BackgroundTricuspid valve repair during mitral valve replacement surgery remains a controversial topic. The risk-benefit ratio in some populations remains uncertain, especially in rheumatic heart disease patients. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant tricuspid repair on surgical mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery due to rheumatic mitral valve disease who have moderate to severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study from January 1, 2017, to December 30, 2022. All patients over 18 years of age who underwent cardiac surgery to correct rheumatic mitral valve disease with concomitant moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were included. The primary outcome was a surgical death. In an exploratory analysis, clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained 2 years after the procedure. ResultsOf the 144 patients included, 83 (57.6%) underwent tricuspid valve repair. The mean age was 46.2 (±12.3) years with 107 (74.3%) female individuals, the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 61.0% (55-67), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was 55.0 mmHg (46-74), with 45 (31.3%) individuals with right ventricular dysfunction. The total in-hospital mortality was 15 (10.4%) individuals, and there was no difference between the groups submitted or not to tricuspid repair: 10 (12.0%) vs. 5 (7.5%); p = 0.46, respectively. There was an association with one variable independently: the sPAP value, relative risk 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.01. The estimated cut-off value of sPAP that indicates higher early mortality through the receiver operating characteristic curve (area 0.70, p = 0.012) was 73.5 mmHg. ConclusionsPerforming tricuspid repair in individuals who were undergoing cardiac surgery to correct rheumatic mitral valve disease was not associated with increased surgical mortality. Our results suggest the safety of tricuspid repair even in this high-risk population, reinforcing the recommendations in current guidelines.

In this issue of Structural Heart, high-impact presentations from Transcatheter Valve Therapies 2023 are reviewed. Dr Jaffar Khan provided updates on the current understanding of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in the field of transcatheter mitral valve replacement, highlighting known predictors of obstruction, a generally agreed-upon strategy for preprocedure assessment, and a host of management strategies in various stages of development and study.

BackgroundCertain patients with functional mitral regurgitation survive longer with fewer heart failure hospitalizations after undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER); however, clinical markers identifying who will benefit have not been established. The ‘proportionality’ of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity compared to left ventricular size has been hypothesized to predict clinical outcome. MethodsWe sought to combine existing studies to compare outcomes between ‘proportionate’ MR and ‘disproportionate’ MR in patients undergoing TEER. PubMed and Medline were searched from January 2018 until May 2023. Data was extracted and synthesized by 2 independent authors using random effects models with risk ratios (RRs) for binary outcomes. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (ACM/HFH). Other outcomes of interest included ACM and residual >2+ MR after TEER. ResultsSix trials with a total of 1594 patients (mean age 71 years, 66% male) were included, which assessed MR proportionality using either a ratio of estimated regurgitant orifice area to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EROA:LVEDV) or regurgitant fraction. Seven hundred and five (mean age 70 years, 75% male) were classified as proportionate MR, and 889 (mean age 72 years, 60% male) had disproportionate MR. There was no significant association between MR proportionality (by EROA:LVEDV) and ACM (RR 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.42). Proportionality did not significantly associate with ACM/HFH, though there were divergent effect signals when proportionality was measured by EROA:LVEDV (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.44) or regurgitant fraction (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.53-4.11). Disproportionate MR showed a greater association with residual MR > 2+ post-TEER that did not meet statistical significance (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.77-4.49). ConclusionsIn patients undergoing TEER for functional mitral regurgitation, MR proportionality was not significantly associated with ACM/HFH, all-cause mortality, or residual MR.

BackgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding the optimal risk stratification of high-degree atrioventricular block (HDAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MethodsThis prospective study sought to determine the utility of the pre- and post-TAVR His-ventricular (HV) interval in the risk stratification of post-TAVR HDAVB. One hundred twenty-one patients underwent an electrophysiology study before and after TAVR. The primary outcome was HDAVB requiring pacemaker implantation within 30 days post-TAVR. A separate retrospective cohort was analyzed to determine the postoperative interval at which the risk of HDAVB is reduced to <5%. ResultsHDAVB occurred in 12 (10%) patients. Baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) (odds ratio [OR]: 13.6), implant depth >4 mm (OR: 3.9), use of mechanically- or self-expanding valves (OR: 6.3), and post-TAVR HV > 65 ​ms (OR: 4.9) were associated with increased risk of HDAVB, whereas PR intervals and pre-TAVR HV were not. In patients without baseline RBBB or new persistent left bundle branch block (LBBB), not one patient with post-TAVR HV < 65 ​ms developed HDAVB. In the separate retrospective cohort (N = 1049), the risk of HDAVB is reduced (<5%) on postoperative days 4 and 3 in patients with pre-TAVR RBBB and post-TAVR persistent LBBB, respectively. ConclusionsBaseline RBBB, new persistent LBBB, implant depth >4 mm, and a post-TAVR HV ≥ 65 ​ms were associated with a higher risk of post-TAVR HDAVB, whereas an HV ≤ 65 ​ms was associated with a lower risk. The pre-TAVR HV was not associated with our outcome, and the delta HV did not have practical incremental prognostic value. Among those without pre-TAVR RBBB or post-TAVR persistent LBBB, no patients with post-TAVR HV < 65 ​ms developed HDAVB.

BackgroundTranscatheter mitral valve-in-valve (MViV) replacement has emerged as an alternative to redo mitral valve (MV) surgery for the management of failed bioprosthetic MVs. The degree of cardiac remodeling assessed by echocardiography has been shown to have prognostic implications in degenerative mitral regurgitation patients undergoing MV surgery. The impact of transcatheter MViV in patients with degenerative bioprosthetic MV failure on cardiac remodeling and its associated prognosis remains undescribed. ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to describe the early anatomic and functional changes of the left-sided chambers and right ventricle by echocardiography posttranscatheter MViV intervention and their impact on mortality outcomes. Additionally, we sought to analyze the outcome of heart failure in bioprosthetic MV failure patients undergoing transcatheter MViV replacement. MethodsWe analyzed consecutive patients undergoing MViV intervention for symptomatic bioprosthetic MV failure. Echocardiograms before intervention and within 100 days postintervention were analyzed. A chart review was performed to obtain baseline characteristics, follow-up visits, 30-day heart failure and 1-year all-cause mortality outcomes. ResultsA total of 62 patients (mean age 69 ± 13 years, 61% male) were included in the study. Most patients were undergoing MViV intervention for prosthetic mitral stenosis n = 48 (77.4%) and the rest for mitral regurgitation or mixed disease. Compared with baseline, significant reductions were observed in median left atrial volume (LAV; 103 [81–129] ml vs. 95.2 [74.5–117.5] ml, p < 0.01) and mean (SD) left atrial conduit strain (9.1% ± 5.2% vs. 10.8% ± 4.8%, p = 0.039) within 100 days postintervention. Early reduction in right ventricular free wall global longitudinal strain and fractional area change also occurred postintervention. No significant change in left ventricular chamber dimensions or ejection fraction was observed. During the 1-year follow up period, 5 (8%) patients died. While baseline LAV was not associated with 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 0.98 CI 0.95–1.01; p = 0.27), a change in LAV in the follow up period was associated with all-cause mortality at 1 year (OR 1.06 CI 1.01–1.12; p = 0.023). At 30 days postintervention, 65% of patients had an improvement in their New York Heart Association functional class. ConclusionIn this retrospective study of patients undergoing transcatheter MViV intervention for failed bioprosthetic MVs, early reverse remodeling of the left atrium occurs within 100 days postintervention and reduction in LAV is associated with reduced all-cause mortality at 1 year. In addition, there is significant improvement in heart failure symptoms at 30 days following intervention but further investigation into the longitudinal remodeling changes and long-term outcomes is needed.

BackgroundIt is unknown whether bioprostheses used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation will have similar long-term durability as those used for surgical aortic valve replacement. Repetitive mechanical stress applied to the valve leaflets, particularly during diastole, is the main determinant of structural valve deterioration. Leaflet mechanical stress cannot be measured in vivo. The objective of this in vitro/in silico study was thus to compare the magnitude and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stress in old vs new generations of self-expanding (SE) vs balloon expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs). MethodsA double activation simulator was used for in vitro testing of two generations of SE THV (Medtronic CoreValve 26 mm and EVOLUT PRO 26 mm) and two generations of BE THV (Edwards SAPIEN 23 mm vs SAPIEN-3 23 mm). These THVs were implanted within a 21-mm aortic annulus. A noncontact system based on stereophotogammetry and digital image correlation with high spatial and temporal resolution (2000 img/sec) was used to visualize the valve leaflet motion and perform the three-dimensional analysis. A finite element model of the valve was developed, and the leaflet deformation obtained from the digital image correlation analysis was applied to the finite element model to calculate local leaflet mechanical stress during diastole. ResultsThe maximum von Mises leaflet stress was higher in early vs new THV generation (p < 0.05) and in BE vs SE THV (p < 0.05): early generation BE: 2.48 vs SE: 1.40 MPa; new generation BE: 1.68 vs SE: 1.07 MPa. For both types of THV, the highest values of leaflet stress were primarily observed in the upper leaflet edge near the commissures and to a lesser extent in the mid-portion of the leaflet body, which is the area where structural leaflet deterioration most often occurs in vivo. ConclusionsThe results of this in vitro/in silico study suggest that: i) Newer generations of THVs have ∼30% lower leaflet mechanical stress than the early generations; ii) For a given generation, SE THVs have lower leaflet mechanical stress than BE THVs. Further studies are needed to determine if these differences between new vs early THV generations and between SE vs BE THVs will translate into significant differences in long-term valve durability in vivo.

BackgroundThe eligibility and potential benefit of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy to treat moderate-severe or severe secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) has not been reported in a contemporary heart failure (HF) population. MethodsEligibility for TEER based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling: (1) HF symptoms, (2) moderate-severe or severe MR, (3) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 20% to 50%, (4) left ventricular end-systolic dimension 7.0 cm, and (5) receiving GDMT (blocker + angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker). The proportion (%) of patients eligible for TEER. The hypothetical number needed to treat to prevent or postpone adverse outcomes was estimated using relative risk reductions from published hazard ratios in the registration trial and the observed event rates. ResultsWe identified 50,841 adults with HF and known LVEF. After applying FDA criteria, 2461 patients (4.8%) were considered eligible for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (FDA+), with the vast majority of patients excluded (FDA-) based on a lack of clinically significant MR (N = 47,279). FDA+ patients had higher natriuretic peptide levels and were more likely to have a prior HF hospitalization compared to FDA- patients. Although FDA+ patients had a more dilated left ventricle and lower LVEF, median (25th-75th) left ventricular end-systolic dimension (cm) was low at 4.4 (3.7-5.1) and only 30.8% had severely reduced LVEF. FDA+ patients were at higher risk of HF-related morbidity and mortality. The estimated number needed to treat to potentially prevent or postpone all-cause hospitalization was 4.4, 8.8 for HF hospitalization, and 5.3 for all-cause death at 24 months in FDA+ patients. ConclusionsThere is a low prevalence of TEER eligibility based on FDA criteria primarily due to absence of moderate-severe or severe MR. FDA+ patients are a high acuity population and may potentially derive a robust clinical benefit from TEER based on pivotal studies. Additional research is necessary to validate the scope of eligibility and comparative effectiveness of TEER in real-world populations.

BackgroundThe location and severity of vascular calcification may influence closure device success in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this study was to analyze effects of vascular access-site calcification on vascular and bleeding outcomes post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. MethodsThe Randomized Comparison of CatHeter-based Strategies fOr Interventional ACcess SitE CLOSURE during Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (CHOICE-CLOSURE) trial assigned 516 patients to access site closure using a pure plug-based technique (MANTA, Teleflex) or a primary suture-based technique (ProGlide, Abbott Vascular). The principal finding of the overall study was that access-site or access-related complications were more common after the plug-based strategy compared to percutaneous closure with a suture-based strategy. In this predefined subgroup analysis, the overall cohort was split into patients with and without anterior calcification at the access site and divided by degree of calcification severity using the classification system developed in the MANTA vs. suture-based vascular closure after transcatHeter aortic valve replacement (MASH) trial. Differences in bleeding and vascular complications were compared. The primary endpoint consisted of access-site- or access-related major and minor vascular complications. ResultsThere were more access-site-related major and minor vascular complications for patients with anterior wall vascular calcification and MASH severe calcification. No significant interaction with choice of closure technique in terms of access-site-related major and minor vascular complications was observed (odds ratio 1.70, 95% CI 0.77-3.78, p = 0.19 for the primary endpoint in plug- vs. suture-based strategy in patients with anterior calcification, odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 0.56-5.65, p = 0.33 for primary endpoint in plug- vs. suture-based strategy with MASH severe calcification, pint = 0.97 for anterior calcification, pint = 0.95 for MASH severe calcification). ConclusionsThe total number of vascular complications was found to be greater in the presence of anterior and MASH severe calcification. Overall, the presence of anterior or severe calcification does not significantly modify the efficacy of the suture-based strategy compared to the plug-based strategy.