There are limited data on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in recipients with prior COVID-19 infection. This single-center retrospective study included 54 adult patients who received allo-HSCT from July 2020 to September 2021 after previous COVID-19 infection and 122 control group patients without a history of COVID-19 who underwent HSCT during the same period, with a median follow-up of 17 months. Median time from COVID-19 to allo-HSCT was 211 days. The incidence of main complications in the post-transplant period was not significantly different between the two groups: deep vein thrombosis (p =.85), TMA (p=.8), VOD (p=.25), bloodstream infections (p=.21), pneumonia of any etiology (p=.41), viral infections (p=.85), invasive fungal disease (p=.08). The 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse incidence, overall survival, and progression-free survival also were comparable in the study and the control groups: 22% (95% CI 10.5-36.2) versus 26.3% (95% CI 18.7-34.6) p =.4; 15.6% (95% CI 7.3-26.9) versus 23.6% (95% CI 16.0-32.3) p =.39; 67.9% (95% CI 50.4-80.3) versus 59.8% (95% CI 50.2-68.1) p =.24 and 62.3% (95% CI 45.5-75.3) versus 49.9% (95% CI 40.0-59.1) p =.18, respectively. The history of previous COVID-19 infection did not affect the results of allo-HSCT.

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has revolutionized solid organ transplantation by providing an opportunity to utilize organs from HCV-viremic donors. Though transplantation of HCV-viremic donor organs into aviremic recipients is safe in the short term, midterm data on survival and post-transplant complications is lacking. We provide a midterm assessment of complications of lung transplantation (LT) up to 2 years post-transplant, including patient and graft survival between HCV-viremic transplantation (D+) and HCV-aviremic transplantation (D-). This is a retrospective cohort study including 500 patients from 2018 to 2022 who underwent LT at our quaternary care institution. Outcomes of patients receiving D+ grafts were compared to those receiving D- grafts. Recipients of HCV antibody+ but PCR- grafts were treated as D- recipients. We identified 470 D- and 30 D+ patients meeting inclusion criteria. Crude mortality did not differ between groups (p=.43). Patient survival at years 1 and 2 did not differ between D+ and D- patients (p=.89, p=.87, respectively), and graft survival at years 1 and 2 did not differ between the two groups (p=.90, p=.88, respectively). No extrahepatic manifestations or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) occurred among D+ recipients. D+ and D- patients had similar rates of post-transplant chronic lung allograft rejection (CLAD) (p=6.7%vs. 12.8%, p=.3), acute cellular rejection (60.0%vs. 58.0%, p=.8) and antibody-mediated rejection (16.7%vs. 14.2%, p=.7). There is no difference in midterm patient or graft survival between D+ and D-LT. No extrahepatic manifestations of HCV occurred. No differences in any type of rejection including CLAD were observed, though follow-up for CLAD was limited. These results provide additional support for the use of HCV-viremic organs in selected recipients in LT.

Immunosuppression reduction for BK polyoma virus (BKV) must be balanced against risk of adverse alloimmune outcomes. We sought to characterize risk of alloimmune events after BKV within context of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch (mMM) risk score. This single-center study evaluated 460 kidney transplant patients on tacrolimus-mycophenolate-prednisone from 2010-2021. BKV status was classified at 6-months post-transplant as "BKV" or "no BKV" in landmark analysis. Primary outcome was T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR). Secondary outcomes included all-cause graft failure (ACGF), death-censored graft failure (DCGF), de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Predictors of outcomes were assessed in Cox proportional hazards models including BKV status and alloimmune risk defined by recipient age and molecular mismatch (RAMM) groups. At 6-months post-transplant, 72 patients had BKV and 388 had no BKV. TCMR occurred in 86 recipients, including 27.8% with BKV and 17% with no BKV (p=.05). TCMR risk was increased in recipients with BKV (HR 1.90, (95% CI 1.14, 3.17); p=.01) and high vs. low-risk RAMM group risk (HR 2.26 (95% CI 1.02, 4.98); p=.02) in multivariable analyses; but not HLA serological MM in sensitivity analysis. Recipients with BKV experienced increased dnDSA in univariable analysis, and there was no association with ABMR, DCGF, or ACGF. Recipients with BKV had increased risk of TCMR independent of induction immunosuppression and conventional alloimmune risk measures. Recipients with high-risk RAMM experienced increased TCMR risk. Future studies on optimizing immunosuppression for BKV should explore nuanced risk stratification and may consider novel measures of alloimmune risk.

Individual events during donation after circulatory death (DCD) procurement, such as hypotensive or hypoxic warm ischemia, or circulatory arrest are all a part of donor warm ischemia time (dWIT), and may have differing effects on the outcome of the liver graft. This study aimed to identify risk factors for postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), a state of severe hemodynamic derangement following graft reperfusion, and its impact on DCD liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. This was a retrospective analysis using 106 DCD LT. Detailed information for events during procurement (withdrawal of life support; systolic blood pressure<80mmHg; oxygen saturation<80%; circulatory arrest; aortic cold perfusion) and their association with the development of PRS were examined using logistic regression. The overall incidence of PRS was 26.4%, occurring in 28 patients. Independent risk factors for PRS were asystolic dWIT (odds ratio (OR) 3.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-9.66) and MELD score (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10). Total bilirubin was significantly higher in the PRS group at postoperative day (POD) 1 (p=.02; 5.2mg/dL vs. 3.4mg/dL), POD 3 (p=.049; 4.5mg/dL vs. 2.8mg/dL), and POD 7 (p=.04; 3.1mg/dL vs. 1.9mg/dL). Renal replacement therapy after LT was more likely to be required in the PRS group (p=.01; 48.2%vs. 23.1%). Asystolic dWIT is a risk factor for the development of PRS in DCD LT. Our results suggest that asystolic dWIT should be considered when selecting DCD liver donors.

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, highly sensitized patients (HSPs) have reduced access to transplantation, leading to increased morbidity and mortality on the waiting list. The Canadian Willingness to Cross (WTC) program proposes allowing transplantation across preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) determined to be at a low risk of rejection under the adaptive design framework. This study collected patients' perspectives on the development of this program. Forty-one individual interviews were conducted with kidney transplant candidates from three Canadian transplant centers in 2022. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed for subsequent analyses. Despite limited familiarity with the adaptive design, participants demonstrated trust in the researchers. They perceived the WTC program as a pathway for HSPs to access transplantation while mitigating transplant-related risks. HSPs saw the WTC program as a source of hope and an opportunity to leave dialysis, despite acknowledging inherent uncertainties. Some non-HSPs expressed concerns about fairness, anticipating increased waiting times and potential compromise in kidney graft longevity due to higher rejection risks. Participants recommended essential strategies for implementing the WTC program, including organizing informational meetings and highlighting the necessity for psychosocial support. The WTC program emerges as a promising strategy to enhance HSPs' access to kidney transplantation. While HSPs perceived this program as a source of hope, non-HSPs voiced concerns about distributive justice issues. These results will help develop a WTC program that is ethically sound for transplant candidates.

Since the 2018 change in the US adult heart allocation policy, more patients are bridged-to-transplant on temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). Previous studies indicate that durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) may lead to allosensitization. The goal of this study was to assess whether tMCS implantation is associated with changes in sensitization. We included patients evaluated for heart transplants between 2015 and 2022 who had alloantibody measured before and after MCS implantation. Allosensitization was defined as development of new alloantibodies after tMCS implant. A total of 41 patients received tMCS before transplant. Nine (22.0%) patients developed alloantibodies following tMCS implantation: 3 (12.0%) in the intra-aortic balloon pump group (n=25), 2 (28.6%) in the microaxial percutaneous LVAD group (n=7), and 4 (44.4%) in the veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation group (n=9)-p=.039. Sensitized patients were younger (44.7±11.6 years vs. 54.3±12.5 years, p=.044), were more likely to be sensitized at baseline - 3 of 9 (33.3%) compared to 2 out of 32 (6.3%) (p=.028) and received more transfusions with red blood cells (6 (66.6%) vs. 8 (25%), p=.02) and platelets (6 (66.6%) vs. 5 (15.6%), p=.002). There was no significant difference in tMCS median duration of support (4 [3,15] days vs. 8.5 [5,14.5] days, p=.57). Importantly, out of the 11 patients who received a durable LVAD after tMCS, 5 (45.5%) became sensitized, compared to 4 out of 30 patients (13.3%) who only had tMCS-p=.028. Our findings suggest that patients bridged-to-transplant with tMCS, without significant blood product transfusions and a subsequent durable LVAD implant, have a low risk of allosensitization. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and determine whether risk of sensitization varies by type of tMCS and duration of support.

Stress cardiomyopathy in donors can potentially affect graft function and longevity. This study aims to investigate the association between echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<50%, and/or the presence of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in organ donors, and short- and long-term liver and kidney graft survival. Our secondary aim was to link graft survival with donor and recipient characteristics. All donors considered for liver and kidney donation with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2006 and 2016 were matched with their recipients through the Scandiatransplant register. The studied outcomes were graft survival, re-transplantation, and recipient death. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot time to event. Multivariate Cox-regression was used to test independence. There were 370 liver donors and 312 kidney donors (matched with 458 recipients) with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between June 2006 and November 2016. Of patients with LV dysfunction by echocardiography, there were 102 liver- and 72 kidney donors. Univariate survival analyses showed no statistical difference in the short- and long-term graft survival from donors with LV dysfunction compared to donors without. Donor age>65 years, recipient re-transplantation and recipient liver tumor were predictors of worse outcome in liver transplants (p<.05). Donor age>65, donor hypertension, recipient re-transplantation, and a recipient diagnosis of diabetes or nephritis/glomerulonephritis had a negative association with graft survival in kidney transplants (p<.05). We found no significant association between donor LV dysfunction and short- and long-term graft survival in liver and kidney transplants, suggesting that livers and kidneys from such donors can be safely transplanted.

To evaluate ureteral stent removal (SR) using a grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope (giFC-Isiris ®, Coloplast ®) after kidney transplantation (KT), with a focus on feasibility, safety, patient experience, and costs. All consecutive KT undergoing SR through giFC were prospectively enrolled from January 2020 to June 2023. Patient characteristics, KT and SR details, urine culture results, antimicrobial prescriptions, and the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) within 1 month were recorded. A micro-cost analysis was conducted, making a comparison with the costs of SR with a reusable FC and grasper. A total of 136 KT patients were enrolled, including both single and double KT, with 148 stents removed in total. The median indwelling time was 34 days [26, 47]. SR was successfully performed in all cases. The median preparation and procedure times were 4 min [3,5]. and 45 s[30, 60], respectively. The median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was 3 [1, 5], and 98.2% of patients expressed willingness to undergo the procedure again. Only one episode of UTI involving the graft (0.7%) was recorded. Overall, the estimated cost per SR procedure with Isiris ® and the reusable FC was 289.2€ and 151,4€, respectively. This prospective series evaluated the use of Isiris ® for SR in a cohort of KT patients, demonstrating feasibility and high tolerance. The UTI incidence was0.7% within 1 month. Based on the micro-cost analysis, estimated cost per procedure favored the reusable FC.

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and risk factors of postoperative neurocognitive disorder (NCD) in patients who underwent heart transplantation. Seventy-six heart transplant patients were analyzed for clinical data including gender, age, height, weight, education level, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (SV), transplantation duration, and pretransplant medical history. Cognitive function was assessed using the mini-mental status examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) scales. Patients were categorized into cognitively normal and impaired groups based on the presence or absence of cognitive dysfunction, and their cognitive function scores were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in postoperative cardiac transplant patients. Cognitive dysfunction was observed in 48 out of 76 heart transplant patients, representing an incidence of 63.2%. Cognitive impairment in heart transplant recipients predominantly affected multiple cognitive domains. Logistic regression analysis identified age (OR=1.057, 95% CI 1.002-1.115), gender (OR=.200, 95% CI.044-.919), education level (OR=.728, 95% CI.600-.883), LVEF (OR=.891, 95% CI.820-.969), and history of diabetes (OR=7.674, 95% CI 1.317-44.733) as independent risk factors for postoperative NCD in heart transplant recipients (P<.05). The study found a high incidence of postoperative NCD in heart transplant patients, with gender, age, education level, LVEF, and diabetes history being significant risk factors. Early identification and intervention targeting these risk factors may help prevent NCD in postheart transplant patients and improve long-term outcomes.