Sort by
Potential anatomical triggers for plan adaptation of cervical cancer external beam radiotherapy.

This study aimed to identify potential anatomical variation triggers using magnetic resonance imaging for plan adaption of cervical cancer patients to ensure dose requirements were met over an external beam radiotherapy course. Magnetic resonance images (MRIs) acquired before and during treatment were rigidly registered to a pre-treatment computerised tomography (CT) image for 11 retrospective cervix cancer datasets. Target volumes (TVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated on both MRIs and propagated onto the CT. Treatment plans were generated based on the pre-treatment contours and applied to the mid-treatment contours. Anatomical and dosimetric changes between each timepoint were assessed. The anatomical changes included the change in centroid position and volume size. Dosimetric changes included the V30Gy and V40Gy for the OARs, and V95%, V100%, D95% and D98% for the TVs. Correlation with dosimetric and anatomical changes were assessed to determine potential replan triggers. Changes in the bowel volume and position in the superior-inferior direction, and the high-risk CTV anterior posterior position were highly correlated with a change in dose to the bowel and target, respectively. Hence changes in bowel and high-risk CTV could be used as a potential replan triggers.

Just Published
Relevant
Deep learning architecture with shunted transformer and 3D deformable convolution for voxel-level dose prediction of head and neck tumors.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been widely used in treating head and neck tumors. However, due to the complex anatomical structures in the head and neck region, it is challenging for the plan optimizer to rapidly generate clinically acceptable IMRT treatment plans. A novel deep learning multi-scale Transformer (MST) model was developed in the current study aiming to accelerate the IMRT planning for head and neck tumors while generating more precise prediction of the voxel-level dose distribution. The proposed end-to-end MST model employs the shunted Transformer to capture multi-scale features and learn a global dependency, and utilizes 3D deformable convolution bottleneck blocks to extract shape-aware feature and compensate the loss of spatial information in the patch merging layers. Moreover, data augmentation and self-knowledge distillation are used to further improve the prediction performance of the model. The MST model was trained and evaluated on the OpenKBP Challenge dataset. Its prediction accuracy was compared with three previous dose prediction models: C3D, TrDosePred, and TSNet. The predicted dose distributions of our proposed MST model in the tumor region are closest to the original clinical dose distribution. The MST model achieves the dose score of 2.23 Gy and the DVH score of 1.34 Gy on the test dataset, outperforming the other three models by 8%-17%. For clinical-related DVH dosimetric metrics, the prediction accuracy in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) is 2.04% for , 1.54% for , 1.87% for , 1.87% for , 1.89% for , respectively, superior to the other three models. The quantitative results demonstrated that the proposed MST model achieved more accurate voxel-level dose prediction than the previous models for head and neck tumors. The MST model has a great potential to be applied to other disease sites to further improve the quality and efficiency of radiotherapy planning.

Just Published
Relevant
Evaluation of direct point dose estimation based on the distribution of the size-specific dose estimate.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the point doses using a distribution of the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) from axial CT images of in-house phantoms having diameters from 8 to 40cm. In-house phantoms made of polyester-resin (PESR) mixed with methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) were used. The phantoms were built with different diameter sizes of 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40cm. The phantoms were scanned by Siemens a SOMATOM Perspective-128 slice CT scanner with constant input parameters. The point doses were interpolated from the central SSDE (SSDEc) and the peripheral SSDE (SSDEp). The SSDEc and SSDEp were calculated from the SSDE with h- and k-factors. The point doses were compared to the direct measurements using the nanoDot™ optically-stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) in dedicated holes on the phantoms. It was found that the point dose decreases as the phantom diameter increased. The doses obtained using two approaches differed by 11% on average. The highest difference was 40% and the lowest difference was < 1%. It was found that dose based on the SSDE concept tended to be higher compared to the measured dose by OSLD. Point dose estimation using the concept of SSDE distribution can be considered an alternative for accurate and simple estimation. This approach still requires improvements to increase its accuracy and its application to estimate the organ dose needs further investigation.

Relevant
Variable-density velocity-selective magnetization preparation for non-contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography.

Velocity-selective (VS) magnetization preparation has shown great promise for non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with the ability to generate positive angiographic contrast directly using a single 3D acquisition. However, existing VS-MRA methods have an issue of aliased saturation around a certain velocity, known as velocity field-of-view (vFOV), which can cause undesired signal loss in arteries. This study aimed to develop a new version of the VS preparation pulse sequence that overcomes the aliased saturation problem in conventional VS preparation. Utilizing the fact that an excitation profile is the Fourier transform of excitation k-space sampling, we sampled the k-space in a non-uniform fashion by scaling gradient pulses accordingly to have aliased excitation diffused over velocity. The variable density sampling function was numerically optimized to maximize the average of the velocity passband signal while minimizing its variance. The optimized variable density VS magnetization was validated through Bloch simulations and applied to peripheral NCE MRA in healthy subjects. The in-vivo experiments showed that the proposed variable density VS-MRA significantly lowered arterial signal loss observed in conventional VS-MRA, as evidenced by a higher arterial signal-to-noise ratio (58.50 ± 14.29 vs. 55.54 ± 12.32; p < 0.05) and improved artery-to-background contrast-to-noise ratio (22.75 ± 7.57 vs. 20.60 ± 6.51; p < 0.05).

Relevant
Enhanced 3D dose prediction for hypofractionated SRS (gamma knife radiosurgery) in brain tumor using cascaded-deep-supervised convolutional neural network.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a well-established technique in radiation therapy (RT) for treating small-size brain tumors. It administers highly concentrated doses during each treatment fraction, with even minor dose errors posing a significant risk of causing severe damage to healthy tissues. It underscores the critical need for precise and meticulous precision in GKRS. However, the planning process for GKRS is complex and time-consuming, heavily reliant on the expertise of medical physicists. Incorporating deep learning approaches for GKRS dose prediction can reduce this dependency, improve planning efficiency and homogeneity, streamline clinical workflows, and reduce patient lagging times. Despite this, precise Gamma Knife plan dose distribution prediction using existing models remains a significant challenge. The complexity stems from the intricate nature of dose distributions, subtle contrasts in CT scans, and the interdependence of dosimetric metrics. To overcome these challenges, we have developed a "Cascaded-Deep-Supervised" Convolutional Neural Network (CDS-CNN) that employs a hybrid-weighted optimization scheme. Our innovative method incorporates multi-level deep supervision and a strategic sequential multi-network training approach. It enables the extraction of intra-slice and inter-slice features, leading to more realistic dose predictions with additional contextual information. CDS-CNN was trained and evaluated using data from 105 brain cancer patients who underwent GKRS treatment, with 85 cases used for training and 20 for testing. Quantitative assessments and statistical analyses demonstrated high consistency between the predicted dose distributions and the reference doses from the treatment planning system (TPS). The 3D overall gamma passing rates (GPRs) reached 97.15% ± 1.36% (3mm/3%, 10% threshold), surpassing the previous best performance by 2.53% using the 3D Dense U-Net model. When evaluated against more stringent criteria (2mm/3%, 10% threshold, and 1mm/3%, 10% threshold), the overall GPRs still achieved 96.53% ± 1.08% and 95.03% ± 1.18%. Furthermore, the average target coverage (TC) was 98.33% ± 1.16%, dose selectivity (DS) was 0.57 ± 0.10, gradient index (GI) was 2.69 ± 0.30, and homogeneity index (HI) was 1.79 ± 0.09. Compared to the 3D Dense U-Net, CDS-CNN predictions demonstrated a 3.5% improvement in TC, and CDS-CNN's dose prediction yielded better outcomes than the 3D Dense U-Net across all evaluation criteria. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed CDS-CNN model outperformed other models in predicting GKRS dose distributions, with predictions closely matching the TPS doses.

Relevant
Dosiomics-based detection of dose distribution variations in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer patients: influence of treatment plan parameters.

The stability of dosiomics features (DFs) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for detecting disparities in helical tomotherapy planned dose distributions was assessed. Treatment plans of 18 prostate patients were recalculated using the followings: field width (WF) (2.5 vs. 5), pitch factor (PF) (0.433 vs. 0.444), and modulation factor (MF) (2.5 vs. 3). From each of the eight plans per patient, ninety-three original and 744 wavelet-based DFs were extracted, using 3D-Slicer software, across six regions including: target volume (PTV), pelvic lymph nodes (PTV-LN), PTV + PTV-LN (PTV-All), one cm rind around PTV-All (PTV-Ring), rectum, and bladder. For the resulting DFs and DVH parameters, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated, and using hierarchical clustering, the features were classified into low/high variability. The significance of parameters on instability was analyzed by a three-way analysis of variance. All DF's were stable in PTV, PTV-LN, and PTV-Ring (average CV ( ≤0.36). Only one feature in the bladder ( =0.9), rectum ( =0.4), and PTV-All ( =0.37) were considered unstable due to change in MF in the bladder and WF in the PTV-All. The value of for the wavelet features was much higher than that for the original features. Out of 225 unstable wavelet features, 84 features had ≥1. The CVs for all the DVHs remained very small ( <0.06). This study highlights that the sensitivity of DFs to changes in tomotherapy planning parameters is influenced by the region and the DFs, particularly wavelet features, surpassing the effectiveness of DVHs.

Relevant
Mechanistic in silico explorations of the immunogenic and synergistic effects of radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a critical review.

Immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving field, with many models attempting to describe its impact on the immune system, especially when paired with radiotherapy. Tumor response to this combination involves a complex spatiotemporal dynamic which makes either clinical or pre-clinical in vivo investigation across the resulting extensive solution space extremely difficult. In this review, several in silico models of the interaction between radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and the patient's immune system are examined. The study included only mathematical models published in English that investigated the effects of radiotherapy on the immune system, or the effect of immuno-radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The findings indicate that treatment efficacy was predicted to improve when both radiotherapy and immunotherapy were administered, compared to radiotherapy or immunotherapy alone. However, the models do not agree on the optimal schedule and fractionation of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This corresponds to relevant clinical trials, which report an improved treatment efficacy with combination therapy, however, the optimal scheduling varies between clinical trials. This discrepancy between the models can be attributed to the variation in model approach and the specific cancer types modeled, making the determination of the optimum general treatment schedule and model challenging. Further research needs to be conducted with similar data sets to evaluate the best model and treatment schedule for a specific cancer type and stage.

Open Access
Relevant