, 5 (14.7%) patients had leaks <5 mm, 17 (50%) had large LA (mean diameter 5.2±1.4 cm) and 12 (35.3%) patients had LA smoke. At 3-year follow-up, three stroke and one transient ischemic attack were reported in group 1 patients on baby-aspirin (4/37, 10.8%), whereas no stroke or bleeding complications occurred in the 34 patients on half-dose NOAC (p=0.04). In group 2 patients on full-dose OAC, a total of 5 (5/34, 14.7%) bleeding events (1 subdural hematoma and 4 GI bleedings) were recorded. Additionally, stroke was reported in one patient that happened during brief discontinuation of OAC for another medical procedure. In our series of patients with coexistent AF and amyloidosis, half-dose NOAC following LAA occlusion procedure appeared to be the safer stroke-prophylaxis strategy.

Occurrence of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants: Causes and Prevention Strategies.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of cardioembolic stroke, which is often fatal or disabling. Prevention of stroke is crucial in AF management, and anticoagulation with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is the mainstay of AF management for stroke prevention. Because NOAC prescriptions have been surging worldwide, the development of acute ischemic stroke in patients with AF who receive NOAC treatment is an increasingly important issue in clinical practice. Moreover, these patients show a high risk of recurrence, with more than a 50% higher risk, than do patients with AF and no prior anticoagulation therapy. Careful evaluation is mandatory to determine possible causes of ischemic stroke during NOAC therapy. Differentiation of AF-unrelated stroke and demonstration of combined cardiac disease/systemic coagulopathy are important in these patients and may provide improved results in their treatment. In addition, ensuring appropriate dosing and good adherence to NOAC treatment is important. Cardioembolism, despite sufficient anticoagulation and no other causes, is the most common and challenging complication because switching to anticoagulants or adding antiplatelets to the treatment regimen does not reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, and there are no guidelines for this specific situation. This review article aimed to present the most updated data on the prevalence, causes, and secondary prevention strategies, specifically focusing on non-pharmacological approaches, together with relevant cases of AF in patients who developed ischemic stroke on NOAC therapy.

Plasma Troponins Identify Patients with Very Low-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Although in the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) era majority of low-risk acute pulmonary embolism (APE) patients can be treated at home, identifying those at very low risk of clinical deterioration may be challenging. We aimed to propose the risk stratification algorithm in sPESI 0 point APE patients, allowing them to select candidates for safe outpatient treatment. Post hoc analysis of a prospective study of 1151 normotensive patients with at least segmental APE. In the final analysis, we included 409 sPESI 0 point patients. Cardiac troponin assessment and echocardiographic examination were performed immediately after admission. Right ventricular dysfunction was defined as the right ventricle/left ventricle ratio (RV/LV) > 1.0. The clinical endpoint (CE) included APE-related mortality and/or rescue thrombolysis and/or immediate surgical embolectomy in patients with clinical deterioration. CE occurred in four patients who had higher serum troponin levels than subjects with a favorable clinical course (troponin/ULN: 7.8 (6.4-9.4) vs. 0.2 (0-1.36) p = 0.000). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve for troponin in the prediction of CE was 0.908 (95% CI 0.831-0.984; p < 0.001). We defined the cut-off value of troponin at >1.7 ULN with 100% PPV for CE. In univariate and multivariate analysis, elevated serum troponin level was associated with an increased risk of CE, whereas RV/LV > 1.0 was not. Solely clinical risk assessment in APE is insufficient, and patients with sPESI 0 points require further assessment based on myocardial damage biomarkers. Patients with troponin levels not exceeding 1.7 ULN constitute the group of "very low risk" with a good prognosis.

Integrating Real-World Evidence in Economic Evaluation of Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in a Developing Country.

This study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Thailand where suboptimal anticoagulation control is common. A hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old patients with NVAF and their disease progression was simulated in the Markov model. The following anticoagulant agents were used: warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Warfarin with high, intermediate, and low time in therapeutic ranges (TTR) was used as the three different reference treatments. Baseline clinical events were obtained from a recently published real-world study in Thailand. A lifetime horizon was utilized in this model, and all analyses were performed from societal and healthcare perspectives. The results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2021 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the influence of parameter uncertainty. Apixaban was a cost-effective intervention compared with warfarin with low and intermediate TTR groups. In the low TTR group, the ICERs were $779 and $816 per QALY gained from the societal and healthcare perspectives, respectively, and in the intermediate TTR group, the ICERs were $2038 and $3159 per QALY gained from the societal and healthcare perspectives, respectively. Both ICERs were below the accepted willingness-to-pay threshold ($4806) in the context of Thailand's healthcare. In a developing country where suboptimal anticoagulation control is common, apixaban was the cost-effective alternative to warfarin for patients with both low and intermediate TTR control.

Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: From the Thromboembolic Risk to the Anticoagulant Treatment Response

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased thromboembolic risk. The impact of the female sex as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events in AF is still debated. Background and Objectives: The aim of this review is to evaluate the gender-related differences in cardioembolic risk and response to anticoagulants among AF patients. Materials and Methods: The PubMed database is used to review the reports about gender differences and thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation. Results: Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent the gold standard for thromboembolic risk prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Despite a similar rate of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) among men and women in NOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) treatment, the use of NOACs in AF women is associated with a lower risk of intracranial bleeding, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality than in men. Conclusions: The female sex can be defined as a stroke risk modifier rather than a stroke risk factor since it mainly increases the thromboembolic risk in the presence of other risk factors. Further studies about the efficacy and safety profile of NOACs according to sex are needed to support clinicians in performing the most appropriate and tailored anticoagulant therapy, either in male or female AF patients.

The effect of antithrombotic treatment on the fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND : Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been widely adopted. The use of antithrombotic treatment is increasing in the Western world. This study aimed to assess the effects of antithrombotic treatment on the FIT-based Danish national screening program for CRC. METHODS : This was a cross-sectional study of all individuals returning a FIT from 2014 until 2016. The effect of antithrombotic treatment on FIT positivity and the positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed using proportions and multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS : Of 884 036 invited individuals, we identified 551 570 participants. A positive FIT was observed in 9052 of 77 007 individuals (11.8 %) receiving antithrombotic treatment compared with 28 387 of 474 587 individuals (6.0 %) receiving no treatment. The adjusted relative risk (RR) for a positive FIT was 1.59 (95 %CI 1.56-1.63) for any treatment. Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were associated with the largest increase in FIT positivity (adjusted RR 2.40, 95 %CI 2.48-2.54). The proportion of CRC detected at colonoscopy was slightly lower among patients on antithrombotic treatment (6.0 %, 95 %CI 5.5 %-6.6 %) than among treatment-naïve patients (6.4 %, 95 %CI 6.1 %-6.7 %). The PPV for CRC or high risk adenomas was decreased nearly twofold in patients treated with NOAC (adjusted RR 0.58, 95 %CI 0.51-0.66]). CONCLUSION : Antithrombotic treatment was associated with a decreased PPV in FIT-based CRC screening.