Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

A Review of Type III Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma and the Importance of Early Detection of Gastric Cancer

A Review of Type III Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma and the Importance of Early Detection of Gastric Cancer

Abstract PO1-18-06: Phase 1/2a Open-label Clinical Trial of BI-1607, an Fc Engineered Monoclonal Antibody to CD32b (FcγRIIB), in Combination with Trastuzumab in Subjects with HER2-positive Advanced Solid Tumors – CONTRAST

Abstract Background The introduction of trastuzumab has dramatically changed outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) cancer. However, primary or acquired resistance to trastuzumab has been increasingly recognized as a major obstacle in the clinical management of this disease. Combination of anti-HER2 antibodies with other immunotherapies is likely to improve the quantity and quality of responses. BI-1607 is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting FcRIIB (CD32b) with antagonistic function capable of blocking the inhibitory function of FcRIIB on immune effector cells. BI-1607 has been engineered to lack a glycan in position N297Q in the constant domain (Fc), and thus cannot interact with FcγRs through its Fc. Given its high specificity and affinity for FcγRIIB, BI-1607 blocks other antibodies’ binding to FcγRIIB. As a result, BI-1607 is expected to shift tumor cells coated antibodies (here anti-HER2) to selectively engage activating FcγRs, thus augmenting FcγR-dependent therapeutic activity (ADDC, ADCP). Tumor-associated macrophages express high levels of FcγRIIB and are a major target of BI-1607 in the tumor microenvironment. This concept was demonstrated in preclinical in vivo models showing increased efficacy of the combination therapy with the murine surrogate of BI-1607 and an anti-HER2, an anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), and an anti-CD20 (rituximab) as compared to monotherapy. It important to note that BI-1607 will have no single-agent activity. Instead, its clinical use will be in combination with other immunotherapies and tumor-targeting antibodies such as trastuzumab. The choice of trastuzumab as the combination agent in this trial was based on promising preclinical studies, a recognized need for additional options for those patients who fail to respond or stop responding to trastuzumab, and promising results from the newly approved Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb margetuximab. Ultimately, if shown to be safe and effective in combination with trastuzumab, BI-1607 can also be used in combination with other cytotoxic or immunomodulatory antibodies for cancer treatment. Methods This is a Phase 1/2a, first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, consecutive-cohort study of BI-1607 in combination with trastuzumab in subjects with HER2+ advanced solid tumors. Phase 1 aims to assess safety and tolerability and to determine the RP2D of BI-1607 in combination with trastuzumab. Phase 2a will explore efficacy at RP2D of BI-1607 in combination with trastuzumab in two separate expansion cohorts, a) in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and b) in subjects with HER2+ metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Eligible patents must have a HER2+ locally advanced unresectable or metastatic solid tumors and have received standard of care or be intolerant to standard of care antineoplastic therapy, with progressive disease after the last line of treatment. Accrual/Planned Accrual As of June 222d, 2023 10 patients have been treated into trial and dosed with BI-1607 and trastuzumab at doses from 75-900 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) in Phase 1. Phase 2a will enroll 15 subjects each in two cohorts of HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer or HER2+ gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma respectively. For information regarding the study, please contact: anna.ropenga@bioinvent.com Citation Format: Javier Cortés, Araceli Priego, Elena Garralda Cabanas, Katerin Rojas Lamito, Simon Lord, Thorsten Goetze, Sherko Küemmel, Simon Crabb, Marie Borggren, Ingrid Karlsson, Linda Mårtensson, Anna Ropenga, Ingrid Teige, Johan Wallin, Björn Frendeus, Andres McAllister. Phase 1/2a Open-label Clinical Trial of BI-1607, an Fc Engineered Monoclonal Antibody to CD32b (FcγRIIB), in Combination with Trastuzumab in Subjects with HER2-positive Advanced Solid Tumors – CONTRAST [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-18-06.

68Ga-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/CT and laparoscopy for the diagnosis of occult peritoneal metastasis in newly diagnosed locally advanced gastric cancer: study protocol of a single-centre prospective cohort study

IntroductionAccurate baseline clinical staging is critical to inform treatment decision-making for patients with gastric cancers. Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most common form of metastasis in gastric cancer and mainly...

Effect of anti-claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody zolbetuximab alone or combined with chemotherapy or programmed cell death-1 blockade in syngeneic and xenograft gastric cancer models

The development of targeted cancer therapies based on monoclonal antibodies against tumor-associated antigens has progressed markedly over recent decades. This approach is dependent on the identification of tumor-specific, normal tissue-sparing antigenic targets. The transmembrane protein claudin-18 splice variant 2 (CLDN18.2) is frequently and preferentially displayed on the surface of primary gastric adenocarcinomas, making it a promising monoclonal antibody target. Phase 3 studies of zolbetuximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2, combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in advanced or metastatic first-line gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma have demonstrated favorable clinical results with zolbetuximab. In studies using xenograft or syngeneic models with gastric cancer cell lines, zolbetuximab mediated death of CLDN18.2-positive human cancer cell lines via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro and demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy in vivo. Mice treated with zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy displayed a significantly higher frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells versus vehicle/isotype control-treated mice. Furthermore, zolbetuximab combined with an anti-mouse programmed cell death-1 antibody more potently inhibited tumor growth compared with either agent alone. These results support the potential of zolbetuximab as a novel treatment option for G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Patients suffering from locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma often face a high postoperative recurrence rate. Despite aggressive treatment, less than 50% survive beyond five years. Ongoing clinical studies are exploring ways to prolong patient survival, revealing that perioperative chemotherapy can extend both the period of recurrence-free survival and overall survival for this group of patients. Currently, combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a critical treatment approach for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, the effectiveness of this approach in locally advanced patients remains unverified. This article delves into the latest research concerning the use of perioperative chemotherapy coupled with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treatment, and highlights prospective challenges and discusses how to best identify patients who may benefit from combined chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Abstract CT104: Results from a phase 1 study of the anti-immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 (ILT4) monoclonal antibody MK-4830 plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background: In the dose escalation phase of a first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT03564691), the anti-ILT4 IgG4 monoclonal antibody MK-4830 + pembrolizumab (pembro) had a manageable safety profile and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced solid tumors, including those with PD on immunotherapy. Here, we present safety, efficacy, and biomarker analyses for MK-4830 + pembro for the previously treated pancreatic adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and gastric cancer cohorts of the expansion phase. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥18 y with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 1-3 lines of prior therapy (cohort A), unresectable glioblastoma and 1 prior line of therapy (cohort B), recurrent or metastatic HNSCC that progressed on a platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitor (cohort C), or recurrent or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma that progressed on ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens (cohort I). Pts in cohorts A, B, and I had not previously received a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. All pts received MK-4830 800 mg + pembro 200 mg Q3W for 35 cycles or until PD, unacceptable toxicity, or study withdrawal. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and ORR per RECIST v1.1 (cohorts A, C, and I) or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (cohort B) by investigator assessment. Exploratory objectives included evaluating DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 (cohorts A, C, and I) or RANO criteria (cohort B) by investigator assessment. Results: At data cut-off (September 27, 2023), 33 pts were enrolled and received treatment in cohort A, 20 pts in cohort B, 35 pts in cohort C, and 35 pts in cohort I. Median follow-up duration was 38.4 mo (range, 35.5-39.9) in cohort A, 34.1 mo (32.3-36.2) in cohort B, 37.5 mo (33.4-42.1) in cohort C, and 29.5 mo (22.3-36.4) in cohort I. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 pts (45%) in cohort A, 13 pts (65%) in cohort B, 19 pts (54%) in cohort C, and 16 pts (46%) in cohort I; grade 3 or 4 TRAEs occurred in 3 pts (9%), 0 pts, 2 pts (6%), and 4 pts (11%), respectively. No deaths due to TRAEs occurred. ORR was 6% (95% CI, 1-20) in cohort A, 5% (0-25) in cohort B, 0% (0-10) in cohort C, and 20% (8-37) in cohort I. Median DOR was 14.3 mo (range, 14.0-14.7) in cohort A, 7.4 mo (7.4-7.4) in cohort B, and 9.6 mo (3.0-27.6+) in cohort I. Median PFS was 1.9 mo (95% CI, 1.6-2.0) in cohort A, 1.2 mo (1.1-1.4) in cohort B, 2.2 mo (1.9-4.1) in cohort C, and 1.4 mo (1.3-3.0) in cohort I. Conclusions: In pts with select previously treated advanced or metastatic solid tumors, MK-4830 + pembro had a manageable AE profile but no significant antitumor activity beyond that historically observed with pembro monotherapy. Other treatment options must be explored for these difficult-to-treat tumors. Citation Format: Lillian L. Siu, Marta Gil-Martin, Byoung Chul Cho, Ruth Perets, John Hilton, Ravit Geva, Iwona Lugowska, Martin Gutierrez, Marcelo Bonomi, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Drew Rasco, Eytan Ben-Ami, Cristina P. Rodriguez, Shabana Siddiqi, Nicole Myer, Leah Suttner, Douglas Wilson, Ombololaji O. Akala, Maria de Miguel. Results from a phase 1 study of the anti-immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 (ILT4) monoclonal antibody MK-4830 plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT104.

Abstract LB417: Leveraging advanced human lung models to explore mechanisms underlying T-DXd-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD)

Abstract Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for several indications, including HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer that progressed on two or more prior therapies, HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have received a prior trastuzumab-based regimen and HER2-mutant unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (USPI-ENH-C9-1122-r006). While the safety profile of T-DXd is manageable, ILD is an important identified risk and considered as an Adverse Event (AE) of special interest (Powell et al ESMO Open 2022). The therapeutic options for patients that develop ILD are limited to steroid medications, including prednisone and methylprednisolone. Hence, a greater understanding of T-DXd-associated ILD pathophysiology has the potential to guide alternative interventions to prevent ILD progression and improve patient care. Here, we used advanced human lung models to explore if T-DXd can affect pulmonary epithelial cell homeostasis and function. Transcriptome and gene set enrichment analysis of bronchial epithelial cells cultured under air-liquid interface (ALI) conditions revealed that genes and pathways associated with senescence, inflammation, and barrier integrity were dysregulated upon treatment with T-DXd. These transcriptomic findings linked to senescence and inflammation were confirmed in follow-up ALI experiments where T-DXd was shown to activate the p53 pathway, and upregulate pro-senescence, -inflammatory and -fibrotic mediators. Similarly, T-DXd activated senescence- and inflammation-associated markers in a microphysiological alveolar lung-on-chip system, thus indicating that T-DXd has similar effects in alveoli epithelia. In addition, T-DXd induced epithelial injury of ALI cells, which was reflected by loss of barrier function and release of epithelial damage markers. These changes were also accompanied by upregulation of mesenchymal cell markers, suggesting cells transition to a partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotype. Whereas the payload (deruxtecan; DXd) and IgG control antibody-DXd conjugate (IgG-DXd) could recapitulate effects measured with T-DXd on lung epithelial cells, trastuzumab did not have any effect, suggesting limited contribution of HER2 targeting to T-DXd-induced epithelial changes in the experimental models used. Altogether, these data demonstrate that DXd can drive epithelial mechanisms and pathways associated with pulmonary fibrosis, inflammation, and damage, which are dysregulated events observed in ILD. Ongoing studies aim to evaluate the translation of these discoveries to the clinic and to support the development of novel therapeutic strategies to manage or prevent ILD. Citation Format: Ingrid Lua, Lin Jia, Jeff Chen, Kevin Contrepois, Mary McFarlane, Anton I. Rosenbaum, Peter Newham, Sonia Terrillon. Leveraging advanced human lung models to explore mechanisms underlying T-DXd-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB417.

FOLFIRI Plus Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric or gastrooesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited. To determine the efficacy of 1 or 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) in the treatment of advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial is a randomized, multicenter, noncomparative, phase 2 trial, conducted from August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, at 37 centers in France that included patients with advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had disease progression after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 [PD-L1]) (FD arm) or FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) (FDT arm). The efficacy analyses used a clinical cutoff date of January 9, 2023. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months according to RECIST 1.1 criteria evaluated by investigators. Overall, between August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, 96 patients were randomized (48 in each arm). The median age was 59.7 years, 28 patients (30.4%) were women and 49 (53.3%) had GEJ tumors. Four month PFS was 44.7% (90% CI, 32.3-57.7) and 55.6% (90% CI, 42.3-68.3) in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. The primary end point was not met. Median PFS was 3.8 and 5.4 months, objective response rates were 34.7% and 37.7%, and median overall survival was 13.2 and 9.5 months in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Disease control beyond 1 year was 14.9% in the FD arm and 24.4% in the FDT arm. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 22 (47.8%) patients in each arm. A combined positive score (CPS) PD-L1 of 5 or higher was observed in 18 tumors (34.0%) and a tumor proportion score (TPS) PD-L1 of 1% or higher in 13 tumors (24.5%). Median PFS according to CPS PD-L1 was similar (3.6 months for PD-L1 CPS ≥5 vs 5.4 months for PD-L1 CPS <5) by contrast for TPS PD-L1 (6.0 months for PD-L1 TPS ≥1% vs 3.8 months for PD-L1 TPS <1%). Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with FOLFIRI in second-line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma showed an acceptable safety profile but antitumor activity only in a subgroup of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959293.

The impact of the length of proximal margin on the prognosis of adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction and strategies:A real-world study

BackgroundThe optimal proximal margin (PM) length for Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the optimal PM length using an abdominal approach to guide surgical decision-making. MethodsA prospective study analyzed 304 consecutive patients diagnosed with Siewert II/III AEJ between January 2019 and December 2021. Total gastrectomy was performed via the abdominal approach, and PM length was measured on fixed gross specimens. X-Tile software determined the optimal PM cut-point based on progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics across PM groups, while survival analyses utilized Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards regression for assessing the impact of margin length on survival. Multivariable analyses were conducted to adjust for confounding variables. ResultsThe study included 264 AEJ cases classified as Siewert II (71.97%) or III (28.03%). The median gross PM length was 1.0 cm (IQR: 0.5 cm–1.5 cm, range: 0 cm–6 cm). PM length ≥1.2 cm was associated with a lower risk of disease progression compared to PM length 0.4 cm on PFS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.20–0.84, P = 0.015). Moreover, PM ≥ 1.2 cm improved prognosis in subgroups of T4 or N3, tumor size <4 cm, Siewert II, and Lauren classification. ConclusionsFor Siewert type II/III AEJ, a proximal margin length ≥1.2 cm (1.65 cm in situ) is associated with improved outcomes. These findings offer valuable insights into the association between PM length and outcomes in Siewert II/III AEJ, providing guidance for surgical approaches and aiding clinical decision-making to enhance patient outcomes.

Chemotherapy Plus Atezolizumab Pre- and Post-Resection in Localized Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas: A Phase I/II Single-Arm Study.

Efforts to improve the prognosis for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma have focused on neoadjuvant approaches to increase the pathological complete response (pathCR) rate, improve surgical resection, and prolong event-free and overall survival (OS). Building on the recent evidence that PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy improves the OS of patients with metastatic GEJ adenocarcinoma, we evaluated whether the application of this strategy in the neoadjuvant setting would improve the pathological response. This single-center phase I/II trial evaluated the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of neoadjuvant atezolizumab with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX) followed by esophagectomy followed by atezolizumab. The primary objective goal was to achieve 20% pathCR. From the twenty enrolled patients, eighteen underwent resection and two (10%, 95% CI: 1.24-31.7%) achieved pathCR. After a median follow-up duration of 40.7 months, 11 patients had disease recurrence and 10 had died. The median disease-free and OS were 28.8 (95% CI: 14.7, NA) and 38.6 months (95% CI: 30.5, NA), respectively. No treatment-related adverse events led to death. Although modified FOLFOX plus atezolizumab did not achieve the expected pathCR, an acceptable safety profile was observed. Our results support the continued development of a more refined strategy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus perioperative immunotherapy/targeted agents) with molecular/immune profiling in parallel.

A prospective phase II clinical trial of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

To investigate the safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy (NCCT) and surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients diagnosed as locally advanced GC or Siewert II/III GEJ adenocarcinoma with clinical stage T3-4 and/or N positive were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent NCRT (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent S-1, followed by NCCT (4 to 6 cycles of the SOX regimen) 2 to 4 weeks after NCRT. Gastric cancer radical resection with D2 lymph node dissection was performed 4 to 6 weeks after the total neoadjuvant therapy. The study was conducted from November 2019 to January 2023, enrolling a total of 46 patients. During the NCRT, all patients completed the treatment without dose reduction or delay. During the NCCT, 32 patients (69.6%) completed at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3 or higher adverse events in NCRT (5 cases) were non-hematological. During the course of NCCT, a notable occurrence of hematological toxicities was observed, with grade 3 or higher leukopenia (9.7%) and thrombocytopenia (12.2%) being experienced. A total of 28 patients (60.9%) underwent surgery, achieving R0 resection in all cases. A significant proportion of cases (71.4%) exhibited pathological downstaging to ypT0-2, while 10 patients (35.7%) demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR). The total neoadjuvant therapy comprising NCRT followed by NCCT and surgery demonstrates a low severe adverse reactions and promising efficacy, which could be considered as a viable treatment for locally advanced GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT04062058); the full date of first trial registration was 20/08/2019.

First-line camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus apatinib (an VEGFR-2 inhibitor) and chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (SPACE): a phase 1 study

Patients with advanced gastric cancer typically face a grim prognosis. This phase 1a (dose escalation) and phase 1b (dose expansion) study investigated safety and efficacy of first-line camrelizumab plus apatinib and chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoints included maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1a and objective response rate (ORR) across phase 1a and 1b. Phase 1a tested three dose regimens of camrelizumab, apatinib, oxaliplatin, and S-1. Dose regimen 1: camrelizumab 200 mg on day 1, apatinib 250 mg every other day, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 40 mg twice a day on days 1–14. Dose regimen 2: same as dose regimen 1, but oxaliplatin 130 mg/m². Dose regimen 3: same as dose regimen 2, but apatinib 250 mg daily. Thirty-four patients were included (9 in phase 1a, 25 in phase 1b). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred so no MTD was identified. Dose 3 was set for the recommended phase 2 doses and administered in phase 1b. The confirmed ORR was 76.5% (95% CI 58.8–89.3). The median progression-free survival was 8.4 months (95% CI 5.9-not evaluable [NE]), and the median overall survival (OS) was not mature (11.6-NE). Ten patients underwent surgery after treatment and the multidisciplinary team evaluation. Among 24 patients without surgery, the median OS was 19.6 months (7.8-NE). Eighteen patients (52.9%) developed grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Camrelizumab plus apatinib and chemotherapy showed favorable clinical outcomes and manageable safety for untreated advanced gastric cancer (ChiCTR2000034109).

Abstract 2535: Development of Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx as a clinical trial assay for the clinical development of anti-claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody osemitamab (TST001) in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

Abstract Clone 14G11 is a mouse anti-Claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody developed by Transcenta. The antibody was generated against a linear epitope located on the extracellular domain of loop1 and has a binding site that overlaps with the binding site of therapeutic antibody Osemitamab. It was selected to further develop for the detection of Claudin 18.2 expression in human cancer. Agilent Technologies, Inc. is developing Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx as an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay for the detection of Claudin 18.2 protein in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in support of clinical studies conducted by Transcenta Therapeutics. Analytical verification for Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx included sensitivity, specificity, and precision assessment. Testing was performed on human formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) gastric and GEJ tissues using Autostainer Link 48 with EnVision FLEX visualization system. Biomarker expression was evaluated using Tumor Proportion Score (TPS). TPS is defined as the percentage of viable invasive tumor cells that exhibit convincing partial or complete membrane staining at any intensity. Sensitivity testing of 102 commercially procured FFPE gastric/GEJ specimens demonstrated a broad dynamic range of Claudin 18.2 positivity that covered TPS from 0% to 100%. Specificity tests confirmed specific targeting of the Claudin 18.2 protein in a variety of normal and abnormal tissues. For laboratory precision testing, which evaluated the assay variability in relation to run, instrument, operator, and reagent lot, ≥ 95% of TPS values were within expected variability limits for each parameter. For observer precision testing, two-sided 95% confidence intervals were ≥ 85% for negative, positive, and overall agreements when assessing two clinical cutoffs. These results demonstrated the Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx assay can provide reliable and reproducible results in day-to-day testing. Analytical verification testing indicates Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx is a sensitive, specific, and precise assay for detecting Claudin 18.2 in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx for Investigational Use Only/for Performance Evaluation Only will be used for patient selection in the upcoming phase III trial of gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma where applicable ethics committee and regulatory approvals have been granted. Citation Format: Hayley Alderson, Katie Lefley, Lesly Fregoso, Achintya Bharadwaj, Dan Castellanos-McKenney, Siena Tabuena-Frolli, Donna Kell, Xinlai Yao, Xueming Qian, Li Xu, Caroline Germa, Emin Oroudjev. Development of Claudin 18.2 IHC 14G11 pharmDx as a clinical trial assay for the clinical development of anti-claudin 18.2 monoclonal antibody osemitamab (TST001) in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2535.

Abstract 6400: Tislelizumab combined with XELOX as a neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas: A prospective, phase II trial

Abstract Background: Combing anti-PD-(L)1 antibody with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy of gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinomas is a promising strategy, but clinical data are remain insufficient. Whether immunotherapy biomarkers in previous studies (TMB, MSI, PD-L1, etc.) have equivalent predictive value for G/GEJ remains to be verified. In this phase II clinical trial of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy, potential therapy-related biomarkers in tumor samples, and changes in the tumor microenvironment during treatment were analyzed, and a predictive model for efficacy was developed. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase II trial. Patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinomas (stage cT3-4aN+M0) were treated with PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab in combination with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) as neoadjuvant treatment for 2 or 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR). The secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, and safety. Tumor samples underwent RNA-sequencing (Amoy Diagnostics Co Ltd, Xiamen, China), to identify potential biomarkers, and a predictive model was developed to explore factors influencing tumor response and survival. Results: 28 patients were enrolled; mean age was 59.5 years (SD = 8.2), 19 (67.9%) patients were male; 14 (50.0%) patients with primary tumor location in the stomach, and 14 (50.0%) patients with primary tumor location in the GEJ. All patients were EB virus negative. Except one patient with PMS2 loss, 27 patients were pMMR. Nine (32.1%) patients achieved MPR after treatment, with four (14.3%) of them achieved pCR. The R0 resection rate was 96.4%, with 14 (50.0%) patients achieved objective response. No serious adverse events were reported. The most common grade 2 TRAEs during neoadjuvant treatment were anemia (5 of 28, 17.86%) and nausea (3 of 28, 10.71%). Analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed enrichment of the antigen processing and presentation pathway in the MPR group, while the TGF-β signaling pathway was enriched in the non-MPR group. Notably, the differential immune microenvironment analysis also uncovered significant differences in the TGF-β signature between the MPR and non-MPR groups. Additionally, a therapeutic response prediction model (HT score) was developed with an AUC of 0.98 (0.932-1) in the training set, and its performance was validated in publicly available datasets. Conclusion: Tislelizumab combined with XELOX holds promise as a neoadjuvant therapy for resectable G/GEJ adenocarcinomas, especially for EBV- and pMMR population, offering a well-tolerated safety profile. Moreover, the HT score has the potential to predict treatment efficacy in this regimen. Trial registration numbers: NCT05507658 and NCT05508399. Citation Format: Haikun Zhou, Tao Han, Lei Tuo, Qingchuan Yang, Ruiqi Gao, Pengfei Yu, Jiangpeng Wei, Changbin Zhu, Jin Wang, Peng Cheng, Xiang Kang, Sihui Pi, Hui Liu, Xiaoxi Pan, Xiaohua Li, Gang Ji. Tislelizumab combined with XELOX as a neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas: A prospective, phase II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6400.

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is an optimal option for second-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

The development of programmed cell death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-L1) have offered new treatment options for several cancers, but the clinical benefit of tislelizumab in the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is still murky. Thus, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with GEJ cancer. In this study, 90 GEJ patients were retrospectively enrolled including 45 patients who received chemotherapy plus tislelizumab while 45 underwent chemotherapy only. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and safety was assessed by treatment-related adverse events between two arms. The ORR was significantly higher in the tislelizumab group than in patients with chemotherapy alone (71.1 vs. 44.4%). The PFS [54.7% (47.2-62.2) vs. 33.3% (26.3-40.3), P = 0.047] and OS [62.1% (54.5-69.7) vs. 40.0% (32.5-47.5), P = 0.031] were also significantly improved in patients with concomitant use of tislelizumab. When stratified by PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 also with significantly higher PFS and OS when taking tislelizumab (P = 0.015 and P = 0.038). The incidence of hematologic toxicity was similar in the combination arm compared to the chemotherapy alone arm and the number of adverse events was not significantly increased by adding tislelizumab (all P > 0.05). Concomitant use of tislelizumab and chemotherapy in GEJ patients may be with optimal therapeutic effect and similar incidence of adverse events than chemotherapy alone. Further studies with larger number of patients are warranted to confirm it.

Abstract 5155: CD8+ T cells and CD4+central memory T cells as biomarkers of perioperative anti-PD-1 therapy in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background: Gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma is one of the most common lethal malignancies in the world. Near half of the G/GEJ adenocarcinoma are locally advanced at diagnosis and with poor prognosis. Several clinical trials including SHARED (ChiCTR1900024428), which conducted in our center, demonstrated that perioperative anti-PD-1 therapy in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced G/GEJ cancers, could raise the pCR rate over 30%. However, the biomarkers for patients with pCR are nor clear. Methods: Baseline tumor biopsies and post-treatment surgical tissues were collected for next-generation sequencing (NGS) and mass cytometry (CyTOF). The overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of surgery to the date of death or the last follow-up visit. Results: 34 patients with locally advanced G/GEJ cancer received anti-PD-1 therapy (Sintilimab) in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our center. Our results met the pre-specified primary endpoint, with a pCR rate of 38.2% (13/34) and median DFS of 17.0 months. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) analyzed by NGS was higher in the pCR group than those not achieving pCR (non-pCR). Deletion of cytoband 7q35, where TPK1 locates, was significantly enriched in pCR groups. The RNA sequencing data revealed an enrichment of dendritic cells (DC), CD8+ T cells and cytotoxic cell signatures in the pCR group. Conversely, the signature for CD4+ central memory T cells (TCM) was observed to be lower in the pCR group. On the other hand, CyTOF data also demonstrated that the proportion of CD8+ T cells, CD8+ effector memory T cells (TEM) were both higher in pCR group at baseline, while CD4+ TCM was lower. Moreover, the proportion of specific subtype characterized by CD127+CD27+CD45RO+CXCR5-CD4+ TCM was significantly lower in pCR patients and significantly reduced after treatment. As continuous variable, only CD8+ T cells correlated with OS. Conclusions: It seemed that CD8+ T cells and CD4+ TCM cells could be predictive biomarkers of perioperative anti-PD-1 therapy in combination with cCRT for locally advanced G/GEJ. Furthermore, we found a new CD4+ TCM subtype defined with CD127+CD27+CD45RO+CXCR5- could be novel biomarkers. Citation Format: Yue Wang, Yawei Chen, Ju Yang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Yutao Wei, Qin Liu, Yang Yang, Wenxian Guan, Baorui Liu, Jia Wei. CD8+ T cells and CD4+central memory T cells as biomarkers of perioperative anti-PD-1 therapy in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5155.

HER2 and PD-L1 Expression in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Insights for Combinatorial Targeting Approaches.

Gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (GA/GEJA) are associated with a poor prognosis, primarily due to late disease diagnosis. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are important biomarkers for treatment selection in locally advanced unresectable and metastatic GA/GEJA, and there is increasing interest in their role in earlier stages of disease. In this study, we aimed to evaluate HER2 and PD-L1 expression in a curative-intent GA/GEJA cohort to describe their expression patterns and analyze the association between HER2 expression and clinicopathological features. HER2 expression was evaluated in surgical and endoscopic submucosal dissection tumor samples, and PD-L1 was evaluated in HER2-positive cases. The clinical cohort included 107 patients, with 8.4% testing positive for HER2 (seven of whom also exhibited a PD-L1 combined positive score of ≥1. HER2 status was not significantly associated with survival outcomes. A pathologist-guided, region-specific analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression rarely overlaps with HER2-positive tumor areas. While the therapeutic implications of these observations remain unknown, these findings suggest that combination strategies targeting HER2 and PD-L1 might be directed toward distinct tumor subclones. The herein disclosed region-specific biomarker expression patterns may have important therapeutic and prognostic impacts, warranting further evaluation.

Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomas With Defective Mismatch Repair: Current Knowledge and Clinical Management.

Esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas, referred to collectively as gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEAs), are a major cause of global cancer-related mortality. Our increasing molecular understanding has led to the addition of biomarker-directed approaches to defined subgroups and has improved survival in selected patients, such as those with HER2 and Claudin18.2 overexpression. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, including GEA, but biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression are lacking. Mismatch repair deficiency and/or high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) is observed in 8% to 22% of nonmetastatic GEA, and 3% to 5% of patients with metastatic disease. dMMR/MSI-H tumors are associated with more favorable prognosis and significant benefit from ICIs, although some heterogeneity exists. The activity of ICIs in advanced dMMR/MSI-H cancer is seen across lines of therapy and should be recommended in the frontline setting. In patients with nonmetastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancer, increasing evidence suggests that perioperative and adjuvant chemotherapy may not provide benefit to the dMMR/MSI-H subgroup. The activity of perioperative chemotherapy-free immune checkpoint regimens in patients with nonmetastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancer is highly promising and underscores the need to identify this unique subgroup. We recommend MMR/MSI testing for all patients with GEA at diagnosis, and review the key rationale and clinical management implications for patient with dMMR/MSI-H tumors across disease stages.

Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) for the treatment of locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATCH): an open-label, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether addition of docetaxel to the combination of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine could provide more clinical benefits than doublet chemotherapies in the perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (LAG/GEJ) cancer in Asia. In this randomized, phase 2 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of perioperative docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in LAG/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients.MethodsPatients with cT3–4 Nany M0 G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were randomized (1:1) to receive 4 cycles of preoperative DOS or SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 4 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR).ResultsFrom Aug, 2015 to Dec, 2019,154 patients were enrolled and 147 patients included in final analysis, with a median age of 60 (26–73) years. DOS resulted in significantly higher MPR (25.4 vs. 11.8%, P = 0.04). R0 resection rate, the 3-year PFS and 3-year OS rates were 78.9 vs. 61.8% (P = 0.02), 52.3 vs. 35% (HR 0.667, 95% CI: 0.432–1.029, Log rank P = 0.07) and 57.5 vs. 49.2% (HR 0.685, 95% CI: 0.429–1.095, Log rank P = 0.11) in the DOS and SOX groups, respectively. Patients who acquired MPR experienced significantly better survival. DOS had similar tolerance to SOX.ConclusionsPerioperative DOS improved MPR significantly and tended to produce longer PFS compared to SOX in LAG/GEJ cancer in Asia, and might be considered as a preferred option for perioperative chemotherapy and worth further investigation.

Multicenter analysis on the value of standard (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

BackgroundTo assess the tolerability and oncological results of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.MethodsThis multi-center retrospective analysis included 86 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (median age 73 years; range 65–92 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. The treatment was performed at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany from 2006 to 2020. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities according to CTCAE criteria v5.0 were analyzed, and parameters potentially relevant to patient outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThirty-three patients (38%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, while the remaining patients received definitive (chemo)radiation. The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 80 patients (93%). In 66 patients (77%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 48% of patients (n = 32) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities and comorbidities. Twenty-nine patients (34%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities and 14 patients (16%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS amounted to 72%, 49%, 46%, and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery was shown to be associated with significantly better PFS (p = 0.006), DMFS (p = 0.006), and OS (p = 0.004) compared with all non-surgical treatments (pooled definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiation). No such advantage was seen over definitive chemoradiation. The majority of patients with neoadjuvant therapy received standard chemoradiotherapy without dose reduction (n = 24/33, 73%). In contrast, concurrent chemotherapy was only possible in 62% of patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (n = 33/53), and most of these patients required dose-reduction or modification of chemotherapy (n = 23/33, 70%).ConclusionsIn our analysis, omission of chemotherapy or adjustment of chemotherapy dose during definitive radiotherapy was necessary for the overwhelming majority of elderly esophageal cancer patients not eligible for surgery, and hence resulted in reduced PFS and OS. Therefore, optimization of non-surgical approaches and the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly patients with (gastro)esophageal adenocarcinoma is required.