PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 基于水源涵养参照系的中国生态系统水源涵养功能优劣评估 DOI: 10.5846/stxb202107161912 作者: 作者单位: 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 国家重点研究计划(2016YFC0500204);中国科学院战略性先导专项(XDA20010202);广西科技重大专项(桂科AA20161002-3) Evaluation of water conservation of China's ecosystems based on benchmark Author: Affiliation: Fund Project: the National Key Research & Development Program of China (2016YFC0500204) 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:为解决水源涵养优劣评估结果空间可比性差的问题,在拟合1990-2018年中国生态系统水源涵养动态数据基础上,构建基于参照系的水源涵养功能优劣等级评估方法体系,从全国和分区尺度揭示中国生态系统水源涵养功能优劣格局与演变规律,阐明该方法的优越性。结果表明:(1)2015年中国全国生态系统水源涵养功能以差级别占主导,约占总面积的44.8%,主要分布于西北、青藏高原、华北平原和东北平原。1990-2018年中国生态系统水源涵养功能中等级面积极显著降低,差等级面积显著增加,其余类型呈波动变化。(2)各气候区生态系统水源涵养优劣等级构成因气候、生态系统构成等差异而不同,一般为气候区愈湿润,其优良等级比重愈高。1990-2018年,共有10个气候区的优、良、中、低或差等级面积发生了显著变化,主要为优、良、中等级以显著降低为主,差等级全显著增加。(3)与其他方法相比,基于参照系的生态系统水源涵养功能优劣评估法因引入分区分类评估思想,评估结果更科学,空间可比性显著提高。 Abstract:Water conservation was one of the important ecological service function of terrestrial ecosystems, which covered the hydrological processes of water in vegetation, soil, atmosphere and animal systems. the change in water conservation of ecosystems was not only directly affected the regional ecosystem status (e.g., regional climate hydrology, vegetation and soil conditions), but also restricted the regional social, economic and ecological sustainable development. Therefore, the evaluation of regional ecosystem water conservation function has become an important part of ecological services research. Although there were many achievements in the researches on the conception, calculation of function and value, and transfer of of ecosystem water conservation, and its ecological compensation across regions. There was still no recognized method to evaluate the level of ecosystem water conservation function, therefore, there were no comparison between most of the previous studies on the level of water conservation function. Because the water conservation calculated based on water balance method was mainly restricted by meteorological conditions, the comparability of the level of water conservation function in different periods were also lower, all those factors greatly reduced the application value of the previous evaluation on the level of regional ecosytem water conservation function. In order to solve the problem of poor comparison in the pros and cons evaluation of water conservation, the evaluation method system of grade of water resource conservation function was constructed based on the water conservation benchmark after fitting the dynamic data of China's ecosystem water conservation from 1990 to 2018, and determining the water conservation benchmark of each evaluation unit. Then the pattern and evolution of the grade of water conservation function in the Chinese ecosystems were revealed on the national and regional scales, and its advantages and disadvantages were also illustrated. The main results were as follows:(1) the grade of water conservation of China's national ecosystem was dominated by poor grade, accounting for 44.8% of the total area, and mainly distributed in northwestern China, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, North China Plain and Northeast China Plain in 2015. The area of the medium grade of water conservation in China's ecosystem decreased significantly from 1990 to 2018, while the area of poor grade of water conservation in China's ecosystem increased significantly, and the areas of the others grades showed no significant regular fluctuations. (2) The grade composition of ecosystem water conservation was different between climate zones because of the differences in climate, ecosystem composition, human disturbance, and so on. Generally, the wetter the climate zone was, the higher proportion of the excellent grades was. There were 10 climate zones which area of the excellent, good, low, or poor grade of water conservation significantly changed from 1990 to 2018. The main performances were that the areas of excellent, good, and medium grades of ecosystem water conservation were significantly reduced, while the areas of poor grade were all increased. (3) Compared with the other two methods, the evaluation method of the ecosystem water conservation based of water conservation benchmark was more comparable and scientific due to the introduction of the research idea of subarea and classification. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献
Read full abstract