Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10042
Visitor’s Corner with Roy Wood, Jr.
  • Dec 12, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Adriane Lentz-Smith

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10061
The Secular City or God in Gotham? The Religion Problem in Urban and Suburban History
  • Dec 12, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Stephen M Koeth

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10049
Crisis in Higher Education
  • Dec 12, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Lauren Jae Gutterman + 4 more

  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10059
Environmental and Agricultural Histories Snakes and Spirits: The Human Problem in Modern American History
  • Dec 11, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Alison Collis Greene

  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10041
Soot, Palm Trees, and Zinc: The Port System of the Greater Caribbean, U.S. Empire, and the Geopolitics of Disgust
  • Nov 18, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Alex Goodall

Abstract This article explores the reactions of white U.S. elite travelers to the greater Caribbean in the Gilded Age and progressive era. Focusing on the tropical port system that was the center of the region’s commodity export trade and simultaneously a center of visitor transit, it explores how visitors’ negative reactions, especially of disgust, fed into the politics of race and empire by attributing the effects of rapid globalization to non-white autonomy in the region.

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10048
“Energy Humanities and American History”
  • Nov 17, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Caleb Wellum + 4 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.10034
Historicizing Ableism
  • Aug 8, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Susan Burch

Abstract Recognizing disability as a socially created category, a lived experience with real-world consequences, and part of a critical analytical framework, disability historians have illuminated core aspects of modern American history. With some frequency, however, both scholars and community members conflate disability with ableism. At other times, disability is presented as a category or identity separate from questions of power, privilege, and marginalization. It is common too that scholarly works focused on locating and defining ableism narrow or neglect historical context or specificity. In framing understandings of ableism around disability, many of us have largely ignored how ableism shape-shifts, how it is connected to other systems of power, or how the defining elements of ableism ebb and flow. This article calls on us to focus on the system of power itself—historicizing ableism. Making this move expands who we can write about, what sources we look at, and what purposes our historical work serves.

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.6
Unity and Struggle: The Twilight of Maoism in the United States
  • Jul 16, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Kazushi Minami

Abstract The Chinese Cultural Revolution reverberated the world over. As many scholars have shown, Maoism, an amorphous body of ideas originating from Chairman Mao Zedong, fed into different facets of the U.S. New Left, becoming one of the most powerful political forces in the 1960s. This article examines the fragmentation of U.S. Maoism in the 1970s to further illuminate the relationship between Mao’s China and its devout followers in the heartland of capitalism. As Sino-American “rapprochement” unfolded, U.S. Maoists travelled to China in droves to learn the essence of Mao’s revolution and replicate their own back home. They sought to build a united front party modeled after the Chinese Communist Party, while debating the “correct” line that their party should follow, an ideological altercation that fueled factional tension. Drawing on an array of U.S. and Chinese sources, this article argues that the quest for unity and struggle, the core tenet of Maoism, precipitated its downfall in the United States.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.8
The Crisis of American Conservatism
  • Jul 16, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Alexander Jacobs

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1017/mah.2025.3
The Specter of Waste: Incarcerated Bodies, “Healthy” Labor, and the Production of Recreational Forests
  • Jul 10, 2025
  • Modern American History
  • Anaïs Lefèvre

Abstract In the post-World War II period, as they faced a spate of prison riots and rising concerns about juvenile delinquency, many states set up penal forestry camps. Portrayed as a progressive step that would make incarcerated people fit for freedom through healthy work in natural settings, forestry camps also promised to contribute to the public good by fulfilling the forests’ manpower needs. At a moment when outdoor leisure was increasingly popular, the work of incarcerated workers helped create infrastructures that would make forests accessible to visitors. Using primarily the case of Washington state, this article shows how and why incarcerated people became a material and ideological resource for the state. It also shows how official discourse about forestry camps clashed with material and human realities on the ground.