Year
Publisher
Journal
1
Institution
Institution Country
Publication Type
Field Of Study
Topics
Open Access
Language
Filter 1
Year
Publisher
Journal
1
Institution
Institution Country
Publication Type
Field Of Study
Topics
Open Access
Language
Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY PERFORMANCE: THE COMPARISON OF BPR KOTA BARU AND BPR IN SOUTH KALIMANTAN PROVINCE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC PERIOD

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic is strongly felt for the Rural Banks (or BPR) industry operating in South Kalimantan province. This study is a case study of BPR Kota Baru operating in South Kalimantan Province. Based on the financial report published by Financial Services Authority (or OJK), the BPR Kota Baru is one of the banks that has the best Return On Asset (ROA) performance, because the ROA ratio continues to grow during the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to find out the extent of the performance of Return On Asset or ROA of BPR Kota Baru compared to the ROA Performance of some BPR in South Kalimantan Province before and during the Covid-19 pandemic has a positive ROA. Analysis of research data is sourced from the financial statements of conventional BPR publications accessed on the website of OJK. This study conducts comparative research methods and finds that during the Covid-19 pandemic the ROA of BPR Kota Baru for September 2020 is 6.74% while the average ROA ratio of other BPR is 4.80%. On asset management and operational cost efficiency to operating income (BOPO), the management of BPR Kota Baru manage to improve profitability capability in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic in the position of financial statements published in September 2020.

Read full abstract
Open Access
A Qualitative Exploration of Heuristics and Cognitive Biases in Auditor Judgements

Professional judgement is inherent in financial statement audits because various methods, techniques, or approaches prescribed in auditing standards do not provide auditors with detailed guidance or specific audit criteria. While auditors are expected to exercise their judgements based on careful reasoning, there is a possibility that they do not always follow such an approach and instead make their judgements using heuristics. This study aims to penetrate and reveal whether there are cognitive biases in the judgements of auditors and what heuristics lead to these biases. This study employs a qualitative research design and uses ethnomethodology as a research approach. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 auditors who were either partners, managers, seniors, or juniors at a public accounting firm. Using the heuristic-bias framework as a theoretical lens and based on an analysis involving data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification, this study identifies five types of biases that auditors can experience: jumping to conclusions, groupthink, representativeness, availability, and anchoring biases. The results of this study present practical implications for auditors, accounting professional associations, public accounting firms, and academic institutions. That is, the findings provide insights for formulating strategies aimed at raising auditors’ awareness about possible systematic errors, or biases, in professional judgements when auditors rely on heuristics as a simplifying judgement-making strategy.

Read full abstract
Open Access