The authors regret that there was an error in the Author list of their published article. The Authors were listed as: L.M. Wroe∗, T.A. Ige†, O.C. Asogwa†, S.C. Aruah†, S. Grover‡, R. Makufa§, M. Fitz-Gibbon¶, S.L. Sheehy∗ ∗ Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK † National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria ‡ Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Botswana-UPENN Partnership, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA § Life Gaborone Private Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana ¶ Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK The correct Author list is presented below: L.M. Wroe∗, T.A. Ige†, O.C. Asogwa†, S.C. Aruah†, S. Grover‡, R. Makufa§, M. Fitz-Gibbon¶, N. Coleman∗∗, M. Dosanjh∗||, F. Van den Heuvel¶ ††, S.L. Sheehy∗ ∗ Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK † National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria ‡ Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Botswana-UPENN Partnership, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA § Life Gaborone Private Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana ¶ Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK || CERN, Geneva, Switzerland ∗∗ International Cancer Expert Corps, Washington, DC, USA †† Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Comparative Analysis of Radiotherapy Linear Accelerator Downtime and Failure Modes in the UK, Nigeria and BotswanaClinical OncologyVol. 32Issue 4PreviewThe lack of radiotherapy linear accelerators (linacs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been recognised as a major barrier to providing quality cancer care in these regions, together with a shortfall in the number of highly qualified personnel. It is expected that additional challenges will be faced in operating precise, high-technology radiotherapy equipment in these environments, and anecdotal evidence suggests that linacs have greater downtime and higher failure rates of components than their counterparts in high-income countries. Full-Text PDF Open Access