Firearms are a leading cause of injury and death among children and adolescents.1WISQARSTM – web-based injury statistics query and reporting system. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed October 20, 2020.Google Scholar For those who survive, firearm injuries are a source of significant toxic stress, often among already marginalized groups.2Vella MA Warshauer A Tortorello G et al.Long-term functional, psychological, emotional, and social outcomes in survivors of firearm injuries.JAMA Surg. 2019; 155: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4533Crossref Scopus (43) Google Scholar,3Fowler KA Dahlberg LL Haileyesus T Gutierrez C Bacon S. Childhood firearm injuries in the United States [published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4):e20172298].Pediatrics. 2017; 140e20163486https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3486Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar Although medical and public health professionals and the victims themselves recognize the need for a more comprehensive mental health approach before and after a firearm injury,4Myers RK Vega L Culyba AJ Fein JA The psychosocial needs of adolescent males following interpersonal assault.J Adolesc Health. 2017; 61: 262-265https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.02.022Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar,5Strong BL Ballard SB Braund W The American College of Preventive Medicine policy recommendations on reducing and preventing firearm-related injuries and deaths.Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51: 1084-1089https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.023Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar the health utilization and expenditures specifically dedicated to mental health services after a firearm injury for children remain unclear. Therefore, the authors set out to compare mental healthcare encounters and expenditures of youth preceding and proceeding a nonfatal firearm injury. Investigators analyzed data from the Medicaid MarketScan claims database, which includes data on healthcare expenditures across 10–12 deidentified states (year dependent). This study included mental health claims for children aged 0–18 years with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/ICD-10 claim associated with firearm injuries (including nonpowder) from 2010 to 2016. Included were those enrolled in Medicaid for at least 11 of 12 months before and after the firearm injury. Only individuals whose initial firearm-related claim was from an emergency department or inpatient encounter were included. Index injuries were identified by ensuring that each child did not have a firearm injury diagnosis in the year prior. The cohort was evaluated in 3 subgroups: (1) low prior healthcare expenditures (previously healthy), (2) high prior outpatient mental health expenditures (>90th percentile=$1,866), and (3) high prior nonmental health expenditures (>90th percentile=$6,730). The latter subgroup served as a default group if a subject had both high mental health expenditures and high general health service expenditures. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient demographics and healthcare service utilization, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare healthcare expenditures before and after firearm injury. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 3,296 children with firearm injuries from 2010 to 2016 were included. Demographic, intent, and health service characteristics are included in Table 1. There were 20,007 total mental healthcare encounters the year before the index firearm injury and 18,448 after 1 year (p=0.057). Those in the healthy subgroup had a 131% increase in mental healthcare encounters (pre=3,699, post=8,532, p<0.001). For the high prior mental healthcare expenditures, there was a 44% decrease in mental healthcare encounters (pre=13,394, post=7,527, p<0.001), which accounted for most of the overall decrease in mental healthcare encounters. Those with high nonmental health expenditures had an 18% decrease in mental healthcare encounters (pre=2,914, post=2,389, p=0.031). There was a decrease of $346,029 in mental health expenditures overall, an increase of $804,024 in the healthy subgroup, a >$1 million decrease among the high prior mental health expenditure subgroup, and a $75,000 decrease in the high non–mental health expenditure group. All of these expenditure changes were statistically significant (p<0.001) (Table 2).Table 1Demographic and Intent Data 1 Year Before and 1 Year After a Nonfatal Firearm Injury Among Children, 0‒18 YearsCharacteristicsTotal (n=3,296)Intentional (197)Self-inflicted (25)Unintentional (2,270)Undetermined (804)Age, years (mean)13.4 (0.1)15.0 (0.3)15.1 (0.7)12.8 (0.1)14.3 (0.1) 0–4155 (4.7)10 (5.1)1 (4.0)112 (4.9)32 (4.0) 5–9448 (13.6)10 (5.1)1 (4.0)360 (15.9)77 (9.6) 10–141,047 (31.8)31 (15.7)2 (8.0)846 (37.3)168 (20.9) 15–181,646 (49.9)146 (74.1)21 (84.0)952 (41.9)527 (65.5)Sex (% male)2,750 (83.4)155 (78.7)22 (88.0)1,893 (83.4)680 (84.6)Race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic Black1,699 (51.5)150 (76.1)9 (36.0)993 (43.7)547 (68.0) White1,242 (37.7)26 (13.2)13 (52.0)1,009 (44.4)194 (24.1) Hispanic103 (3.1)6 (3.0)0 (0.0)79 (3.5)18 (2.2) Other252 (7.6)15 (7.6)3 (12.0)189 (8.3)45 (5.6)Hospitalization % inpatientaIncludes intensive care unit admission. AMA, against medical advice; ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay.597 (18.1)58 (29.4)12 (48.0)312 (13.7)215 (26.7) % ED2,699 (81.9)139 (70.6)13 (52.0)1,958 (86.3)589 (73.3)Disposition Admit/transfer49 (8.2)5 (8.6)2 (16.7)22 (7.1)20 (9.3) Discharged/AMA424 (71.0)36 (62.1)7 (58.3)225 (72.1)156 (72.6) Other124 (20.8)17 (29.3)3 (25.0)65 (20.8)39 (18.1)Inpatient LOS (mean)3.8 (0.2)4.2 (0.5)4.6 (1.2)3.8 (0.3)3.7 (0.3)Preutilization category Low utilization2,823 (85.6)163 (82.7)14 (56.0)1,962 (86.4)684 (85.1) High mental health utilization282 (8.6)20 (10.2)3 (12.0)182 (8.0)77 (9.6) High nonmental health utilization145 (4.4)14 (7.1)8 (32.0)126 (5.6)43 (5.3)a Includes intensive care unit admission.AMA, against medical advice; ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay. Open table in a new tab Table 2Mental Health Utilization and Expenditures 1 Year Before and 1 Year After a Nonfatal Firearm Injury Among Children 0‒18 YearsPrePostDifference (post-pre)Prespending categoryTotalTotalTotalMeanMedian90th PctlMaxp-valueUtilization, encounters Total (3,296)20,00718,448‒1,559‒1.10202050.057 Low prior expenditures (2,823 [85.6%])3,6998,5324,8334.9120205<0.001 High prior mental health expenditures (282 [8.6%])13,3947,527‒5,867‒20.8‒1716123<0.001 High nonmental health prior expenditures (145 [4.4%])2,9142,389‒525‒4‒1241840.031Expenditures, standard payment, $ Total (3,296)2,901,4422,555,413‒346,029‒248‒38.22,410.4061,6100.029 Low prior expenditures (2,823 [85.6%])351,2601,155,284804,024819.663.12,390.9061,610<0.001 High prior mental health expenditures (282 [8.6%])2,080,7981,005,893‒1,074,905‒3,811.70‒2,4851,982.3017,632<0.001 High nonmental health prior expenditures (145 [4.4%])469,384394,235−75,149−569.3−215.52,78244,0510.006Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).Max, maximum; Pctl, percentile. Open table in a new tab Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). Max, maximum; Pctl, percentile. In this study of mental healthcare utilization before and after firearm injury, surprisingly, there was no change in utilization of mental healthcare services. However, when different subpopulations were evaluated, youth with low prior healthcare expenditures had a substantial increase in mental healthcare encounters and expenditures, whereas youth with previously high mental healthcare expenditures had a significant drop in mental healthcare service utilization and expenditures. This suggests that healthy children received needed services, but it remains unclear why those with high baseline need of mental health care had a decrease in utilization following a firearm injury. It is possible that increased medical utilization owing to severity of injury superseded mental healthcare needs, or children are connected into an interdisciplinary treatment group that addresses mental health, without it being reflected in utilization and expenditure data. Important limitations include the following: (1) potential high utilizer outlier influence for these services (although included mean, median, 90th percentile, and maximum in Table 2 suggest that this is not the case); (2) exclusion of severe injuries, because children may have died in the year following the firearm injury after the initial event; (3) other diagnoses outside of firearm injuries during the year prior and year after the injury were not taken into account; and (4) inability to analyze more longitudinal data with adequate sample size given database limitations. This investigation suggests that some childhood victims of firearm injury, notably those at highest risk, may not be receiving needed mental health services. Although previously healthy children had an increase in mental health services after firearm injury, it is unclear from this study if this level of increased mental health services is adequately serving the needs of this vulnerable population. Further investigation should better characterize the potential gaps in mental health needs of children after firearm injury.6Ranney M Karb R Ehrlich P et al.What are the long-term consequences of youth exposure to firearm injury, and how do we prevent them? A scoping review.J Behav Med. 2019; 42: 724-740https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-019-00035-2Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar