- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101205
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Netta Granot + 2 more
- Research Article
1
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2026.101220
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Daniel Tzabbar
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101196
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Kemi S Anazodo + 8 more
- Research Article
- 10.1016/s0090-2616(26)00005-7
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101202
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Arkapravo Sarkar
Despite unprecedented AI investment, 74% of companies struggle to achieve value from AI initiatives. This disconnect stems not from technological limitations but from the absence of strategic frameworks that embed AI into workflow processes. This article presents a four-phase framework for integrating generative AI across organizational functions: Explore, Codify, Integrate, and Elevate. Unlike traditional technology adoption models, this framework emphasizes prompt strategy and workflow integration as primary transformation drivers. Through functional analysis of marketing, human resources, and operations, we demonstrate how organizations can move from scattered experimentation to systematic integration by treating prompt engineering as a core organizational capability. The framework addresses three critical adoption traps: the Pilot Trap, Policy Trap, and Skill Trap. By providing concrete examples and implementation roadmaps, this article offers practitioners a pathway to transform AI from technological curiosity into a competitive advantage embedded in daily workflows.
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101201
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Marion Festing + 3 more
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101200
- Mar 1, 2026
- Organizational Dynamics
- Syrus M Islam
Social enterprises are hybrid organizations aiming to achieve both financial sustainability and social impact. Because of their active role in creating social impact by addressing pressing social problems, they are recognized as important agents to help attain the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In the social enterprise context, organizational growth is considered a major strategy to scale social impact since it helps them offer more products/services to a larger number of beneficiaries. However, little is known about when and how this strategy may not work as intended. By synthesizing prior research and using real-life examples, this article presents ten conditions under which scaling social impact through an organizational growth strategy can create unintended consequences in social enterprises. The article also develops a holistic framework articulating how these ten conditions can emerge via seven growth-related activities in social enterprises. The developed framework facilitates a comprehensive understanding for managers and social entrepreneurs about the pitfalls to avoid while pursuing organizational growth as a social impact scaling strategy in social enterprises. Finally, this article introduces a diagnostic tool — ImpactProtect: A Growth Risk Assessment Tool for Social Enterprises — designed to help social enterprises evaluate their vulnerability to unintended consequences associated with organizational growth. • Organizational growth is a common strategy for scaling social impact in social enterprises. • Limited knowledge exists on when growth may fail to scale social impact in social enterprises. • Organizational growth can create unintended consequences under ten conditions. • A framework shows the relationship between organizational growth and its unintended consequences in social enterprises. • ImpactProtect – a diagnostic tool – helps social enterprises self-assess growth risks to safeguard impact integrity.
- Research Article
6
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101154
- Dec 1, 2025
- Organizational Dynamics
- Paula Caligiuri
- Research Article
6
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101157
- Dec 1, 2025
- Organizational Dynamics
- David G Sirmon + 2 more
- Research Article
2
- 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101128
- Dec 1, 2025
- Organizational Dynamics
- Michael H Morris + 1 more
The nature of strategy and its implementation for entrepreneurs in emergent-stage ventures is explored. The emergent nature of these ventures finds them in an ongoing state of becoming as the entrepreneur interprets and makes sense of novel developments, with strategy formulation and implementation capabilities emerging in real time. Lacking resources, marketplace legitimacy, and critical capabilities, these entrepreneurs find the strategic direction of the firm is reliant on experimentation and ongoing learning through trial and error. It is important for entrepreneurs to realize that a bi-directional relationship exists between the formulation and implementation of strategy, where strategy is formed and modified in response to the realities introduced through execution efforts. We identify the fundamental differences in strategy formulation and implementation depending on whether the entrepreneur is creating a survival, lifestyle, managed growth, or aggressive growth business. These differences impact the need for and capacity of the firm to adapt and/or pivot as it evolves through stages of development. Key implementation priorities are provided for entrepreneurs.