Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Articles

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) in Rupture of the Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) with Severe Neck Angulation in Conscience of National Health Coverage in Tertiary Referral Hospital in Indonesian: Case Report

AbstractAn aortic aneurysm is a condition with focal dilation of 50% or more over the normal aortic diameter. The most frequent form of aortic aneurysms is infrarenal. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is a valid treatment for treating patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are electively repaired to prevent rupture. We present a case of an elderly man with an impending rupture of intraluminal infrarenal AAA with bilateral common iliac arteries aneurysms. Overall, the patient had completed the procedure and made a good postoperative recovery with fully coverage of Indonesian national health insurance.

Outcomes Following Different Management of Mycotic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

The objective was to present our experience on managing mycotic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (MIAAA) through a retrospective cohort study. Data of patients with MIAAA managed in our center from July 2016 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis of MIAAA was made based on: (1) preoperative clinical signs of infection; (2) elevated serologic infection parameters; (3) para-aneurysmal infection features on enhanced computed tomography; and (4) positive blood or tissue cultures. All the patients received standard antibiotic therapy. Surgical management including endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), initial EVAR followed by open re-operation, and initial open surgical repair (OSR) were conducted according to disease seriosity, physical condition, and patient's will. Infection index and clinical outcome were evaluated during the follow-up time. A total of 23 patients (21 men; averaged=66.3 years, range=49-79 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 19.9 months (range=1-75 months). Bacteria culture from blood or tissue specimen was positive in 15 patients (Salmonella, n=8; Escherichia coli, n=3; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA], n=1; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n=1; Staphylococcus epidermidis, n=1; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, n=1). Seven patients received OSR as the initial surgical intervention, whereas 14 patients chose EVAR instead. The 2 conservatively managed patients (refused surgery) died within 30 days. The 7 patients who received initial OSR survived till now. Among the 14 patients who underwent initial EVAR, infection deteriorated without exception (14/14, 100%). Three of these patients refused re-operation and died within 6 months. Eleven patients received secondary surgical intervention (10 cases of aneurysm and endograft resection, thorough debridement, subclavian to bi-femoral artery bypass, or in situ aorta reconstruction; 1 case of laparoscopic debridement) and 7 survived the follow-up time. The overall mortality rate was 39.1% (9/23). The mortality rates differed greatly following different intervention methods (merely antibiotic management, 100%; initial open operation, 0%; initial EVAR without secondary operation, 100%; initial EVAR plus secondary operation, 36.4%). Open surgical repair is still the first choice for hemodynamically stable and low-risk patients. Merely EVAR is related with disastrous results, which should be reserved as a temporary alternative for patients with ruptured aneurysms, hemodynamic instability or high surgical risk, and followed by timely secondary OSR. The management of mycotic or primary-infected aortic aneurysm is challenging; treatment remains controversial. Our center has reviewed our experience over the past 6 years and found that open surgical repair is still the first choice for hemodynamically stable and low-risk patients. Merely endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is related with disastrous results, which should be reserved as a temporary alternative for patients with ruptured aneurysms, hemodynamic instability or high surgical risk, and followed by timely secondary open surgical repair.

Controlling the nutritional status score: a new tool for predicting postoperative mortality in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aneurysm repair

BackgroundAAA is a fatal condition that commonly occurs during vascular surgery. Nutritional status exerts a significant influence on the prognosis of various pathological conditions Scores from the CONUT screening tool have been shown to predict outcomes of certain malignancies and chronic diseases. However, the ramifications of nutritional status on AAA patients undergoing EVAR have not been elucidated in prior studies. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the correlation between CONUT scores and postoperative prognostic outcomes in patients with AAA undergoing EVAR.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of 177 AAA patients treated with EVAR from June 2018 to November 2019 in a single center. Patient characteristics, CONUT scores, and postoperative status were collected. These patients were stratified into groups A and B according to CONUT scores. Subsequently, a comparative analysis of the baseline characteristics between the two cohorts was conducted. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the autonomous predictors of mid-term mortality and complications, respectively.ResultsCompared with group A, patients in group B had higher midterm mortality (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that CONUT scores; respiratory diseases; stent types; preoperative Hb, CRP, PT, and Fb levels were risk factors for death. Multivariate analysis confirmed that CONUT score [HR, 1.276; 95% CI, 1.029–1.584; p = 0.027] was an independent risk factor for mortality. Logistic regression analysis showed that prior arterial disease, smoking, and D-dimer levels were risk factors, although multivariate analysis showed smoking (OR, 3.492; 95% CI, 1.426–8.553; p = 0.006) was an independent risk factor. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that patients in group B had shorter mid-term survival than those in group A (log-rank p < 0.001).ConclusionMalnutrition was strongly associated with mid-term mortality in patients with infrarenal AAA treated with EVAR.

Variability in Short-term Mortality Following Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Across Centers and Physicians

Variation in the care management of repairs for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) between centers and physicians, e.g., the procedural volumes may explain differences in mortality outcomes. First, we quantified the center and physician variability associated with 30- and 90-day mortality risk following open (rOSR) and endovascular (rEVAR) aneurysm repair. Second, we explored wheter part of this variability was attributable to procedural volume at the center and physician level. Two cohorts including rOSR and rEVAR procedures between 2013-2019 were analyzed from the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Thirty- and 90-day all-cause mortality was derived from linked Medicare claims data. The median odds ratio (MOR, median mortality risk from low- to high-risk cluster) and intraclass correlation (ICC, variability attributable to each cluster) for 30- and 90-day mortality risk associated with center and physician variability were derived using patient-level adjusted multilevel logistic regression models. Procedural volume was calculated at the center and physician levels and stratified by quartiles. The models were sequentially adjusted for volumes, and the difference in ICC (without vs. with accounting for volume) was calculated to describe the center and physician variability in mortality risk attributable to volumes. We included 450 rOSRs (mean age=74.5±7.6 years; 23.5% female) and 752 rEVARs (76.4±8.4 years; 26.1% female). Following rOSRs, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 32.9% and 38.7%. No variability across centers and physicians was noted (30- and 90-day MORs ≈ 1 and ICCs ≈ 0%). Neither center nor physician volume was associated with 30-day(P=.477 and P=.796) or 90-day mortality (P=.098 and P=.559). Following rEVAR, the 30- and 90-day mortality rate was 21.3% and 25.5%, respectively. Significant center variability (30-day MOR=1.82 95%CI 1.33-2.22 and ICC=11% 95%CI 2%-36%; 90-day MOR=1.76 95%CI 1.37-2.09 and ICC=10% 95%CI 3%-30%), but negligeable variability across physicians (30- and 90-day MORs≈1 and ICCs ≈ 0%) were noted. Neither center nor physician volume was associated with 30- (P=.076 and P=.336) nor 90-day mortality risk (P=.066 and P=.584). The center variability attributable to procedural volumes was negligeable (difference in ICCs: 1% for 30-day; 0% for 90-day mortality). Variability in practice from center-to-center was associated with short-term mortality outcomes in rEVAR, but not for rOSR. Physician variability was not associated with short-term mortality for rOSR or rEVAR. Annualized center and physician volumes did not significantly explain these associations. Further work is needed to identify center-level factors affecting the quality of care and outcomes for ruptured AAA.

[The effect of the ratio of aneurysm sac diameter to patient age on the long-term efficacy of different surgical methods for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm].

Objective: To investigate the effect of the ratio of the maximum diameter of aneurysm sac to age (R) on the long-term efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study.The clinical data of 317 patients with IAAA who underwent surgical repair in the Department of Vascular Surgery,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from January 2016 to October 2022 were retrospectively collected.There were 266 males and 51 females,aged (69.7±8.3) years (range:37 to 87 years).The R value of the patient was calculated and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to establish a model to calculate the optimal cut-off value.The propensity score matching method was used to match the baseline data of patients in the EVAR and OSR group by 3∶1 (the caliper value was 0.05),and the patients were stratified according to the cutoff value of R,and the postoperative efficacy and survival of the patients were analyzed.The primary endpoint was the total mortality rate,and the secondary endpoints included the occurrence of postoperative complications and reintervention.Pearson χ2 or Fisher 's exact test was used for categorical variables,and t test was used for continuous variables to compare differences between groups.The survival curves of the two groups were described by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: After propensity score matching,198 cases were in the EVAR group and 66 cases were in the OSR group.The ROC model showed that the best cut-off value of R value was 0.90,and the two groups were divided into two layers:R<0.90 and R≥0.90.Among them,112 patients with R<0.90 (84 cases of EVAR,28 cases of OSR);there were 152 patients with R≥0.90 (114 cases of EVAR and 38 cases of OSR).The follow-up time was (23.6±1.6) months (range:1 to 70 months).In the R≥0.90 stratification,the total mortality (26.3% vs.5.3%,P<0.05),complication rate (44.7% vs.26.3%,P<0.05), and secondary intervention rate (31.6% vs.13.2%,P<0.05) in the EVAR group were higher than those in the OSR group.In the R<0.90 stratification,there was no significant difference in the total mortality rate (13.1% vs.10.7%,P<0.05),complication rate (28.6% vs.35.7%,P>0.05) and secondary intervention rate (14.3% vs.21.4%, P>0.05) between the two groups. Conclusions: When R≥0.90 in IAAA patients,OSR maybe more beneficial to patients in terms of survival rate,postoperative complication rate and secondary intervention rate than EVAR.When R<0.90,there are no significant differences in survival rate,complication rate and secondary intervention rate between the two surgical methods.

Initial experience of endovascular aneurysm repair at the Dr. Eduardo Liceaga General Hospital of Mexico

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the permanent and irreversible dilation of the lower part of the aorta where the vessel expands, making it susceptible to rupture, which represents a high mortality incident. Methods: A review of clinical records was carried out from September 2021 to March 2023, patients who were diagnosed with aortic aneurysm were included in whom endovascular exclusion of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysm was performed at the General Hospital of Mexico by the angiology vascular and endovascular surgery department. Results: 18 endovascular repairs of aortic aneurysms were performed, of which 15.4% were female (n=6) and 84.6% male (n=12). The average proximal neck diameter in the thoracic aorta was 31 mm, average proximal neck diameter in infrarenal AAA 22.2 mm, average aneurysmal diameter in infrarenal segment 63.8 mm, thoracic 31 mm. Regarding the type of endovascular procedure, 11.1% were repaired with the fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) technique, and the same proportion with chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ChEVAR), for a resolution with conventional EVAR of 77.7%. Complications occurred in 3 patients, 2 of which resulted in type 1a and 1b endoleaks that were reoperated and repaired with a proximal cuff, balloon angioplasty, and embolization of the aneurysmal sac with coils. Conclusions: Aortic aneurysm remains a major cause of death in adults because of aortic rupture despite advances over the past two decades that have been made in the endovascular management of large, symptomatic, and ruptured. Timely treatment is essential to prevent rupture and poor patient outcomes.

Mid-term results of "off-label" use of the Endurant stentgraft in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

EVAR is the preferred treatment modality for patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with suitable anatomy. Each manufacturer of aortic stentgrafts has specific anatomic requirements. In some patients, it is not possible to adhere to the instructions for use, but alternative treatment is also not possible. In these patients, EVAR can be performed outside instructions for use. In this study, all consecutive patients in whom an Endurant II or IIS stentgraft was used between 1 January and 31 December were reviewed. We compared the two patient groups in whom this stentgrafts was used outside and inside instructions for use. Patients with planned adjuvant therapy, for example, chimney procedure or iliac side branches, were excluded. In 74 of 178 (41.6%) patients, the instructions for use were not adhered. The main reason was pathology of the aortic neck. There were more patients with type IA endoleak, this difference was borderline significant (p = .06). There were more patients with limb occlusion in the early postoperative period, but at the end of the follow-up period, the incidence was comparable. Aneurysm-related mortality and all-cause mortality were comparable in both groups. In this study, real-life experience with the Endurant II and IIS stentgraft is described. Non-adherence with instructions for use was associated with a higher risk of endoleak type IA (p = .06). In the early postoperative period, there were more patients with limb occlusion; this finding was not observed anymore at the end of the follow-up period.

Assessment of fitness for open repair in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) was originally designed as a treatment modality for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) deemed unfit for open repair. However, the definition of "unfit for open repair" is largely subjective and heterogenous. The purpose of this study was to compare patients deemed unfit for open repair who underwent EVAR to a matched cohort who underwent open repair for infrarenal AAAs. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) was queried for patients who underwent EVAR and open infrarenal AAA repair from 2003-2022. Patients that underwent EVAR were included if they were deemed unfit for open repair by the operating surgeon. EVAR patients deemed unfit because of a hostile abdomen were excluded. Patients in both the open and EVAR datasets were excluded if their repair was deemed non-elective or if they had prior aortic surgery. EVAR patients were matched to a cohort of open patients. The primary outcome for this study was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), pulmonary complications, non-home discharge, re-interventions, and 5-year survival. A total of 5,310 EVAR patients were identified who were deemed unfit for open repair. Of those, 3,028 (57.0%) EVAR patients were able to be matched 1:1 to a cohort of open patients. Open patients had higher rates of MACE (20.2% versus 4.4%, P<.001), pulmonary complications (12.8% versus 1.6%, P<.001), non-home discharges (28.5% versus 7.9%, P<.001), and 30-day mortality (4.5% versus 1.4%, P<.001). There were no differences in early survival but open repair had better middle and late survival compared to EVAR over the course of 5 years. A total of 74 (2.4%) EVAR patients had reinterventions during the study period. EVAR patients that required interventions had higher 1-year (40.5%% versus 7.3%, P<.001) and 5-year mortality (43.2% versus 14.1%, P<.001) compared to those that did not require re-interventions. EVAR patients who had reinterventions had higher 1-year (40.5% versus 6.3%, P<.001) and 5-year (43.2% versus 20.3%, P=.006) mortality compared to their matched open cohort. Patients undergoing EVAR for AAAs who are deemed unfit for open repair have better perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to open. However, patients who had an open repair had better middle and late survival over the course of 5 years. The categorization of unfitness for open surgery may be inaccurate and re-evaluation of this terminology/concept should be undertaken.

Endosutured Aneurysm Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Short Necks Achieves Acceptable Midterm Outcomes—Results from the Peru Registry

IntroductionThe study aims to describe midterm outcomes following treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with short necks by endosutured aneurysm repair (ESAR) using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor system. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from nine vascular surgery departments between June 2010 - December 2019, including treated AAAs with neck lengths ≤ 10mm. The decision for the use of EndoAnchors was made by the treating surgeon or multidisciplinary aortic committee according to each centre’s practice. There were two subgroups further assessed according to neck length, A (≥4 and < 7mm) and B (≥7 and ≤10mm). The main outcomes analysed were technical success, freedom from type Ia endoleaks (TIaEL), sac size increase, all-cause (ACM) and aneurysm related mortality (ARM). Results76 patients were included in the study, 17 fell into Subgroup A and 59 into subgroup B. Median follow-up for the cohort was 40.5 (IQR 12-61) months. A median of 6 (IQR 3) EndoAnchors were deployed in each subject. Technical success was 86.8% for the total group, 82.4% and 88.1% (p=0.534) for subgroups A and B respectively. Six out of ten (60%) of TIaELs at the completion angiographies showed spontaneous resolution. Cumulative freedom from TIaEL at 3 and 5 years for the total group was 89% and 84% respectively; this was 93% and 74% for subgroup A and 88% at both intervals in subgroup B (p=0.545). In total, there were 7 (9.2%) patients presenting with type Ia endoleaks over the entire study period. Two (11.8%) in subgroup A and 5 (8.5%) in subgroup B (p=0.679). There were more patients with sac regression in subgroup B (subgroup A=6 - 35.3% versus subgroup B=34 - 57.6%, p=0.230) with no statistical significance. ACM was 19 (25%) patients, with no difference (4 – 23.5% versus 15 – 25.4%, p=0.874) between subgroups; whereas ARM occurred in one patient from subgroup A and 3 from subgroup B. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates reasonable outcomes for patients with short-necked AAAs treated by ESAR in terms of type Ia endoleaks up to 5 year follow up. EndoAnchor use should be judiciously evaluated in short necks and may be a reasonable option when anatomical constraints are encountered, mainly for those with 7-10mm neck lengths. Shorter neck length aspects, as indicated by the results from Group A, may be an alternative when no other options are available or feasible.

Implications and Late Outcomes of Type II Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

ObjectiveType II endoleaks (T2EL) are the most common cause of reintervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). While most resolve spontaneously, the long-term implications of T2EL remain elusive. We aim to evaluate the impact of persistent and late T2EL on clinical outcomes after EVAR. MethodsSingle institution retrospective review of patients who underwent EVAR for degenerative infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and June 2022 with no Type I (T1EL) or III (T3EL) endoleak seen at EVAR completion. Patients were categorized based on T2EL status. Group 1 included patients with never detected or transient T2EL (detected at EVAR completion but not after). Group 2 encompassed persistent T2EL (seen at EVAR completion and again during follow-up) and late T2EL (detected for the first time at any point during follow-up). Time-to-event analysis was conducted using a time-dependent approach to T2EL status. Primary outcomes included freedom from sac enlargement (SE), aneurysm-related reinterventions, and overall survival. Results803 patients met inclusion criteria. Group 1 included 418 patients (52%), of which 85% had no T2EL and 15% had transient T2EL. Group 2 had 385 patients; 23% had persistent T2EL, and 77% developed a new T2EL. Patients in group 1 had a higher prevalence of smoking (88% vs. 83%; p<0.001), COPD (33% vs. 25%; p=0.008), chronic kidney disease (13% vs. 8%; p=0.021) and a higher mean SVS score (7 vs. 6 points; p=0.049). No differences were found in aneurysm diameter or morphology. Mean follow-up was 5 years for the entire cohort. In Group 2, 58 patients (15%) underwent T2EL treatment, most commonly transarterial embolization. At 10 years after EVAR, Group 2 was associated with lower freedom from SE (p<0.001) and AAA-related reinterventions (p<0.001) and comparable overall survival (p=0.42). More T1EL were detected during follow-up in Group 2 (6 [1%] vs. 20 [5%]; p=0.004), with 15 (75%) of these detected at a median of 3 years after the T2EL. No difference between groups was observed in explant (0.7% vs. 2.1%; p=0.130) or aneurysm rupture (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p=0.269) rates. ConclusionOne-half of patients treated with infrarenal EVAR developed persistent/late T2ELs, which are associated with a higher risk of sac enlargement and reinterventions. No difference in overall survival or aneurysm rupture risk was seen at 10 years, based on T2EL status or T2EL intervention. A conservative approach to T2EL may be appropriate for most patients with absent T1EL or T3EL.

Early and midterm outcomes of EVAR with 34 and 36 mm large endograft sizes: A single tertiary center study

Aim: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a preferred method for accessing anatomically suitable abdominal aortic aneurysms in recent years. Advances in techniques and materials have led to the management of more challenging cases. Anatomical difficulties in the structure of the aneurysm neck can adversely affect the success of the procedure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate early and midterm outcomes in patients with wide-necked infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with 34 mm or 36 mm EVAR endografts. Material and Methods: We evaluated infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with 34 mm or 36 mm long EVAR allografts between January 2019 and January 2023 at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic. We included and assessed patients with a neck diameter of 28 mm or greater using follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA). We evaluated early and midterm morbidity and mortality as well as endovascular complications such as endoleak or migration. Results: A total of 58 patients with wide-neck infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent 34 mm or 36 mm EVAR endograft deployment. There was no early mortality. The mean follow-up period was 21.7±6.4 months. Eight patients were found to have endoleaks—four had type 2 endoleaks, two had type 1b endoleaks, one had type 3 endoleak and one had type 1a endoleak. Except for type 2 endoleaks, all patients underwent endovascular reintervention. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the successful application of 34 mm or 36 mm long endografts to patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms with a wide neck diameter. Regarding the midterm outcomes, standard EVAR procedures with large endografts are feasible and have successful outcomes.

Incidence of endoleak type IA in patients undergoing chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR) vs. standard endovascular repair.

Almost half of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures are performed in hostile anatomy, increasing the risk of procedure related complications such as type IA endoleaks, which may be prevented with the chimney technique in EVAR (ChEVAR). Our aim is to describe the differential characteristics between EVAR in favorable anatomy and ChEVAR in hostile necks. A cohort of patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) that were treated with EVAR or ChEVAR were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of type IA endoleak. Secondary outcomes were the rate of chimney occlusion, reintervention, migration, rupture, acute limb ischemia, sac growth, and aneurysm-related mortality during the follow-up period. . With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, 79 patients were treated with EVAR and 21 with ChEVAR. The overall age was 76.49 ± 7.32 years old, and 82% were male. The ChEVAR cohort had a higher prevalence of tobacco use than the EVAR cohort (38.1% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.041), and a shorter neck (7.88 mm ± 5.73 vs 36.28 mm ± 13.73, p<0.001). There were no differences in type IA endoleak incidence between the groups (a single endoleak type IA in the EVAR group, p = 0.309). One patient experienced an asymptomatic chimney occlusion in the ChEVAR group, and another patient required a reintervention due to chimney occlusion. Sac regression and reinterventions were not different between groups. There were no migration, rupture, acute limb ischemia, or aneurysm-related mortality events. . In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, ChEVAR in hostile necks had similar event rates to EVAR in favorable necks.

Hostile neck anatomy contributes to higher rates of reintervention following endovascular aortic repair for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) presenting with hostile neck anatomy can represent a challenge in surgical decision-making. We hypothesized that, patients who require reinterventions have higher rates of compromised neck anatomy at initial presentation and may indicate a need for altered surveillance paradigm. Patients presenting with ruptured AAA to a single tertiary care institution from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Those treated with infrarenal EVAR, with no prior aortic surgeries, and with available pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans were included. Demographics, timing and type of reintervention, follow-up, and survival were collected. CT scans were assessed for hostile neck anatomy via measurements of diameter, length, angle, taper, bulge, calcification, and thrombus. Demographics, comorbidities, and neck anatomy of those with and without reintervention were compared using Fischer's Exact and Student's T-test. Survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. Eighty-nine patients were available for analysis, 37 of which met inclusion criteria. Intraoperative death occurred in 3 patients (8.1%) and 1 patient (2.7%) was intraoperatively converted to an open repair. Thirty-day and 1-year survival were 97% and 91%, respectively. The reintervention rate was 30% (n = 10), occurring at a median of 200days (18-2053days) after the index operation. All patients requiring reintervention met hostile neck criteria (p = .002) and had a statistically higher number of hostile neck criteria (1.80 vs 0.87, p = .03). Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients that received a reintervention had neck diameter greater than 3cm, compared to zero patients in the non-reintervention group (p = .022). Proximal reinterventions (n = 5) had statistically higher neck diameters and neck angle compared to the non-reintervention group. Infrarenal rEVAR is effective at preventing acute mortality despite specific anatomic considerations that may contribute to the higher reintervention rates, and therefore those parameters ought to be considered when following patients in the post-intervention period.

Long-term Costs to Medicare Associated with Endovascular and Open Repairs of Infrarenal and Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

The vast majority of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) undergoing repairs receive endovascular interventions (EVARs) instead of open operations (OARs). Although EVARs have better short-term outcomes, OARs have improved longer-term durability and require less radiographic follow-up and monitoring, which may have significant implications on health care economics surrounding provision of AAA care nationally. Herein, we compared costs associated with EVAR and OAR of both infrarenal and complex AAAs. We examined patients undergoing index elective EVARs or OARs of infrarenal and complex AAAs in the 2014-2019 Vascular Quality Initiative-Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VQI-VISION) dataset. We defined overall costs as the aggregated longitudinal costs associated with: (1) the index surgery; (2) reinterventions; and (3) imaging tests. We evaluated overall costs up to 5 years after infrarenal AAA repair and 3 years for complex AAA repair. Multivariable regressions adjusted for case-mix when evaluating cost differences between EVARs vs OARs. We identified 23,746 infrarenal AAA repairs (8.7% OAR, 91% EVAR) and 2279 complex AAA repairs (69% OAR, 31% EVAR). In both cohorts, patients undergoing EVARs were more likely to be older and have more comorbidities. The cost for the index procedure for EVARs relative to OARs was lower for infrarenal AAAs ($32,440 vs $37,488; P< .01) but higher among complex AAAs ($48,870 vs $44,530; P< .01). EVARs had higher annual imaging and reintervention costs during each of the 5 postoperative years for infrarenal aneurysms and the 3 postoperative years for complex aneurysms. Among patients undergoing infrarenal AAA repairs who survived 5 years, the total 5-year cost of EVARs was similar to that of OARs ($35,858 vs $34,212;-$223 [95% confidence interval (CI),-$3042 to $2596]). For complex AAA repairs, the total cost at 3 years of EVARs was greater than OARs ($64,492 vs $42,212;+$9860 [95% CI, $5835-$13,885]). For patients receiving EVARs for complex aneurysms, physician-modified endovascular grafts had higher index procedure costs ($55,835 vs $47,064; P< .01) although similar total costs on adjusted analyses (+$1856 [95% CI,-$7997 to $11,710]; P= .70) relative to Zenith fenestrated endovascular grafts among those that were alive at 3 years. Longer-term costs associated with EVARs are lower for infrarenal AAAs but higher for complex AAAs relative to OARs, driven by reintervention and imaging costs. Further analyses to characterize the financial viability of EVARs for both infrarenal and complex AAAs should evaluate hospital margins and anticipated changes in costs of devices.

Long Term Outcomes of the Gore Excluder Low Permeability Endoprosthesis for the Treatment of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms

This study evaluated the long term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair using the Gore Excluder Low Permeability (LP) endoprosthesis across high volume Dutch hospitals. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients treated with the Excluder LP for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in four hospitals between 2004 - 2017. Primary outcomes were overall survival, freedom from re-interventions (overall, inside/outside instructions for use, IFU), and AAA sac dynamics: growth (> 5 mm), stabilisation, and regression (< 5 mm). Secondary outcomes were technical success (device deployment), procedural parameters, and re-interventions. Follow up visits were extracted from patient files, with imaging assessed for complications and AAA diameter. A total of 514 patients were enrolled, with a median (IQR) follow up of 5.0 (2.9, 6.9) years. Survival rates were 94.0% at 1 year, 73.0% at 5 years, and 37.0% at 10 years of follow up, with freedom from re-interventions of 89.0%, 79.0%, and 71.0%, respectively. Treatment outside IFU was 37.9%, leading to significantly more re-interventions over 10 years compared with inside IFU (36.0% vs. 25.0%, respectively; p = .044). The aneurysm sac regressed by 53.5% at 1 year, 65.8% at 5 years, and 77.8% at 10 years, and grew by 9.8%, 14.3%, and 22.2%, respectively. Patients with 1 year sac growth had significantly worse survival (p = .047). Seven patients (1.4%) had a ruptured aneurysm during follow up. Over 15 years, endoleak type 1a occurred in 5.3%, type 1b in 3.1%, type 3 in 1.9%, type 4 in 0.2%, and type 2 in 35.6% of patients. This multicentre study of real-world endovascular aneurysm repair data utilising the Gore Excluder LP endoprosthesis demonstrated robust long term survival and re-intervention rates, despite 37.9% of patients being treated outside IFU, with type 4 endoleak being rare. Treatment outside IFU significantly increased re-intervention rates and 1 year sac growth was associated with statistically significantly worse survival.

Follow-up compliance in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at Veterans Affairs hospitals

ObjectiveThe Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend annual imaging surveillance following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and every 5 years following open surgical repairs (OSR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Adherence to these guidelines is low outside of clinical trials, and compliance at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals is not yet well-established. We examined imaging follow-up compliance and mortality rates after AAA repair at VA hospitals. MethodsWe queried the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for elective infrarenal AAA repairs, EVAR and OSR, then merged in follow-up imaging and mortality information. Mortality rate over time was derived using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Generalized estimating equation with a logit link and a sandwich standard error estimate was performed to compare the probability of having annual follow-up imaging over time between procedure types and to identify variables associated with follow-up imaging for EVAR patients. ResultsOur analysis included 11,668 patients who underwent EVAR and 4507 patients who underwent OSR at VA hospitals between the years 2000 and 2019. The 30-day mortality rate for EVAR and OSR was 0.37% and 0.82%, respectively. OSR was associated with lower long-term mortality after adjusting age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and preoperative renal failure with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.92; P < .01). Of surviving patients, the follow-up imaging rate was 69.1% by 1 year post-EVAR. The follow-up rate after 5 years was 45.6% post-EVAR compared with 63.6% post-OSR of surviving patients. A history of smoking or drinking, baseline hypertension, and known cardiac disease were independently associated with poor follow-up after EVAR. ConclusionsPatients undergoing elective open AAA repair in the VA hospital system had lower long-term mortality compared with patients who underwent endovascular repair. Compliance with post-EVAR imaging is low. Patient factors associated with poor post-EVAR imaging surveillance were smoking within the last year, excess alcohol consumption, and cardiac risk factors including hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair Within and Outside the Instructions for Use in Korean Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been used worldwide to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Outcomes after EVAR within and outside the instruction for use (IFU) remain controversial. We analyzed long-term outcomes of EVAR within-the-IFU compared with that outside-the-IFU and baseline clinical/anatomical characteristics that influence outcomes of EVAR. The study included 546 patients who underwent EVAR for infrarenal AAA from 1997 to 2021 at 2 Korean medical centers. The primary endpoint was graft-related adverse events (GRAEs), including type 1 or 3 endoleak, reintervention (included open conversion), aneurysm sac enlargement, aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), rupture, stent-graft migration, and stent thrombotic occlusion. The patients who underwent EVAR outside the IFU were 287 (52.6%). A neck angle of >60° was most common outside the IFU criteria (n=146, 50.9%). This study revealed that patients outside the IFU had a higher rate of GRAEs compared with patients within the IFU (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.879; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.045-2.386). A neck angle of >60° was a significant risk factor for GRAEs (adjusted HR: 2.229; 95% CI: 1.418-3.503), type 1 or 3 endoleak (adjusted HR: 2.640; 95% CI: 1.343-5.189), and reintervention (adjusted HR: 1.891; 95% CI: 1.055-3.388). Our study revealed EVAR with outside the IFU was associated with increased GRAEs, mainly attributed to endoleak and ARM, compared with EVAR with within the IFU. In addition, severe neck angulation was an independent risk factor for GRAEs, type 1 or 3 endoleak, and reintervention. Our study revealed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with outside-the-instruction for use (IFU) was associated with increased graft-related adverse events (GRAEs) compared with EVAR with within-the-IFU. In the low-risk population, the incidence of GRAEs and Aneurysm related mortality were higher in the outside-the-IFU group rather than within-the-IFU group. In addition, severe neck angulation was an independent risk factor for GRAEs, type 1 or 3 endoleak and reintervention.

Results of the Italian Collaborators for Evar Registry on Acute Kidney Injury After Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

To analyze the incidence and predictive factors of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in a large recent, multicenter cohort. This is a multicenter, retrospective, financially unsupported physician-initiated observational cohort study. Between January 2018 and March 2021, only patients treated with elective standard EVAR for infrarenal non-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm were analyzed. Patients already on hemodialysis (HD) were excluded. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or an increase in sCr to ≥1.5 times baseline known or presumed to have occurred within 7 days, or a urine volume of <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. Primary outcomes of interest were AKI incidence at 30 days and freedom from HD at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were freedom from severe postoperative complication, and freedom from aorta-related mortality (ARM) at 1 year. The final cohort analyzed 526 (29.8%). There were 489 (93%) males and 37 (7%) females: the median age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-81). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 86 (16.3%) patients. Early mortality was observed in 8 (1.5%) patients, none was aorta-related. Complication rate was 17.1% (n=89). AKI was observed in 17 (3.2%). Renal replacement therapy was needed in 4 (0.8%). HD was transitory in 2 cases and definitive in 1. Binary logistic regression analysis identified CKD (odds ratio [OR]: 4.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.10-10.45, p<0.001), and the presence of renal artery stenosis (OR: 3.80, 95% CI: 1.35-10.66, p=0.011) to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Estimated freedom from ARM was 94.9% at 1 year. Estimated freedom from HD rate at 1 year was 94%: This was significantly different between patients with preoperative CKD and those who did not have preoperative CKD (log-rank, p=0.042). AKI after elective standard EVAR still occurs but with an acceptably low incidence rate. Preoperative CKD is the most important predictor for postoperative AKI, which was not associated with the need for HD at 1-year follow-up but with a higher propensity of mortality. This "real world" experience confirm that EVAR performed with standard contrats agent protocol remains safe for acute kidney injury development. Therefore, only patients presenting with preoperative borderline or ascertained chronic kidney disease will take the most advantage from the use of carbon dioxide contrast.

Chronic hypertension in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery. Multivariate analysis

Background and objectives: Chronic hypertension has a higher incidence in the perioperative setting. It increases the risk of complications like acute hypertension, bleeding, myocardial ischemia, and stroke. Perioperative management of these patients during vascular surgery could be challenging because of the additional co-morbidities like diabetes mellitus, vasculopathy, and cardiac disease. For these reasons, we conducted a retrospective study to observe the complications and mortality associated with chronic hypertension during vascular surgery. Materials and methods: After ethical committee approval we retrospectively review medical records of patients undergone abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery. Age, sex, ASA physical status, chronic hypertension (controlled or uncontrolled), type of surgery (open or endovascular; scheduled or urgent), anesthesia type, postoperative complications (acute hypertension, bleeding, acute renal failure, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrest) and mortality were recorded. A multivariate analysis of chronic hypertension, postoperative complications, and mortality was conducted using SPSS Software. A p - value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Our study included 544 patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair surgery. Ninety-four percent of patients were men, mean age of 72 years old, and 67% were ASA III and IV. Seventy-three percent of patients presented chronic hypertension with appropriate control defined as the lack of target organ damage and previous complications related to hypertension in 83% of these patients. Endovascular surgery was performed in 44% and open procedure in 56% of patients. Elective surgery was carried out in 83% and urgent surgery in 17% of patients. General anesthesia was performed in 73% (combined general anesthesia with epidural analgesia in 36%) and regional anesthesia in 27% of cases. Controlled chronic hypertension was not associated with postoperative complications (CI 95% 0,581-2,982 p 0,510) and mortality (1-year mortality CI 95% 0,786-5,240 p 0,144; 2-year mortality CI 95% 0,655-3,845 p 0,306). Discussion: Chronic hypertension is largely considered a risk factor for perioperative complications of AAA repair. Conversely, our results suggest that adequate control of chronic hypertension before AAA repair leads to a low incidence of postoperative complications as well as 1 and 2-year mortality rates.

Survival, Short And Long-Term Outcomes Of Open And Endovascular Surgical Repair Of Unruptured Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR) has become the standard management of Unruptured Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (UIAAA); however, current evidence is limited and uncertain in our environment compared to Open repair. Our study aimed to determine the survival, short and long-term outcomes of EVAR vs. Open in a Peruvian cohort of UIAAA. A single-center observational, analytical, longitudinal study using a retrospective registry of 251 patients treated (EVAR=205 vs Open=46) for UIAAA from 2000 to 2017. Variables considered were baseline, comorbidities, type of treatment, short-term (<30 days) and long-term (<5 years) outcomes, postoperative mortality according to the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Risk Score, survival curves including reoperation-free rate and according to size (<65 mm vs. >65 mm) of long-term UIAAA. All variables were grouped according to the treatment performed (EVAR vs. Open) and we used the descriptive, multivariate, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival statistical analyses. 251 UIAAA were evaluated and the mean age was 74.5 years [±13.32], smoking, family members with UIAAA, and previous abdominal surgery were the main antecedents. Diabetes mellitus 2 was the main comorbidity; more than 50% of patients with UIAAA had diameters greater than 65 mm (p=0.021). The calculated mortality (VQI) was Open=2.21% vs. EVAR=1.65%. The outcomes in short-term were mortality (Open=2.92% vs. EVAR=0%; p=0.039), blood transfusion >4 Units (Open=72.68% vs. EVAR=17.39%; p=0.021) and overall hospital stay (Open=14 vs. EVAR=5 days; p=0.049. A reduction in mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.62-0.96, p=0.045) and readmission for aneurysmal rupture was identified for EVAR (HR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.79-0.85, p=0.031). In long-term outcomes, mortality (Open=3.41% vs. EVAR=19.56%; p=0.047), aneurysmal rupture (Open=0% vs. EVAR 13.04%; p=0.032) and reinterventions (Open=2.43% vs. EVAR=10.86%; p=0.002). An 86% risk of mortality (HR 1.86, 95% CI, 1.32-2.38, p=0.039) and elevated risk of readmission for aneurysmal rupture was identified for EVAR (HR 2.21, 95% CI, 1.98-2.45, p=0.028). At 5 years, survival for Open=93.67% vs. EVAR=80.44% (p=0.043), reintervention-free survival for Open=89.26% vs. EVAR=47.82% (p=0.021), survival for treated IUAAA <65 mm for Open=95.77% vs. EVAR=63.63% (p=0.019) and >65 mm for Open=92.53% vs. EVAR=85.71% (p=0.059). EVAR has shown better short-term benefits and survival than Open management; however, the latter still prevails in the long term in our Peruvian UIAAA cohort. Further follow-up studies are required to demonstrate the long-term benefit of EVAR in our population.