Androgen Deprivation Research Articles

CYB561 supports the neuroendocrine phenotype in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is associated with resistance to androgen deprivation therapy, and an increase in the population of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiated cells. It is hypothesized that NE differentiated cells secrete neuropeptides that support androgen-independent tumor growth and induce aggressiveness of adjacent proliferating tumor cells through a paracrine mechanism. The cytochrome b561 (CYB561) gene, which codes for a secretory vesicle transmembrane protein, is constitutively expressed in NE cells and highly expressed in CRPC. CYB561 is involved in the α-amidation-dependent activation of neuropeptides, and contributes to regulating iron metabolism which is often dysregulated in cancer. These findings led us to hypothesize that CYB561 may be a key player in the NE differentiation process that drives the progression and maintenance of the highly aggressive NE phenotype in CRPC. In our study, we found that CYB561 expression is upregulated in metastatic and NE prostate cancer (NEPC) tumors and cell lines compared to normal prostate epithelia, and that its expression is independent of androgen regulation. Knockdown of CYB561 in androgen-deprived LNCaP cells dampened NE differentiation potential and transdifferentiation-induced increase in iron levels. In NEPC PC-3 cells, depletion of CYB561 reduced the secretion of growth-promoting factors, lowered intracellular ferrous iron concentration, and mitigated the highly aggressive nature of these cells in complementary assays for cancer hallmarks. These findings demonstrate the role of CYB561 in facilitating transdifferentiation and maintenance of NE phenotype in CRPC through its involvement in neuropeptide biosynthesis and iron metabolism pathways.

Risk of prostate cancer death in men diagnosed with prostate cancer at cystoprostat-ectomy. A nationwide population-based study.

One out of three men who undergo cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer is diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer (PCa) at histopathological examination. Many of these men are PSA tested as part of their follow-up, but it is unclear if this is needed. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of PCa death in these men and the need of PSA-testing during follow-up. Between 2002 and 2020, 1,554 men were diagnosed with PCa after cystoprostatectomy performed for non-metastatic bladder cancer and registered in the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden. We assessed their risk of death from PCa, bladder cancer and other causes up to 15 years after diagnosis by use of data in The Cause of Death Register. The use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a proxy for PCa progression was assessed by fillings in The Prescribed Drug Register. Fifteen years after diagnosis, cumulative incidence of death from PCa was 2.6% (95% CI 2.3%-2.9%), from bladder cancer 32% (95% CI: 30%-34%) and from other causes 40% (95% CI: 36%-44%). Only 35% of men with PCa recorded as primary cause of death in The Cause of Death Register had started ADT before date of death, indicating sticky-diagnosis bias with inflated risk of PCa death. For a large majority of men diagnosed with incidental PCa at cystoprostatectomy performed for bladder cancer, the risk of PCa death is very small so there is no rationale for PSA testing during follow-up.

Identifying Suitable Patients for Overcoming Androgen Deprivation Monotherapy in De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Identifying Suitable Patients for Overcoming Androgen Deprivation Monotherapy in De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial.

The usefulness of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer has been extensively reported, but there are limited studies on proton beam therapy (PBT) using similar hypofractionation schedules. The aim of this prospective phase II study is to confirm the safety of a shortened PBT course using 70Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in 28 fractions. From May 2013 to June 2015, 102 men with localized prostate cancer were enrolled. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered according to risk classification. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Of the 100 patients ultimately evaluated, 15 were classified as low risk, 43 as intermediate risk, and 42 as high risk. The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 96months (range: 60-119months). The 5-year cumulative incidences of grade 2 gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse events were 1% (95% CI: 0.1-6.9) and 4% (95% CI: 1.5-10.3), respectively; no grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary adverse events were observed. The current study revealed a low incidence of late adverse events in prostate cancer patients treated with moderately hypofractionated PBT of 70Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions, indicating the safety of this schedule.

Recent advances in flavonoid compounds for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is a malignant epithelial tumor of the prostate gland and is the most common malignant tumor of the male genitourinary system. Pharmacological therapies, including chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, play a key role in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, drug resistance and side effects limit the use of these drugs and so there is a need for new drug therapies for prostate cancer patients. Flavonoids, with their wide range of sources and diverse biological activities, have attracted much attention in the field of anti-tumor drug screening. In 2016, at least 58 flavonoids were reported to have anti-prostate cancer activity. In recent years, six additional flavonoid compounds have been found to have anti-prostate cancer potential. In this review, we have collected a large amount of evidence on the anti-prostate cancer effects of these six flavonoids, including a large number of cellular experiments and a small number of preclinical animal experiments. In addition, we predicted their drug-forming properties using Schrödinger's QikProp software and ADMETlab due to the lack of in vivo pharmacokinetic data for the six compounds. In conclusion, this review has fully confirmed the anti-prostate cancer effects of these six flavonoids, summarized their mechanisms of action and predicted their druggability. It provides a reference for the further development of these compounds into anti-prostate cancer drugs.

Chronic radiation proctitis refractory to steroid enema was successfully treated by metformin and sodium butyrate: a case report

BackgroundRadiation proctitis (RP) is a significant complication of pelvic radiation. Effective treatments for chronic RP are currently lacking. We report a case where chronic RP was successfully managed by metformin and butyrate (M-B) enema and suppository therapy.Case presentationA 70-year-old Asian male was diagnosed with prostate cancer of bilateral lobes, underwent definitive radiotherapy to the prostate of 76 Gy in 38 fractions and six months of androgen deprivation therapy. Despite a stable PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL for 10 months post-radiotherapy, he developed intermittent rectal bleeding, and was diagnosed as chronic RP. Symptoms persisted despite two months of oral mesalamine, mesalamine enema and hydrocortisone enema treatment. Transition to daily 2% metformin and butyrate (M-B) enema for one week led to significant improvement, followed by maintenance therapy with daily 2.0% M-B suppository for three weeks, resulting in continued reduction of rectal bleeding. Endoscopic examination and biopsy demonstrated a good therapeutic effect.ConclusionsM-B enema and suppository may be an effective treatment for chronic RP.

Catalyzing Precision Medicine: Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management

Background: The aim was to analyze the current state of deep learning (DL)-based prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis with a focus on magnetic resonance (MR) prostate reconstruction; PCa detection/stratification/reconstruction; positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT); androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); prostate biopsy; associated challenges and their clinical implications. Methods: A search of the PubMed database was conducted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the use of DL methods within the abovementioned areas. Results: A total of 784 articles were found, of which, 64 were included. Reconstruction of the prostate, the detection and stratification of prostate cancer, the reconstruction of prostate cancer, and diagnosis on PET/CT, ADT, and biopsy were analyzed in 21, 22, 6, 7, 2, and 6 studies, respectively. Among studies describing DL use for MR-based purposes, datasets with magnetic field power of 3 T, 1.5 T, and 3/1.5 T were used in 18/19/5, 0/1/0, and 3/2/1 studies, respectively, of 6/7 studies analyzing DL for PET/CT diagnosis which used data from a single institution. Among the radiotracers, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [18F]DCFPyl, and [18F]PSMA-1007 were used in 5, 1, and 1 study, respectively. Only two studies that analyzed DL in the context of DT met the inclusion criteria. Both were performed with a single-institution dataset with only manual labeling of training data. Three studies, each analyzing DL for prostate biopsy, were performed with single- and multi-institutional datasets. TeUS, TRUS, and MRI were used as input modalities in two, three, and one study, respectively. Conclusion: DL models in prostate cancer diagnosis show promise but are not yet ready for clinical use due to variability in methods, labels, and evaluation criteria. Conducting additional research while acknowledging all the limitations outlined is crucial for reinforcing the utility and effectiveness of DL-based models in clinical settings.

EORTC 2238 “De-Escalate”: a pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the era of new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors

The landscape of treating metastatic prostate cancer has evolved with the addition of Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), significantly improving survival rates. However, prolonged use of these therapies introduces notable side effects, prompting a need to revisit intermittent treatment duration. The EORTC 2238 De-Escalate trial is a pragmatic trial seeking to reassess the role of intermittent therapy in patients undergoing maximal androgen blockade (MAB) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC), i.e., the combination of ADT with an ARPI, with the aims of reducing side effects, enhancing Quality of Life (QoL) and optimizing resource usage, while maintaining oncological benefits.

Treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer and de novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer: Identification, prognosis and survival, genetic and epigenetic factors

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) shows an aggressive behavior compared to prostate cancer (PCa), also known as prostate adenocarcinoma. Scanty foci in PCa can harbor genetic alternation that can arise in a heterogeneity of prostate cancer. NEPC may arise de novo or develop following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). NEPC that arise following ADT has the nomenclature “treatment-emerging/induced NEPC (t-NEPC)”. t-NEPC would be anticipated in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic PCa. t-NEPC is characterized by low or absent androgen receptor (AR) expression, independence of AR signaling, and gain of neuroendocrine phenotype. t-NEPC is an aggressive metastatic tumor, develops from PCa in response to drug induced ADT, and shows very short response to conventional therapy. t-NEPC occurs in 10%-17% of patients with CRPC. De novo NEPC is rare and is accounting for less than 2% of all PCa. The molecular mechanisms underlying the trans-differentiation from CRPC to t-NEPC are not fully elucidated. Sphingosine kinase 1 plays a significant role in t-NEPC development. Although neuroendocrine markers: Synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and insulinoma associated protein 1 (INSM1 ) are expressed in t-NEPC, they are non-specific for diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of therapy. t-NEPC shows enriched genomic alteration in tumor protein P53 (TP53 ) and retinoblastoma 1 (RB1 ). There are evidences suggest that t-NEPC might develop through epigenetic evolution. There are genomic, epigenetic, and transcriptional alterations that are reported to be involved in development of t-NEPC. Knock-outs of TP53 and RB1 were found to contribute in development of t-NEPC. PCa is resistant to immunotherapy, and at present there are running trials to approach immunotherapy for PCa, CRPC, and t-NEPC.

Functional imaging guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with focal dose escalation and bladder trigone sparing for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: study protocol for phase II safo trial

BackgroundStereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment alternative for patients with localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. As already explored by some authors in the context of conventional moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy, focal boost of the index lesion defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with an improved biochemical outcome. The objective of this phase II trial is to determine the effectiveness (in terms of biochemical, morphological and functional control), the safety and impact on quality of life, of prostate SABR with MRI guided focal dose intensification in males with intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer.MethodsPatients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer according to NCCN definition will be treated with SABR 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions to the whole prostate gland with MRI guided simultaneous integrated focal boost (SIB) to the index lesion (IL) up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions, using a protocol of bladder trigone and urethra sparing. Intra-fractional motion will be monitored with daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intra-fractional tracking with intraprostatic gold fiducials. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) will be allowed. The primary endpoint will be efficacy in terms of biochemical and local control assessed by Phoenix criteria and post-treatment MRI respectively. The secondary endpoints will encompass acute and late toxicity, quality of life (QoL) and progression-free survival. Finally, the subgroup of high-risk patients will be involved in a prospective study focused on immuno-phenotyping.DiscussionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first trial to evaluate the impact of post-treatment MRI on local control among patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing SABR and MRI guided focal intensification. The results of this trial will enhance our understanding of treatment focal intensification through the employment of the SABR technique within this specific patient subgroup, particularly among those with high-risk disease, and will help to clarify the significance of MRI in monitoring local responses. Hopefully will also help to design more personalized biomarker-based phase III trials in this specific context. Additionally, this trial is expected to be incorporated into a prospective radiomics study focused on localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05919524; Registered 17 July 2023.Trial SponsorIRAD/SEOR (Instituto de Investigación de Oncología Radioterápica / Sociedad Española de Oncología Radioterápica).Study settingClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05919524; Registered 17 July 2023.Trial statusProtocol version number and date: v. 5/ 17 May-2023. Date of recruitment start: August 8, 2023. Date of recruitment completion: July 1, 2024.

Patient-derived castration-resistant prostate cancer model revealed CTBP2 upregulation mediated by OCT1 and androgen receptor

BackgroundProstate cancer is dependent on androgen receptor (AR) signaling, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has proven effective in targeting prostate cancer. However, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) eventually emerges. AR signaling inhibitors (ARSI) have been also used, but resistance to these agents develops due to genetic AR alterations and epigenetic dysregulation.MethodsIn this study, we investigated the role of OCT1, a member of the OCT family, in an AR-positive CRPC patient-derived xenograft established from a patient with resistance to ARSI and chemotherapy. We conducted a genome-wide analysis chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing and bioinformatic analyses using public database.ResultsGenome-wide analysis of OCT1 target genes in PDX 201.1 A revealed distinct OCT1 binding sites compared to treatment-naïve cells. Bioinformatic analyses revealed that OCT1-regulated genes were associated with cell migration and immune system regulation. In particular, C-terminal Binding Protein 2 (CTBP2), an OCT1/AR target gene, was correlated with poor prognosis and immunosuppressive effects in the tumor microenvironment. Metascape revealed that CTBP2 knockdown affects genes related to the immune response to bacteria. Furthermore, TISIDB analysis suggested the relationship between CTBP2 expression and immune cell infiltration in prostate cancer, suggesting that it may contribute to immune evasion in CRPC.ConclusionsOur findings shed light on the genome-wide network of OCT1 and AR in AR-positive CRPC and highlight the potential role of CTBP2 in immune response and tumor progression. Targeting CTBP2 may represent a promising therapeutic approach for aggressive AR-positive CRPC. Further validation will be required to explore novel therapeutic strategies for CRPC management.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy/Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitor Treatments for Prostate Cancer: Pathophysiology and Review of Effects on Cardiovascular Disease.

Androgen deprivation therapy is the cornerstone of systemic management for prostate cancer but is associated with multiple adverse effects that must be considered during treatment. These effects occur because of the profound hypogonadism that is induced from lack of testosterone or due to the medications used in the treatment or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. This article critically reviews the associations between androgen deprivation therapy, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, and cardiovascular complications such as prolonged QT interval, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. These unfavorable outcomes reinforce the need for regular cardiovascular screening of patients undergoing androgen deprivation for the management of prostate cancer.

Rapid time to prostate-specific antigen nadir after androgen deprivation therapy is associated with vitamin d deficiency in prostate cancer patients

Rapid time to prostate-specific antigen nadir after androgen deprivation therapy is associated with vitamin d deficiency in prostate cancer patients

Elective Pelvic Lymph Node Radiation Therapy and the Risk of Death in Patients With Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Postrandomization Analysis.

Although a contemporary randomized clinical trial has led to the use of whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT), long-term data evaluating a potential reduction in mortality are lacking and are addressed in the current study. From 2005 to 2015, 350 men with localized, unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) were randomly assigned to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and RT plus docetaxel versus ADT and RT. Treatment of the pelvic lymph nodes was at the discretion of the treating physician. Multivariable Cox and Fine and Grays regression analyses were performed to assess whether a significant association existed between radiation treatment volume and all-cause mortality (ACM) and PC-specific mortality (PCSM), respectively, adjusting for known PC prognostic factors and comorbidity. An interaction term between age (categorized by dichotomization at 65 years to enable clinical interpretation and applicability of the results and which approximates the median (66 years [IQR, 61-70]) and radiation treatment volume was included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 10.20 years (IQR, 7.96-11.41), 89 men died (25.43%); of these, 42 died of PC (47.19%). Of the 350 randomly assigned patients, 88 (25.14%) received WPRT. In men younger than 65 years, WPRT was associated with a significantly lower ACM risk (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.97]; P = .04) and lower PCSM risk (AHR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.35]; P = .09) after adjusting for covariates, whereas this was not the case for men 65 years or older. WPRT has the potential to reduce mortality in younger men with unfavorable-risk PC.

Recommendations on the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Patient selection

The standard treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is now a combination of androgen deprivation therapy plus an androgen receptor-targeted therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide), with or without chemotherapy (docetaxel). The selection of suitable patients for each therapeutic approach has become a determining factor to ensure efficacy and minimize side effects. This article combines recent clinical evidence with the accumulated experience of experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology and urology, to provide a comprehensive view and therapeutic recommendations for mHSPC.

A real world observational study characterizing patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with or without androgen receptor-pathway-inhibitor therapies in Alberta, Canada

BackgroundData are needed to improve the current understanding of clinical management and characteristics of patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) therapy. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study using real-world, population-level data from Alberta, Canada included all individuals diagnosed in 2017-2020 with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) or non-metastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For mCSPC, patients were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 180 days of initiating ADT, while patients with nmCRPC were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 2 years of diagnosis. ResultsThis study included 976 patients with mCSPC and 233 with nmCRPC of which 33.5% and 25.3% received an ARPI, respectively. The proportion of patients with mCSPC treated with an ARPI increased considerably for patients diagnosed in 2020 compared to 2017 (56.2% vs. 6.0%). In contrast, the use of ARPI to treat nmCRPC only increased marginally from 2017 to 2019/2020 (19.7% vs. 28.9%). Patients with mHSPC who were ARPI-exposed had longer median survival than patients who were ARPI-naive (38.47 (95% CI=32.84-NA). vs 34.19 (95% CI=33.33-38.83; p=0.03), with a higher proportion of patients surviving to 2-years. For nmCRPC, survival was similar between ARPI-exposed and ARPI-naive. In multivariable analyses, receiving ARPI for mCSPC was associated with younger patient age, more recent diagnoses, fewer comorbidities, a higher number of metastatic sites, referral to a medical oncologist as well as receiving surgery and radiation before ADT. Receiving ARPI for nmCRPC was associated with referral to a medical oncologist, younger age, and more recent diagnoses. ConclusionsOutcome analyses in this population suggest a continued unmet clinical need and complex clinical management pathways. Given that treatment pathways have evolved considerably, continued follow-up to understand the impact of these advancements on patient outcomes are warranted.

Overall survival benefit of androgen suppression in addition to dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: Nationwide real-world data indicates a shift in men that benefit

ObjectiveTo evaluate the real-world added value of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in addition to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer, in view of advances in radiotherapy and diagnostics. MethodsAll Dutch men diagnosed with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (defined as: ≥cT2c-T3b N0M0, PSA ≥20–50 ng/ml, and/or Gleason score ≥8 (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade ≥4)) from 2009 through 2019 and treated with EBRT with or without ADT were identified in the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry.Propensity scores were used to match (1:1) men that received ADT to men that did not receive ADT. Subsequently, OS was compared. Analyses were also stratified by number of high-risk features, 1 (either ≥cT2c, PSA >20 ng/ml or Gleason score ≥8) versus ≥2 (out of ≥cT2c, PSA >20 ng/ml and Gleason score ≥8). ResultsA total of 14,773 men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer were identified, 3,958 (27%) of which received EBRT alone. After matching, 3,427 men remained in both groups and baseline characteristics were well-balanced. After a median follow-up of 92 months, OS was better in men treated with EBRT and ADT compared to men treated with EBRT alone (10-year OS: 66.4% versus 61.8%; HR 0.88 [95%CI: 0.80–0.96]). There was no statistically significant difference in OS in the subgroup of men with only 1 high-risk feature (10-year OS 67.7% versus 64.9%; HR 0.95 [95%CI: 0.85–1.07]). ConclusionsIn a contemporary cohort of men treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer with EBRT, an OS benefit of adding ADT was only observed in men with at least 2 high-risk features. These results suggest that improvements in diagnostics and treatment in recent decades have resulted in a stage shift of men benefiting from the addition of ADT to EBRT.

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy vs Hormonal Therapy in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy.

Benefits of docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) remain largely unknown. We explored whether docetaxel-based NCHT would bring pathological benefits and improve biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) over neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in locally advanced prostate cancer. A randomized trial was designed recruiting 141 locally advanced, high-risk prostate cancer patients who were randomly assigned at the ratio of 2:1 to the NCHT group (75 mg/m2 body surface area every 3 weeks plus androgen deprivation therapy for 6 cycles) and the NHT group (androgen deprivation therapy for 24 weeks). The primary end point was 3-year bPFS. Secondary end points were pathological response including pathological downstaging and minimal residual disease rates. The NCHT group showed significant benefits in 3-year bPFS compared to the NHT group (29% vs 9.5%, P = .002). At a median follow-up of 53 months, the NCHT group achieved a significantly longer median bPFS time than the NHT group (17 months vs 14 months). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in pathological downstaging and minimal residual disease rates. NCHT plus RP achieved significant bPFS benefits when compared with NHT plus RP in high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer. A larger cohort with longer follow-up duration is essential in further investigation.

Evolution of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy after skin cancer in men in Australia. Its management varies according to tumour stage. Due to the significant dependence on androgen receptor signalling, agents that interfere with this pathway (most commonly medical castration in the form of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) are the mainstay treatment of advanced disease. This review provides a contemporary update on ADT, withfurther discussion of emerging novel therapies for primary care. ADT is currently indicated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, disease recurrence following attempted local curative therapy, as well as combined use with radiotherapy for intermediate/high-risk disease. There has been rapid development of new pharmaceuticals targeting the androgen receptor. These are reviewed historically with an emphasis placed on emerging therapies, their common side effects, and how to managethem in the general practice setting.

Impact of the coronavirus disease pandemic on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and urologists' treatment behaviors: A single tertiary center retrospective study.

To assess whether the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic affected the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and urologists' treatment behaviors. We retrospectively examined the medical records of 208 patients who had undergone RARP between August 2017 and December 2022. We compared the rate of preoperative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), waiting period for RARP, patients' baseline characteristics and quality of life (QOL), proportion of adverse pathology on the RARP specimen, rate of Gleason grade group upgrading from biopsy to the RARP specimen, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival between the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups. The rate of preoperative ADT was significantly higher during than before the COVID-19 pandemic (13.7% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.002). The baseline physical and mental QOL scores did not differ significantly between the groups. The proportion of D'Amico low-risk patients was significantly lower (13.6% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.005) and waiting period for RARP was significantly shorter (median 3.5 months vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.016) in the pandemic group than in the pre-pandemic group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of adverse pathology between the groups (p = 0.104); however, the upgrading rate was significantly higher in the pre-pandemic group (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in PSA recurrence-free survival between the groups (log-rank, p = 0.752). The COVID-19 pandemic did not adversely affect the oncologic outcomes of RARP and QOL before RARP. However, it caused urologists to increase the use of preoperative ADT and to reserve RARP for higher-risk cases.