Well-trained Middle-distance Runners Research Articles

Relationship between 800-m Running Performance and Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Metabolism Capacities in Well-Trained Middle-Distance Runners

Relationship between 800-m Running Performance and Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Metabolism Capacities in Well-Trained Middle-Distance Runners

Relationship between 800-m running performance and running economy during high-intensity running in well-trained middle-distance runners

Relationship between 800-m running performance and running economy during high-intensity running in well-trained middle-distance runners

The Effects of Wearing Undersized Lower-Body Compression Garments on Endurance Running Performance

To examine whether wearing various size lower-body compression garments improves physiological and performance parameters related to endurance running in well-trained athletes. Eleven well-trained middle-distance runners and triathletes (age: 28.4 ± 10.0 y; height: 177.3 ± 4.7 cm; body mass: 72.6 ± 8.0 kg; VO2max: 59.0 ± 6.7 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed repeat progressive maximal tests (PMT) and time-to-exhaustion (TTE) tests at 90% VO2max wearing either manufacturer-recommended LBCG (rLBCG), undersized LBCG (uLBCG), or loose running shorts (CONT). During all exercise testing, several systemic and peripheral physiological measures were taken. The results indicated similar effects of wearing rLBCG and uLBCG compared with the control. Across the PMT, wearing either LBCG resulted in significantly (P < .05) increased oxygen consumption, O2 pulse, and deoxyhemoglobin (HHb) and decreased running economy, oxyhemoglobin, and tissue oxygenation index (TOI) at low-intensity speeds (8-10 km·h-1). At higher speeds (12-18 km·h-1), wearing LBCG increased regional blood flow (nTHI) and HHb values, but significantly lowered heart rate and TOI. During the TTE, wearing either LBCG significantly (P < .05) increased HHb concentration, whereas wearing uLBCG also significantly (P < .05) increased nTHI. No improvement in endurance running performance was observed in either compression condition. The results suggest that wearing LBCG facilitated a small number of cardiorespiratory and peripheral physiological benefits that appeared mostly related to improvements in venous flow. However, these improvements appear trivial to athletes, as they did not correspond to any improvement in endurance running performance.

Effect Of Tendon Stiffness And Leg Stiffness On Running Economy In Well-trained Middle Distance Runners

PURPOSE: Previous research suggests that a stiff 'leg spring' during running can provide significant energy savings from the elastic properties in the leg‘s soft tissues. Knowing that the absorption and recovery of elastic energy in muscle-tendon units is important in determining the energy cost of running, researchers have used the leg stiffness measured during the ground contact phase in running as a surrogate for muscle-tendon stiffness. However, no research has examined both the leg spring stiffness and the stiffness of the major tendons simultaneously. The aim of the present study was to examine how leg stiffness and the mechanical properties of the primary ankle and knee tendons influence running economy. METHODS: Eleven well-trained male middle distance runners volunteered for the study. Medial gastrocnemius (MG) and vastus lateralis (VL) tendon force-elongation properties were measured during an isometric maximal voluntary contraction. Tendon forces were determined from joint moments measured by isokinetic dynamometry, corrected for agonist-antagonist co-contraction and joint rotation. Tendon elongation was measured using B-mode 2-D ultrasonography. Eccentric leg stiffness was measured during over-ground running using a previously published kinetic model. Total leg stiffness of the entire ground contact phase was derived from kinetic and kinematic measures. Running economy was measured using a standardised incremental treadmill protocol. RESULTS: Analysis revealed no correlation with MG or VL tendon stiffness and either eccentric (r = -0.03 and r = -0.07, respectively) or total leg stiffness (r = -0.06 and r = 0.16, respectively). Leg stiffness was not correlated with running economy; however, MG tendon stiffness and peak ankle joint moment were significantly correlated with economy (r = -0.66 and r = -0.68, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Leg stiffness does not appear to be a surrogate for tendon stiffness and is not predictive of running economy in well-trained runners. Leg stiffness might be influenced by changes in leg mechanics or muscular co-contraction. Interestingly, Achilles tendon stiffness tends to be greater in more economical runners. Faster tendon recoil, indicative of stiffer tendons, could benefit power generation at the ankle joint during high speed running.

Different hormonal response to continuous and intermittent exercise in middle‐distance and marathon runners

In order to study the effects of different athletic backgrounds on exercise-induced hormonal responses, serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and cortisol concentrations were measured before and after intensive continuous and intermittent running in well-trained middle-distance runners (MID) and marathon runners (MAR). They performed two 40-min exercises on a treadmill: a continuous run at an intensity of 80% [tempo run (TR)] and an intermittent run (IR) at an intensity of 100% of the velocity associated with VO(2max). The testosterone response to IR and the cortisol response to TR was higher (P<0.05) in MID compared with MAR. The testosterone response to IR correlated positively with the maximal blood lactate concentration achieved after the maximal running test (r=0.46, P<0.05, n=20), while the cortisol response to TR correlated negatively with the runner's VO(2max) (r=-0.62, P<0.05, n=20). In conclusion, a continuous running exercise resulted in a lower cortisol response in runners who are adapted for longer distances, and an intermittent running exercise resulted in a higher testosterone response in runners who are adapted to middle distances.

Running-Specific, Periodized Strength Training Attenuates Loss of Stride Length During Intense Endurance Running

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a running-specific, periodized strength training program (performed over the specific period [8 weeks] of a 16-week macrocycle) on endurance-trained runners' capacity to maintain stride length during running bouts at competitive speeds. Eighteen well-trained middle-distance runners completed the study (personal bests for 1500 and 5000 m of 3 minutes 57 seconds +/- 12 seconds and 15 minutes 24 seconds +/- 36 seconds). They were randomly assigned to each of the following groups (6 per group): periodized strength group, performing a periodized strength training program over the 8-week specific (intervention) period (2 sessions per week); nonperiodized strength group, performing the same strength training exercises as the periodized group over the specific period but with no week-to-week variations; and a control group, performing no strength training at all during the specific period. The percentage of loss in the stride length (cm)/speed (m.s) (SLS) ratio was measured by comparing the mean SLS during the first and third (last) group of the total repetitions, respectively, included in each of the interval training sessions performed at race speeds during the competition period that followed the specific period. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in mean percentage of SLS loss between the 3 study groups, with the periodized strength group showing no significant SLS change (0.36 +/- 0.95%) and the 2 other groups showing a moderate or high SLS loss (-1.22 +/- 1.5% and -3.05 +/- 1.2% for the nonperiodized strength and control groups, respectively). In conclusion, periodized, running-specific strength training minimizes the loss of stride length that typically occurs in endurance runners during fatiguing running bouts.

Influence of test duration on oxygen uptake attained during treadmill running

Previous investigations have revealed that in well-trained middle-distance runners, oxygen uptake (VO2) does not attain maximal values (VO2max) in exhaustive treadmill trials where the VO2 demand exceeds VO2max. To date, this shortfall in the VO2 attained has been demonstrated in trials as short as 2 min in duration. In this study, we investigated whether a reduction in exhaustive test duration influences the VO2 attained during running on a treadmill. Six middle-distance runners participated in the study, completing an exhaustive 400 m and 800 m trial. These trials, together with a progressive test to determine VO2max, were completed in a counterbalanced order. Oxygen uptakes attained during the 400 m and 800 m trials were compared to examine the influence of exhaustive test duration. A plateau in VO2 was observed in all participants for the progressive test, demonstrating the attainment of VO2max. The mean speed, duration, and resulting distance in the constant-speed exhaustive trials were 25.8 km · h−1 (s=1.2), 55.8 s (s=2.3), and 400.2 m (s=20.2) for the 400 m trial, and 24.3 km · h−1 (s=0.8), 108.4 s (s=21.2), and 730.1 m (s=129.1) for the 800 m trial, respectively. A paired-samples t-test revealed a significantly different (P=0.018)%VO2max was attained for the 400 m (85.7%, s=3.0) and 800 m (89.1%, s=5.0) trials. In conclusion, VO2 did not reach VO2max during the exhaustive constant-speed 400 m and 800 m trials, but the test duration does influence the%VO2max achieved. Specifically, the VO2 attained becomes progressively further below VO2max as trial duration is reduced, such that 89% and 86% VO2max is achieved in exhaustive 800 m and 400 m constant-speed trials, respectively.

The Effect of Two Warm-Up Protocols on Some Biomechanical Parameters of the Neuromuscular System of MiddleDistance Runners

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of 2 different warm-up protocols on the neuromuscular system of well-trained middle distance runners. Seven runners performed 2 different warm-up protocols, one of which included slow running, stretching, and bounding and sprinting exercises, while the other consisted of slow running and stretching only. Before and after warm-up, contractile properties of the vastus lateralis and quadriceps femoris were monitored with a single twitch test, maximal torque, and the level of muscle activation during maximal voluntary extension. The 2 types of warm-up protocols showed statistically significant differences in the increase of peak knee extension torque and muscle activation level. After warm-up 1 maximal twitch torque was increased and twitch contraction time (CT) was shortened. Both maximal torque and the level of activation were increased. Parameter changes after warm-up 2 were similar to those after warm-up 1 but not statistically significant. Sprinting and bounding as part of athletes' warm-up improve muscle activation.

Serum hormone and myocellular protein recovery after intermittent runs at the velocity associated with VO(2max).

The responses of serum myocellular proteins and hormones to exercise were studied in ten well-trained middle-distance runners [maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) = 69.4 (5.1) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)] during 3 recovery days and compared to various measures of physical performance. The purpose was to establish the duration of recovery from typical intermittent middle-distance running exercises. The subjects performed, in random, order two 28-min treadmill running exercises at a velocity associated with VO(2max): 14 bouts of 60-s runs with 60 s of rest between each run (IR(60)) and 7 bouts of 120-s runs with 120 s of rest between each run (IR(120)). Before the exercises (pre- exercise), 2 h after, and 1, 2 and 3 days after the exercises, the same series of measurements were performed, including those for serum levels of the myocellular proteins creatine kinase, myoglobin and carbonic anhydrase III (S-CK, S-Mb and S-CA III, respectively), serum hormones testosterone, Luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and cortisol (S-testosterone, S-LH, S-FSH and S-cortisol, respectively) and various performance parameters: maximal vertical jump height (CMJ) and stride length, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion during an 8-min run at 15 km x h(-1) (SL(15 km x h(-1)), HR(15 km x h(-1)) and RPE(15 km x h(-1)), respectively). Two hours after the end of both exercise bouts the concentration of each measured serum protein had increased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to the pre-exercise level, but there were no changes in SL(15 km x h(-1)) or CMJ. During the recovery days only S-CK was significantly raised (P < 0.01), concomitant with a decrease in CMJ (P < 0.01) and an increase in RPE(15 km x h(-1)) (P < 0.01). Hormone levels remained unchanged compared to the pre-exercise levels during the recovery days and there were no significant differences between the two exercise bouts in any of the observed post-exercise day-to-day responses. With the exception of S-CK, after IR(120) the post-exercise responses returned to their pre-exercise levels within the 3 days of recovery. The present findings suggest that a single 28-min intermittent middle-distance running exercise does not induce changes in serum hormones of well-trained runners during recovery over 3 days, while changes in S-CK, CMJ and RPE(15 km x h(-1)) indicate that 2-3 days of light training may be needed before the recovery at muscle level is complete.

Daily stability in energy cost of running, respiratory parameters and stride rate among well-trained middle distance runners.

The purpose of this study was to quantify total intraindividual variability in energy cost of running (C), ventilation (VE), respiratory frequency (RF), heart rate (HR), lactate concentration (La) and stride rate (SR) at usual training pace in French elite middle distance runners. Subjects were monitored four times a week during submaximal treadmill tests at 75% VO2max speed (15.8 +/- .02 km.h-1). No significant differences (p > .05) were found between tests in C, VE, RF, HR, SR. Significant day to day differences were found in La (0.5 +/- 0.3, p < .025). However, a wide range of individual coefficients of variation were observed for C (0.2-10.6), VE (0.9-8.8) and RF (0.7-9.3). SR appears to be the most stable parameter (0.2-2.6). No correlation was found between these individual variations. These results suggest that in well-trained runners C, VE, RF, HR and SR are stable measures for assessing the efficacy of procedures aimed at improving the energy cost of running. For the speed used in testing, the respiratory parameters and energy cost of running presented a wide range of individual variation whereas stride rate appeared to be a very stable measure.