Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Research Articles

Association of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors With Clinical Outcomes, Hemodynamics, and Myocardial Remodeling Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure on Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

We evaluated the potential benefits of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in patients with left ventricular assist device support. A total of 165 consecutive patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implant and alive at 6-month on support were studied. RAASi status after 6-month visit along with clinical reasons for nonprescription/uptitration were retrospectively assessed. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death between 6 and 24 months after left ventricular assist device implant. Remodeling and hemodynamic outcomes were explored by studying the association of RAASi new prescription/uptitration versus unmodified therapy at 6-month visit with the change in echocardiographic parameters and hemodynamics between 6 and 18 months. After the 6-month visit, 76% of patients were on RAASi. Patients' characteristics among those receiving and not receiving RAASi were mostly similar. Of 85 (52%) patients without RAASi new prescription/uptitration at 6-month visit, 62% had no apparent clinical reason. RAASi were independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.16-0.69]). The baseline rates of optimal echocardiographic profile (neutral interventricular septum, mitral regurgitation less than mild, and aortic valve opening) and hemodynamic profile (cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min per m2, wedge pressure <18 mm Hg, and right atrial pressure <12 mm Hg) were similar between groups. At 18 months, patients receiving RAASi new prescription/uptitration at 6 months had higher rates of optimal hemodynamic profile (57.5% versus 37.0%; P=0.032) and trends for higher rates of optimal echocardiographic profile (39.6% versus 22.9%; P=0.055) compared with patients with 6-month unmodified therapy. Optimal 18-month hemodynamic and echocardiographic profiles were associated with the primary outcome (log-rank=0.022 and log-rank=0.035, respectively). RAASi are associated with improved outcomes and improved hemodynamics among mechanically unloaded patients.

Noncardiac Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A 11-Year Institutional Experience.

Limited options in the end-stage treatment of heart failure have led to increased use of left ventricular assist devices. For this reason, the rate of non-cardiac surgeries in patients with left ventricular assist devices is also increasing. Our study aims to analyze surgical rate, anesthesia management, and results by reviewing our 11-year experience with patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery receiving left ventricular assist devices support. We retrospectively evaluated 57 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery and 67 non-cardiac surgical procedures among 274 patients who applied between January 2011 and December 2022 and underwent left ventricular assist devices implantation with end-stage heart failure. Fifty (74.6%) patients with left ventricular assist devices admitted to the hospital for non-cardiac surgery were emergency interventions. The most common reasons for admission were general surgery (52.2%), driveline wound revision (22.3%), and neurological surgery (14.9%). This patient group has the highest in-hospital mortality rate (12.8%) and the highest rate of neurological surgery (8.7%). While 70% of the patients who underwent neurosurgery were taken to surgery urgently, the International Normalized Ratio values of these patients were between 3.5 and 4.5 at the time of admission to the emergency department. With a perioperative multidisciplinary approach, higher morbidity and mortality risks can be reduced during emergencies and major surgical procedures.

426 A Beat Away from Precision Medicine: Characterizing Human Cardiac Fibroblast Responsiveness to Hemodynamic Unloading in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Myocardial interstitial fibrosis leads to high hemodynamic load resulting in heart failure (HFrEF). Previous studies show that treatment with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) does not reduce fibrosis. We hypothesize that human cardiac fibroblasts are highly activated in HFrEF and remain unresponsive to hemodynamic unloading by LVAD. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Forty human subjects with HFrEF undergoing LVAD implantation were enrolled to provide a portion of myocardium routinely removed during LVAD placement. In addition, 7 biopsies previously collected from transplanted hearts with extended LVAD treatment were also evaluated (LVEX). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Quantification of PSR-stained sections reveals a significant increase in collagen content in the HFrEF tissue (CVF = 2.8) compared to control tissues (CVF = 0.9) that remained elevated in LVEX hearts (CVF = 3.1). HCFs from LV biopsies were isolated and grown to confluence. HCFs from HFrEF patients and control HCFs were plated on substrates with stiffnesses reflective of normal myocardium (2kPa) or HFrEF myocardium (8kPa). Cells were collected at 4- and 7-day time points and levels of collagen I and alpha-smooth muscle actin were quantified by western blot analysis. Control HCFs were responsive to changes in substrate stiffness producing more Col I and a-SMA on 8kPa versus 2kPa, HCFs from HFrEF patients were unresponsive to changes in stiffness exhibiting no significant difference in protein production on 2 vs. 8kPa. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our data suggests that HCFs isolated from the failing myocardium do not respond to changes in mechanical load and might contribute to persistent increases in fibrosis. These findings bring us one step closer to elucidating mechanisms behind fibrosis in HFrEF which could lead to targeted therapies to improve patient outcomes from LVAD support.

(1133) - Cardiac Recovery and Improved Outcomes During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: The First Heart-Mate 3 in Argentina

(1133) - Cardiac Recovery and Improved Outcomes During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: The First Heart-Mate 3 in Argentina

(819) - Evaluation of Platelet Activation by Flow Cytometry in Contemporary Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

(819) - Evaluation of Platelet Activation by Flow Cytometry in Contemporary Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

(62) - Sildenafil Modifies Platelet Activation and Reduces Mediators of Vascular Remodeling During Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study

(62) - Sildenafil Modifies Platelet Activation and Reduces Mediators of Vascular Remodeling During Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study

(1289) - Acclimation of Right Ventricular Function After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

(1289) - Acclimation of Right Ventricular Function After Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

Professional Employment With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: Does Working With an LVAD Allow It to Work Too?

Professional Employment With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: Does Working With an LVAD Allow It to Work Too?

The Longest Living Patient Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Device (14 Years).

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival and reduce symptoms in patients with advanced heart failure; however, the longer-term durability of LVADs remains uncertain especially with older-generation devices. In this case report, we describe the clinical course of a patient who has been successfully treated with the same HeartMate II LVAD for 14 years, the longest published and still ongoing LVAD support with the same originally implanted device.

Reversibility of precapillary pulmonary hypertension and outcomes after heart transplantation bridged with left ventricular assist devices: Insight from the United Network for Organ Sharing

BackgroundIn light of the updated lowered threshold for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension (PH), the reversibility of precapillary PH with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and the associated post-heart transplantation (HT) outcomes remain unclear. MethodsUsing data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we aimed to investigate predictors of persistent precapillary PH in HT recipients bridged with LVAD and examine the interrelated post-HT survival using the updated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) cutoff of >2 Wood units for precapillary PH. ResultsAmong 2169 HT recipients bridged with LVAD, 1299 had PVR >2 at baseline; 551 (42.4%) of whom normalized their PVR ≤2 and 748 (57.6%) remained with elevated PVR >2 after LVAD implantation. Female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-3.07; P < .001) and inotrope treatment at listing (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66; P = .028) were associated with persistently elevated PVR after LVAD. Conversely, longer duration of LVAD support (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65-0.84; P < .001) and use of HeartMate II (aOR, 0.74; CI, 0.59-0.93; P = .011) were found to be protective against persistently elevated PVR after LVAD. Persistently elevated PVR >2 after LVAD was associated with increased risk of death compared with those who normalized their PVR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57; P = .037). However, the normalized PVR post-LVAD group had comparable survival with those with PVR ≤2 at baseline (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.02; P = .07). ConclusionsMany recipients of HT bridged with LVAD remain with PVR >2 after LVAD implantation, which is associated with increased risk of death after HT compared with patients with normalized PVR after LVAD.

Quality Improvement in Anesthetic Management of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Presenting for Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Single Center Experience.

With the growing number of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients requiring non-cardiac surgery and the limited availability of cardiac anesthesiologists, our study reviewed non-cardiac surgeries in HeartMate III patients with LVAD at our institution. We focused on anesthesiologist roles, detailing patient characteristics, anesthetic management, and outcomes and identifying improvement opportunities in this specialized care setting. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients with LVAD who underwent non-cardiac surgery at our institution between 2017 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, anesthetic management, and 30-day mortality rates were also assessed. A total of 23 patients were identified, with 17 (73.9%) males and a median age of 61 [53.5, 67.5] years. Cardiac anesthesiologists were present in nine (39.1%) cases. Elective surgeries were more common (73.9%), with intermediate-risk surgeries accounting for 52.2% of all surgeries. General anesthesia was administered to 18 patients (78.3%), with a median duration of 40 [24, 63.5] min. A single patient required reoperation because of bleeding, and two patients (8.7%) experienced 30-day mortality. Despite guidelines lacking detail, involving non-cardiac anesthesiologists in certain cases is essential. Sharing our experience aims to enhance the evolving discourse on non-cardiac surgeries for patients with LVAD, improving their outcomes and safety.

Successful management of HeartMate 3 in a patient with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

The management of right heart failure during durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support remains an unsolved issue so far. We had a 44-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and received HeartMate 3 LVAD (Abbott, USA) implantation as a bridge-to-transplant indication. The pump speed was adjusted as low as 4500rpm to avoid the left ventricular narrowing and interventricular septal leftward shift. Riociguat was administered to decrease the afterload of the right ventricle and increase the preload of the left ventricle, in addition to the combination of neurohormonal blockers. Frequent low-flow alarm events eventually disappeared after amlodipine administration, and he was successfully returned to work. We here present a unique management in a patient with right heart failure due to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy during HeartMate 3 LVAD support.

Bridge to Weight Loss: A Case Series.

Durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a well-established therapeutic option for patients with advanced heart failure. These devices are often used to "bridge" patients to an orthotopic heart transplantation (HT). Unfortunately, many patients on LVAD support with a body mass index (BMI) above a certain value are not eligible for HT due a lack of suitable donors and the association between obesity and poor outcomes after HT. This case series describes three individuals on LVAD support who were able to successfully lose enough weight to qualify to be listed for an HT. We highlight a systematic, multidisciplinary approach to implementing guideline-driven weight loss strategies, including some aggressive methods (ie, meal replacements, weight loss medications, and bariatric surgery). In addition to describing the weight loss outcomes, we also discuss barriers and medical challenges during weight loss that are unique to this population.

Machine Learning Multicenter Risk Model to Predict Right Ventricular Failure After Mechanical Circulatory Support

The existing models predicting right ventricular failure (RVF) after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support might be limited, partly due to lack of external validation, marginal predictive power, and absence of intraoperative characteristics. To derive and validate a risk model to predict RVF after LVAD implantation. This was a hybrid prospective-retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted from April 2008 to July 2019 of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) requiring continuous-flow LVAD. The derivation cohort included patients enrolled at 5 institutions. The external validation cohort included patients enrolled at a sixth institution within the same period. Study data were analyzed October 2022 to August 2023. Study participants underwent chronic continuous-flow LVAD support. The primary outcome was RVF incidence, defined as the need for RV assist device or intravenous inotropes for greater than 14 days. Bootstrap imputation and adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator variable selection techniques were used to derive a predictive model. An RVF risk calculator (STOP-RVF) was then developed and subsequently externally validated, which can provide personalized quantification of the risk for LVAD candidates. Its predictive accuracy was compared with previously published RVF scores. The derivation cohort included 798 patients (mean [SE] age, 56.1 [13.2] years; 668 male [83.7%]). The external validation cohort included 327 patients. RVF developed in 193 of 798 patients (24.2%) in the derivation cohort and 107 of 327 patients (32.7%) in the validation cohort. Preimplant variables associated with postoperative RVF included nonischemic cardiomyopathy, intra-aortic balloon pump, microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist device/venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, LVAD configuration, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profiles 1 to 2, right atrial/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, platelet count, and serum sodium, albumin, and creatinine levels. Inclusion of intraoperative characteristics did not improve model performance. The calculator achieved a C statistic of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in the derivation cohort and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80) in the validation cohort. Cumulative survival was higher in patients composing the low-risk group (estimated <20% RVF risk) compared with those in the higher-risk groups. The STOP-RVF risk calculator exhibited a significantly better performance than commonly used risk scores proposed by Kormos et al (C statistic, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.63) and Drakos et al (C statistic, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.57-0.67). Implementing routine clinical data, this multicenter cohort study derived and validated the STOP-RVF calculator as a personalized risk assessment tool for the prediction of RVF and RVF-associated all-cause mortality.

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Activated by a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent the final treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) not eligible for transplantation. Although LVAD design has been further improved in the last decade, their use is associated with different complications. Specifically, inflammation, fibrosis, bleeding events, right ventricular failure, and aortic valve regurgitation may occur. In addition, reverse remodeling is associated with substantial cellular and molecular changes of the failing myocardium during LVAD support with positive effects on patients' health. All these processes also lead to the identification of biomarkers identifying LVAD patients as having an augmented risk of developing associated adverse events, thus highlighting the possibility of identifying new therapeutic targets. Additionally, it has been reported that LVAD complications could cause or exacerbate a state of malnutrition, suggesting that, with an adjustment in nutrition, the general health of these patients could be improved.

Aortic arch branching variations and risk of cerebrovascular accidents in patients with a left ventricular assist device.

This retrospective study investigated the association between anatomical variations in the aortic arch branching and adverse events, including the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Medical charts were reviewed for all patients with HeartMate 3 LVAD support at our center from 2016 to 2021. Computed tomography scans were evaluated to categorize the variations in the aortic arch branching based on seven different types, as described in the literature. In total, 101 patients were included: 86 (85.1%) with a normal branching pattern and 15 (14.9%) with an anatomical variation. The following variations were observed: eight (7.9%) with a bovine arch and seven (6.9%) with a left vertebral arch. The median age was 57 years, 77.2% were men, and the median follow-up was 25 months. No difference was found in the rate of early (< 30 days) re-exploration due to bleeding after LVAD implantation. The rate of CVA and mortality did not differ significantly between patients with a normal arch or an anatomical variation during follow-up, with hazard ratios of 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-4.48; P = 0.495] and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.24-1.98; P = 0.489), respectively. This preliminary study showed no differences in early and long-term adverse events, including CVA, when comparing patients with a variation in the aortic arch branching to patients with a normal aortic arch. However, knowledge of the variations in aortic arch branching could be meaningful during cardiac surgery for potential differences in surgical events in the perioperative period.

Numerical simulation analysis of multi-scale computational fluid dynamics on hemodynamic parameters modulated by pulsatile working modes for the centrifugal and axial left ventricular assist devices

Continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) operate at a constant speed mode, which could result in increased risk of adverse events due to reduced vascular pulsatility. Consequently, pump speed modulation algorithms have been proposed to augment vascular pulsatility. However, the quantitative local hemodynamic effects on the aorta when the pump is operating with speed modulation using different types of CF-LVADs are still under investigation. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was conducted to quantitatively elucidate the hemodynamic effects on a clinical patient-specific aortic model under different speed patterns of CF-LVADs. Pressure distribution, wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and velocity were calculated to compare their differences at constant and pulsatile speeds under centrifugal and axial LVAD support. Results showed that pulse pressure on the aorta was significantly larger under pulsatile speed mode than that under constant speed mode for both CF-LVADs, indicating enhanced aorta pulsatility, as well as the higher peak blood flow velocity on some representative slices of aorta. Pulsatile speed modulation enhanced peak WSS compared to constant speed; high TAWSS region appeared near the branch of left common carotid artery and distal aorta regardless of speed modes and CF-LVADs but these regions also had low OSI; RRT was almost the same for all the cases. This study may provide a basis for the scientific and reasonable selection of the pulsatile speed patterns of CF-LVADs for treating heart failure patients.

Percutaneous Stenting of a Stenotic Berlin Heart Outflow Cannula Graft in a 2 Year Old Child.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outflow obstruction is a rare complication of long-term LVAD support. We present the first case of successful percutaneous stent implantation in a pediatric patient with LVAD outflow obstruction.

Temporary Right Ventricular Support Using the Existing Bypass Circuit During LVAD Implantation

BackgroundRight-sided heart failure after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation carries high morbidity. We sought to develop a technique for expedient short-term right ventricular (RV) support with the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit already in use during the LVAD implantation procedure. MethodsPatients at high risk for RV failure during LVAD implantation were supported by a modified CPB circuit. A standard CPB circuit was modified to include a series of 4 wye (Y) bridge connections, allowing the ability to exclude the venous reservoir and oxygenator and to flow venous blood or arterialized blood in the same CPB outflow line. ResultsFrom 2019 to 2022 at a single institution, 6 patients were identified as high risk for early RV failure. Preoperative mean clinical values included central venous pressure of 16.3 ± 3.2 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 26.7 ± 3.2 mm Hg, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion of 1.2 ± 0.23 cm, RV stroke work index of 311.7 ± 32.5, and central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 0.61 ± 0.10. All 6 patients were successfully weaned from CPB to LVAD support without the need for RV support at the conclusion of the implantation procedure. ConclusionsWe describe a configuration that supports the right ventricle during the critical period after CPB when it is at high risk of failure while the patient is being resuscitated with transfusions and volume. This technique provides flexibility in the management of complex, critically ill patients with RV failure, increasing the possibility of intraoperative RV recovery and successful separation from CPB during LVAD implantation.

Ventricular assist devices and sleep-disordered breathing-A mechanical heart stimulating a sleepy brain.

Sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA), is common in severe heart failure (HF) patients. There is limited data on the effect of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) on sleep apnea. We performed a retrospective review of 350 durable LVAD patients and found 5 with a history of pre- and post-LVAD sleep studies. All five patients had OSA, and three had concomitant CSA. We observed reduced apnea-hypopnea index following LVAD placement. This was due to a near abolishment of CSA in three mixed sleep apnea patients-as seen by a central apnea index improvement from an average of 25.9 ± 13.1 to 1.4 ± 2.5 events per hour (p = 0.063). LVAD placement was associated with an increase in thermodilution cardiac output from 2.7 ± 0.6 to 4.1 ± 1.1 L/min (p = 0.014). These findings support chemoreception physiology seen in patients with poor circulation and the effect of restoring this circulation with LVAD support.