Lung Cancer-specific Survival Research Articles

Treatment strategies for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A SEER-based population study.

There are various therapeutic methods for treating stage IA (T1N0M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but no studies have systematically assessed multiple treatments to determine the most effective therapy. Stage IA NSCLC patient data collected between 2004 and 2018 were gathered from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Treatment modalities included observation, chemotherapy alone (CA), radiation alone (RA), radiation+chemotherapy (RC), surgery alone (SA), surgery+chemotherapy (SC), surgery+radiation (SR) and surgery+radiation+chemotherapy (SRC). Comparisons were made of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) among patients based on different therapeutic methods by survival analysis. Ultimately, 89147 patients with stage IA NSCLC between 2004 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. The order of multiple treatment modalities based on the hazard ratio (HR) for OS for the entire cohort revealed the following results: SA (HR: 0.20), SC (HR: 0.25), SR (HR: 0.42), SRC (HR: 0.46), RA (HR: 0.56), RC (HR: 0.72), CA (HR: 0.91) (P<0.001), and observation (HR: Ref). The SA group had the best OS and LCSS, and similar results were found in most subgroup analyses (all P<0.001). The order of surgical modalities based on the HR for OS for the entire cohort revealed the following results: lobectomy (HR: 0.32), segmentectomy (HR: 0.41), wedge resection (HR: 0.52) and local tumor destruction (HR: Ref). Lobectomy had the best effects on OS and LCSS, and similar results were found in all subgroup analyses (all P<0.001). SA appeared to be the optimal treatment modality for patients with stage IA NSCLC, and lobectomy was associated with the best prognosis. There may be some indication and selection bias in our study, and the results of this study should be confirmed in a prospective study.

Limited resection is comparable to lobectomy for tumor size ≤ 2 cm pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma

ObjectivesInvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has a rare incidence with better prognosis than nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the prognosis between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.MethodsData were taken from two cohorts: In Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) corhort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgery. In the SEER corhort, 480 patients with stage T1 IMA who after surgery were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for SPH corhort, lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort were compared between patients undergoing lobectomy and limited resection by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsIn SPH corhort, patients who underwent limited resection had equivalent prognosis than those underwent lobectomy (5-year RFS: 79.3% versus. 82.6%, p = 0.116; 5-year OS: 86.2% versus. 88.3%, p = 0.235). However, patients with IMA > 2 to 3 cm had worse prognosis than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%, p = 0.007). In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that limited resection was an independent risk factor of RFS (hazard ratio, 2.417; 95% confidence interval, 1.157–5.049; p = 0.019), while OS (p = 0.122) was not significantly different between two groups. For IMA ≤ 2 cm, limited resection was not a risk factor of RFS (p = 0. 953) and OS (p = 0.552). In the SEER corhort, IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection was equivalent prognosis in LCSS (p = 0.703) and OS (p = 0.830).ConclusionsLimited resection could be a potential surgical option which comparable to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Surgical outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer in younger adults: A population-based study.

The surgical outcomes for younger patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features long-term survival outcomes in younger individuals with NSCLC following surgery. We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2017, selecting all pathologically confirmed NSCLC cases that underwent cancer-directed surgery. Younger patients were defined as those aged 18-50 years, while older patients were 51-80 years. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to mitigate selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among the 33 586 treated surgically patients, 2223 (6.6%) were young. Compared to the older group, younger patients had a higher frequency of female gender, non-white ethnicity, carcinoid tumors, stage IV disease, pneumonectomy, and postoperative adjuvant therapies. The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher for younger patients (79.3% vs. 62.0%; p < 0.001), as were the 5-year LCSS rates (82.4% vs. 71.8%; p < 0.001). Post-PSM, younger patients consistently demonstrated significantly better OS and LCSS. Further stage-specific analysis revealed significantly improved 5-year OS rates at each stage and superior 5-year LCSS for stages I-II among younger patients. However, there was no statistically significant difference in LCSS for stages III-IV. Overall, younger patients with NSCLC treated surgically exhibit superior OS and LCSS compared to their older counterparts, although no statistically significant difference in LCSS for stages III-IV was observed between the two age groups.

The characteristics and prognosis of different disease patterns of multiple primary lung cancers categorized according to the 8th edition lung cancer staging system.

The 8th edition lung cancer staging system was the first to describe the detailed diagnosis and staging of multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC). However, the characteristics and prognosis of MPLC categorized according to the new system have not been evaluated. We retrospectively analyzed data from surgically treated MPLC patients in a single center from 2011 to 2013 and explored the characteristics and outcomes of different MPLC disease patterns. In total, 202 surgically treated MPLC patients were identified and classified into different groups according to disease categories and diagnostic time (multifocal ground glass/lepidic (GG/L) nodules: n = 139, second primary lung cancer (SPLC): n = 63, simultaneous MPLC (sMPLC): n = 171, and metachronous MPLC (mMPLC): n = 31). There were significant differences in clinical characteristics between SPLC and GG/L nodule patients and simultaneous and metachronous MPLC patients. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rates of MPLC were 97.98%, 90.18%, and 82.81%, respectively. Five-year survival was better in patients with multiple GG/L nodules than in those with SPLC (87.94% vs. 71.29%, P < 0.05). Sex was an independent prognostic factor for sMPLC (5-year survival, female vs. male, 88.0% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.05), and in multiple tumors, the highest tumor stage was an independent prognostic factor for all categories of MPLC. The different disease patterns of MPLC have significantly different characteristics and prognoses. Clinicians should place treatment emphasis on the tumor with the highest stage as it is the main contributor to the prognosis of all categories of MPLC patients.

Abstract CT281: The phase 3 INTerpath-002 study design: Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) V940 (mRNA-4157) plus pembrolizumab vs placebo plus pembrolizumab for resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro; anti-PD-1) is indicated as adjuvant monotherapy following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients (pts) with stage IB (T2a ≥4 cm), II, or IIIA NSCLC (per AJCC v7). However, many pts experience disease recurrence, and have limited treatment options available. V940 (mRNA-4157) is a novel individualized neoantigen therapy that encodes up to 34 neoantigens that is specifically tailored and manufactured for each pt derived from their tumor. V940 as monotherapy and in combination with pembro has shown preliminary antitumor activity in the phase 1 KEYNOTE-603 study in several solid tumor types, including NSCLC. Additionally, in pts with completely resected, high-risk stage IIIB/C/D and IV cutaneous melanoma in the KEYNOTE-942 primary analysis, V940 plus pembro demonstrated significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.561 [95% CI, 0.309-1.017]; P = 0.0266) and distant metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.347 [95% CI, 0.145-0.828]; P = 0.0063) vs pembro alone. Here we present the design of the phase 3, randomized, double-blind INTerpath-002 study (NCT06077760) of adjuvant V940 plus pembro vs placebo plus pembro in pts with completely resected and chemotherapy-treated stage II-IIIB (N2) NSCLC (AJCC v8). Methods: Eligible pts aged ≥18 years with completely resected stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC (per AJCC v8.0) where EGFR-directed therapy is not indicated as primary therapy (ie, absence of sensitizing EGFR mutations e.g. DEL19 or L858R), who have received 1-4 doses of adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy, have ECOG PS 0 or 1, and have available tumor tissue for next-generation sequencing and PD-L1 testing will be enrolled. Pts must not have received previous neoadjuvant therapy for NSCLC and must not have received or be candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive V940 1 mg IM or placebo Q3W for up to 9 doses plus pembro 400 mg IV Q6W for up to 9 cycles or until disease recurrence, pt withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or an additional malignancy requiring treatment. Randomization will be stratified by histology (squamous vs nonsquamous), PD-L1 TPS (&amp;lt;1% vs 1%-49% vs ≥50%), disease stage (II vs III), and geographic location (North America/Western Europe/Australia vs rest of world). The primary endpoint is disease-free survival per investigator review. Secondary endpoints include distant metastasis-free survival per investigator assessment, OS, lung cancer‒specific survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Tumor imaging will occur at baseline, every 12 wk until wk 48, every 24 wk through year 3, and every 48 wk thereafter. Enrollment began in October 2023 and is ongoing globally (NCT06077760). Citation Format: Jonathan D. Spicer, Santosh M. Nair, Adnan Khattak, Jay M. Lee, Michelle Brown, Robert S. Meehan, Nazly Shariati, Xuan Deng, Ayman Samkari, Jamie E. Chaft. The phase 3 INTerpath-002 study design: Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) V940 (mRNA-4157) plus pembrolizumab vs placebo plus pembrolizumab for resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT281.

Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer-specific survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a SEER database analysis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and lymph node dissection (LND) is a significant surgical procedure employed in its management. Although some studies suggest benefits of LND, the extent of its impact on survival, the optimal range of lymph nodes to be examined, and the specific patient groups that benefit most remain areas of active debate and investigation. A population-based analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 2004 and 2017, undergoing primary tumor resection, were included. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses assessed the effect of LND on survival, and a restricted cubic spline method determined the optimal range for lymph node examination. This study of 37,323 NSCLC patients delved into the impact of LND on lung cancer-specific survival. Key findings revealed a median survival of 19.58 months, with 85% mortality. Baseline characteristics included a majority of White patients (81%), distant stage diagnoses (63%), and 64% with Grade IV tumors. LND emerged as a crucial predictor, influencing survival across age, gender, race, and tumor characteristics. Univariate analysis highlighted its significance, with higher T, N, and M categories, advanced stage, and poorer grade associating with elevated hazard ratios. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis reinforced LND's impact, showcasing lower hazard ratios post-removal. Hazard ratios for biopsy/aspiration and removal of regional lymph nodes were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.89; P<0.001] and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.39-0.46; P<0.001), underscoring the protective effect. Visualizations and a U-shaped curve analysis identified an optimal range (24-32 nodes) for examination, emphasizing the nuanced benefits across NSCLC stages. The study findings suggest that LND plays a critical role in improving cancer-specific survival in NSCLC patients, particularly when tailored to the early stages of the disease. The optimal range of lymph nodes examined, between 24 and 32, offers crucial insights for personalized NSCLC treatment strategies and may enhance overall survival. These results underscore the need for refined surgical guidelines that incorporate the extent of LND, supporting the utility of a more personalized approach in NSCLC management.

Clinical Utility of a CT-based AI Prognostic Model for Segmentectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background Currently, no tool exists for risk stratification in patients undergoing segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) prognostic model using preoperative CT scans and clinical and radiologic information for risk stratification in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy. Materials and Methods In this single-center retrospective study, transfer learning of a pretrained model was performed for survival prediction in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy from January 2008 to March 2017. The internal set was divided into training, validation, and testing sets based on the assignments from the pretraining set. The model was tested on an independent test set of patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy from January 2010 to December 2017. Its prognostic performance was analyzed using the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for freedom from recurrence (FFR) at 2 and 4 years and lung cancer-specific survival and overall survival at 4 and 6 years. The model sensitivity and specificity were compared with those of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) eligibility criteria for sublobar resection. Results The pretraining set included 1756 patients. Transfer learning was performed in an internal set of 730 patients (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 366 male), and the segmentectomy test set included 222 patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 58-71 years]; 114 male). The model performance for 2-year FFR was as follows: AUC, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.96); sensitivity, 87.4% (7.17 of 8.21 patients; 95% CI: 59.4, 100); and specificity, 66.7% (136 of 204 patients; 95% CI: 60.2, 72.8). The model showed higher sensitivity for FFR than the JCOG criteria (87.4% vs 37.6% [3.08 of 8.21 patients], P = .02), with similar specificity. Conclusion The CT-based DL model identified patients at high risk among those with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy, outperforming the JCOG criteria. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Intentional wedge resection versus segmentectomy for ≤2 cm Ground-Glass-Opacity-Dominant Non-Small cell lung cancer: a Real-World study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Whether wedge resection is oncological suitable for ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2cm is still debatable. The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of intentional wedge resection and segmentectomy for those patients. This was a real-world study from one of the largest thoracic surgery centers in XX. Patients who underwent intentional wedge resection or segmentectomy for ≤2cm CTR(consolidation-to-tumor)≤0.5 NSCLC were consecutively included between December 2009 and December 2018. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), were analyzed using Cox proportional model. A total of 1209 patients were included (497 in the wedge resection group, 712 in the segmentectomy group). Compared to segmentectomy, wedge resection had a significantly lower rate of complications (3.8% vs. 7.7%, P=0.008), a shorter operating time (65min vs. 114min, P<0.001), and a shorter postoperative stay (3d vs. 4d, P<0.001). The median follow-up was 70.1 months. The multivariate Cox model indicated that wedge resection had survival outcomes that were similar to segmentectomy in terms of 5-year OS (98.8% vs. 99.6%, HR=1.98, 95%CI: 0.59-6.68, P=0.270), 5-year RFS (98.8% vs. 99.5%, HR=1.88, 95%CI: 0.56-6.31, P=0.307) and 5-year LCSS (99.9% vs. 99.6%, HR=1.76, 95%CI: 0.24-13.15, P=0.581). Intentional wedge resection is an appropriate choice for ≤2cm GGO-dominant NSCLC.

The value of high-risk clinicopathologic features for chemotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study.

Surgical resection is the main treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but recurrence remains a concern. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to have survival benefits for resected stage II and III NSCLC, but debate continues regarding its use in stage I NSCLC. High-risk features, such as tumor size and stage, are considered in deciding whether to administer adjuvant chemotherapy. The data of 666,689 patients diagnosed with lung cancer from 2004 to 2016 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Ultimately, 26,160 patients diagnosed with stage I NSCLC were included in the study based on a screening procedure. After matching, 4,285 patients were identified, of whom 1,440 (33.6%) received chemotherapy. High-risk clinicopathologic features, including a high histologic grade, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), the examination of an insufficient number of lymph nodes (LNs), and limited resection, were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy significantly improved lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) in stage I patients with VPI [LCSS: hazard ratio (HR): 0.839, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.706-0.998, P=0.047; OS: HR: 0.711, 95% CI: 0.612-0.826, P<0.001], regardless of whether or not the patient had fewer than 11 LNs (LCSS: HR: 0.809, 95% CI: 0.664-0.986, P=0.04; OS: HR: 0.677, 95% CI: 0.570-0.803, P<0.001). Chemotherapy was only observed to improve OS for stage IB patients with a high histologic grade when combined with either or both of the following high-risk factors: the presence of VPI and fewer than 11 LNs examined. The presence of VPI was the dominant predictor and the examination of an insufficient number of LNs was the secondary indicator, and a high histologic grade was a potential indicator of the need to administer chemotherapy in the treatment of stage I NSCLC.

Wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy: oncologic outcomes based on extent of surgical resection for ≤2 cm stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Long-standing controversy has existed over whether sublobar resection is an adequate oncological procedure for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm, despite the recent randomized trial reports of Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802 and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 demonstrating non-inferior outcomes with sublobar resection compared to lobectomy. As practice patterns shift, we sought to compare oncologic outcomes in patients with these early-stage tumors after wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy in a contemporary, real-world, cohort. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from a single institution was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify all patients with clinically staged IA1 or IA2 NSCLC (tumors ≤2 cm with no nodal involvement). The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes of lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), recurrence patterns, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 480 patients were identified; 93 (19.4%) patients underwent wedge resection, 90 (18.7%) received segmentectomy, and 297 (61.9%) underwent lobectomy. Patients who underwent wedge resection had worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (23.7% ECOG 1 or 2 vs. 5.6% among segmentectomy and 5.4% among lobectomy, P<0.05). Both wedge resection and segmentectomy patients had lower preoperative mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) compared to the lobectomy group (81.8% and 82.6% vs. 89.6%, P=0.002), a higher proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year OS, DFS, or LCSS between groups: 90%, 61%, 78% for wedge resections compared with 85%, 75%, 86% for segmentectomy, and 87%, 77%, 87% for lobectomy, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 17 patients who underwent wedge resection (18.3%, 8 local, 9 distant), 12 patients who received segmentectomy (13.4%, 6 local, 6 distant), and 38 patients who underwent lobectomy (12.8%, 11 local, 27 distant), which was not significantly different (P=0.36). Patients with inferior performance status or lower baseline pulmonary function are more likely to receive wedge resection for clinical stage IA NSCLC ≤2 cm in size. For these small tumors, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection provide comparable oncologic outcomes.

Long-term Survival After Lung Cancer Resection in the National Lung Screening Trial

BackgroundThis study sought to evaluate the long-term survival and causes of death after surgery among patients with pathologic stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). MethodsPatients who underwent surgery and who had a diagnosis of pathologic stage IA NSCLC in the NLST were identified for analysis. The 5- and 10-year overall survival and lung cancer–specific survival, stratified by operation type, were evaluated. Among patients who underwent lobectomy, the causes of death and the cumulative incidence of lung cancer death were assessed. ResultsA total of 380 patients (n = 329, 86.6% lobectomy; n = 20, 5.3% segmentectomy; n = 31, 8.1% wedge resection) met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up time from the date of surgery was 7.8 years (interquartile range, 4.8-10.7 years). The 10-year overall survival rate was 58.3% (95% CI, 52.4%-63.8%) for lobectomy, 59.9% (95% CI, 33.2%-78.8%) for segmentectomy, and 45.2% (95% CI, 20.8%-66.9%) for wedge resection. The 10-year lung cancer–specific survival rate was 74.3% (95% CI, 68.6%-79.1%) for lobectomy, 81.3% (95% CI, 51.3%-93.8%) for segmentectomy, and 84.8% (95% CI, 64.0%-94.1%) for wedge resection. Lung cancer was the leading cause of death, accounting for 55.8% of deaths after lobectomy. The 10-year cumulative incidence of lung cancer death after lobectomy was 22.5% (95% CI, 18.3%-27.1%). ConclusionsThe 10-year overall survival rate after lobectomy among patients with pathologic stage IA NSCLC in the NLST was 58%. Lung cancer was the leading cause of death, accounting for more than 55% of deaths.

OP04 The Efficacy Of Segmentectomy And Lobectomy For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

IntroductionThe latest clinical practice guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in 2022 recommend that patients with NSCLC (&gt;1 and ≤2 cm) should be diagnosed as T1b. Segmentectomy and lobectomy are equally effective in treating patients with NSCLC no bigger than 2 cm, and especially for tumors no bigger than 1 cm. However, the effectiveness of these treatments for NSCLC tumors between 1 and 2 cm is unknown. We conducted a systemic review and meta- analysis to assess the efficacy of these two surgical treatments in patients with T1b stage NSCLC.MethodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating the efficacy of lobectomy and segmentectomy for patients with T1b stage NSCLC. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. We used random effects models to analyze overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The effect of covariates was assessed using subgroup analysis. All procedures were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.ResultsWe identified ten cohort studies that matched our selection criteria, with general low risk of quality, including a total of 37,691 patients. No publication bias was found. Compared to lobectomy, segmentectomy had lower OS (HR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.47; p=0.026) and LCSS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.42, p=0.015) before Cox regression. After multivariable Cox regression, adjusted by age, sex, histological type, and lymph node section, segmentectomy had similar OS (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.37; p=0.2) and LCSS (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.36; p=0.8).ConclusionsSegmentectomy can be used to treat patients with T1b stage NSCLC. Patients who undergo segmentectomy have survival outcomes that are the same as those of patients who received lobectomy. This evidence-based observation provides a reference for surgical choice in the treatment of patients with T1b stage NSCLC, which should be further confirmed through RCTs.

Clinical characteristics and progression of pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma harboring ALK or RET rearrangements: a retrospective cohort study.

Patients harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or rearranged during transfection (RET) rearrangements are usually diagnosed at a relatively late stage with nodal and distant metastasis, and rapid progression course of ALK/RET fusion-positive lung cancer were well-known. However, clinical characteristics and course of pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma harboring ALK or RET fusions are poorly described. Identifying patients with gene fusions at early stage may offer surgical options that could cure those patients. We retrospectively included patients with surgically resected pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or ALK/RET rearrangements, and further compared the patient clinical characteristics, nodule natural course, and survival outcomes. Radiological characteristics including ground-glass component, cystic airspace, pleural attachment, etc. were specially assessed for this study. EGFR (exons 18-22) was detected by Sanger sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze the ALK/RET rearrangements. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were all evaluated. Of 238 patients with pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas, 226 patients had EGFR mutations, 7 patients had ALK fusions, and 5 patients had RET fusions. Average age at surgery was 45.3 years for ALK/RET-positive group and 52.6 years for EGFR-positive group (P=0.049). Radiologically, among the 12 patients with ALK/RET fusions, the majority of lesions (10/12) manifested as mixed ground-glass opacities (mGGOs), which was significantly more prevalent when compared with patients with EGFR mutations (83.4% vs. 24.3%, P<0.001). Moreover, a substantial proportion of cystic airspace was found in ALK/RET-positive group but not in EGFR-positive group (66.7% vs. 14.2%, P<0.001). Among four patients with ALK/RET fusions undergoing surveillance over 1 year before surgery, two of them developed rapid radiologic progression. The 5-year LCSS and RFS were 100%, 100% for ALK/RET-positive group, and 100%, 100% for EGFR-positive group, respectively. ALK/RET-positive pre-/minimally invasive lung adenocarcinomas were mostly characterized as mGGOs with cystic airspace developing rapid nodule progression, and no recurrence occurred during long-term follow-up after resection. This provides insights into proper curative surgery timing in the management of patients with gene fusions. However, these findings must be treated with caution and validated in future multi-center studies with larger sample size.

OA20.05 The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Grading System for Recurrence and Lung Cancer-Specific Survival

OA20.05 The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Grading System for Recurrence and Lung Cancer-Specific Survival

Prospective Cohort Study to Compare Long-Term Lung Cancer-Specific and All-Cause Survival of Clinical Early Stage (T1a–b; ≤20 mm) NSCLC Treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Surgery

IntroductionWe aimed to compare outcomes of patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLC treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MethodsWe identified patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLCs on last pretreatment computed tomography treated by surgery or SBRT in the following two prospective cohorts: International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) and Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART). Lung cancer-specific survival and all-cause survival after diagnosis were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline demographics and comorbidities and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. ResultsOf 1115 patients with NSCLC, 1003 had surgery and 112 had SBRT; 525 in I-ELCAP in 1992 to 2021 and 590 in IELCART in 2016 to 2021. Median follow-up was 57.6 months. Ten-year lung cancer-specific survival was not significantly different: 90% (95% confidence interval: 87%–92%) for surgery versus 88% (95% confidence interval: 77%–99%) for SBRT, p = 0.55. Cox regression revealed no significant difference in lung cancer-specific survival for the combined cohorts (p = 0.48) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 1.00). Although 10-year all-cause survival was significantly different (75% versus 45%, p < 0.0001), after propensity score matching, all-cause survival using Cox regression was no longer different for the combined cohorts (p = 0.74) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 0.62). ConclusionsThis first prospectively collected cohort analysis of long-term survival of small, early NSCLCs revealed that lung cancer-specific survival was high for both treatments and not significantly different (p = 0.48) and that all-cause survival after propensity matching was not significantly different (p = 0.74). This supports SBRT as an alternative treatment option for small, early NSCLCs which is especially important with their increasing frequency owing to low-dose computed tomography screening. Furthermore, treatment decisions are influenced by many different factors and should be personalized on the basis of the unique circumstances of each patient.

Survival outcomes for lung neuroendocrine tumors in California differ by sociodemographic factors.

Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few known predictors of survival. We investigated associations of sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors with overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for incident lung NET cases (typical or atypical histology) in the California Cancer Registry (CCR) from 1992 to 2019. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by sociodemographic and disease factors univariately with the log-rank test. We used sequential Cox proportional hazards regression for multivariable OS analysis. LCSS was estimated using Fine-Gray competing risks regression. There were 6038 lung NET diagnoses (5569 typical, 469 atypical carcinoid); most were women (70%) and non-Hispanic White (73%). In our multivariable model, sociodemographic factors were independently associated with OS, with better survival for women (hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.68, P < 0.001), married (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.84, P < 0.001), and residents of high socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods (HRQ5vsQ1 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.85, P < 0.001). Compared to cases with private insurance, OS was worse for cases with Medicare (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.40, P < 0.001) or Medicaid/other public insurance (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.68, P < 0.001). In our univariate model, non-Hispanic Black Californians had worse OS than other racial/ethnic groups, but differences attenuated after adjusting for stage at diagnosis. In our LCSS models, we found similar associations between sex and marital status on survival, but no differences in outcomes by SES or insurance. By race/ethnicity, American Indian cases had worse LCSS. In summary, beyond disease-related and treatment variables, sociodemographic factors were independently associated with survival in lung NETs.

Online decision tools for personalized survival prediction and treatment optimization in elderly patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundDespite major advances in cancer therapeutics, the therapeutic options of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LSCC)-specific remain limited. Furthermore, the current staging system is imperfect for defining a prognosis and guiding treatment due to its simplicity and heterogeneity. We sought to develop prognostic decision tools for individualized survival prediction and treatment optimization in elderly patients with LSCC.MethodsClinical data of 4564 patients (stageIB-IIIB) diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for prognostic nomograms development. The proposed models were externally validated using a separate group consisting of 1299 patients (stage IB-IIIB) diagnosed from 2012–2015 in China. The prognostic performance was measured using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, the average time-dependent area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC), and decision curve analysis.ResultsEleven candidate prognostic variables were identified by the univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement between the actual and nomogram-estimated Lung Cancer-Specific Survival (LCSS) rates. By calculating the c-indices and average AUC, our nomograms presented a higher prognostic accuracy than the current staging system. Clinical usefulness was revealed by the decision curve analysis. User-friendly online decision tools integrating proposed nomograms were created to estimate survival for patients with different treatment regimens.ConclusionsThe decision tools for individualized survival prediction and treatment optimization might facilitate clinicians with decision-making, medical teaching, and experimental design. Online tools are expected to be integrated into clinical practice by using the freely available website (https://loyal-brand-611803.framer.app/).

The Incidence and Effect of Different Organ Metastasis on the Prognosis of NSCLC.

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of different organ metastasis on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with distant metastatic NSCLC were selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2016 to 2019. The incidence of different organ metastasis and their association with clinicopathological factors were explored. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for metastatic NSCLC were calculated, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed with a nomogram for OS being constructed based on Cox regression. Total 26,210 patients with distant metastatic NSCLC were included in this study. Around 48.9% of the metastatic NSCLC were multiple-organ metastasis and bone was the most commonly involved organ (44.4%). For patients with single-organ metastasis, the prognosis for lung or distant lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis was better than others (with median OS of 15 and 16 months for lung and distant LNs metastasis, respectively), and liver metastasis resulted in the worst prognosis with median OS of 8 months. A nomogram was constructed to visualize Cox regression model, along with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated good discrimination for the predictive model with 1- and 2-year area under the curve of ROC of 0.687 and 0.702, respectively. The prognosis of NSCLC patients with distant metastasis was poor. Liver metastasis results in the worst prognosis among the single-organ metastasis. The nomogram developed based on the Cox regression model has provided a useful tool to estimate the probability of OS of the metastatic NSCLC.

Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for peripheral clinical T1aN0 non–small cell lung cancer: A post hoc analysis of CALGB 140503 (Alliance)

BackgroundWe have recently reported the primary results of CALGB 140503 (Alliance), a randomized trial in patients with peripheral cT1aN0 non–small cell lung cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh) treated with either lobar resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SLR). Here we report differences in disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) between LR, segmental resection (SR), and wedge resection (WR). We also report differences between WR and SR in terms of surgical margins, rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR), and expiratory flow rate at 6 months postoperatively. MethodsBetween June 2007 and March 2017, a total of 697 patients were randomized to LR (n = 357) or SLR (n = 340) stratified by clinical tumor size, histology, and smoking history. Ten patients were converted from SLR to LR, and 5 patients were converted from LR to SLR. Survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan–Maier estimator and tested by the stratified log-rank test. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare margins and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between groups, and the χ2 test was used to test the associations between recurrence and groups. ResultsA total of 362 patients had LR, 131 had SR, and 204 had WR. Basic demographic and clinical and pathologic characteristics were similar in the 3 groups. Five-year DFS was 64.7% after LR (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.6%-70.1%), 63.8% after SR (95% CI, 55.6%-73.2%), and 62.5% after WR (95% CI, 55.8%-69.9%) (P = .888, log-rank test). Five-year OS was 78.7% after LR, 81.9% after SR, and 79.7% after WR (P = .873, log-rank test). Five-year LCSS was 86.8% after LR, 89.2% after SR, and 89.7% after WR (P = .903, log-rank test). LRR occurred in 12% after SR and in 14% after WR (P = .295). At 6 months postoperatively, the median reduction in % FEV1 was 5% after WR and 3% after SR (P = .930). ConclusionsIn this large randomized trial, LR, SR, and WR were associated with similar survival outcomes. Although LRR was numerically higher after WR compared to SR, the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the reduction of FEV1 between the SR and WR groups.

Impact of previous extra-pulmonary malignancies on surgical outcomes of sequential primary non-small cell lung cancer

Reduced cancer deaths have led to an increase in the number of cancer survivors and the risk of the second primary tumor. This study explored the surgical outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer as the second primary tumor and the impact of previous extra-pulmonary malignancies. Patients’ data were obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The patients were divided into lung surgery and non-surgery groups. Propensity-score matching was used to balance potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to test the overall survival and lung-cancer-specific survival. Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate death risk. In total 3054 lung surgery and 1094 non-surgery patients with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer as the second primary tumor were included. The surgery group showed longer overall survival (68 vs. 22 months) and lung cancer-specific survival (not reached vs. 37 months) than those of non-surgery groups (both P < 0.001). Patients with previous hormone-dependent malignancies had similar survival rates (overall survival: 22 vs. 20 months, P = 0.666; lung cancer-specific survival: 38 vs. 37 months, P = 0.292) as those with non-hormone dependent malignancies in the non-surgery group. Significantly longer overall survival (90 vs. 60 months, P = 0.001) was observed in patients with hormone-dependent malignancies in the surgery group; however, there was no difference in lung cancer-specific survival (P = 0.225). Competing risk analysis showed that for patients undergoing lung surgery, there was higher previous malignancy-induced mortality in patients with non-hormone dependent malignancies than in patients with hormone-dependent malignancies. However, there was no difference in lung cancer-induced mortality between the two groups. Patients who underwent lobectomy showed longer survival than those who underwent pneumonectomy and other resection types (89, 27.5 and 65 months, P < 0.001). In summary, lung surgery is beneficial for patients with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer as the second primary tumor after hormone-dependent malignancy resection.