G Protein-coupled Receptors Signaling Research Articles

Fungal alkaloid malbrancheamide reorients the lipid binding domain of GRK5

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest group of receptors involved in various types of signaling. GPCR signaling is regulated via receptor phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinases 5 (GRK5). Calmodulin (CaM), a universal Ca2+ sensor, inhibits receptor phosphorylation by binding to GRK5. However, the inhibitor malbrancheamide (MBC), which binds at CaM C-lobe, allows for receptor phosphorylation. To understand the phosphorylation mechanism by GRK5, we carried out a MD simulation of the CaM/GRK5 complex in the presence and absence of the MBC inhibitor. The lipid binding domain (LBD) of GRK5 adopted different positions in the presence and absence of inhibitor. Furthermore, the inhibitor MBC restricted the movement of the N-lobe tether (NLT) loop, probably blocking the autophosphorylation of GRK5. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Altered expression of transfer RNAs and their possible roles in brain white matter injury.

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) can regulate cell behavior and are associated with neurological disorders. Here, we aimed to investigate the expression levels of tRNAs in oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) and their possible roles in the regulation of brain white matter injury (WMI). Newborn Sprague-Dawley rats (postnatal day 5) were used to establish a model that mimicked neonatal brain WMI. RNA-array analysis was performed to examine the expression of tRNAs in OPCs. psRNAtarget software was used to predict target mRNAs of significantly altered tRNAs. Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG were used to analyze the pathways for target mRNAs. Eighty-nine tRNAs were changed after WMI (fold change absolute ≥1.5, P < 0.01), with 31 downregulated and 58 upregulated. Among them, three significantly changed tRNAs were identified, with two being significantly increased (chr10.trna1314-ProTGG and chr2.trna2771-ProAGG) and one significantly decreased (chr10.trna11264-GlyTCC). Further, target mRNA prediction and GO/KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the target mRNAs of these tRNAs are mainly involved in G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathways and beta-alanine metabolism, which are both related to myelin formation. In summary, the expression of tRNAs in OPCs was significantly altered after brain WMI, suggesting that tRNAs may play important roles in regulating WMI. This improves the knowledge about WMI pathophysiology and may provide novel treatment targets for WMI.

Profiling the proximal proteome of the activated μ-opioid receptor.

The μ-opioid receptor (μOR) represents an important target of therapeutic and abused drugs. So far, most understanding of μOR activity has focused on a subset of known signal transducers and regulatory molecules. Yet μOR signaling is coordinated by additional proteins in the interaction network of the activated receptor, which have largely remained invisible given the lack of technologies to interrogate these networks systematically. Here we describe a proteomics and computational approach to map the proximal proteome of the activated μOR and to extract subcellular location, trafficking and functional partners of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity. We demonstrate that distinct opioid agonists exert differences in the μOR proximal proteome mediated by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Moreover, we identify two new μOR network components, EYA4 and KCTD12, which are recruited on the basis of receptor-triggered G-protein activation and might form a previously unrecognized buffering system for G-protein activity broadly modulating cellular GPCR signaling.

Deciphering the role of glycosaminoglycans in GPCR signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are two essential components of the cell surface that regulate physiological processes in the body. GPCRs are the most extensive family of transmembrane receptors that control cellular responses to extracellular stimuli, while GAGs are polysaccharides that contribute to the function of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Due to their proximity to the plasma membrane, GAGs participate in signal transduction by interacting with various extracellular molecules and cell surface receptors. GAGs can directly interact with certain GPCRs or their ligands (chemokines, peptide hormones and neuropeptides, structural proteins, and enzymes) from the glutamate receptor family, the rhodopsin receptor family, the adhesion receptor family, and the secretin receptor family. These interactions have recently become an emerging topic, providing a new avenue for understanding how GPCR signaling is regulated. This review discusses our current state of knowledge about the role of GAGs in GPCR signaling and function.

Have All of the Phytohormonal Properties of Melatonin Been Verified?

Melatonin is a ubiquitous regulator in plants and performs a variety of physiological roles, including resistance to abiotic stress, regulation of growth and development, and enhancement of plant immunity. Melatonin exhibits the characteristics of a phytohormone with its pleiotropic effects, biosynthesis, conjugation, catabolism, effective concentration, and the shape and location of its dose-response curves. In addition, CAND2/PMTR1, a phytomelatonin receptor candidate belonging to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), supports the concept of melatonin as a phytohormone. However, the biochemistry of plant melatonin receptors needs to be further characterized. In particular, some of the experimental findings to date cannot be explained by known GPCR signaling mechanisms, so further studies are needed to explore the possibility of novel signaling mechanisms.

G protein-coupled receptor-mediated autophagy in health and disease.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest and most diverse superfamily of mammalian transmembrane proteins. These receptors are involved in a wide range of physiological functions and are targets for more than a third of available drugs in the market. Autophagy is a cellular process involved in degrading damaged proteins and organelles and in recycling cellular components. Deficiencies in autophagy are involved in a variety of pathological conditions. Both GPCRs and autophagy are essential in preserving homeostasis and cell survival. There is emerging evidence suggesting that GPCRs are direct regulators of autophagy. Additionally, autophagic machinery is involved in the regulation of GPCR signalling. The interplay between GPCR and autophagic signalling mechanisms significantly impacts on health and disease; however, there is still an incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications in different tissues and disease contexts. This review aims to discuss the interactions between GPCR and autophagy signalling. Studies on muscarinic receptors, beta-adrenoceptors, taste receptors, purinergic receptors and adhesion GPCRs are summarized, in relation to autophagy.

Time-resolved cryo-EM of G-protein activation by a GPCR.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate heterotrimeric G proteins by stimulating guanine nucleotide exchange in the Gα subunit1. To visualize this mechanism, we developed a time-resolved cryo-EM approach that examines the progression of ensembles of pre-steady-state intermediates of a GPCR-G-protein complex. By monitoring the transitions of the stimulatory Gs protein in complex with the β2-adrenergic receptor at short sequential time points after GTP addition, we identified the conformational trajectory underlying G-protein activation and functional dissociation from the receptor. Twenty structures generated from sequential overlapping particle subsets along this trajectory, compared to control structures, provide a high-resolution description of the order of main events driving G-protein activation in response to GTP binding. Structural changes propagate from the nucleotide-binding pocket and extend through the GTPase domain, enacting alterations to Gα switch regions and the α5 helix that weaken the G-protein-receptor interface. Molecular dynamics simulations with late structures in the cryo-EM trajectory support that enhanced ordering of GTP on closure of the α-helical domain against the nucleotide-bound Ras-homology domain correlates with α5 helix destabilization and eventual dissociation of the G protein from the GPCR. These findings also highlight the potential of time-resolved cryo-EM as a tool for mechanistic dissection of GPCR signalling events.

Functional Selectivity of Cannabinoid Type 1 G Protein-Coupled Receptor Agonists in Transactivating Glycosylated Receptors on Cancer Cells to Induce Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Metastatic Phenotype.

Understanding the role of biased G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonism in receptor signaling may provide novel insights into the opposing effects mediated by cannabinoids, particularly in cancer and cancer metastasis. GPCRs can have more than one active state, a phenomenon called either 'biased agonism', 'functional selectivity', or 'ligand-directed signaling'. However, there are increasing arrays of cannabinoid allosteric ligands with different degrees of modulation, called 'biased modulation', that can vary dramatically in a probe- and pathway-specific manner, not from simple differences in orthosteric ligand efficacy or stimulus-response coupling. Here, emerging evidence proposes the involvement of CB1 GPCRs in a novel biased GPCR signaling paradigm involving the crosstalk between neuraminidase-1 (Neu-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in the activation of glycosylated receptors through the modification of the receptor glycosylation state. The study findings highlighted the role of CB1 agonists AM-404, Aravnil, and Olvanil in significantly inducing Neu-1 sialidase activity in a dose-dependent fashion in RAW-Blue, PANC-1, and SW-620 cells. This approach was further substantiated by findings that the neuromedin B receptor inhibitor, BIM-23127, MMP-9 inhibitor, MMP9i, and Neu-1 inhibitor, oseltamivir phosphate, could specifically block CB1 agonist-induced Neu-1 sialidase activity. Additionally, we found that CB1 receptors exist in a multimeric receptor complex with Neu-1 in naïve, unstimulated RAW-Blue, PANC-1, and SW-620 cells. This complex implies a molecular link that regulates the interaction and signaling mechanism among these molecules present on the cell surface. Moreover, the study results demonstrate that CB1 agonists induce NFκB-dependent secretory alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) activity in influencing the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal markers, E-cadherin, and vimentin in SW-620 cells, albeit the impact on E-cadherin expression is less pronounced compared to vimentin. In essence, this innovative research begins to elucidate an entirely new molecular mechanism involving a GPCR signaling paradigm in which cannabinoids, as epigenetic stimuli, may traverse to influence gene expression and contribute to cancer and cancer metastasis.

Orphan G protein-coupled receptors: the ongoing search for a home.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) make up the largest receptor superfamily, accounting for 4% of protein-coding genes. Despite the prevalence of such transmembrane receptors, a significant number remain orphans, lacking identified endogenous ligands. Since their conception, the reverse pharmacology approach has been used to characterize such receptors. However, the multifaceted and nuanced nature of GPCR signaling poses a great challenge to their pharmacological elucidation. Considering their therapeutic relevance, the search for native orphan GPCR ligands continues. Despite limited structural input in terms of 3D crystallized structures, with advances in machine-learning approaches, there has been great progress with respect to accurate ligand prediction. Though such an approach proves valuable given that ligand scarcity is the greatest hurdle to orphan GPCR deorphanization, the future pairings of the remaining orphan GPCRs may not necessarily take a one-size-fits-all approach but should be more comprehensive in accounting for numerous nuanced possibilities to cover the full spectrum of GPCR signaling.

GPCRs in the round: SMA-like copolymers and SMALPs as a platform for investigating GPCRs

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane proteins, regulate a plethora of physiological responses and are the therapeutic target for 30–40% of clinically-prescribed drugs. They are integral membrane proteins deeply embedded in the plasma membrane where they activate intracellular signalling via coupling to G-proteins and β-arrestin. GPCRs are in intimate association with the bilayer lipids and that lipid environment regulates the signalling functions of GPCRs. This complex lipid ‘landscape’ is both heterogeneous and dynamic. GPCR function is modulated by bulk membrane properties including membrane fluidity, microdomains, curvature, thickness and asymmetry but GPCRs are also regulated by specific lipid:GPCR binding, including cholesterol and anionic lipids. Understanding the molecular mechanisms whereby GPCR signalling is regulated by lipids is a very active area of research currently. A major advance in membrane protein research in recent years was the application of poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) copolymers. These spontaneously generate SMA lipid particles (SMALPs) encapsulating membrane protein in a nano-scale disc of cell membrane, thereby removing the historical need for detergent and preserving lipid:GPCR interaction. The focus of this review is how GPCR-SMALPs are increasing our understanding of GPCR structure and function at the molecular level. Furthermore, an increasing number of ‘second generation’ SMA-like copolymers have been reported recently. These are reviewed from the context of increasing our understanding of GPCR molecular mechanisms. Moreover, their potential as a novel platform for downstream biophysical and structural analyses is assessed and looking ahead, the translational application of SMA-like copolymers to GPCR drug discovery programmes in the future is considered.

GPCR kinases differentially modulate biased signaling downstream of CXCR3 depending on their subcellular localization.

Some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) demonstrate biased signaling such that ligands of the same receptor exclusively or preferentially activate certain downstream signaling pathways over others. This phenomenon may result from ligand-specific receptor phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs). GPCR signaling can also exhibit location bias because GPCRs traffic to and signal from subcellular compartments in addition to the plasma membrane. Here, we investigated whether GRKs contributed to location bias in GPCR signaling. GRKs translocated to endosomes after stimulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 or other GPCRs in cultured cells. GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, and GRK6 showed distinct patterns of recruitment to the plasma membrane and to endosomes depending on the identity of the biased ligand used to activate CXCR3. Analysis of engineered forms of GRKs that localized to either the plasma membrane or endosomes demonstrated that biased CXCR3 ligands elicited different signaling profiles that depended on the subcellular location of the GRK. Each GRK exerted a distinct effect on the regulation of CXCR3 engagement of β-arrestin, internalization, and activation of the downstream effector kinase ERK. Our work highlights a role for GRKs in location-biased GPCR signaling and demonstrates the complex interactions between ligands, GRKs, and cellular location that contribute to biased signaling.

Doxorubicin alters G-protein coupled receptor-mediated vasocontraction in rat coronary arteries.

Doxorubicin (Doxo)-associated cardio-and vasotoxicity has been recognised as a serious complication of cancer chemotherapy. The purpose of this novel paper was to determine the effect of Doxo on G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated vasocontraction located on vascular smooth muscle cells. Rat left anterior descending artery segments were incubated for 24h with 0.5 µM Doxo. The vasocontractile responses by activation of endothelin receptor type A (ETA) and type B (ETB), serotonin receptor 1B (5-HT1B) and thromboxane A2 prostanoid receptor (TP) were investigated by a sensitive myography using specific agonists, while the specificity of the GPCR agonists was verified by applying selective antagonists (i.e. ETA and ETB agonist = 10- 14-10- 7.5 M endothelin-1 (ET-1); ETA antagonist = 10 µM BQ123; ETB agonists = 10- 14-10- 7.5 M sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) and ET-1; ETB antagonist = 0.1 µM BQ788; 5-HT1B agonist = 10- 12-10- 5.5 M 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT); 5-HT1B antagonist = 1 µM GR55562; TP agonist = 10- 12-10- 6.5 M U46619; TP antagonist = 1 µM Seratrodast). Our results show that 0.5 µM Doxo incubation of LAD segments leads to an increased VSMC vasocontraction through the ETB, 5-HT1B and TP GPCRs, with a 2.2-fold increase in ETB-mediated vasocontraction at 10- 10.5 M S6c, a 2.0-fold increase in 5-HT1B-mediated vasocontraction at 10- 5.5 M 5-CT, and a 1.3-fold increase in TP-mediated vasocontraction at 10- 6.5 M U46619. Further studies unravelling the involvement of intracellular GPCR signalling pathways will broaden our understanding of the Doxo-induced vasotoxicity, and thus pave the way to mitigate the adverse effects by potential implementation of adjunct therapy options.

GPCRs involved in metabolic diseases: pharmacotherapeutic development updates.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are expressed in a variety of cell types and tissues, and activation of GPCRs is involved in enormous metabolic pathways, including nutrient synthesis, transportation, storage or insulin sensitivity, etc. This review intends to summarize the regulation of metabolic homeostasis and mechanisms by a series of GPCRs, such as GPR91, GPR55, GPR119, GPR109a, GPR142, GPR40, GPR41, GPR43 and GPR120. With deep understanding of GPCR's structure and signaling pathways, it is attempting to uncover the role of GPCRs in major metabolic diseases, including metabolic syndrome, diabetes, dyslipidemia and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, for which the global prevalence has risen during last two decades. An extensive list of agonists and antagonists with their chemical structures in a nature of small molecular compounds for above-mentioned GPCRs is provided as pharmacologic candidates, and their preliminary data of preclinical studies are discussed. Moreover, their beneficial effects in correcting abnormalities of metabolic syndrome, diabetes and dyslipidemia are summarized when clinical trials have been undertaken. Thus, accumulating data suggest that these agonists or antagonists might become as new pharmacotherapeutic candidates for the treatment of metabolic diseases.

GPCR signaling bias: an emerging framework for opioid drug development.

Biased signaling has emerged as an important concept in drug development targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Drugs that provoke biased signaling are expected to offer an opportunity for enhanced therapeutic effectiveness with minimized side effects. Opioid analgesics, while exerting potent pain-relieving effects, have become a social problem owing to their serious side effects. For the development of safer pain medications, there has been extensive exploration of agonists with a distinct balance of G-protein and β-arrestin (βarr) signaling. Recently, several approaches based on protein-protein interactions have been developed to precisely evaluate individual signal pathways, paving the way for the comprehensive analysis of biased signals. In this review, we describe an overview of bias signaling in opioid receptors, especially the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), and how to evaluate signaling bias in the GPCR field. We will also discuss future directions for rational drug development through the integration of diverse signal datasets.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as Potential Therapeutics for Psychiatric Disorders.

In the central nervous system (CNS), G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most common targets of neuropharmacological drugs. GPCRs are activated by various neurotransmitters, which results in slow synaptic transmission. Recently, remarkable progress has been achieved in identifying genes and signaling pathways linked to the risk of psychiatric disorders. Even though the biological mechanisms governing psychiatric disorders, such as mood disorders and schizophrenia, are uncertain, GPCRs are essential in diagnosing and treating various ailments. However, due to the complicated reasons responsible for these disorders, there has been a significant decrease in the pipeline for the progression of novel psychiatric medications throughout the world. Antipsychotics and antidepressants target GPCRs, which regulate various subsequent signaling pathways and play a key role in altering brain function. The advancement of our knowledge of GPCR signaling has opened up new avenues for developing customized medications. This review summarizes the current understanding of therapeutic GPCR targets for psychiatric disorders. For patients resistant to current therapies, the future development of new drugs targeting GPCR signaling pathways is promising.

Abstract 126: Connectome Gradient Dysfunction Contributes to White Matter Hyperintensity-Related Cognitive Decline

Introduction: Although White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is closely associated with cognitive decline, the precise neurobiological mechanisms underlying this relationship are not fully elucidated. Connectome studies have identified a primary-to-transmodal gradient in functional brain networks that support the spectrum from sensation to cognition. However, whether this gradient structure is altered as WMH progresses and how this alteration is associated with WMH-related cognitive decline remain unknown. Methods: A total of 758 individuals with WMH were enrolled from two medical centers and one community. All these participants completed cognitive assessment and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). The functional connectome gradient was reconstructed based on rs-fMRI by using a gradient decomposition framework. Interrelations amongst regional WMH, functional gradient measures, and specific cognitive domains were explored. Results: The larger WMH volume, the narrower range ( r = -0.099, p = 0.006) and smaller variance ( r = -0.121, p &lt; 0.001) of the primary-to-transmodal gradient, as well as the poorer executive function ( r = -0.135, p = 0.001) and information processing speed ( r = -0.224, p = 0.001). A narrower range ( r = 0.131, p = 0.001) and smaller variance ( r = 0.136, p = 0.001) of the primary-to-transmodal gradient corresponded to poorer executive function. In particular, the relationship between frontal/occipital WMH and executive function was partly mediated by gradient range/variance of the primary-to-transmodal gradient (the 95% confidence interval did not contain the value 0). WMH-related gradient alterations were associated with gene expression levels involved in the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway (FDR q -value &lt; 10 -4 ) and chemical synaptic transmission (FDR q -value &lt; 10 -6 ). Discussion: We found that the primary-to-transmodal gradient dysfunction contributes to WMH-related cognitive decline. The detrimental effect of frontal/occipital WMH on executive function was mediated by decreased differentiation of the connectivity pattern between the primary and transmodal areas. The neurobiological mechanisms may be related to the GPCR signaling pathway and chemical synaptic transmission.

Semi-synthetic nanobody-ligand conjugates exhibit tunable signaling properties and enhanced transcriptional outputs at neurokinin receptor-1.

Antibodies have proven highly valuable for therapeutic development; however, they are typically poor candidates for applications that require activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest collection of targets for clinically approved drugs. Nanobodies (Nbs), the smallest antibody fragments retaining full antigen-binding capacity, have emerged as promising tools for pharmacologic applications, including GPCR modulation. Past work has shown that conjugation of Nbs with ligands can provide GPCR agonists that exhibit improved activity and selectivity compared to their parent ligands. The neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R), a GPCR targeted for the treatment of pain, is activated by peptide agonists such as Substance P (SP) and neurokinin A (NKA), which induce signaling through multiple pathways (Gs , Gq and β-arrestin). In this study, we investigated whether conjugating NK1R ligands with Nbs that bind to a separate location on the receptor would provide chimeric compounds with distinctive signaling properties. We employed sortase A-mediated ligation to generate several conjugates consisting of Nbs linked to NK1R ligands. Many of these conjugates exhibited divergent and unexpected signaling properties and transcriptional outputs. For example, some Nb-NKA conjugates showed enhanced receptor binding capacity, high potency partial agonism, prolonged cAMP production, and an increase in transcriptional output associated with Gs signaling; whereas other conjugates were virtually inactive. Nanobody conjugation caused only minor alterations in ligand-induced upstream Gq signaling with unexpected enhancements in transcriptional (downstream) responses. Our findings underscore the potential of nanobody conjugation for providing compounds with advantageous properties such as biased agonism, prolonged duration of action, and enhanced transcriptional responses. These compounds hold promise not only for facilitating fundamental research on GPCR signal transduction mechanisms but also for the development of more potent and enduring therapeutics.

Hepatocyte GPCR signaling regulates IRF3 to control hepatic stellate cell transdifferentiation

BackgroundInterferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3) is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in the innate immune response by recognizing and responding to foreign antigens. Recently, its roles in sterile conditions are being studied, as in metabolic and fibrotic diseases. However, the search on the upstream regulator for efficient pharmacological targeting is yet to be fully explored. Here, we show that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can regulate IRF3 phosphorylation through of GPCR-Gα protein interaction.ResultsIRF3 and target genes were strongly associated with fibrosis markers in liver fibrosis patients and models. Conditioned media from MIHA hepatocytes overexpressing IRF3 induced fibrogenic activation of LX-2 hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). In an overexpression library screening using active mutant Gα subunits and Phos-tag immunoblotting, Gαs was found out to strongly phosphorylate IRF3. Stimulation of Gαs by glucagon or epinephrine or by Gαs-specific designed GPCR phosphorylated IRF3. Protein kinase A (PKA) signaling was primarily responsible for IRF3 phosphorylation and Interleukin 33 (IL-33) expression downstream of Gαs. PKA phosphorylated IRF3 on a previously unrecognized residue and did not require reported upstream kinases such as TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1). Activation of Gαs signaling by glucagon induced IL-33 production in hepatocytes. Conditioned media from the hepatocytes activated HSCs, as indicated by α-SMA and COL1A1 expression, and this was reversed by pre-treatment of the media with IL-33 neutralizing antibody.ConclusionsGαs-coupled GPCR signaling increases IRF3 phosphorylation through cAMP-mediated activation of PKA. This leads to an increase of IL-33 expression, which further contributes to HSC activation. Our findings that hepatocyte GPCR signaling regulates IRF3 to control hepatic stellate cell transdifferentiation provides an insight for understanding the complex intercellular communication during liver fibrosis progression and suggests therapeutic opportunities for the disease.3Z-4y3zsWdGiZ_62kYezA1Video

Hepatic regulator of G protein signaling 14 ameliorates NAFLD through activating cAMP-AMPK signaling by targeting Giα1/3

ObjectiveNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging public health threat as the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. However, there remains no effective medication to improve NAFLD. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most frequently investigated drug targets family. The Regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14), as an essential negative modulator of GPCR signaling, plays important regulatory roles in liver damage and inflammatory responses. However, the role of RGS14 in NAFLD remains largely unclear. Methods and resultsIn this study, we found that RGS14 was decreased in hepatocytes in NAFLD individuals in a public database. We employed genetic engineering technique to explore the function of RGS14 in NAFLD. We demonstrated that RGS14 overexpression ameliorated lipid accumulation, inflammatory response and liver fibrosis in hepatocytes in vivo and in vitro. Whereas, hepatocyte specific Rgs14-knockout (Rgs14-HKO) exacerbated high fat high cholesterol diet (HFHC) induced NASH. Further molecular experiments demonstrated that RGS14 depended on GDI activity to attenuate HFHC-feeding NASH. More importantly, RGS14 interacted with Guanine nucleotide-binding protein (Gi) alpha 1 and 3 (Giα1/3, gene named GNAI1/3), promoting the generation of cAMP and then activating the subsequent AMPK pathways. GNAI1/3 knockdown abolished the protective role of RGS14, indicating that RGS14 binding to Giα1/3 was required for prevention against hepatic steatosis. ConclusionsRGS14 plays a protective role in the progression of NAFLD. RGS14-Giα1/3 interaction accelerated the production of cAMP and then activated cAMP-AMPK signaling. Targeting RGS14 or modulating the RGS14-Giα1/3 interaction may be a potential strategy for the treatment of NAFLD in the future.

Investigating G-protein coupled receptor signalling with light-emitting biosensors.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most frequent target of currently approved drugs and play a central role in both physiological and pathophysiological processes. Beyond the canonical understanding of GPCR signal transduction, the importance of receptor conformation, beta-arrestin (β-arr) biased signalling, and signalling from intracellular locations other than the plasma membrane is becoming more apparent, along with the tight spatiotemporal compartmentalisation of downstream signals. Fluorescent and bioluminescent biosensors have played a pivotal role in elucidating GPCR signalling events in live cells. To understand the mechanisms of action of the GPCR-targeted drugs currently available, and to develop new and better GPCR-targeted therapeutics, understanding these novel aspects of GPCR signalling is critical. In this review, we present some of the tools available to interrogate each of these features of GPCR signalling, we illustrate some of the key findings which have been made possible by these tools and we discuss their limitations and possible developments.