Background: A comprehensive stroke center (CSC) servicing remote areas in South Florida became HEMS direct-from-field capable on October 15, 2020. This analysis reviews the utilization of this service and compares it to ground EMS (GEMS). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from October 15, 2020, to July 31, 2021, that collected HEMS adult stroke alert data and compared it to the prior year's summary GEMS stroke alert data. Using HEMS transportation logs, presenting stroke symptoms and prehospital assessment were abstracted, in addition to initial NIHSS, downgrade rate, stroke diagnosis percentage, treatment rate, and times. Results: The analysis included a total of 52 direct transport HEMS stroke alerts. Assessment tools utilized by HEMS included the Cincinnati stroke scale (4%) and the FAST-ED (37%); most cases (59%) did not document a stroke assessment tool. The median NIHSS was 10, with 37% presenting a score <6. Cases were downgraded upon arrival in 27% and after CT imaging in 15% of cases. Significantly (p<.001), more HEMS cases were diagnosed as stroke (69%) compared to GEMS (57%). Stroke treatment rates remained similar (HEMS=23%; GEMS=24%). Median door-to-needle times were significantly faster for HEMS (15 min) than GEMS (25 min) (p<.05). Median door-to-puncture times were clinically faster for HEMS (61mins) than GEMS (66 mins). Conclusion: Prehospital triage could be improved to better detect the 77% of patients who are not eligible for acute stroke reperfusion treatments and may benefit from ground as opposed to air transportation. The current HEMS triage, although not consistently documented, appropriately selects stroke victims, but not necessarily those who need air transport to a higher care level. Patients arriving via HEMS receive similar access to stroke treatment and, if treated, significantly faster treatment times.
Read full abstract