Introduction: To analyze visual and anatomical outcomes after switch to intravitreal brolucizumab therapy in eyes affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Methods: Retrospective study of eyes with nAMD that underwent intravitreal brolucizumab at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) or San Rocco Clinical Institute (Ome, Italy) between January 2021 and July 2022. All study eyes had persistent residual retinal fluid after receiving at least 3 intravitreal injections of other anti-VEGF agents prior to switch to brolucizumab. Results: Among 66 eyes from 60 patients (35 males; mean age 76.5 ± 7.4 years) with nAMD, 43 (65.2%) eyes received a complete loading dose of 3 brolucizumab injections, while 15 (22.7%) and 8 (12.1%) eyes were treated with 2 or 1 brolucizumab injections, respectively. The average number of brolucizumab injections was 2.5 during 4.0 ± 2.0 months (mean interval between two injections of 51.2 days). Lower letter gains (<5 letter improvement from baseline) were found in eyes that did not complete a loading dose, after a greater number of previous anti-VEGF injections, after a longer duration of disease, and in eyes with a greater rate of macular atrophy at baseline. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were found after switch to brolucizumab. Conclusion: nAMD eyes with persistent residual retinal fluid despite frequent anti-VEGF treatment can still gain functional and anatomical improvements after switch to brolucizumab therapy. Despite a relevant heterogeneity in patients’ response to brolucizumab, we identified potential biomarkers for functional and anatomical improvement.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to report surgical outcomes and risk factors for primary surgical failure following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, RRD patients who underwent primary surgery at a tertiary center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020, were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as reoperation within 60 days postoperatively due to retinal re-detachment and putative risk factors for surgical failure were analyzed. Results: Of 2,383 eyes (2,335 patients), 1,342 (56.3%) underwent vitrectomy and 1,041 (43.7%) underwent scleral buckling. The surgical failure rate was 9.1% overall, and 6.0% and 13.1% for the vitrectomy and scleral buckling groups, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, surgical failure was associated with surgical experience (first-year fellow vs. senior professor) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; p = 0.018), scleral buckling (OR: 2.33; p < 0.001), and longer axial length (AL; ≥26.5 mm) (OR: 1.49; p = 0.017). In each surgical approach, age <40 years (OR: 2.11; p = 0.029) in the vitrectomy group and age >40 years (OR, 1.84; p = 0.004), male sex (OR: 1.65; p = 0.015), and first-year fellows compared to senior professors (OR: 1.95; p = 0.013) in the scleral buckling group were associated with surgical failure. Lens status were not associated with the surgical failure rate. Conclusion: In this large retrospective study using data from Korea, vitrectomy was superior to scleral buckling in terms of primary anatomical outcomes in the management of RRD. First-year fellows were a risk factor for surgical failure, especially for scleral buckling. Longer AL was a significant parameter for predicting the success rates.

Introduction: The aim of our study was to investigate factors associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity fluctuations in patients undergoing intravitreal injections for diabetic macular edema and to explore risk factors for proliferative DR (PDR). Methods: We graded ultra-widefield fundus photography imaging at each visit using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Severity Scale (DRSS). We calculated the deviation from the mode (DM) of DRSS values as a proxy of DR severity fluctuations, and we analyzed its clinical associations with linear models. We computed risk factors for PDR with Cox hazard models. We included the DRSS area-under-the-curve (AUC) of DRSS scores as a covariate in all analyses. Results: We included 111 eyes with a median follow-up of 44 months. Higher DRSS-AUC values (β = +0.03 DRSS DM for unitary DRSS/month increase, p = 0.01) and a higher number of anti-VEGF injections (β = +0.07 DRSS DM for injection, p = 0.045) were associated with wider DR severity fluctuations. Higher DRSS-AUC values (HR = 1.45 for unitary DRSS/month increase, p = 0.001) and wider DR severity fluctuations (HR = 22.35 4th quartile vs. 1st–3rd quartile of DRSS DM, p = 0.01) were risk factors for PDR. Conclusion: Patients with larger DR variability in response to intravitreal injections may be at higher risk of DR progression. We advocate attentive follow-up in these patients to recognize PDR early.

Introduction: The Canadian Treat-and-Extend Analysis Trial with Ranibizumab (CANTREAT) was a 2-year, multicentred, randomized clinical trial to evaluate treat-and-extend (T&E) relative to monthly administration of ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This post hoc analysis of the CANTREAT trial explores the relationship between the maximal extension interval tolerated by patients receiving T&E ranibizumab and visual acuity outcomes. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with nAMD were randomized to receive either a once-monthly dosing or T&E regimen of ranibizumab across 27 treatment centres in Canada and were followed for 24 months. For this post hoc analysis, patients in the T&E cohort were subdivided into the following groups based on maximum extension interval: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 24 while secondary outcomes included change in central retinal thickness (CRT). All results were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 285 participants undergoing T&E were enrolled in this post hoc analysis. At month 24, the change in BCVA from baseline was +8.5 ± 9.3, +7.7 ± 13.8, +4.4 ± 9.6, +4.4 ± 18.5, and +7.8 ± 14.8 letters in the 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 12-week cohorts, respectively. The change in CRT at month 24 was −79.2 ± 95.0, −143.9 ± 128.9, −97.7 ± 101.1, −120.9 ± 105.3, and −133.2 ± 108.8 μm in the 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 12-week cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: The capacity to extend does not necessarily associate with improved visual acuity outcomes, with the poorest change in BCVA seen in those extended 8–10 weeks. The highest change in BCVA and lowest decrease in CRT was in the group maximally extended for 4 weeks. There was a correlation between change in BCVA and change in CRT for other extension groups. Future studies should establish the predictive factors for successful extension in patients undergoing T&E in nAMD.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the early efficacy and safety of treatment with intravitreal injections (IVIs) of brolucizumab in patients presenting with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective study included 194 eyes of 180 patients with nAMD treated with standard 6-mg IVIs of brolucizumab in our clinic between March 11, 2021, and June 15, 2022. Both treatment-naive (33 eyes) and switch therapy patients (161 eyes) were included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), retinal fluid distribution (classified as intraretinal, subretinal, under the pigmented epithelium), treatment intervals, and adverse event rates were collected for analysis. Results: Average follow-up time was 37.2 ± 16.6 weeks. Mean baseline BCVAs were 38.1 ± 4.5 and 41.9 ± 6.7 letters in the treatment-naive and switch therapy groups, with a final gain of 16.0 ± 4.9 (p < 0.0001) and 10.7 ± 5.9 (p < 0.0001) letters in the two groups, respectively. Throughout the study period, CST significantly decreased in both treatment naïve (from 352.0 ± 129.4 to 284.2 ± 93.8 µm; p = 0.0015) and switch therapy (from 369.9 ± 140.5 to 307.4 ± 123.5 µm; p < 0.0001). Significant fluid control rates were achieved at the end of the study period (45% and 27% eyes were completely free of fluid in naïve and switch groups, respectively). Five eyes (2.6%) developed adverse events with different grades of intraocular inflammation and visual outcomes. Conclusion: Brolucizumab IVI showed very good anatomical and functional outcomes in both naive and switch patients in this real-world experience. Nevertheless, even showing a favorable risk/benefit profile, clinicians and patients should be aware of the possibility of a small rate of severe complications.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to report the clinical presentations, management, and factors affecting the outcomes of posterior segment open globe injuries in 2,360 consecutive eyes. Methods: This was a retrospective, consecutive, non-comparative interventional case series. All cases with scleral and corneoscleral wounds presenting to these centers from January 2014 to January 2021 were included. The cases were defined according to the Birmingham Eye Traumatology Terminology system (BETTs) classification. The Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) was applied to the dataset. Results: Mean age of presentation was 36.63 ± 19.92 years (median 35 years). Penetrating trauma accounted for 70.92%, rupture for 18.6%, perforation for 4.60%, and IOFB in 5.88% eyes. In 76.60%, the location of injury involved zone 1 extending till zone 2, while in 23.40% it involved zone 2 and/or zone 3. Vision at presentation was logMAR 3.03 ± 0.99 and at the last visit was logMAR 2.47 ± 1.42 (p < 0.0001). Time interval between presentation to the treatment center and globe repair was 13.93 ± 19.56 h (median 7.60 h). Favorable functional outcomes were seen in 29.20% eyes and favorable anatomic outcomes in 66.90%. Decreasing age at presentation, penetrating injury instead of rupture or perforating injury, a higher OTS, absence of corneal involvement, absence of retinal detachment at presentation, and absence of concurrent orbital fracture were associated with a favorable functional outcome (>20/200). Final visual acuity in logMAR correlated with the OTS value calculated at presentation. Conclusions: In the absence of retinal detachment and orbital fracture, posterior open globe injuries typically have a favorable functional outcome. OTS correlated with the final visual acuity.

Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate non-persistence with treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NvAMD) before day 720 (24 months) after initiation, explore associations with baseline characteristics and variation between sites. Methods: Anonymised demographic and clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records at treating National Health Service (NHS) Trusts for NvAMD eyes starting intra-vitreal therapy from 2017 to 2018. Time to non-persistence with treatment, defined as no recorded attendance for either monitoring or treatment for a period ≥6 months, was visualised with a Kaplan-Meier survival plot. Associations with treatment non-persistence were investigated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Analysis included 7,970 eyes of 7,112 patients treated at 13 NHS trusts. Censoring deaths and those eyes in which treatment was stopped permanently, the Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated survival figures of 77.7% for persistence with treatment to day 360 and 71.8% to day 720. Hazard ratios for non-persistence with treatment were reduced at 10 sites, relative to the reference, with first-treated eye status and with baseline acuity worse than or equal to LogMAR 1.0. Hazard ratios increased with younger age, in the presence of other ocular co-morbidities and with baseline acuity better than or equal to LogMAR 0.5. After an episode of non-persistence, visual acuity decreased by at least 0.1 and 0.3 LogMAR in 39% and 18% of eyes, respectively. Conclusions: Non-persistence with treatment was common, especially in the first year of treatment, and was often associated with a decrease in visual acuity. Treatment site, baseline visual acuity, and age were the strongest predictors of treatment non-persistence before day 720. Understanding and addressing reasons for non-persistence are important to ensure that effective but expensive treatments are used cost-effectively and to maintain acuity. Variation in non-persistence between sites, even after adjustment for other variables, suggests that local factors in treatment provision may be particularly important.

To determine the short-term real-world safety and efficacy of intravitreal brolucizumab injections in Korean patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This multicenter retrospective study involved 294 eyes (treatment naïve 20 eye (6.8%) and non-treatment naïve 274 eyes (93.2%)) of 290 patients from 13 hospitals or retinal centers in South Korea. Patients with nAMD who received brolucizumab injection(s) between April 1 and November 30, 2021, with a follow-up ≥1 month, were included. Primary outcomes were safety, incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), and potential risk factors. The secondary outcome was efficacy, i.e., change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography-measured macular thickness and retinal fluid. The mean age was 71.63±8.66. The follow-up period was 2.38±0.79 months. The mean number of brolucizumab injections during the follow-up was 1.52±0.58. The overall incidence of IOI was 13.9% (n=41 eyes). Most IOI cases were of anterior uveitis (8.8%, 26 eyes), followed by retinal vasculitis (2.4%, seven eyes) and occlusive retinal vasculitis (0.3%, one eye). Most eyes showed IOI resolution (n=40, 97.5%) and BCVA restoration (n=39, 95.1%) with or without corticosteroid treatment during the follow-up. Age, sex, IOI history, or other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection histories were not associated with the occurrence of IOI. However, only thin subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was associated with the occurrence of IOI (odds ratio=0.995, p=0.020). BCVA at 1 month improved from baseline (Baseline 0.518±0.356 vs. 1 month 0.503±0.383, p=0.023), but the improvement was not maintained. Anatomical improvement was significant after 3 months. IOI was well-controlled with or without steroid treatment. Most IOI eyes (95.1%) were restored to the level of vision before IOI occurrence and occlusive vasculitis was rare. In the short term, brolucizumab injection effectively improved vision at 1 month and dried retinal fluid for 3 months.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of initial treatment regimen individualization (pro re nata or treat-and-extend [TAE]), according to macular neovascularization (MNV) subtype, on the functional and anatomical response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The secondary objective was to compare the treatment burden between each MNV subtype. Methods: Consecutive treatment-naïve nAMD patients were retrospectively included. MNV subtype was graded by 2 independent blinded investigators on multimodal imaging. Functional and anatomical outcomes were analysed according to treatment regimen and MNV subtypes. Results: A total of 281 eyes from 243 patients were included in the study. According to the treatment regimen, there was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity gain within the first 2 years of treatment for type 1 (p = 0.106) and type 3 MNV (p = 0.704). Conversely, there was a significant difference in favour of TAE regimen for type 2 (p = 0.017) and type 4 MNV (p = 0.047). Type 1 MNV had a higher proportion of visits with subretinal fluid (p = 0.0007) but not with intraretinal fluid (p = 0.22). The mean interval between the last 2 injections was significantly shorter for type 1 MNV (p = 0.0045). Conclusion: The individualization of the initial treatment protocol according to MNV subtype can improve the functional outcome and may decrease the treatment burden.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the changes in serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and B after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) or conbercept (IVC) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods: In this prospective study, infants with type 1 ROP in both eyes were recruited in our hospital from September 2021 to February 2022, randomly assigned to the ranibizumab and conbercept groups and administered IVR or IVC (0.25 mg/0.025 mL). Blood samples were collected before the operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation to measure the concentrations of serum VEGF-A and B. Results: A total of 20 ROP infants were randomly assigned to the ranibizumab (n = 10) and conbercept groups (n = 10). In the ranibizumab group, the serum VEGF-A concentrations before operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation were 73.55 ± 40.78, 11.47 ± 7.00, and 75.36 ± 30.87 pg/mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Least Significant Difference (LSD) pairwise comparison did not show any significant difference in the groups between 4 weeks postoperatively and preoperatively (p > 0.05). In the conbercept group, the serum VEGF-A concentrations before operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation were 86.69 ± 55.06, 14.68 ± 10.11, and 43.55 ± 57.92 pg/mL, respectively (p < 0.01). LSD comparison showed significant differences between 1 week and 4 weeks postoperatively and preoperatively (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were observed between 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively (p > 0.05). Regarding serum VEGF-B concentrations before the operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation, no significant differences were detected in the ranibizumab group (p > 0.05), but significant differences were observed in the conbercept group (7.26 ± 2.34, 3.09 ± 2.41, and 4.55 ± 3.37 ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.01). LSD showed significant differences between 1 or 4 weeks postoperatively and preoperatively (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was detected between 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Serum VEGF-A levels in infants with ROP were suppressed after IVR or IVC but returned to preoperative levels at 4 weeks after IVR and remained lower than the preoperative levels at 4 weeks after IVC. Serum VEGF-B was not affected by IVR but was suppressed by IVC for 4 weeks.