IntroductionThe evolution of our society depended on from the very beginning. Different technologies developed in order to store, to retrieve, to transmit, or to process described this evolution. However, in the November 1958 issue, Harvard Business Review published the article Management in the 1980's, by Harold J. Leavitt and Thomas L. Whisler. In that article, the authors had highlighted that Over the last decade a new has begun to take hold in American business, one so new that its significance is still difficult to evaluate. While many aspects of this are uncertain, it seems clear that it will move into the managerial scene rapidly, with definite and far-reaching impact on managerial organization. The new does not yet have a single established name. We shall call it That article is available today online, at the web address: https://hbr.org/1958/11/management-in-the1980s. Nowadays, about Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia, is warning us Not to be confused with Informatics. Google search engine offers us autocomplete options for the keywords as definition, or vs computer science or and communications or outsourcing. If the users edit the keywords communication, others options available are networks, plan or definition, and if the search phrase is communications, other options are manager job description, plan, or manager. Searching for Romanian keywords tehnologia informaţiei, the autocomplete options are si a comunicarii, si a comunicatiilor, referat. When we start a new search using the names Leavitt and Whisler, one Google's autocomplete option is leavitt whisler 19581'Using BizNar for searching information technology, we get a search summary, a structured, or a visual result, and we can refine the search depending on topics, authors, publications, source, dates, document format or document type.Using WolframAlpha for searching information technology, we get a structured result assuming information technology is a general topic, or we can get different results using the phrase as an occupation or a word instead.When Leavitt and Whisler named the new they prognosticated that should move the boundary between planning and performance upward, and much more of the work will be programed, i.e., covered by sets of operating rules governing the day-to-day decisions that are made. At the same time, the authors considered that a radical reorganization of middle-management levels should occur, with certain classes of middle-management jobs moving downward in status and compensation (because they will require less autonomy and skill), while other classes move upward into the top-management group [1]. The same authors highlight the idea that on a broader social scale one can conceive of large problems outside the firm that affect many institutions ancillary to industry. In this context, they ask how we educate people for routinized middle-management jobs, especially if the path from those jobs up to top management gets much rockier, and to what extent do schools start training new kinds of specialists?In 1964, [2] emphasized that in operational and practical fact, the medium (defined as any extension of ourselves) is the message. The author explained that the personal and social consequences of any medium result from the new scale that is included into our affairs by each extension of ourselves, or by any new technology. In addition, he gives two examples: the restructuring of human work and association which were shaped by the technique of fragmentation, which it was the essence of machine while the essence of automation is the opposite, it is integral and decentralist in its patterning of human relationships. …
Read full abstract