In transactions using Paypal, of course, there are many reasons for the risk of disputes occurring, ranging from delays in delivery, damaged goods, and transactions without authorization. The problem will be different when they carry out business transactions in different regions of the country and they have different nationalities. The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach, a normative juridical approach is carried out by studying legal norms or rules, while the empirical approach is carried out by direct interviews with sources who will relate to research problems, the data analysis used is qualitative. In trading transactions via the internet, trade is generally carried out by people who are located and subject to different countries and jurisdictionsThe legal relationship between Payment Gateway Users and Payment Gateway Providers At Fintech Paypal Indonesia is where the parties involved in the electronic payment system include consumers, business actors, acquirers, issuers and payment gateway providers. legal relationships that arise between consumers, business actors, acquirers, issuers and payment gateway operators are born from agreements made by the parties. Dispute Resolution and Chargeback Claims in Payment Gateway Transaction activities on Paypal Fintech where the paypal system provides services can communicate directly with the seller by opening a dispute at the Paypal Dispute Settlement Center. if it is not completed in following the policies provided by paypal services, consumers or business actors can ask for recommendations to mediate to the paypal service center but if they are not finished, business actors and consumers can resolve disputes through litigation, which usually business actors are subject to the applicable law, applies where the consumer is a national.

Law is a structure that regulates the pattern of society to form a culture. The Islamic family culture in Indonesia is strongly influenced by the prevailing family law structure which includes marriage and divorce. This is regulated in the structural system of laws regarding marriage, namely Law No. 1 of 1974 as amended by Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning Changes in the Minimum Age of Marriage for Women. Articles which for some people believe have not accommodated the interests of all parties and have not met the times, so that this Law is felt by some women activists to be discriminatory which tends to reap injustice. Among the articles that are considered controversial, namely the Minimum Age for Marriage. study on the actualization of Indonesian Marriage Age Limits uses a qualitative descriptive method by using a literature study, so that the findings are that Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage which was amended by Law No. 1 of 2019 especially related to Article 7 concerning the age limit is already in line with and accommodate the interests of citizens, In the Qur’an and Hadith there is no mention of age limits but mentions “baligh” and “able” as a benchmark in the permissibility of marriage, Jumhur scholars accept Maslahah Mursalah as one of the reasons in establishing sharia law, but in the application and placement of conditions they have different opinions

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis permasalahan mengenai keabsahan perjanjian pengikatan jaminan dengan polis asuransi jiwa konvensional sebagai objek jaminan. Masalah yang diteliti adalah mengenai penentuan perikatan sebagai suatu benda berdasarkan Pasal 511 ayat (3) KUHPerd dan keabsahan perjanjian pengikatan jaminan yang menggunakan polis asuransi jiwa sebagai objeknya. Metode yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan mengumpulan data secara studi pustaka (library research). Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa benda dalam suatu perikatan bukanlah perikatan itu sendiri, melainkan prestasi atau utang yang terkandung dalam perikatan tersebut,dengan demikian, ada atau tidaknya prestasi sangat mempengaruhibisa atau tidaknya suatu perikatan diklasifikasikan sebagai benda. Polis asuransi jiwa bukanlah salah satu benda sebagaimana yang ditentukan Pasal 511 ayat (3) KUHPerd, dengan demikian perjanjian pengikatan jaminan yang menggunakan polis asuransi jiwa konvensional sebagai objek jaminan adalah tidak sah karena tidak memenuhi syarat sahnya perjanjian “suatu hal tertentu” berdasarkan Pasal 1320 KUHPerd.