Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Research Articles

Investigation of Strategies to Block Downstream Effectors of AT1R-Mediated Signalling to Prevent Aneurysm Formation in Marfan Syndrome.

Cardiovascular outcome in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients most prominently depends on aortic aneurysm progression with subsequent aortic dissection. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent aneurysm formation in MFS mouse models. In patients, ARBs only slow down aortic dilation. Downstream signalling from the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is mediated by G proteins and β-arrestin recruitment. AT1R also interacts with the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) receptor, resulting in inflammation. In this study, we explore the targeting of β-arrestin signalling in MFS mice by administering TRV027. Furthermore, because high doses of the ARB losartan, which has been proven beneficial in MFS, cannot be achieved in humans, we investigate a potential additive effect by combining lower concentrations of losartan (25 mg/kg/day and 5 mg/kg/day) with barbadin, a β-arrestin blocker, and DMX20, a C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) blocker. A high dose of losartan (50 mg/kg/day) slowed down aneurysm progression compared to untreated MFS mice (1.73 ± 0.12 vs. 1.96 ± 0.08 mm, p = 0.0033). TRV027, the combination of barbadin with losartan (25 mg/kg/day), and DMX-200 (90 mg/kg/day) with a low dose of losartan (5 mg/kg/day) did not show a significant beneficial effect. Our results confirm that while losartan effectively halts aneurysm formation in Fbn1C1041G/+ MFS mice, neither TRV027 alone nor any of the other compounds combined with lower doses of losartan demonstrate a notable impact on aneurysm advancement. It appears that complete blockade of AT1R function, achieved by administrating a high dosage of losartan, may be necessary for inhibiting aneurysm progression in MFS.

Hemodynamic effects of withholding vs. continuing angiotensin II receptor blockers on the day of prone positioning spinal surgery in elderly patients

IntroductionThe hemodynamic effects of withholding vs. continuing angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) before surgery in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in a prone position during anesthesia induction to skin incision are still unknown.MethodsIn this prospective study, 80 patients undergoing spinal surgery in a prone position with general anesthesia, aged 60–79 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II or III, were enrolled. Patients who had ARBs only in their preoperative medication list were randomly divided into two groups at a 1:1 ratio: In Group A, ARBs were continued on the morning of surgery, while in Group B, they were withhold. Norepinephrine was infused to maintain the blood pressure at the baseline level of ±20% during anesthesia induction in all patients. The primary outcome was the consumption of norepinephrine in each group from anesthesia induction to skin incision. The secondary outcomes include changes in invasive arterial blood pressure and heart rate, the fluid infusion volumes, the amounts of anesthetic drugs, and the total time from induction to skin incision.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the demographics, the fluid infusion volumes, the amounts of anesthetic drugs, the total time from induction to skin incision, and hemodynamics at different time points (p > 0.05), while significant differences were found in norepinephrine consumption between the two groups (p < 0.001). Compared with Group B, the consumption of norepinephrine increased significantly in Group A (93.3 ± 29.8 vs. 124.1 ± 38.7 μg, p = 0.000). In addition, the same trend was illustrated in the pumping rate of norepinephrine between Group B (0.04 ± 0.01 μg·kg−1·min−1) and Group A (0.06 ± 0.02 μg·kg−1·min−1) (p = 0.004).ConclusionOur study conducted in elderly patients with hypotension undergoing prone spinal surgery demonstrated a greater pumping rate of norepinephrine during anesthesia induction in patients with ARBs continuing before surgery than those withholding, indicating that it was more difficult to maintain hemodynamic stability.Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=141081, ChiCTR2100053583.

In-depth Exploration of the Pharmacological, Analytical, and Pharmaceutical Attributes of Irbesartan

Irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), has gained prominence in the management of hypertension and diabetic nephropathy due to its potent antihypertensive and Reno protective effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pharmacological, analytical, and pharmaceutical characteristics of Irbesartan. Pharmacologically, Irbesartan selectively antagonizes the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors, leading to vasodilation, reduced aldosterone secretion, and consequently blood pressure lowering. The drug also exhibits favourable effects on renal function, making it a cornerstone therapy for diabetic nephropathy. Analytically, various chromatographic methods including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) have been developed and validated for the quantification of Irbesartan in biological samples and pharmaceutical formulations, owing to its importance in pharmacokinetic studies and quality control processes. Moreover, spectroscopic techniques such as UV-visible spectrophotometry have been utilized for Irbesartan determination due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Pharmaceutical considerations encompass formulation strategies, stability studies, and bioavailability enhancement techniques aimed at ensuring the efficacy and safety of Irbesartan formulations. The regulatory approval of Irbesartan-containing products by major health authorities underscores its clinical significance and quality assurance.

Sacubitril-valsartan vs ACE/ARB in pediatric heart failure: A retrospective cohort study

The first angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor on the market, sacubitril-valsartan, has shown marked improvements in death and hospitalization for heart failure among adults, and is now approved for use in pediatric heart failure. While the ongoing PANORAMA-HF trial is evaluating the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan for pediatric patients with a failing systemic left ventricle, the enrollment criteria do not include the majority of pediatric heart failure patients. Additional studies are needed. Using the TriNetX database, we performed a propensity score matched, retrospective cohort study to assess the incidence of a composite of all-cause mortality or heart transplant within 1year. The 519 patients who received sacubitril-valsartan were compared to 519 matched controls who received an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). There was no significant difference in the incidence of the composite outcome with sacubitril-valsartan over an ACE/ARB (13.3% vs 13.2%, p=0.95), or among the components of mortality (5.0% vs 5.8%, p=0.58) or heart transplantation (8.7% vs 7.5%, p=0.50). Patients who were receiving full goal-directed medical therapy (14.4% vs 16.0%, p=0.55) also showed no difference in the composite outcome. We observed a significantly increased incidence of hypotension (10% vs 5.2%, p=0.006) and a trend toward reduced number of hospitalizations per year (mean (SD) 1.3 (4.4) vs 2.0 (9.1), p=0.09). Sacubitril-valsartan is not associated with a decrease in the composite of all-cause mortality or heart transplantation within 1year. Future studies should evaluate the possible reduction in hospitalizations and optimal dosing to minimize hypotension.

Relationship between 2nd-generation angiotensin receptor blockers and the risk of hypotension in COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital.

It has not yet been established whether angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), statins, and multiple drugs affect the severity of COVID-19. Therefore, we herein performed an observational study on the effects of 1st- and 2nd-generation ARB, statins, and multiple drugs, on COVID-19 in patients admitted to 15 Japanese medical facilities. The results obtained showed that ARB, statins, and multiple drugs were not associated with the primary outcome (odds ratio: 1.040, 95% confidence interval: 0.688-0.571; 0.696, 0.439-1.103; 1.056, 0.941-1.185, respectively), each component of the primary outcome (in-hospital death, ventilator support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and admission to the intensive care unit), or the secondary outcomes (oxygen administration, disturbed consciousness, and hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg). ARB were divided into 1st- and 2nd-generations based on their approval for use (before 2000 and after 2001), with the former consisting of losartan, candesartan, and valsartan, and the latter of telmisartan, olmesartan, irbesartan, and azilsartan. The difference of ARB generation was not associated with the primary outcome (odds ratio with 2nd-generation ARB relative to 1st-generation ARB: 1.257, 95% confidence interval: 0.613-2.574). The odd ratio for a hypotension as one of the secondary outcomes with 2nd-generation ARB was 1.754 (95% confidence interval: 1.745-1.763) relative to 1st-generation ARB. These results suggest that patients taking 2nd-generation ARB may be at a higher risk of hypotension than those taking 1st-generation ARB and also that careful observations are needed. Further studies are continuously needed to support decisions to adjust medications for co-morbidities.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and risk of Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.

Hypertension is a recognized risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD). The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are widely used to treat hypertension. However, the association of RAS inhibitor use with PD has still been an area of controversy. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between RAS inhibitor use and PD. PUBMEDand EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to Oct 2023. All studies that examined the relationship between RAS inhibitor use and the incidence of PD were included. Seven studies with total 3,495,218 individuals met our inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. Overall, RAS inhibitor use was associated with a reduction in PD risk (OR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.79-0.98) compared with the controls. When restricted the analysis to individuals with RAS inhibitor use indication, RAS inhibitor exposure was also associated with a decreased risk of PD (OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.62-0.92). Pooled results of cohort studies also did support a protective role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (OR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.89-1.07) users and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (OR = 0.8, 95%CI = 0.63-1.02) in PD. Overall, RAS inhibitor use as a class is associated with a reduction in PD risk. However, the findings of ACEIs and ARBs may be limited by small sample size. Future well-designed studies considering the classification by inhibitor type, duration, dose, or property of BBB penetration of RAS inhibitors are needed to clarify the contribution of these exposure parameters on the risk of PD.

Evaluating prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with diabetes and albuminuria.

Although guidelines recommend the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria, their use remains suboptimal in several developed countries. Limited data are available on ACEi/ARB use in developing countries. Here, we assessed the use of ACEi/ARB and identified factors contributing to their underutilization at Hatyai Hospital, Thailand. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Hatyai Hospital database. Adult patients with diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria were included. Clinical data and laboratory results were extracted. Furthermore, this study recorded pre-specified conditions that influenced physicians' decisions regarding the prescription of ACEi/ARBs in patients who did not adhere to guidelines. Of 4,655 eligible patients, 500 patients were selected. The average age of the patients was 66.3 years, and 59.6% were female. The adherence rate was 72.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found a significant association between non-adherence and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.60, p = 0.019). The most common pre-specified condition contributing to non-adherence was "no condition identified" (69.8%). Among the cases of non-adherence, 21.7% were due to ACEi/ARB discontinuation after acute kidney injury, followed by hyperkalemia (5.1%) and a moderate increase in serum creatinine (4.3%). ACEi/ARB therapy was suboptimal in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria. Non-adherence was associated with CKD stage, possibly because of concerns about adverse events and healthcare-related factors.

Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiac Function in Breast Cancer Patients: Integrating Multiparametric Speckle Tracking Imaging and Conventional Echocardiography Parameters.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the role of different echocardiography parameters in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. While echocardiography examination with calculation of ejection fraction (EF), is pivotal for patient monitoring, its operator dependence and insensitivity to subtle changes in left ventricular (LV) contractility present challenges. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from speckle tracking, is more sensitive and stable than EF. Our research aimed to delineate supplementary echocardiography measurements beneficial for the cardiological monitoring of breast cancer patients. Methods Patients were followed up with echocardiography at baseline, during, and after the chemotherapy. Conventional echocardiography and multiple speckle tracking imaging parameters including myocardial work index, atrial strain, twist, and automatic EF were investigated. Results A total of 25 patients were recruited. A subset (15/25) exhibited pronounced GLS reduction, associated with decreased EF and altered cardiac mechanics. Patients with unchanged GLS were often hypertensive and on specific medications, in particular angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), potentially indicating protective effects. Despite stability in other parameters, GLS and EF sensitivity highlight their importance. A strong correlation between manual and automated EF measurement methods was also observed. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, across diverse echocardiography parameters, GLS and EF are primarily affected by chemotherapy. Hypertensive individuals exhibited lower susceptibility to chemotherapy-induced damage, likely attributed to the cardioprotective properties of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. A strong correlation between automatic and Simpson-based EF was found.

Enteropathy and intestinal malabsorption in patients treated with antihypertensive drugs. A retrospective cohort study.

To investigate differences in the incidence of enteropathy or intestinal malabsorption in patients taking angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), calcium channel blocker (CCB), and beta blockers (BBs) at a single center in Korea. In this retrospective study, we utilized data from the Yangsan electronic medical records to identify 129,169 patients. These individuals were prescribed olmesartan, other ARBs, ACEI, CCB, and BBs between November 2008 and February 2021. Of the 44,775 patients, 51 (0.11%) were observed to have enteropathy or intestinal malabsorption. Compared with the ACEI group, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for enteropathy and intestinal malabsorption were OR=1.313 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.188-6.798], p=0.893) for olmesartan, OR=0.915 (95% CI: [0.525-1.595], p=0.754) for the other ARBs, OR=0.928 (95% CI: [0.200-4.307]; p=0.924) for the CCB, and OR=0.663 (95% CI: [0.151-2.906]; p=0.586) for the BBs group. These findings were adjusted for factors such as age, gender, duration of antihypertensive medication, and comorbidities. In a retrospective cohort study of patients on antihypertensive medications, no significant difference was found in the incidence of enteropathy or intestinal malabsorption when ACEI was compared to olmesartan, other ARBs, CCB, and BBs.

Are Guideline-concordant Processes of Care Consistent Across the Rural–Urban Continuum? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Adults Newly Treated for Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectivesOur aim in this study was to identify the association between place of residence (metropolitan, urban, rural) and guideline-concordant processes of care in the first year of type 2 diabetes management. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of new metformin users between April 2015 and March 2020 in Alberta, Canada. Outcomes were identified as guideline-concordant processes of care through the review of clinical practice guidelines and published literature. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following outcomes were examined by place of residence: dispensation of a statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), eye examination, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), cholesterol, and kidney function testing. ResultsOf 60,222 new metformin users, 67% resided in a metropolitan area, 10% in an urban area, and 23% in a rural area. After confounder adjustment, rural residents were less likely to have a statin dispensed (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 0.87) or undergo cholesterol testing (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.90) when compared with metropolitan residents. In contrast, rural residents were more likely to receive A1C and kidney function testing (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.21 and aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.24, respectively). ACEi/ARB use and eye examinations were similar across place of residence. ConclusionsProcesses of care varied by place of residence. Limited cholesterol management in rural areas is concerning because this may lead to increased cardiovascular outcomes.

Assessment of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Incidence and Antihypertensive Therapy Efficacy in Hypertensive Patients

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive individuals in Karachi, Pakistan, and to evaluate the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy in preventing LVH. Methodology: A total of 200 hypertensive patients were referred from the Cardiac OPD to the Radiology department of Medicare Cardiac and General Hospital, Karachi, for echocardiography. Echocardiographic measurements of cardiac chambers were performed by expert echocardiographers, and left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated using the formula recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography. Results: Among the hypertensive patients, 100 had uncontrolled blood pressure (≥140/90 mmHg) while 100 had controlled blood pressure (≤130/80 mmHg). The female-to-male ratio was 3:1, with ages ranging from 21 to 80 years. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension exhibited a higher mean body mass index (29 ± 5 kg/m2) and significantly elevated LVM (mean 154 ± 4 g/m2). Angiotensin receptor inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed and effective antihypertensive agents, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy (60%), demonstrating utility in preventing LVH. Conclusion: This study highlights a high incidence of LVH in uncontrolled hypertensive individuals compared to those with controlled hypertension. Transthoracic echocardiography emerged as a highly valuable, non-invasive tool for measuring LVM and assessing the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus that of angiotensin receptor blockers on survival in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a nationwide observational cohort study

Background This study aimed to evaluate the patient survival rates based on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in a large cohort of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Methods Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into four groups based on the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) as follows: No group, patients without a prescription of any anti-hypertensive drugs including RASBs; Other group, patients with a prescription of anti-hypertensive drugs excluding RASBs; ACEI group, patients with a prescription of an ACEI; and ARB group, patients with a prescription of an ARB. Results The 5-year survival rates in the no, other, ACEI, and ARB groups were 68.6%, 67.8%, 70.6%, and 69.2%, respectively. The ACEI group had the best patient survival trend among the four groups. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences were observed between the ACEI and ARB groups. Among young patients and patients without diabetes or heart disease, the ACEI group had the best patient survival among the four groups. However, among patients with DM or heart disease, the ARB group had the best patient survival. Conclusions Our study found that patients receiving ACEI and ARB had comparable survival. However, patients receiving ARB had better survival in the subgroups of patients with DM or heart disease, and patients receiving ACEI had better survival in the subgroup of young patients or patients without diabetes or heart disease.

The potential for improved outcomes in the prevention and therapy of diabetic kidney disease through 'stacking' of drugs from different classes.

Aggressive therapy of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) can not only slow the progression of DKD to renal failure but, if utilized at an early enough stage of DKD, can also stabilize and/or reverse the decline in renal function. The currently recognized standard of therapy for DKD is blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). However, unless utilized at a very early stage, monotherapy with these drugs in DKD will only prevent or slow the progression of DKD and will neither stabilize nor reverse the progression of DKD to renal decompensation. Recently, the addition of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor and/or a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker to ACE inhibitors or ARBs has been clearly shown to further decelerate the decline in renal function. The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists shown promise in decelerating the progression of DKD. Other drugs that may aid in the deceleration the progression of DKD are dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, pentoxifylline, statins, and vasodilating beta blockers. Therefore, aggressive therapy with combinations of these drugs (stacking) should improve the preservation of renal function in DKD.

Association of antihypertensives and Parkinson's disease in a primary care population matched for underlying diagnosis.

To examine the association of several antihypertensive medication classes with incidence of Parkinson's disease (PD), taking into account possible underlying conditions. In a case-control study based on a large primary care database and including 21,981 PD cases and 21,981 non-PD controls matched for age, sex, and possible treatment indications associations with different antihypertensive medication groups, including diuretics, betablockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor-blockers and PD were examined. Antihypertensive medications overall were associated with a lower risk of subsequent diagnosis of PD (OR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97), with the negative association most significant for medications acting on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. A positive association with diagnosis of PD was only seen for betablockers and restricted to those with relatively young age and not in those with longer treatment duration. When taking into account underlying diagnoses, antihypertensive medications overall were associated with a reduced incidence of PD.

Irbesartan ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by activating the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway and suppressing NLRP3 inflammasomes in vivo and in vitro

ObjectivesDiabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by albuminuria and renal dysfunction caused by diabetes. At present there is no specific treatment for DN. Irbesartan (IRB) is an angiotensin receptor inhibitor indicated for the treatment of hypertension and DN. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of IRB on DN remains obscure. MethodsRAW264.7 macrophages were incubated in RPMI-1640, cell viability was evaluated by CCK-8 assays, transcriptional level of proinflammatory cytokines and was measured by ELISA and qPCR, NLRP3 inflammasome and Nrf2/Keap1 related proteins were measured by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic male C57BL/6 mice were used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of IRB on DN.Key findings First, we found that IRB improved high glucose-induced cell inflammation by inhibiting the transcription of IL-1β and IL-18. IRB activated the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway and decreased the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). IRB also suppressed the expression of NLRP3 and caspase-1. IRB combined with the N-acetylcysteine (NAC) significantly inhibited the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes. Conversely, IRB combined with the Nrf2-related inhibitor ML385 enhanced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, suggesting that IRB suppressed NLRP3 inflammasome via the Nrf2 pathway. In vivo study, HE staining and immunohistochemistry analysis further showed that IRB ameliorated high glucose-induced renal injury by elevating the expression of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and suppressing the proinflammatory cytokine and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. ConclusionsOur results suggested that IRB ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by activating the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway and suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasomes in vivo and in vitro. These findings provide new therapeutic strategies of diabetic nephropathy.

Nitrosamine Contamination in Pharmaceuticals: Regulatory Perspectives and Control Strategies of USFDA, EMA & HC

Various regulatory authorities were notified the presence of nitrosamine impurities in human medicines including angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), ranitidine, nizatidine and metformin in 2018. The presence of nitrosamines led manufacturers to assessed their products by any means that might inadvertently lead to nitrosamine content and taking steps to mitigate these risks after issuance of safety alerts, recall and withdraw certain batches of these drugs. Importantly, global cooperation by regulatory authorities triggered the investigation of synthetic route, rapid development of analytical procedures and publication of guidelines. This article highlights mainly on risk assessment and control strategies adopted by United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada (HC) regulatory bodies. Additionally, compare the acceptable intake (AI) values recommended by these regulatory authorities which will help the manufacturer to either limit or eliminate nitrosamines impurities in their medicines because nitrosamines are probable or possible human carcinogens, hence, it is recommended that the potential causes of nitrosamine formation as well as any other pathways observed and evaluate the risk for nitrosamine contamination or formation in their APIs and drug products. Manufacturers should prioritize evaluation of APIs and drug products based on factors such as maximum daily dose, duration of treatment, therapeutic indication, and number of patients treated for the products which are under pre approval stage and already marketed products.
 Conclusion: 
 As nitrosamine contamination affects patients worldwide, in case the levels of nitrosamines exceed acceptable limits, or more than one nitrosamine is observed, such products should not be commercialized. All the international regulatory agencies continuing to work with to propose various analytical methodologies to determining nitrosamine content in the API or FPP, risk assessment evaluation and control strategies, extrapolation of toxicological data and various confirmatory test for mutagenicity detection. Due to this rapid action taken by global authorities will help manufacturer to design their manufacturing process to be more robust so that they will timely register their products and reduce the additional cost require for its complete analysis by taking care of consumer’s safety as well.

Conversion of Olmesartan to Olmesartan Medoxomil, A Prodrug that Improves Intestinal Absorption, Confers Substrate Recognition by OATP2B1.

Olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan-MX), an ester-type prodrug of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, is predominantly anionic at intestinal pH. Human organic anion transporting polypeptide 2B1 (OATP2B1) is expressed in the small intestine and is involved in the absorption of various acidic drugs. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that OATP2B1-mediated uptake contributes to the enhanced intestinal absorption of olmesartan-MX, even though olmesartan itself is not a substrate of OATP2B1. Tetracycline-inducible human OATP2B1- and rat Oatp2b1-overexpressing HEK 293 cell lines (hOATP2B1/T-REx-293 and rOatp2b1/T-REx-293, respectively) were established to characterize OATP2B1-mediated uptake. Rat jejunal permeability was measured using Ussing chambers. ARBs were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Significant olmesartan-MX uptake was observed in hOATP2B1/T-REx-293 and rOatp2b1/T-REx-293 cells, whereas olmesartan uptake was undetectable or much lower than olmesartan-MX uptake, respectively. Furthermore, olmesartan-MX exhibited several-fold higher uptake in Caco-2 cells and greater permeability in rat jejunum compared to olmesartan. Olmesartan-MX uptake in hOATP2B1/T-REx-293 cells and in Caco-2 cells was significantly decreased by OATP2B1 substrates/inhibitors such as 1mM estrone-3-sulfate, 100µM rifamycin SV, and 100µM fluvastatin. Rat Oatp2b1-mediated uptake and rat jejunal permeability of olmesartan-MX were significantly decreased by 50µM naringin, an OATP2B1 inhibitor. Oral administration of olmesartan-MX with 50µM naringin to rats significantly reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of olmesartan to 76.9%. Olmesartan-MX is a substrate for OATP2B1, and the naringin-sensitive transport system contributes to the improved intestinal absorption of olmesartan-MX compared with its parent drug, olmesartan.

Sparsentan, a Dual Endothelin Type A and Angiotensin II Subtype 1 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: Latest Trial Results, Pharmacokinetic Considerations, and Binding Profile

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the most common forms of primary glomerulonephritis. In some patients, it can progress rapidly, leading to proteinuria, kidney failure, and death. Standard of care is traditionally with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), or an angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blocker (ARB). More recently, drugs targeting both endothelin 1 (ET-1) and Ang II receptors have been developed, as overactivation of such is implicated in IgAN. Sparsentan is a dual ET Type A (ETAR) and Ang II subtype 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist. The PROTECT study compared sparsentan with the ARB irbesartan, in patients with IgAN and with proteinuria of ≥1 g/day despite stable dose of ACEi/ARB for ≥90 days. Data presented at the 2023 American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Kidney Week showed that use of sparsentan led to sustained (>110 weeks) decreases in proteinuria, and a significantly greater preservation of kidney function, compared with irbesartan. The ongoing SPARTAN study is investigating the use of sparsentan in recently diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with IgAN. Preliminary data in 12 patients showed rapid and sustained proteinuria reductions, with little change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body weight, or total body water mean at Week 36. In both studies, sparsentan was generally well-tolerated with, in PROTECT, a comparable safety profile to irbesartan. Data presented at the congress also showed that sparsentan consistently occupies AT1R at levels exceeding ETAR occupancy. This balance is hypothesised to contribute to sparsentan’s limited risk of fluid retention.

Statins, ACE/ARBs drug use, and risk of pneumonia in hospitalized older patients: a retrospective cohort study.

The aims of this study is to evaluate the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARBs) and/or statin use with the risk of pneumonia, as well as and with in-hospital and short-term outpatient mortality in hospitalized older patients with pneumonia. Patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized in internal medicine and/or geriatric wards throughout Italy and enrolled in the REPOSI (REgistro Politerapuie SIMI-Società Italiana di Medicina Interna) register from 2010 to 2019 were screened to assess the diagnosis of pneumonia and classified on whether or not they were prescribed with at least one drug among ACE-I, ARBs, and/or statins. Further study outcomes were mortality during hospital stay and at 3 months after hospital discharge. Among 5717 cases included (of whom 18.0% with pneumonia), 2915 (51.0%) were prescribed at least one drug among ACE-I, ARBs, and statins. An inverse association was found between treatment with ACE-I or ARBs and pneumonia (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95). A higher effect was found among patients treated with ACE-I or ARBs in combination with statins (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85). This study confirmed in the real-world setting that these largely used medications may reduce the risk of pneumonia in older people, who chronically take them for cardiovascular conditions.

From Hypertension to Beyond: Unraveling the Diverse Mechanisms of Olmesartan in Disease Modulation.

Olmesartan, originally known for its antihypertensive properties, exhibits promising potential in addressing inflammation-mediated diseases. As an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), Olmesartan influences pivotal pathways, including reactive oxygen species, cytokines, NF-κB, TNF-α, and MAPK. This suggests a viable opportunity for repurposing the drug in conditions such as ulcerative colitis, neuropathy, nephropathy, and cancer, as supported by multiple preclinical studies. Ongoing clinical trials, particularly in cardiomyopathy and nephropathy, suggest a broader therapeutic scope for Olmesartan. Repurposing efforts would entail comprehensive investigations using disease-specific preclinical models and dedicated clinical studies. The drug's established safety profile, wide availability, and well-understood ARB mechanism of action offer distinct advantages that could facilitate a streamlined repurposing process. In summary, Olmesartan's versatile impact on inflammation-related pathways positions it as a promising candidate for repurposing across various diseases. Ongoing clinical trials and the drug's favorable attributes enhance its appeal for further exploration and potential application in diverse medical contexts.