Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection Research Articles

Implementing protocol-based relaparoscopy for severe complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Although laparoscopy has demonstrated growing applications for either primary colorectal resections or reoperations, no standardized criteria for implementing laparoscopy in revisional surgery have been reported. This study analyzes a single-center series of major complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, undergoing laparoscopic (LR), or open reoperations in compliance with a hemodynamics-based institutional management. This study retrospectively analyzes a series of consecutive patients who primarily underwent either laparoscopic left colectomy or low anterior resection in a tertiary referral center between 2016 and 2021. Major complications requiring reoperation (MCR) were managed through an interdisciplinary protocol and submitted to reoperation according to patient hemodynamics and intra-abdominal contamination. A cohort analysis primarily assessed treatment failure rates (i.e., 90-day mortality and need for further surgery), while postoperative morbidity was secondarily examined. Out of 1137 laparoscopic colorectal resections, 497 patients met eligibility criteria, while 45 (9.1%) developed MCRs were managed according to the standardized interdisciplinary protocol. Revisional surgery was performed through either LR (66.7%) or (33.3%). Treatment failure was 13.3% overall, including additional surgery (11.1%) and 90-day mortality (6.6%) after reoperation. In both overall and anastomotic leak-specific MCRs, relaparoscopy resulted in minimized length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and intensity of care. Relaparoscopy for MCR preserves clinical benefits related to minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Further studies should investigate applicative determinants and impediments related to the center volume.

A modified method for precise anastomosis during laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: the first clinical experience and application

BackgroundThere is no criterion to guide and evaluate the anastomosis of laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). We developed a new technique for precise anastomosis. This study endeavored to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this new technology.MethodsPatients with mid-low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic LAR in our department were enrolled retrospectively between January 1, 2021 and July 1, 2023. During the LAR, the distance between the sacral promontory and the rectal stump was measured and used to determine the length of the sigmoid colon, which was preserved for anastomose. The demographic characteristics and short-term outcomes were analyzed.ResultsForty-nine patients (26 men, 23 women) with low and middle rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 6.4 ± 2.7 cm. The operative time was 193 ± 42 min. All patients underwent precise anastomosis, among which 12 patients underwent freeing of the splenic flexure of the colon. According to our criteria, there was no redundant or tense state of the colon anterior to the sacrum after the anastomosis. Only one patient had a postoperative anastomotic leak (Grade B). All 15 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy underwent terminal ileostomy. No postoperative death occurred within 30 days of the surgery. The median follow-up time in our study was 12 months. One patient developed a single metastasis in the right lobe of the liver in the eighth month after surgery and underwent microwave radiofrequency ablation, which did not recur in the four months of postoperative follow-up, and the rest of the patients survived disease-free without recurrence of metastasis.ConclusionsPrecise measurement of the proximal colon of the anastomosis can ensure accurate and convenient colorectal anastomosis and this may be a technique worthy of clinical application. However, its effectiveness needs to be further verified in a multicenter clinical trial.

Ureteral Injury in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection Learning Curve: Common Mistakes and Preventive Strategies.

Ureteral Injury in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection Learning Curve: Common Mistakes and Preventive Strategies.

Investigation of the impact of COVID-19 on postoperative outcomes using a nationwide Japanese database of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and low anterior resection for gastric cancer and rectal cancer.

The COVID-19 outbreak made conventional medical care impossible, forcing changes in both healthcare providers and patients. In Japan, COVID-19 infection began spreading in earnest in 2020 and exploded in 2021. There was concern that the medical impact of COVID-19 in 2021 would differ from that in 2020. We aimed to clarify the impact of COVID-19 on mortality and anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer and rectal cancer in Japan using the National Clinical Database (NCD). We collected data from patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and laparoscopic low anterior resection (LLAR) from January 2018 to December 2021 from the NCD, a web-based surgical registration system in Japan. The number of surgical cases, monthly incidence of mortality and morbidity (anastomotic leakage), standardized mortality ratio (SMR), and standardized morbidity-leakage ratio (SMLR [ratio of observed patients to expected patients calculated using the risk calculator established in the NCD]) were evaluated. The numbers of LDG and LLAR cases continued to decline in the first year of the pandemic in 2020 and were as low in 2021 as in 2020. Although the numbers of robot-assisted LDG and LLAR cases increased, the growth rate was lower than the rate of increase prior to the pandemic. Mortality and anastomotic leakage, two of the most important complications, as assessed by SMR and SMLR, did not worsen during the pandemic in comparison to the pre-pandemic period. Laparoscopic surgeries were performed safely in Japan and were not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study

BackgroundThe selection of diverting ileostomy (DI) is controversial. This study aimed to explore the factors affecting the selection of diverting ileostomy (DI) following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.MethodsThis retrospective, case-control study included patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted sphincter-saving surgery for mid-low rectal cancer from January 2019 to June 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the patient’s clinicopathological characteristics and pelvic dimensions measured by abdominopelvic electron beam computed tomography.ResultsA total of 382 patients were included in the analysis, of which 182 patients (47.6%) did not undergo DI, and 200 patients (52.4%) underwent DI. The univariate analysis suggested that male sex (p = 0.003), preoperative radiotherapy (p < 0.001), patients with an anastomosis below the levator ani plane (p < 0.001), the intertuberous distance (p < 0.001), the sacrococcygeal distance (p = 0.025), the mid pelvis anteroposterior diameter (p = 0.009), and the interspinous distance (p < 0.001) were associated with performing DI. Multivariate analysis confirmed that preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.037, odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07–8.30), anastomosis below the levator ani plane (p < 0.001, OR = 7.09, 95% CI = 4.13–12.18), and the interspinous distance (p = 0.047, OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.93-1.00) were independently associated with performing DI.ConclusionPelvic parameters also influence the choice of DI. According to this single-center experience, patients with a shorter interspinous distance, particularly narrow pelvic with an interspinous distance of < 94.8 mm, preoperative radiotherapy, and anastomosis below the levator ani plane, prefer to have a DI and should be adequately prepared by the physician.

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Total mesorectal excision using conventional straight fixed devices may be technically difficult because of the narrow and concave pelvis. Several laparoscopic articulating tools have been introduced as an alternative to robotic systems. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® and robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer. This retrospective study included 682 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer from September 2018 to December 2021. Among them, 82 underwent laparoscopic surgery using ArtiSential® (groupA) and 201 underwent robotic surgery (groupB). A total of 73 [group A; 66.37 ± 11.62; group B 65.79 ± 11.34] patients were selected for each group using a propensity score matching analysis. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between groupA and B. Mean operative time was longer in groupB than A (163.5 ± 61.9 vs 250.1 ± 77.6min, p < 0.001). Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the two groups (6.2 ± 4.7 vs 6.7 ± 6.1days, p = 0.617). Postoperative complications, reoperation, and readmission within 30 days after surgerywere similar between the two groups. Pathological findings revealed that the circumferential resection margins were above 10mm in both groups (11.00 ± 7.47 vs 10.17 ± 6.25mm, p = 0.960). At least 12 lymph nodes were sufficiently harvested, with no significant difference in the number harvested between the groups (20.5 ± 9.9 vs 19.7 ± 7.3, p = 0.753). Laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® can achieve acceptable clinical and oncologic outcomes. ArtiSential®, a multi-joint and articulating device, may serve a feasible alternative approach to robotic surgery in rectal cancer.

Early predictive factors and risk assessment for anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Anastomotic leakage is a complication that creates significant concern in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery. This study aimed to identify variables for detecting anastomotic leakage in those who had open, laparoscopic, or robotic low anterior resection for cancer and to explore their relationships. A total of 283 patients who were diagnosed with rectal cancer and underwent low anterior resection were divided into two groups: those with and without anastomotic leakage. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage was detected in 23 of 283 patients who underwent low anterior resection. The postoperative analysis of the biochemical data of the patients showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of C-reactive protein (Crp), albumin, lymphocytes, leukocytes, neutrophils, and their ratio. The performance of these parameters in predicting anastomotic leakage was statistically analyzed in the patient group with anastomotic leakage, and nomogram results were acquired. Immune system components and biomarkers were statistically tested, and nomogram results were obtained in rectal cancer patients. These parameters can be used together as a potential marker in anastomotic leakage. Further development of these variables has the potential to facilitate the timely detection and treatment of anastomotic leakage.

Evaluation of the advantage of surgeons certified by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system participating in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection.

A technical qualification system was developed in 2004 by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. An analysis of the EnSSURE study on 3188 stage II-III rectal cancer patients, which was performed by including the participation of qualified surgeons as assistants and advisers without restricting their participation as operators, revealed that the participation of technically qualified surgeons in surgery improved the technical and oncological safety of laparoscopic rectal resection. This secondary retrospective analysis of the EnSSURE study examined the advantage of qualified surgeons participating in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR). The outcomes of low anterior resection were compared between groups with and without the participation of surgeons qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (Q and non-Q groups, respectively). We used propensity score matching to generate paired cohorts at a one-to-one ratio. The postoperative complication rate, short-term results (hemorrhage volume, operative time, number of dissected lymph nodes, open conversion rate, intraoperative complication rate, and R0 resection rate), and long-term results (disease-free survival rate, local recurrence rate, and overall survival rate) were evaluated. The frequencies of postoperative complications, anastomotic bleeding, and intraperitoneal abscess were significantly lower, the operative time was significantly shorter, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter, and the number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in the Q group. No significant differences were observed in disease-free survival, local recurrence, or overall survival rate rates between the groups. The participation of qualified surgeons in LAR is technically advantageous.

Nomogram for predicting prolonged postoperative ileus after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer

BackgroundProlonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a common complication after colorectal surgery that increases patient discomfort, hospital stay, and financial burden. However, predictive tools to assess the risk of PPOI in patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection have not been developed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop a nomogram to predict PPOI after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 548 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid­low rectal cancer at a single tertiary medical center were retrospectively enrolled between January 2019 and January 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze potential predictors of PPOI. The nomogram was constructed using the filtered variables and internally verified by bootstrap resampling. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve, and the clinical usefulness was evaluated by the decision curve.ResultsAmong 548 consecutive patients, 72 patients (13.1%) presented with PPOI. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that advantage age, hypoalbuminemia, high surgical difficulty, and postoperative use of opioid analgesic were independent prognostic factors for PPOI. These variables were used to construct the nomogram model to predict PPOI. Internal validation, conducted through bootstrap resampling, confirmed the great discrimination of the nomogram with an area under the curve of 0.738 (95%CI 0.736–0.741).ConclusionsWe created a novel nomogram for predicting PPOI after laparoscopic low anterior resection. This nomogram can assist surgeons in identifying patients at a heightened risk of PPOI.

CO114 Comparative 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes between Robotic-Assisted Low Anterior Resection (RALAR) and Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection (LLAR) Among Rectal Cancer Patients in Japan

CO114 Comparative 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes between Robotic-Assisted Low Anterior Resection (RALAR) and Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection (LLAR) Among Rectal Cancer Patients in Japan

Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study.

To investigate the feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy. A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and skin bridge loop ileostomy between August 2018 and August 2022, including 44 patients with specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy (experimental group) and 51 patients with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision (control group). Following the application of propensity score matching (PSM), 34 pairs of data were successfully matched. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was conducted on the clinical data of the two groups. The experimental group exhibited significantly better outcomes than the control group in various aspects. Specifically, the experimental group had lower values for average operative time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), median length of visible incision after surgery (P < 0.001), median VAS pain score on the first day after surgery (P = 0.015), and average postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.001). There was no statistical significance observed in the incidence of stoma-related complications in both groups (P > 0.05). Within each group, the stoma-QOL scores before stoma closure surgery were significantly higher than those at one month and two months after the surgery, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Specimen extraction via a U-Plus skin bridge loop ileostomy is a safe and feasible method that shortens operation time and postoperative visual incision length, decreases estimated blood loss, and reduces patient postoperative pain compared with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision.

Clinical application of a novel stent-assisted in situ intestinal bypass in preventing postoperative anastomotic leakage for low-mid rectal cancer: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of a novel stent-assisted in situ intestinal bypass for low-mid rectal cancer patients. Patients who were diagnosed with rectal cancer and received laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection plus a novel stent-assisted in situ intestinal bypass were respectively included from March 2022 to June 2022. Biofragmentable intestinal stent with a protective sleeve was placed in the proximal colon before anastomosis, and feces could be discharged through the protective sleeve without touching the anastomosis, which achieved an in situ bypass of feces. Perioperative characteristics and short-term outcomes were collected. Rectal imaging was performed each week after surgery for the first 3 weeks to surveil the stent and feces delivery. Follow-ups were conducted for more than 3 months. Thirty patients who successfully received surgery were included in this study. There were 18 (60.0%) males and 12 (40.0%) females. As for perioperative characteristics, operation time was 213.8 ± 43.0 minutes, blood loss was 53.3 ± 24.6 mL, time to first flatus via protective sleeve after surgery was 3.2 ± 1.1 days, postoperative hospital stay was 11.8 ± 1.6 days, and time to discharge stent was 22.4 ± 3.2 days. As for short-term outcomes, 6 patients suffered from pneumonia, urinary tract infection or incision infection. During the follow-up, there was no anastomotic leakage or mortality. This novel stent-assisted in situ intestinal bypass is safe and feasible, it might be an applicable way to prevent postoperative anastomotic leakage for patients with low-mid rectal cancer.

Predicting multiple linear stapler firings in double stapling technique with an MRI-based deep-learning model

Multiple linear stapler firings is a risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) using double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis. In this study, our objective was to establish the risk factors for ≥ 3 linear stapler firings, and to create and validate a predictive model for ≥ 3 linear stapler firings in laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. We retrospectively enrolled 328 mid–low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. With a split ratio of 4:1, patients were randomly divided into 2 sets: the training set (n = 260) and the testing set (n = 68). A clinical predictive model of ≥ 3 linear stapler firings was constructed by binary logistic regression. Based on three-dimensional convolutional networks, we built an image model using only magnetic resonance (MR) images segmented by Mask region-based convolutional neural network, and an integrated model based on both MR images and clinical variables. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and Youden index were calculated for each model. And the three models were validated by an independent cohort of 128 patients. There were 17.7% (58/328) patients received ≥ 3 linear stapler firings. Tumor size ≥ 5 cm (odds ratio (OR) = 2.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15–5.60, p = 0.021) and preoperative carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 ng/mL [OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.20–4.04, p = 0.011] were independent risk factors associated with ≥ 3 linear stapler firings. The integrated model (AUC = 0.88, accuracy = 94.1%) performed better on predicting ≥ 3 linear stapler firings than the clinical model (AUC = 0.72, accuracy = 86.7%) and the image model (AUC = 0.81, accuracy = 91.2%). Similarly, in the validation set, the integrated model (AUC = 0.84, accuracy = 93.8%) performed better than the clinical model (AUC = 0.65, accuracy = 65.6%) and the image model (AUC = 0.75, accuracy = 92.1%). Our deep-learning model based on pelvic MR can help predict the high-risk population with ≥ 3 linear stapler firings in laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. This model might assist in determining preoperatively the anastomotic technique for mid–low rectal cancer patients.

Assessment of Quality of Life Before and After Ileostomy Reversal After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Aim: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome negatively affects patients’ quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer. Temporary loop leostomy is preferred to avoid anastomosis leakage related problems. Aim of this study is to evaluate Patients’ quality of life before and after ileostomy reversal. &#x0D; Material and Methods: Patients with laparoscopic low anterior resection with protective loop ileostomy were included in the study. Before and after the reversal of the ileostomy quality of life assessment was done by EORTC QLQ-C30 scale. &#x0D; Results: Sixty two patients with temporary loop ileostomy after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer were included in the study. Our study population showed better results in General health scale and social function scale after ileostomy reversal. However; there is no significant difference in general function and general symptom scale. &#x0D; Conclusion: Temporary ileostomy can negatively affect patients’ quality of life and patients have higher quality of life scores after ileostomy reversal.

Remote cadaveric minimally invasive surgical training.

The aim of the study is to discuss the efficacy of live vs. remote cadaver surgical training (CST) for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). A cohort of 30 interns in their first and second years of training were divided into three groups: live observers (n = 12), live participants (n = 6), and remote observers: (n = 12). The interns had the opportunity to either observe or actively participate in two different surgical procedures, namely, laparoscopic lower anterior resection, performed by a colorectal surgical team, and laparoscopic fundoplication, performed by a pediatric surgical team. The procedures were conducted either at a base center or at a remote center affiliated with the institute. Some of the interns interacted directly with the surgical teams at the base center, and others interacted indirectly with the surgical teams from the remote center. All interns were administered questionnaires before and after completion of the CST in order to assess their understanding of various aspects related to the operating room layout/instruments (called "design"), accessing the surgical field (called "field"), understanding of anatomic relations (called "anatomy"), their skill of dissection (called "dissection"), ability to resolve procedural/technical problems (called "troubleshooting"), and their skill in planning surgery (called "planning") according to their confidence to operate using the following scale: 1 = not confident to operate independently; 4 = confident to operate with a more senior trainee; 7 = confident to operate with a peer; and 10 = confident to operate with a less experienced trainee. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All scores improved after CST at both the base and remote centers. The following significant increases were observed: for remote observers: "field" (2.67→4.92; p < .01), "anatomy" (3.58→5.75; p < .01), "dissection" (3.08→4.33; p = .01), and "planning" (3.08→4.33; p < .01); for live observers: "design" (3.75→6.17; p < .01), "field" (2.83→5.17; p < .01), "anatomy" (3.67→5.58; p < .01), "dissection" (3.17→4.58; p < .01), "troubleshooting" (2.33→3.67; p < .01), and "planning" (2.92→4.25; p < .01); and for live participants: "design" (3.83→6.33; p = .02), "field" (2.83→6.83; p < .01), "anatomy" (3.67→5.67; p < .01), "dissection" (2.83→6.17; p < .01), "troubleshooting" (2.17→4.17; p < .01), and "planning" (2.83→4.67; p < .01). Understanding of "design" improved significantly after CST in live observers compared with remote observers (p < .01). Understanding of "field and "dissection" improved significantly after CST in live participants compared with live observers (p = .01, p = .03, respectively). Out of the 12 remote observers, 10 participants (83.3%) reported that interacting with surgical teams was easy because they were not on-site. Although all the responses were subjective and the respondents were aware that observation was inferior to hands-on experience, the results from both centers were equivalent, suggesting that remote learning could potentially be viable when resources are limited.

Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection for Diverticulitis

Colonic diverticula represent saccular outpouchings of the colonic wall and are referred to as diverticulosis under normal circumstances, and as diverticulitis when inflamed. Diverticulosis is usually asymptomatic and rare in patients younger than 30 years of age, but the incidence increases with age. In addition, 10-25% of these patients will progress to diverticulitis and experience abdominal pain, bloating, and/or fever. Diverticulitis can be further differentiated as uncomplicated or complicated depending on the type of perforation and whether or not it is associated with purulent or fecal peritonitis, or a pelvic abscess. Treatment ranges from oral antibiotic and diet modification for a single episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis to intravenous antibiotic and surgical management for recurrent diverticulitis. Surgery entails removal of the diseased segment of the colon with anastomosis or colostomy depending on the degree of inflammation and amount of healthy tissue. Here, we present a case of a female patient with 12 previous episodes of uncomplicated diverticulitis in a span of a year and a half. Laparoscopic low anterior resection with a side-to-end Baker-type rectocolon anastomosis was elected to remove the diseased segment and prevent recurrence.

Minimally invasive treatment of multiple primary tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical observation

   For now days we don’t have any guidelines for the treatment of synchronous and metachronous tumors of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. In this case report, we are talking about optimal treatment strategy in a patient with early gastric cancer, a neuroendocrine tumor of the sigmoid colon, and a locally advanced rectal cancer. The patient underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and endoscopic excision of the early neuroendocrine tumor of the sigmoid colon. View of the local advanced rectal cancer patient underwent combined preoperative “sandwich” treatment with 2 courses of chemotherapy before a long course of chemoradiotherapy and 2 courses of chemotherapy after. The treatment was well tolerated. Ten weeks later, the patient gets surgical procedure: laparoscopic low anterior resection with loop colostomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. At the end of chemotherapy colostomy closure was done. The minimally invasive surgical treatment is safe and feasible in patients with synchronous malignancies of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Fast track rehabilitation and minimal surgical trauma ensure timely delivery of chemotherapy.

Specialty-Certified Colorectal Surgeons Demonstrate Favorable Short-term Surgical Outcomes for Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: Assessment of a Japanese Nationwide Database.

There are few studies on the impact of a colorectal-specific technically certified surgeon on good surgical outcomes for laparoscopic low anterior resection in the real world. To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with the participation of a certified colorectal surgeon. This was a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese nationwide database. This study was conducted as a project for the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery. This study included 41,741 patients listed in the National Clinical Database who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection performed by certified, noncertified, and colorectal-specific certified surgeons, according to the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System, from 2016 to 2018. Operative mortality rate and anastomotic leak rate were the primary outcome measures. Overall 30-day mortality and operative mortality were 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively, without significant differences between all kinds of certified and noncertified surgeon groups. Overall anastomotic leak rate was 9.3%, with a significant difference between the 2 groups. Colorectal- and stomach-certified groups had lower 30-day mortality and operative mortality than the biliary-certified and noncertified groups. The anastomotic leak rate was the lowest in the colorectal-certified group. Based on a logistic regression analysis using the risk-adjusted model, operative mortality was significantly higher in the biliary-certified group than in the colorectal-certified group. Moreover, anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower in the colorectal-certified group than in the stomach-certified and noncertified groups. This study was a retrospective study, and there was a possibility of different definitions of anastomotic leak due to the use of a nationwide database. The participation of a colorectal-specific certified surgeon may decrease the risk of operative mortality and anastomotic leak for laparoscopic low anterior resection. ANTECEDENTES:Hay pocos estudios sobre el impacto de un cirujano certificado técnicamente especializado en cáncer colorrectal con un buen resultado quirúrgico para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica en el mundo real.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados a corto plazo de la resección anterior baja laparoscópica con la participación de un cirujano colorrectal certificado.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utilizó una base de datos nacional japonesa.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó como un proyecto para la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Endoscópica y la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Gastroenterológica.PACIENTES:este estudio incluyó a 41 741 pacientes incluidos en la base de datos clínica nacional que se sometieron a una resección anterior baja laparoscópica realizada por cirujanos certificados, no certificados y certificados específicamente colorrectales, según el Sistema de calificación de habilidades quirúrgicas endoscópicas de 2016 a 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La tasa de mortalidad operatoria y la tasa de fuga anastomótica fueron los resultados primarios.RESULTADOS:La mortalidad general a los 30 días y la mortalidad operatoria fueron del 0,2 % y el 0,3 %, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos de todos los tipos de cirujanos certificados y no certificados. La tasa global de fuga anastomótica fue del 9,3 %, con una diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos. Los grupos con certificación colorrectal y estomacal tuvieron una mortalidad a los 30 días y una mortalidad operatoria más bajas que los grupos con certificación biliar y sin certificación. La tasa de fuga anastomótica fue la más baja en el grupo certificado colorrectal. Con base en un análisis de regresión logística utilizando el modelo ajustado por riesgo, la mortalidad operatoria fue significativamente más alta en el grupo con certificación biliar que en el grupo con certificación colorrectal. Además, la tasa de fuga anastomótica fue significativamente más baja en el grupo con certificación colorrectal que en los grupos con certificación estomacal y sin certificación.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue retrospectivo y existía la posibilidad de diferentes definiciones de fuga anastomótica debido al uso de una base de datos nacional.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de un cirujano certificado en video específico colorrectal puede disminuir el riesgo de mortalidad operatoria y fuga anastomótica para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Outcomes of curative laparoscopic sugery with diverting loop ileostomy in rectal cancer patients

Objective: To evaluate clinical, tests and early outcomes of curative laparoscopic sugery rectal cancer with diverting loop ileostomy and potential benifits and complications of diverting loop ileostomies after sugery rectal cancer. Materials and methods: Prospective study. From February 2020 to August 2022, there were 32 patients rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery with diverting loop ileostomies in Hue University Medical and Pharmacy Hospital and Hue Central hospital. Results: Men age was 54.7, male/female was 1.3. The most symptoms were abdominal pain and blood in stool, the rates was 68.8% and 59.4%, respectively. The rates of lower rectal cancer was 59.4%. The rates of EUS and MRI was 75% and 87.5%, respectively. The most pre- operative tumor stage was II, III with 90.6%. The most method surgery is laparoscopic low anterior resection (46.9%). The rate complicates in operative was 6.3%, post - operative was 18.9%. The incidence rates of anastomotic leakage was 6.2%. The recurrence rate was 6.2% and metastatic rates was 9.3%. The rate complications ileostomies was 12.5% include peristomal dermatitis and fluid and electrolyte imblances. The rate complications of ileostomy closure was 28.6% and there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between. Ileostomy closure before and after 8 weeks. Conclusions: The diverting loop Ileostomy is a safe procedure. A diverting stoma reduces the consequences of anastomotic leakage. Early closure of ileostomy is safe and can improve better quality of life for patiens. Key words: rectal cancer, Ileostomy.

Ureteral Injury.

A 70-year-old man underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection for a rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Postoperatively, the patient had high drain volume output, with 800 mL of clear serous fluid being drained on the second postoperative day. Drain creatinine returned as 300 mmol/L, with a corresponding serum creatinine of 100 mmol/L. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed a left ureteric injury with an associated urinoma. After urology consultation, the patient underwent a left ureteric reimplantation emergently.