Emergency Department Physicians Research Articles

Use of a Large Language Model to Assess Clinical Acuity of Adults in the Emergency Department

The introduction of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4; OpenAI), has generated significant interest in health care, yet studies evaluating their performance in a clinical setting are lacking. Determination of clinical acuity, a measure of a patient's illness severity and level of required medical attention, is one of the foundational elements of medical reasoning in emergency medicine. To determine whether an LLM can accurately assess clinical acuity in the emergency department (ED). This cross-sectional study identified all adult ED visits from January 1, 2012, to January 17, 2023, at the University of California, San Francisco, with a documented Emergency Severity Index (ESI) acuity level (immediate, emergent, urgent, less urgent, or nonurgent) and with a corresponding ED physician note. A sample of 10 000 pairs of ED visits with nonequivalent ESI scores, balanced for each of the 10 possible pairs of 5 ESI scores, was selected at random. The potential of the LLM to classify acuity levels of patients in the ED based on the ESI across 10 000 patient pairs. Using deidentified clinical text, the LLM was queried to identify the patient with a higher-acuity presentation within each pair based on the patients' clinical history. An earlier LLM was queried to allow comparison with this model. Accuracy score was calculated to evaluate the performance of both LLMs across the 10 000-pair sample. A 500-pair subsample was manually classified by a physician reviewer to compare performance between the LLMs and human classification. From a total of 251 401 adult ED visits, a balanced sample of 10 000 patient pairs was created wherein each pair comprised patients with disparate ESI acuity scores. Across this sample, the LLM correctly inferred the patient with higher acuity for 8940 of 10 000 pairs (accuracy, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.89-0.90]). Performance of the comparator LLM (accuracy, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.83-0.84]) was below that of its successor. Among the 500-pair subsample that was also manually classified, LLM performance (accuracy, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.86-0.91]) was comparable with that of the physician reviewer (accuracy, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89]). In this cross-sectional study of 10 000 pairs of ED visits, the LLM accurately identified the patient with higher acuity when given pairs of presenting histories extracted from patients' first ED documentation. These findings suggest that the integration of an LLM into ED workflows could enhance triage processes while maintaining triage quality and warrants further investigation.

Transitioning from the Emergency Department to a General Internist Outpatient Clinic for Paracentesis: A Qualitative Inquiry.

Repeated paracentesis for ascites can place significant demands on the emergency department (ED). A new general internist-led outpatient procedure clinic to alleviate this demand required ED staff and patients to accept this transition of care. This qualitative study evaluates barriers and facilitators to implementing the FLuid ASPiration (FLASP) clinic in a safety net hospital. The FLASP clinic opened during the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2021. From February to April 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with: 10 ED physicians and nurses; 5 FLASP clinic patients; and 4 patients receiving paracentesis in the ED. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach for themes categorized by Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) domains including: attitudes/knowledge; social norms; and logistics. Thematic analysis found that ED staff appreciated reduced demand for paracentesis, but barriers included: lack of knowledge; concerns about unstable patients and patient expectations (norms); and scheduling logistics. FLASP clinic patients had only favorable themes: belief in clinic safety; positive relationship with staff; and clinic efficiency. Patients using the ED for paracentesis expressed only concerns: possible need for testing or hospitalization; care usually in the ED; and unclear clinic scheduling. This study reveals challenges to transitioning sites of care for paracentesis including the need for greater ED staff education and standardizing methods to triage patients to appropriate site of care. Greater support and education of ED patients about the benefits of an outpatient procedure clinic may also reduce ED burden for paracentesis.

Rapid recognition and optimal management of hemophilia in the emergency department: A quality improvement project.

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement initiative at the University of Florida Health Physicians practice in reducing the time to administer factor replacement therapy (FRT) for hemophilia patients presenting with bleeding in the emergency department (ED). The study, a quasi-experimental, interventional design, was conducted between January 2020 and January 2023. The intervention, implemented in September 2021, involved training ED physicians, creating a specialized medication order set within the electronic health record (EHR), and a rapid triage system. The effectiveness was measured by comparing the time from ED arrival to factor administration before and after the intervention and benchmarking it against the National Bleeding Disorders Foundation's Medical and Scientific Advisory Council (MASAC)-recommended 1-hour timeline for factor administration. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis with a generalized least squares model assessed the intervention's impact. A total of 43 ED visits (22 pre-intervention and 21 post-intervention) were recorded. Post-intervention, the average time from ED arrival to factor administration decreased from 5.63 to 3.15hours. There was no significant increase (27%vs. 29%) in the patients receiving factor within 1-hour of ED arrival. The ITS analysis predicted a 20-hour reduction in the average quarterly time to administer factor by the end of the study, an 84% decrease. The quality improvement program decreased the time to administer FRT for patients with hemophilia in the ED. However, the majority of patients did not achieve the 1-hour MASAC-recommended timeline for factor administration after ED arrival.

Blood Culture Algorithm Implementation in Emergency Department Patients as a Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention

ObjectiveBlood cultures (BCx) are important for selecting appropriate antibiotic treatment. Ordering BCx for conditions with a low probability of bacteremia has limited utility, thus improved guidance for ordering BCx is needed. Inpatient studies have implemented BCx algorithms, but no studies examine the intervention in an Emergency Department (ED) setting. MethodsWe performed a quasi-experimental pre-/post-intervention study from 12/1/2020 to 10/31/2023 at a single academic adult ED and implemented a BCx algorithm. The primary outcome was the blood culture event rates (BCE per 100 ED admissions) pre- and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates (30-day ED and hospital readmission and antibiotic days of therapy). Seven ED physicians/APP reviewed BCx for appropriateness, with monthly feedback provided to ED leadership and physicians. ResultsAfter BCx algorithm implementation, the BCE rate decreased from 12.17 BCE/100 ED admissions to 10.50 BCE/100 ED admissions. Of the 3,478 reviewed BCE, we adjudicated 2153 BCE (62%) as appropriate, 653 (19%) as inappropriate, and 672 (19%) as uncertain. Adverse safety events were not statistically different pre/post-intervention. ConclusionImplementation of an ED BCx algorithm demonstrated a reduction in BCE, without increased adverse safety events. Future studies should compare outcomes of BCx algorithm implementation in a community hospital ED without intensive chart review.

Meningococcal Disease Presenting with Acute Myopericarditis and Concurrent Acute Meningitis

Emergency department physicians uncommonly associate myopericarditis with bacterial infection and, even more rarely, encounter myopericarditis caused by meningococcal infection. This case report describes a 38-year-old man who presented with chest pain, electrocardiographic changes, and cardiac biomarkers consistent with acute myopericarditis and rapidly developed central nervous system symptoms that were concerning for acute bacterial meningitis. The diagnosis of Neisseria meningitidis infection was confirmed by blood cultures. Once identified, the patient made a full recovery following a course of intravenous antibiotic therapy. This case underscores the difficulty of diagnosing this rare, but potentially life-threatening, condition in the emergency department.

COMPARISON OF PRE-HOSPITAL PRELIMINARY DIAGNOSIS AND DEFINITIVE DIAGNOSIS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN PATIENTS BROUGHT BY AMBULANCE

Aim: In this study, it was evaluated whether the anamnesis taken by paramedics before the hospital and the physical examination performed by paramedics in a limited time in non-traumatic patients brought to a second-level district state hospital by ambulance showed targeted effectiveness and whether the appropriate preliminary diagnosis was made in the evaluations made, and these preliminary diagnoses were compared with the final diagnoses made after the examinations in the emergency department. Methods: Between 01.01.2023 and 30.06.2023, patients brought to a State Hospital by ambulance were retrospectively analyzed. All age groups brought from the field for non-traumatic reasons were included in the study. Results: During the study period, all patients brought to our emergency department by ambulance were examined. The mean age of the patients was 66. More than half of the cases were female (57.7%). Comparison of the body systems belonging to the symptoms and preliminary diagnoses considered by the paramedics with the body systems belonging to the definitive diagnoses made in the emergency department showed a statistically moderate level of agreement between the pathologies considered by the 112 teams and the pathologies considered by the emergency department physicians in all body systems except the pathologies of the genitourinary system (Kappa 0.558). Conclusion: It was observed that the preliminary diagnosis or symptom stated in the case form by ambulance workers working in prehospital emergency health services was similar to the definitive diagnostic systems in the emergency department. However, it was found that 74.9% of the case forms indicated symptoms instead of preliminary diagnosis. This may have been due to the fact that paramedics did not want to take responsibility by stating a more general approach in patient delivery.

How much time do emergency department physicians spend on medication-related tasks? A time- and-motion study

BackgroundMedication-related problems are an important cause of emergency department (ED) visits, and medication errors are reported in up to 60% of ED patients. Procedures such as medication reconciliation and medication review can identify and prevent medication-related problems and medication errors. However, this work is often time-consuming. In EDs without pharmacists, medication reconciliation is the physician’s responsibility, in addition to the primary assignments of examining and diagnosing the patient. The aim of this study was to identify how much time ED physicians spend on medication-related tasks when no pharmacists are present in the EDs.MethodsAn observational time-and-motion study of physicians in three EDs in Northern Norway was conducted using Work Observation Method by Activity Timing (WOMBAT) to collect and time-stamp data. Observations were conducted in predefined two-hour observation sessions with a 1:1 relationship between observer and participant, during Monday to Friday between 8 am and 8 pm, from November 2020 to October 2021.ResultsIn total, 386 h of observations were collected during 225 observation sessions. A total of 8.7% of the physicians’ work time was spent on medication-related tasks, of which most time was spent on oral communication about medications with other physicians (3.0%) and medication-related documentation (3.2%). Physicians spent 2.2 min per hour on medication reconciliation tasks, which includes retrieving medication-related information directly from the patient, reading/retrieving written medication-related information, and medication-related documentation. Physicians spent 85.6% of the observed time on non-medication-related clinical or administrative tasks, and the remaining time was spent standby or moving between tasks.ConclusionIn three Norwegian EDs, physicians spent 8.7% of their work time on medication-related tasks, and 85.6% on other clinical or administrative tasks. Physicians spent 2.2 min per hour on tasks related to medication reconciliation. We worry that patient safety related tasks in the EDs receive little attention. Allocating dedicated resources like pharmacists to contribute with medication-related tasks could benefit both physicians and patients.

Building Blocks-A Block-by-Block Approach to Better Emergency Care in Children.

We describe a case series of regional nerve blocks, which comprise an adapted framework for the pediatric emergency setting and were performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians. A case series of 8 different ultrasound-guided nerve blocks and 1 anatomical block, performed in 11 pediatric patients, aged 7 weeks to 17 years. All blocks resulted in adequate analgesia. No procedural complications were observed. We describe a set of nerve blocks performed by emergency medicine physicians in the pediatric population in an ED setting. In suitable settings, this is a safe and effective tool for procedural analgesia or for pain management. In such cases, performing an ultrasound-guided nerve block in the ED is a viable alternative for repeated doses of opiates, deep procedural sedation, or the operating theater. We propose this set of regional anesthesia procedures as a pediatric-adapted toolkit for the emergency physician to be performed in children in the ED setting. Adopting this set of procedures ensures better and safer care for children and provides a training framework for pediatric ED physicians.

Self-induced Hot Water Finger Burn Trying to Get Feeling Back after Ropivacaine Block

Summary: This case report is about a patient with self-induced hot water burns several hours after an infraclavicular block with ropivacaine for a scaphoid fracture operation. This patient was honest about what happened. However, some patients are too embarrassed to admit what they did to themselves. The injury may be misdiagnosed by the emergency department physician or by the surgeon because the history is incomplete. The resulting burn, which can lead to fingertip loss when severe, can be erroneously misdiagnosed as an ischemic injury after lidocaine with epinephrine local anesthesia. Most hand surgeons have seen ischemic finger injuries the morning after failed finger replantation. Acutely ischemic fingers from arterial insufficiency do not have parallel hot water burn lines, reactive hyperemia at the base of the burn, or burn blisters at the fingertips. The purpose of this article and its video is to help physicians and nurses recognize the three signs of self-induced hot water finger burns after local anesthesia: (1) a parallel hot water line in the fingers at the proximal burn level; (2) reactive hyperemia just proximal to the burn line; (3) burn blisters in the submerged fingertips. When seeing postoperative patients with these signs, the examining clinician may tactfully ask: “Did you try to get the feeling back in your fingers by warming them?” It is hoped that the patient may then reveal that he tried warming the finger in water, and that may lead to the truth that the water was indeed too hot.

You Code It! Answers: Cannabis Poisoning in a 4-Year-Old

This “You Code It!” challenge asked you to assign codes to a scenario where a 4-year-old presents to an emergency department (ED) physician with altered mental status due to poisoning from ingestion of edible cannabis products. These answers include the codes and rationale.

Overtriage of transfers to the pediatric trauma center: the importance of minor head injury

OBJECTIVE Accurate triage of minor head injuries remains a challenge for mature trauma systems. More than one-third of trauma transfers are overtriaged, and minor head injuries predominate. Overtriage is inefficient, wasteful of resources, and burdensome for families. The authors studied overtriage at the sole level I pediatric trauma center (PTC) in a small state with a view toward improvement of processes. METHODS Data on transfer patients were extracted from an institutional trauma registry over an 8-year period. Three definitions of overtriage were examined: one based on transfer criteria from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, one based on resource utilization, and one adapted to the regional environment of the PTC. Associations of demographic, geographic, clinical, and social factors with overtriage were examined. RESULTS There were 1754 unique patients transferred from the emergency departments (EDs) of other institutions to the PTC. Thirty-six percent of transfers were overtriaged by all 3 criteria, and 23% of all transfers were minor head injuries overtriaged by all criteria. Infants were more likely to be overtriaged than other age groups. Among racial categories, Black patients were least likely to be overtriaged. Patients with commercial insurance were more likely to be overtriaged. Overtriaged patients averaged shorter trips from the referring ED to the PTC, even though the PTC was farther from their homes. These observations suggest a sensitivity to social expectations in the exercise of ED physician judgments about transfer. CONCLUSIONS More than one-third of all transfers to the study PTC were overtriaged, and almost one-quarter of all transfers were overtriaged minor head injuries. Minor head injuries are a potentially rewarding focus for system-wide quality improvement, but the interplay of social factors with ED physician judgments must be recognized.

Developing medical simulations for opioid overdose response training: A qualitative analysis of narratives from responders to overdoses.

Medical simulation offers a controlled environment for studying challenging clinical care situations that are difficult to observe directly. Overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs aim to train potential rescuers in responding to opioid overdoses, but assessing rescuer performance in real-life situations before emergency medical services arrive is exceedingly complex. There is an opportunity to incorporate individuals with firsthand experience in treating out-of-hospital overdoses into the development of simulation scenarios. Realistic overdose simulations could provide OEND programs with valuable tools to effectively teach hands-on skills and support context-sensitive training regimens. In this research, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 individuals experienced in responding to opioid overdoses including emergency department physicians, first responders, OEND program instructors, and peer recovery specialists. Two coders conducted qualitative content analysis using open and axial thematic coding to identify nuances associated with illicit and prescription opioid overdoses. The results are presented as narrative findings complemented by summaries of the frequency of themes across the interviews. Over 20 hours of audio recording were transcribed verbatim and then coded. During the open and axial thematic coding process several primary themes, along with subthemes, were identified, highlighting the distinctions between illicit and prescription opioid overdoses. Distinct contextual details, such as locations, clinical presentations, the environment surrounding the patient, and bystanders' behavior, were used to create four example simulations of out-of-hospital overdoses. The narrative findings in this qualitative study offer context-sensitive information for developing out-of-hospital overdose scenarios applicable to simulation training. These insights can serve as a valuable resource, aiding instructors and researchers in systematically creating evidence-based scenarios for both training and research purposes.

How well do ED physician practices align with the CAEP acute atrial fibrillation checklist for stroke prevention and disposition?

Acute atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter (AFL) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. In 2021, an updated version of CAEP's Acute AF/AFL Best Practices Checklist was published, seeking to guide management. We assessed the alignment with and safety of application of the Checklist, regarding stroke prevention and disposition. This health records review included adults presenting to two tertiary care academic EDs between January and August 2022 with a diagnosis of acute AF/AFL. Patients were excluded if their initial heart rate was < 100 or if they were hospitalized. Data extracted included: demographics, CHADS-65 score, clinical characteristics, ED treatment and disposition, and outpatient prescriptions and referrals. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patient encounters with one or more identified safety issues. Each case was assessed according to seven predetermined criteria from elements of the CAEP Checklist and either deemed "safe" or to contain one or more safety issues. We used descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals. 358 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 66.9years, 59.2% were male and 77.4% patients had at least one of the CHADS-65 criteria. 169 (47.2%) were not already on anticoagulation and 99 (27.6%) were discharged home with a new prescription for anticoagulation. The primary outcome was identified in 6.4% (95% CI 4.3-9.5) of encounters, representing 28 safety issues in 23 individuals. The safety concerns included: failure to prescribe anticoagulation when indicated (n = 6), inappropriate dosing of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) (n = 2), inappropriate prescription of rate or rhythm control medication (n = 9), and failure to recommend appropriately timed follow-up for new rate control medication (n = 11). There was a very high level of ED physician alignment with CAEP's Best Practices Checklist regarding disposition and stroke prevention. There are opportunities to further improve care with respect to recommendation of anticoagulation and reducing inappropriate prescriptions of rate or rhythm medications.

Awareness of somatisation disorder among Swedish physicians at emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey

BackgroundSomatisation is a highly prevalent psychiatric syndrome in both women and men, in which psychological distress is manifested in physical symptoms without a medical explanation. Many patients with somatisation disorder are high healthcare utilisers, particularly at emergency departments. Unnecessary investigations and diagnostic operations occur frequently, which cause both patient suffering and a significant burden on the healthcare system. Emergency department physicians’ awareness of somatisation and its manifestations has not previously been studied. This study aimed to investigate awareness about somatisation disorder among physicians working at emergency departments in western Sweden, and to explore differences between gender, specialty, and work experience.MethodsA web-based, cross-sectional survey consisting of six dichotomous questions about somatisation disorder was conducted, in December 2021 – January 2022, among licensed physicians of various specialties working at emergency departments in western Sweden. Descriptive analyses and comparative analyses were performed to investigate differences between gender, type of specialty, and years of practice. Data were analysed using chi2 tests and Fisher’s exact test.ResultsOf the 526 eligible physicians who received the survey, 241 responded; response rate 45.8%. The majority of the respondents (56.4%) were women, and most (35.3%) were specialised in obstetrics/gynaecology. Average years of work experience was 11.1 (SD 8.7) years. Although 71% of respondents were aware of the diagnosis, only 7% knew the diagnostic criteria and only 6% had ever diagnosed a patient with somatisation disorder. Female physicians were more aware of underlying factors than their male colleagues (55.7% vs. 38.2%; p = .010). Type of specialty or years of practice did not affect awareness.ConclusionsAwareness of somatisation disorder is low among physicians working at emergency departments in western Sweden. The findings suggest a need to increase awareness and knowledge and provide training in diagnosing the condition, to ensure correct decisions and optimal patient management. Clinical guidelines need to be developed to support diagnosis, investigation, and treatment, in Sweden as well as internationally.

The Barriers to Recognizing and Reporting Child Physical Abuse by Emergency Physicians and Associated Factors.

Although the reporting rate of child abuse is increasing every year, the child abuse detection rate is 3.81% as of 2019 in Korea, which is significantly lower than that of developed countries for child rights. We investigated the associated factors with barriers that emergency physicians face in recognizing and reporting cases of child abuse. From May to July 2022, 240 emergency physicians working in the 15 emergency department were asked to participate in the survey via email. The questionnaire included the respondent's basic information, treatment experience for child abuse, reasons for reporting or not reporting, and opinions on measures to increase the reporting rate. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to discern the factors contributing to underreporting. Seventy-one individuals were included in the analysis, after excluding those who had never encountered suspected cases of child abuse. A multivariable logistic regression was performed with the above variables, and although it was not statistically significant, there was a tendency for workers to report well when working at a pediatric emergency department (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.97 [0.98-16.09]). The primary reason for reporting suspected abuse was the pattern of damage suspected of abuse. The first reason for not reporting suspected abuse was because they were not sure it was child abuse. Respondents answered that to report better, a quick and appropriate response from the police and confidentiality of the reporter were needed. Physicians in pediatric emergency departments demonstrated a tendency for more proactive reporting suspected cases of child abuse.

Health-related social needs information in the emergency department: clinician and patient perspectives on availability and use

BackgroundPatient health-related social needs (HRSN) complicate care and drive poor outcomes in emergency department (ED) settings. This study sought to understand what HRSN information is available to ED physicians and staff, and how HRSN-related clinical actions may or may not align with patient expectations.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews guided by HRSN literature, the 5 Rights of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) framework, and the Contextual Information Model. We asked ED providers, ED staff, and ED patients from one health system in the mid-Western United Stated about HRSN information availability during an ED encounter, HRSN data collection, and HRSN data use. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using modified thematic approach.ResultsWe conducted 24 interviews (8 per group: ED providers, ED staff, and ED patients) from December 2022 to May 2023. We identified three themes: (1) Availability: ED providers and staff reported that HRSNs information is inconsistently available. The availability of HRSN data is influenced by patient willingness to disclose it during an encounter. (2) Collection: ED providers and staff preferred and predominantly utilized direct conversation with patients to collect HRSNs, despite other methods being available to them (e.g., chart review, screening questionnaires). Patients’ disclosure preferences were based on modality and team member. (3) Use: Patients wanted to be connected to relevant resources to address their HRSNs. Providers and staff altered clinical care to account for or accommodate HRSNs. System-level challenges (e.g., limited resources) limited provider and staff ability to address patients HRSNs.ConclusionsIn the ED, HRSNs information was inconsistently available, collected, or disclosed. Patients and ED providers and staff differed in their perspectives on how HSRNs should be collected and acted upon. Accounting for such difference in clinical and administrative decisions will be critical for patient acceptance and effective usage of HSRN information.

Early identification of suspected serious infection among patients afebrile at initial presentation using neural network models and natural language processing: A development and external validation study in the emergency department

ObjectiveTo develop and externally validate models based on neural networks and natural language processing (NLP) to identify suspected serious infections in emergency department (ED) patients afebrile at initial presentation. MethodsThis retrospective study included adults who visited the ED afebrile at initial presentation. We developed four models based on artificial neural networks to identify suspected serious infection. Patient demographics, vital signs, laboratory test results and information extracted from initial ED physician notes using term frequency-inverse document frequency were used as model variables. Models were trained and internally validated with data from one hospital and externally validated using data from a different hospital. Model discrimination was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsThe training, internal validation, and external validation datasets comprised 150,699, 37,675, and 85,098 patients, respectively. The AUCs (95% CIs) for Models 1 (demographics + vital signs), 2 (demographics + vital signs + initial ED physician note), 3 (demographics + vital signs + laboratory tests), and 4 (demographics + vital signs + laboratory tests + initial ED physician note) in the internal validation dataset were 0.789 (0.782–0.796), 0.867 (0.862–0.872), 0.881 (0.876–0.887), and 0.911 (0.906–0.915), respectively. In the external validation dataset, the AUCs (95% CIs) of Models 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.824 (0.817–0.830), 0.895 (0.890–0.899), 0.879 (0.873–0.884), and 0.913 (0.909–0.917), respectively. Model 1 can be utilized immediately after ED triage, Model 2 can be utilized after the initial physician notes are recorded (median time from ED triage: 28 min), and Models 3 and 4 can be utilized after the initial laboratory tests are reported (median time from ED triage: 68 min). ConclusionsWe developed and validated models to identify suspected serious infection in the ED. Extracted information from initial ED physician notes using NLP contributed to increased model performance, permitting identification of suspected serious infection at early stages of ED visits.

Comparison of Manchester, qSOFA, emergency severity index, and national early warning scores for prognostic estimation and effective triage system in geriatric patients.

Triage refers to classifying and prioritizing patients based on the severity of their injuries or illnesses in the health care setting. The increasing number of elderly patients seeking care in emergency departments (EDs) highlights the need for special attention to the unique needs of this patient population. We aimed to compare the qSOFA, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), and Manchester Triage System (MTS) scores to assist ED physicians in assessing the severity of elderly patients' clinical conditions and triaging them appropriately. This cross-sectional study included 1066 patients aged 65 and over who presented to our ED as outpatients or by ambulance between September 1, 2022, and August 30, 2023. Scoring systems at the time of admission to the ED were recorded separately for outpatients and arriving by ambulance. According to the qSOFA, patients with a score of 0 were 0.976 times less likely to arrive by ambulance compared to those scoring 1 and above (OR = 0.976, p = .934). According to the NEWS, patients in the moderate-risk category were 0.447 times less likely to arrive by ambulance (OR = 0.447, p = .054). According to the ESI score, patients requiring high resource use with normal vital signs were 146.758 times more likely to arrive by ambulance (OR = 146.758, p = .001). Significant differences in patients' methods of presentation to the ED were observed based on the MTS, qSOFA, NEWS, and ESI scores.

Trends in Opioid and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use for Patients with Kidney Stones in United States Emergency Departments from 2015 to 2021.

Introduction: Renal colic is frequently treated with opioids; however, narcotic analgesic use can lead to dependence and abuse. We evaluated use trends of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain management of kidney stones in United States emergency departments (EDs) from 2015 to 2021. Methods: Kidney stone encounters were identified using National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. We applied a multistage survey weighting procedure to account for selection probability, nonresponse, and population weights. Medication use trends were estimated through logistic regressions on the timing of the encounter, adjusted for selected demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Between 2015 and 2021, there were an estimated 9,433,291 kidney stone encounters in United States EDs. Opioid use decreased significantly (annual odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, p = 0.003), and there was no significant trend in NSAID use. At discharge, male patients were more likely than females (OR: 1.93, p = 0.001) to receive opioids, and Black patients were less likely than White patients (OR: 0.34, p = 0.010) to receive opioids. Regional variation was also observed, with higher odds of discharge prescriptions in the West (OR: 3.15, p = 0.003) and Midwest (OR: 2.49, p = 0.010), compared with the Northeast. Thirty-five percent of patients received opioids that were stronger than morphine. Conclusion: These results suggest improved opioid stewardship from ED physicians in response to the national opioid epidemic. However, regional variation as well as disparities in discharge prescriptions for Black and female patients underscore opportunities for continued efforts.

Adapting an Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care in Tanzania: Co-Design of the MIMIC Intervention.

Uptake of evidence-based care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is suboptimal in Tanzania, but there are currently no published interventions to improve AMI care in sub-Saharan Africa. Co-design a quality improvement intervention for AMI care tailored to local contextual factors. An interdisciplinary design team consisting of 20 physicians, nurses, implementation scientists, and administrators met from June 2022 through August 2023. Half of the design team consisted of representatives from the target audience, emergency department physicians and nurses at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania. The design team reviewed multiple published quality improvement interventions focusing on ED-based AMI care. After selecting a multicomponent intervention to improve AMI care in Brazil (BRIDGE-ACS), the design team used the ADAPT-ITT framework to adapt the intervention to the local context. The design team audited current AMI care processes at the study hospital and reviewed qualitative data regarding barriers to care. Multiple adaptations were made to the original BRIDGE-ACS intervention to suit the local context, including re-designing the physician reminder system and adding patient educational materials. Additional feedback was sought from topical experts, including patients with AMI. Draft intervention materials were iteratively refined in response to feedback from experts and the design team. The finalized intervention, Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Myocardial Infarction Care in Tanzania (MIMIC), consisted of five core components: physician reminders, pocket cards, champions, provider training, and patient education. MIMIC is the first locally tailored intervention to improve AMI care in sub-Saharan Africa. Future studies will evaluate implementation outcomes and efficacy.