Waitlist Mortality In Patients Research Articles

Heart transplantation from COVID-positive donors with 6-month follow-up: A case series.

Data on long term outcomes in heart transplant recipients from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive donors are limited. We present a series of nine patients who underwent heart transplants from COVID-19 PCR-positive donors between November 2021 to August 2022 with mean follow-up of 12.12±3 months. All the recipients received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and had at least 6 months follow-up. Eight recipients had acceptable long-term outcomes; one patient died during index admission from primary graft dysfunction. Details regarding donor and recipient characteristics, management and outcomes are provided. Two patients developed deep vein thrombosis, and one patient underwent pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction. Among the surviving eight patients, none developed COVID-19 infection during follow-up period. There was no significant difference in outcome parameters when compared to patients who received hearts from donors who tested negative for COVID-19 during the same time period at our center. Keeping in mind the significant waitlist mortality in patients awaiting heart transplantation, COVID-19-positive donors should be considered for heart transplantation to help expand the donor pool and potentially reduce waitlist mortality.

Nonselective beta-blockers may lead to stage 2 acute kidney injury and waitlist mortality in child class C cirrhosis.

Nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) protect patients with compensated cirrhosis; however, it is unclear if NSBB is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We aimed to determine if the use of NSBB was associated with an increased risk of stage II AKI or greater and waitlist mortality (WLM) among patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant stratified by cirrhosis severity. Included were 1816 outpatients listed for liver transplantation at UCSF from June 2012 to April 2022. Our primary outcome was stage 2 AKI (>200% increase in serum creatinine). Our secondary outcome was WLM (all-cause mortality). Our primary exposure was the use of any NSBB derived using natural language processing of clinical notes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent variables were used to determine the HR of NSBB use on stage 2 AKI and WLM, stratified by Child-Pugh Score. The average age of the cohort was 58 years old, with 35% identifying as female. In multivariable time-dependent models, NSBB use was associated with 1.53 × (95 CI 1.19-1.97) the hazard of stage 2 AKI in the cohort overall and 1.80 × (95 CI 1.26-2.57) among those with Child C cirrhosis, respectively. Similarly, NSBB use was associated with 1.30 × (95 CI 1.07-1.59) and 1.45 × (95 CI 1.03-2.03) the hazard of WLM, overall and in Child C, respectively. NSBB use was not significantly associated with AKI nor WLM among those with Child A. NSBB use is associated with Stage 2 AKI and WLM in patients awaiting liver transplantation and Child C cirrhosis. These data suggest cautious use of NSBBs in patients in this population.

FRI-448 - Prognostic role of serum alpha-1 antitrypsin levels for waitlist mortality in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease

FRI-448 - Prognostic role of serum alpha-1 antitrypsin levels for waitlist mortality in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease

CT-quantified sarcopenic visceral obesity is associated with poor transplant waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality than seen with either sarcopenia or obesity alone. We aimed to define sarcopenic visceral obesity (SVO) using CT-quantified skeletal muscle index and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio and to examine its association with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Included were 326 adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation in the ambulatory setting with available abdominal CT within 6 months from enrollment between February 2015 and January 2018. SVO was defined as patients with sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index <50cm 2 /m 2 in men and <39cm 2 /m 2 in women) and visceral obesity (visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio ≥1.21 in men and ≥0.48 in women). The percentage who met criteria for sarcopenia, visceral obesity, and SVO were 44%, 29%, and 13%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality was higher in patients with SVO compared to patients with sarcopenia without visceral obesity or visceral obesity without sarcopenia at 12 months (40% vs. 21% vs. 12%) (overall logrank p =0.003). In univariable Cox regression, SVO was associated with waitlist mortality (HR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.58-7.39), which remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, ascites, encephalopathy, MELDNa, liver frailty index, and different body compositions (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.11-6.30). SVO was associated with increase waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis in the ambulatory setting awaiting liver transplantation. Concurrent loss of skeletal muscle and gain of adipose tissue seen in SVO quantified by CT may be a useful and objective measurement to identify patients at risk for suboptimal pretransplant outcomes.

Waitlist mortality in patients with autoimmune liver diseases

Introduction and ObjectivesAutoimmune liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the primary indication for ∼24% of total liver transplants. The liver transplant allocation system is currently based upon the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and it often underestimates the severity of autoimmune liver diseases. We aim to compare the rate of adverse waitlist removal among patients with all autoimmune liver diseases and other indications for liver transplant in the Model for End-Stage Liver -Na era. Materials and MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified all patients listed for liver transplant from 2016 to 2019. The outcome of interest was waitlist survival defined as the composite outcome of death or removal for clinical deterioration. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate the waitlist survival. ResultsPatients with autoimmune hepatitis had a higher risk of being removed from the waitlist for death or clinical deterioration (SHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08–1.72; P<0.007), followed by primary biliary cholangitis (SHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07–1.68; P<0.011). ConclusionsHigh waitlist death or removal for clinical deterioration was observed in patients with PBC and AIH when compared to other etiologies. It may be useful to reassess the process of awarding MELD exception points to mitigate such disparity.

Model for end-stage liver disease underestimates mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure waiting for liver transplantation.

Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) show excess mortality in MELD-Na based organ allocation for liver transplantation (LT). Whether MELD-based allocation in the Eurotransplant region similarly underprioritizes ACLF patients is unknown. 428 patients listed for LT from 01/2010 to 02/2021 at a tertiary center in Germany were screened and 209 patients included as derivation (n=123) and validation cohort (n=86). Competing risk analysis for waitlist mortality and LT as competing events was performed. 90-day waitlist mortality for patients with MELD < and ≥ 25 at baseline was 9% vs. 33%, respectively (p=0.009). Competing risk analysis shows significantly higher 90-day waitlist mortality in patients listed with ACLF compared to those without ACLF (p=0.021) in the low MELD stratum. Probability of LT was similar between the two groups (p=0.91). In the high MELD group, 90-day waitlist mortality and rates of LT were not significantly different between patients with and without ACLF (31% vs. 20%, p=0.55 and 59% vs. 60%, p=0.72, respectively). Post-transplant survival was similar between patients with and without ACLF. This result was confirmed in the validation cohort. MELD-based organ allocation in the Eurotransplant region underestimates waitlist mortality in patients with ACLF in lower MELD ranges.

Sarcopenia predicts ascitic decompensation and mortality independently of portal hypertension status in patients with advanced chronic liver disease outside the liver transplantation setting

Introduction: Sarcopenia is mostly defined by a loss in muscle mass identified at cross-sectional imaging assessment by computed tomography (CT), where parameters such as skeletal muscle index (SMI) have been consistently associated with waitlist mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease, as well as withthe hepatic encephalopathy, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the role of sarcopenia in predicting hepatic decompensation other than hepatic encephalopathy is still unclear.

Primary biliary cholangitis has the highest waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis and acute on chronic liver failure awaiting liver transplant.

Data are sparse on etiology specific outcomes on waitlist (WL) and post-transplant outcomes among patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). In a retrospective cohort of 14,774 adults from United network for organ sharing (UNOS) database listed for Liver transplantation (LT) with cirrhosis and ACLF (January 2013-June 2019), 40% were due to alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), followed by hepatitis C virus (HCV) at 20%, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (19%), cryptogenic cirrhosis (7%), autoimmune hepatitis (5%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) at 3%, and 2% each for hepatitis B, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and metabolic etiology. Using competing risk analysis, cumulative risk of WL mortality was highest for PBC at 20.5% and lowest for PSC at 13.3%, P<.001. Compared with ALD as reference, WL mortality was higher for PBC (1.45 [1.16-1.82]), and similar for other etiologies, P<.001. Of this cohort, 9650 (65.3%) patients received LT, with 1-year. patient survival of 91.6% for PBC, worst for cryptogenic cirrhosis (89.5%) and best for PSC and ALD (93.4%), P<.001. Among listed candidates with ACLF, those with PBC have highest WL mortality 1-year. post-transplant survival was excellent among recipients for PBC. If these findings are validated in prospective studies, liver disease etiology should be considered for LT selection among patients in ACLF.

Patient-reported dyspnea and health predict waitlist mortality in patients waiting for lung transplantation in Japan

BackgroundWaitlist mortality due to donor shortage for lung transplantation is a serious problem worldwide. Currently, the selection of recipients in Japan is mainly based on the registration order. Hence, scientific evidence for risk stratification regarding waitlist mortality is urgently needed. We hypothesized that patient-reported dyspnea and health would predict mortality in patients waitlisted for lung transplantation.MethodsWe analyzed factors related to waitlist mortality using data of 203 patients who were registered as candidates for lung transplantation from deceased donors. Dyspnea was evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and the health status was determined with St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).ResultsAmong 197 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the main underlying disease was interstitial lung disease (99 patients). During the median follow-up period of 572 days, 72 patients died and 96 received lung transplantation (69 from deceased donors). Univariable competing risk analyses revealed that both mMRC dyspnea and SGRQ Total score were significantly associated with waitlist mortality (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively) as well as age, interstitial lung disease, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and forced vital capacity. Multivariable competing risk analyses revealed that the mMRC and SGRQ score were associated with waitlist mortality in addition to age and interstitial lung disease.ConclusionsBoth mMRC dyspnea and SGRQ score were significantly associated with waitlist mortality, in addition to other clinical variables such as patients’ background, underlying disease, and pulmonary function. Patient-reported dyspnea and health may be measured through multi-dimensional analysis (including subjective perceptions) and for risk stratification regarding waitlist mortality.

Functional Status at Liver Transplant Waitlisting Correlates With Greater Odds of Encephalopathy, Ascites, and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Whether higher liver transplant (LT) waitlist mortality in patients with poor functional status (FS) is mediated by higher prevalence of cirrhosis complications is not clear. We aim to evaluate the impact of FS on risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) among adults listed for LT. Using 2005-2018 United Network for Organ Sharing LT data, we retrospectively evaluated the impact of FS on prevalence of ascites, HE, and SBP among adults listed for LT using Karnofsky Performance Status Score categories (KPSS-1: FS 80-100%, KPSS-2: 60-70%, KPSS-3: 40-50%, KPSS-4: 10-30%), stratified by underlying liver disease etiology. Between-group comparisons used chi-squared methods and adjusted multivariate logistic regression. Among 100,618 adults listed for LT (68.8% male, 72.4% non-Hispanic white) 35.2% were KPSS-1, 36.6% KPSS-2, 15.7% KPSS-3, and 12.6% KPSS-4 at time of LT waitlist registration. Patients with worse FS were significantly more likely to have ascites, HE, and SBP at time of waitlist registration (KPSS-1 vs. KPSS-4: ascites, 66% vs. 93%; HE, 81% vs. 49%; SBP, 4% vs. 16%, p < 0.001 for all). On multivariate regression, compared with patients with KPSS-1, those with KPSS-4 had significantly higher odds of ascites (odds ratio [OR]: 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-1.62, p < 0.01), HE (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.59-1.80, p < 0.01), and SBP (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.98-2.38, p < 0.01), which was observed across all liver disease etiologies. Worse FS is associated with higher odds of cirrhosis complications including ascites, HE, and SBP, which was observed across all liver disease etiologies.

Changes in frailty are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis

To date, studies evaluating the association between frailty and mortality in patients with cirrhosis have been limited to assessments of frailty at a single time point. We aimed to evaluate changes in frailty over time and their association with death/delisting in patients too sick for liver transplantation. Adults with cirrhosis, listed for liver transplantation at 8 US centers, underwent ambulatory longitudinal frailty testing using the liver frailty index (LFI). We used multilevel linear mixed-effects regression to model and predict changes in LFI (ΔLFI) per 3 months, based on age, gender, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-Na, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy, categorizing patients by frailty trajectories. Competing risk regression evaluated the subhazard ratio (sHR) of baseline LFI and predicted ΔLFI on death/delisting, with transplantation as the competing risk. We analyzed 2,851 visits from 1,093 outpatients with cirrhosis. Patients with severe worsening of frailty had worse baseline LFI and were more likely to have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, or dialysis-dependence. After a median follow-up of 11 months, 223 (20%) of the overall cohort died/were delisted because of sickness. The cumulative incidence of death/delisting increased by worsening ΔLFI group. In competing risk regression adjusted for baseline LFI, age, height, MELD-Na, and albumin, a 0.1 unit change in ΔLFI per 3 months was associated with a 2.04-fold increased risk of death/delisting (95% CI 1.35-3.09). Worsening frailty was significantly associated with death/delisting independent of baseline frailty and MELD-Na. Notably, patients who experienced improvements in frailty had a lower risk of death/delisting. Our data support the longitudinal measurement of frailty, using the LFI, in patients with cirrhosis and lay the foundation for interventional work aimed at reversing frailty. Frailty, as measured at a single time point, is predictive of death in patients with cirrhosis, but whether changes in frailty over time are associated with death is unknown. In a study of over 1,000 patients with cirrhosis who underwent frailty testing, we demonstrate that worsening frailty is strongly linked with mortality, regardless of baseline frailty and liver disease severity. Notably, patients who experienced improvements in frailty over time had a lower risk of death/delisting. Our data support the longitudinal measurement of frailty in patients with cirrhosis and lay the foundation for interventional work aimed at reversing frailty.

Waitlist and post-transplant outcomes in patients listed with intra-aortic balloon pump for heart transplant: United Network for Organ Sharing registry.

Intra-aortic balloon pump as bridge-to-transplant (BTT) has been used successfully in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, the waitlist mortality in this population is high and predictors of waitlist mortality in this population are not known. We sought to identify predictors for waitlist mortality in patients listed with intra-aortic balloon pump and risk factors for 1-year mortality after heart transplant in this population. We identified patients listed for heart transplantation with intra-aortic balloon pump in the United Network for Organ Sharing data set from 1994 to 2015. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of waitlist mortality and 1-year post-transplant mortality. From 1945 patients listed with intra-aortic balloon pump, 67.5% (N = 1313) were alive at 1 year and waitlist mortality was 32.5% (N = 632). We found that higher pulmonary vascular resistance, need for inotropes, and need for mechanical ventilation were associated with higher waitlist mortality. Mechanical ventilation and dialysis prior to transplantation were important predictors of 1-year post-transplant mortality. Predictors of mortality such as high pulmonary vascular resistance, dialysis dependence, inotrope, and ventilator dependence in patients listed with intra-aortic balloon pump can help us identify those patients that are at high risk of dying prior to a heart transplantation.

Including body composition in MELD scores improves mortality prediction among patients awaiting liver transplantation.

The Model for End-stage Liver Diseases (MELD) is widely accepted for prioritizing candidates awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, MELD scores do not reflect the severity of the nutritional or functional status of patients with cirrhosis. This retrospective study analyzed data from 173 patients who were waitlisted for LT at our institution between April 2006 and December 2016. By including skeletal muscle mass, muscle quality and visceral adiposity evaluated using plain computed tomography imaging in MELD scores, we developed body composition-MELD (BC-MELD), and investigated its impact on the prediction of mortality among patients awaiting LT. The equation generated using Cox regression analysis was as follows: BC-MELD=MELD score+3.59×low SMI+5.42×high IMAC+2.06×high VSR. (IMAC, intramuscular adipose tissue content; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; VSR, visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio). The median BC-MELD score was 17.4 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) revealed a cut-off BC-MELD score of 21.4 (AUC=0.835, P<0.001, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 70.7%). Waitlist mortality in patients with high BC-MELD was significantly higher in all tested cohorts (P<0.001) and among patients with lower conventional MELD scores (<15) (P<0.001). The discriminatory power was significantly better for BC-MELD than MELD scores (AUC; 0.835 vs. 0.732, P=0.001 for 3-month, AUC; 0.765 vs. 0.671, P=0.002 for 6-month, AUC; 0.716 vs. 0.615, P<0.001 for 12-month, AUC; 0.636 vs. 0.584, P=0.014 for overall mortality). BC-MELD is the first to include not only muscularity but also visceral adiposity. It predicted waitlist mortality more accurately than the conventional MELD score. A new allocation system based on BC-MELD might lead to better outcomes for patients with cirrhosis awaiting LT.

A New Combined Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Excluding INR (CMELD-XI) Score Better Predicts Pediatric Heart Transplant Outcomes

The Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, derived based on serum creatinine, bilirubin, and INR, was developed to accurately predict the probability of waitlist mortality in patients awaiting a liver transplant. Subsequently, a MELD excluding INR (MELD-XI) score was adapted to predict mortality after heart transplant (HT). Our objective was to devise a new combined scoring model (defined as CMELD-XI, derived by adding the MELD-XI score with independent predictors of 1-year mortality) to accurately predict mortality after pediatric HT (PHT).

Outcomes in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Awaiting Heart Transplantation.

Current organ allocation policy and the rapid growth of mechanical support favor heart transplant (HT) candidates on left ventricular assist devices. HT candidates with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are usually not left ventricular assist device candidates and may have a disadvantage compared with dilated forms of cardiomyopathy. Adult HT candidates registered in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database between 1999 and 2016 were included. HCM candidates were compared with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ICM patients. Two eras were defined on the basis of the approval date of the first continuous-flow left ventricular assist device for bridge-to-transplant in the United States (2008). Patients outcomes were evaluated while on the waitlist and after HT. The proportion of patients with HCM listed for HT increased by 44% in era 2 compared with era 1. Waitlist mortality in patients with ICM (15.5%-8.7%) and non-ICM (14.2%-8.2%) declined across eras, but minimal decline was observed in HCM patients (11.7%-9.6%; P=0.06). In era 2, the 12-month rate of HT in HCM (64.8%) was comparable to that of ICM (60.9%) and non-ICM (62.7%) patients (P=0.06). Post-transplant survival in HCM patients was the most favorable in the most recent era (1 year: 91.6% and 5 years: 82.5%; P<0.05 for all comparisons). The number of patients with HCM in need of HT is increasing. Although post-transplant survival in HCM is excellent, waitlist mortality is substantial and with minimal decline in the most recent era, despite the frequent use of listing status upgrade by exception in this patient cohort. Different strategies to improve the performance of the organ allocation system in patients with HCM are needed.

The Liver Frailty Index Improves Mortality Prediction of the Subjective Clinician Assessment in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Frailty, a critical determinant of health outcomes, is most commonly assessed in patients with cirrhosis by general clinician assessment that is limited by its subjectivity. We aimed to compare the objective Liver Frailty Index (LFI), consisting of three performance-based tests (grip, chair stands, balance), with a subjective hepatologist assessment. Outpatients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT) underwent: (1) objective measurement using the LFI and (2) subjective clinician assessment. Spearman's correlation assessed associations between the LFI and clinician assessment; Cox regression with waitlist mortality (death/delisting for sickness); discriminative ability with Concordance(C) statistics. The net reclassification index evaluated the percentage of patients correctly reclassified by adding the LFI to the clinician assessment. Of the 529 patients with cirrhosis, median LFI was 3.8 (range 1.0-7.0) and clinician assessment was 3 (range 0-5). Correlation between LFI and the clinician assessment was modest (ρ=0.38) with high variability by hepatologist (ρ=0.26-0.70). At a median of 11 months, 102 (19%) died/were delisted. Both the LFI (hazard ratio (HR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-2.9) and clinician assessment (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9) were associated with adjusted waitlist mortality risk (P<0.01). The addition of the LFI to the clinician assessment significantly improved mortality prediction over the clinician assessment alone (0.74 vs. 0.68; P=0.02). Compared with the clinician assessment alone, the addition of the LFI correctly reclassified 34% (95% CI 8-53%) of patients to their correct survival status. The subjective clinician assessment can predict waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis but is subjective and variable by hepatologist. The addition of the LFI to the subjective clinician assessment significantly improved mortality risk prediction, reclassifying 34% of patients. Our data strongly support the incorporation of the objective LFI to anchor our assessments of patients with cirrhosis to enhance our decision-making.

Predictors of Waitlist Mortality in Portopulmonary Hypertension.

The current Organ Procurement Transplantation Network policy grants Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points to patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), but potentially important factors, such as severity of liver disease and pulmonary hypertension, are not included in the exception score, and may affect survival. The purpose of this study was to identify significant predictors of waitlist mortality in patients with POPH. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database with hemodynamics consistent with POPH (defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure >25 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] ≥240 dynes·s·cm) who were approved for a POPH MELD exception between 2006 and 2014. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we identified predictors of waitlist mortality (or removal for clinical deterioration). One hundred ninety adults were included. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.08; P = 0.0499), initial native MELD score (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17; P < 0.001), and initial PVR (HR, 1.12 per 100 dynes·s·cm; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23; P = 0.02) were the only significant univariate predictors of waitlist mortality and remained significant predictors in a multivariate model, which had a c-statistic of 0.71. PVR and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were not significant predictors of posttransplant mortality. Both the severity of liver disease and POPH (as assessed by MELD and PVR, respectively) were significantly associated with waitlist, but not posttransplant, mortality in patients with approved MELD exceptions for POPH. Both factors should potentially be included in the POPH MELD exception score to more accurately reflect waitlist mortality risk.

(1035) - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Does Not Impact Wait-List Mortality in Patients Bridged with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

(1035) - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Does Not Impact Wait-List Mortality in Patients Bridged with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Impact of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillatorson WaitlistMortality AmongPatients Awaiting Heart Transplantation: An UNOS/OPTN Analysis.

This study sought to assess the impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) on waitlist mortality in patients listed for heart transplantation (HT). The impact of ICDs on preventing sudden cardiac death in patients awaiting HT has not been studied in large multicenter cohorts. Furthermore, whether ICDs benefit patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is unknown. Adults (age≥18 years) listed for first-time HT in the United States between January 1, 1999, and September 30, 2014, were retrospectively identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. The primary predictor variable was the presence of an ICD at the time of listing. Primary outcome variable was all-cause waitlistmortality. Data on 32,599 patients (mean age 53 ± 12 years, 77% male, 70% Caucasian) were analyzed. During median follow-up of 154 days, 3,638 patients (11%) died on the waitlist (9% in ICD group vs. 15% in no-ICD group; p< 0.0001), whereas 63% underwent HT. Having an ICD at listing was associated with an adjusted 13% relative reduction in mortality (hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 0.94). In the subgroup of patients with LVAD (n= 9,478), having an ICD was associated with an adjusted 19% relative reduction in mortality (hazard ratio:0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.94). ICD use was associated with improved survival on the HT waitlist in patients with or without LVADs. These findings strengthen the current guideline recommendations of using ICDs in nonhospitalized patients awaitingHTand provide new insight into the effectiveness of ICDs on survival in LVAD-supported patients.

Differential effect of body mass index on pediatric heart transplant outcomes based on diagnosis.

The impact of nutritional status on HTx waitlist mortality in children is unknown, and there are conflicting data regarding the role of nutrition in post-HTx survival. This study examined the influence of nutrition on waitlist and post-HTx outcomes in children. Children 2-18yr listed for HTx from 1997 to 2011 were identified from the OPTN database and stratified by BMI percentile. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the influence of BMI on waitlist mortality. Cox proportional hazard regression assessed the impact of BMI on post-HTx mortality. When all 2712 patients were analyzed, BMI did not impact waitlist, one-, or five-yr mortality. However, when stratified by diagnosis, BMI>95% (AOR 1.96; 95% CI 1.24, 3.09) and BMI<1% (AOR 2.17; 95% CI 1.28, 3.68) were independent risk factors for waitlist mortality in patients with CM. BMI did not impact waitlist mortality in CHD and did not impact post-HTx outcomes, regardless of diagnosis. BMI>95% and BMI<1% are independent risk factors for waitlist mortality in patients with CM, but not CHD. This suggests differing risk factors based on disease etiology, and an individualized approach to risk assessment based on diagnosis may be warranted.