302 Rhetoric & Public Affairs episode between the fifth and sixth chapters of the third and last part of Flaubert's L'Education sentimentale. The life of a central character of the novel, Senecal, unfolds the social contradiction that Flaubert and other conservatives of the time were acutely aware of the drift of European societies toward authoritarian democracy. When imprisoned for conspiracy before the revolutions of 1848, Senecal's colleague Dussardier deplored Senecal's lot as a victim of repression. But by the date of the fateful episode recounted in this section of the book, December 2,1851, the former revolutionary has become a policeman. The "blank" is the open-mouthed shock registered on the face of Frederick Moreau when, at first seeing a protester falling dead after being struck by a policeman 's sword, suddenly recognizes the policeman. "And Frederic, open-mouthed recognized Senecal." This sentence is followed by a rapid-fire series of narrative cuts to subsequent scenes in Moreau's life. Proust, who did not admire Flaubert as a writer, found these scenes so remarkable that he made them the focus of an important critical essay. Flaubert's use of—"He traveled, he came to know the melancholy of the steamboat, the cold awakening in the tent___He returned. He went into society . . . . Toward the end of 1867...."—in place of similar but much more slowly paced locutions in Balzac, grounds Proust's claim that Flaubert is the first to transform such transitional "dregs" in history writing to the status of music. Ginzburg turns Proust's claim around to use it as evidence of the mutual interaction of style and substance of historical knowledge. Part of his argument, violently summarized, is that Flaubert accurately reflects the nascent world of the cinema and the impact of rapid transportation by rail. But the main, and more nuanced, part of his argument is that the availability of new means for the construction of narrative influences the way history is discovered, for it affects the very research methods of the historian. Instancing Marc Bloch's analogy of history as the last scene on a reel of film which the historian attempts to unroll backward, despite the gaps and blanks he will surely find, Ginzburg stresses how "the very availability of a narrative device can generate ... a specific approach to research" (102). For Ginzburg, Aristotle's view of rhetoric provides a cognitively rich understanding of narrative and hence of history. Historical narrative, far from enclosing history in a prison house of language or confining it to the endlessly recursive mobius strip of self-reference, beckons (sometimes in spite of itself) toward an objective world beyond the text waiting to be known. John Angus CampbeU University of Memphis Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives. Edited by Virginia D. Nazarea. University of Arizona Press, 1999; pp. 299. $40.00. In many ways, rhetoric has always been a provincial discipline, claiming imprimatur for its universal claims from a small town in a small country a long time ago. Book Reviews 303 This provinciality is perhaps most evident in its favorite object of study, "great speeches by great men." This approach has long since exceeded its virtues, which the discipline of rhetoric, to its credit, has begun to acknowledge. Rhetorical critics now study the rhetoric of images, of science, of memorials, of city streets, of commercials , of bodies, of landscapes, and so on. This is an exciting but chaUenging development , for as it opens vistas for scholars, it also requires scholars to be open to interdisciplinary and intercultural knowledge. Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/ Located Lives can contribute to the necessary task of opening. The editor of this volume, Virginia D. Nazarea, in her introduction and in her essay "Lenses and Latitudes in Landscapes and Lifescapes," makes clear ethnoecology 's definition and its relevance for rhetorical studies. Nazarea defines ethnoecology as "the investigation of systems of perception, cognition, and the use of the natural environment" (8-9). For ethnoecology, "understanding is shaped by standing , as is disposition by position" (8) and even perception is ideological. Nazarea's insistence that "culture structures perception and operates both as a way of seeing and a way of not seeing things" (93) has a fam...
Read full abstract