Versus Vitamin K Antagonists Research Articles

606 Oral anticoagulants in fragile patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and atrial fibrillation: the Origami study

Abstract Aims Randomized trials support the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), leading to increased use of these compounds. Crushed forms of DOACs have shown to be reliable, but evidence supporting percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) delivery is lacking. PEG is a long-term option for enteral food and drug delivery in patients unable to maintain oral intake, bypassing the risks and disadvantages of parenteral nutrition. We investigate the safety and efficacy of Edoxaban administered via PEG in patients with atrial fibrillation and a clinical indication for a long-term anticoagulation. Methods and results In this prospective, single centre observational study, 12 PEG-treated patients with indication to anticoagulation will receive edoxaban via PEG and will be followed-up to 6 months. Plasma anti-Factor Xa activity and edoxaban concentrations will be assessed. Thromboembolic (ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) will be recorded at 1 and 6 months. A retrospective analysis of 5 AF cases undergoing PEG-implantation at our Institution, who received edoxaban via PEG, showed plasma anti-FXa levels at steady state of 146 ± 15 ng/ml, without major adverse event at a mean follow-up of 6 months. Conclusion We prospectively investigate PEG-administration of edoxaban in PEG-treated patients requiring long term anticoagulation. Our preliminary retrospective data support this route of DOAC administration.

Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with obesity: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants’ (DOAC) pharmacokinetics are affected by obesity. Their efficacy and safety in obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) and morbid obesity (BMI≥40 kg/m2) are still unclear in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy/safety of DOAC versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of VTE in patients with obesity and morbid obesity. The primary efficacy/safety outcomes were VTE recurrence and major bleeding (MB). Clinically relevant non-MB and mortality were also evaluated. MethodsA systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science) identified studies evaluating DOAC in the treatment of VTE in patients with obesity and reporting one of the outcomes. Relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. ResultsWe included 21 studies (50,360pts) of which 16,150 patients had a BMI≥30 kg/m2 and 6443 patients had a BMI≥40 kg/m2. VTE recurrence was similar with DOAC compared to VKA/LMWH in patients with obesity (RR 1.03;95 %CI 0.93–1.15;p = 0.55) and morbid obesity (RR 1.06;95 %CI 0.94–1.19;p = 0.35). DOAC were also associated with a reduction in MB (RR 0.57;95 %CI 0.34−0.94;p = 0.03 and RR 0.71;95 %CI 0.50–1.00;p = 0.05 in patients with obesity and morbid obesity, respectively). Subgroup analyses comparing randomized controlled trials to observational studies showed consistent results. No difference was observed in regards of clinically relevant non-MB and mortality. ConclusionThere is no signal for differences in VTE recurrence in patients with obesity and morbid obesity treated with DOAC compared to VKA/LMWH, while DOAC likely reduce the risk of MB compared to VKA/LMWH.

Vitamin K antagonists versus direct oral anticoagulants after cardiac surgery: a 31-country cohort study

Abstract Background About 10% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery have a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Among these patients, uncertainty exists regarding the safest and most effective oral anticoagulant (OAC) during the postoperative period. Purpose To evaluate practice patterns regarding OAC early after cardiac surgery in patients with a preoperative history of AF and to compare the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Methods We conducted a nested cohort study within the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III (NCT01561651). LAAOS III included patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery with a CHA2DS2-VASC ≥2. In this substudy, we examined patients without end-stage renal dysfunction (eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73m2) who were discharged on OAC. We evaluated bleeding and thromboembolism within 90 days postoperatively using logistic regression adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASC score. Results Recruitment started in 2012 and completed in 2018 in 113 centres in 31 countries. Of the 4811 patients enrolled in LAAOS III, 3725 (77%) were included in this substudy. Preoperatively, 58% of patients received OAC: 56% DOACs and 44% VKAs. At hospital discharge 23% received DOACs and 77% VKAs; 55% of patients on a DOAC at baseline were switched to a VKA while 5% of patients on a VKA were switched to a DOAC. Patients discharged on a DOAC were older, had a higher CHA2DS2-VASC, and were more likely to be male. Patients having undergone an isolated coronary bypass procedure were more likely prescribed DOACs than VKAs (41% vs 23%, p<0.001) whereas isolated non-mechanical valve patients were more likely to be prescribed VKAs (43% vs 28%, p<0.001). Switching from a DOAC to a VKA postoperatively occurred in 42% of patients In Australia/New Zealand, 49% in Europe, and 63% in North America. Major bleeding between 48 hours postoperatively and 30 days occurred in 1.5% in the DOAC group and 1.3% in the VKA group (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 0.60–2.15, p=0.69) while between 48 hours and 90 days, it occurred in 1.8% of patients in both groups (aOR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.54–1.17, p=0.91). Cardiac tamponade, the composite of stroke and systemic arterial embolism, and the composite of stroke, systemic arterial embolism and death did not differ significantly at 30 and 90 days between the DOAC and VKA groups. Conclusions VKAs was the dominant OAC used early after cardiac surgery, but postoperative OAC practices varied by region. After adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASC score, the early postoperative incidence of major bleeding and of the composite of stroke and systemic arterial embolism did not differ significantly when DOACs were compared with VKAs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): CIHR, Heart and Stroke Foundation

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer a meta-analysis

BackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with cancer and AF the efficacy and safety of DOACs are not well established.ObjectiveWe performed a meta-analysis comparing available data regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in cancer patients with non-valvular AF.MethodsAn online search of Pubmed and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 1 2020) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Nine studies were considered eligible for the meta-analysis involving 46,424 DOACs users and 182,797 VKA users.ResultsThe use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of systemic embolism or any stroke (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.81; p 0.001), ischemic stroke (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p 0.007) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52–0.71; p 0.00001) as compared to VKA group. DOAC use was associated with significantly reduced risks of major bleeding (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50–0.92; p 0.01) and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47–0.88; p 0.006). Compared to VKA, DOACs provided a non-statistically significant risk reduction of the outcomes major bleeding or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.13; p 0.50) and any bleeding (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.06; p 0.24).ConclusionsIn comparison to VKA, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction of the rates of thromboembolic events and major bleeding complications in patients with AF and cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

The Number of Concomitant Drugs and the Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Routine Care Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Background The benefit of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) on major bleeding was less prominent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with polypharmacy in post-hoc randomized controlled trials analyses. Whether this phenomenon also exists in routine care is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the number of concomitant drugs prescribed modifies safety and effectiveness of DOACs compared with VKAs in AF patients treated in general practice. Study Design Adult, nonvalvular AF patients with a first DOAC or VKA prescription between January 2010 and July 2018 were included, using data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Primary outcome was major bleeding, secondary outcomes included types of major bleeding, nonmajor bleeding, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality. Effect modification was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression, stratified for the number of concomitant drugs into three strata (0–5, 6–8, ≥9 drugs), and by including the continuous variable in an interaction term with the exposure (DOAC vs. VKA). Results A total of 63,600 patients with 146,059 person-years of follow-up were analyzed (39,840 person-years of DOAC follow-up). The median age was 76 years in both groups, the median number of concomitant drugs prescribed was 7. Overall, the hazard of major bleeding was similar between VKA-users and DOAC-users (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.11), though for apixaban a reduction in major bleeding was observed (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68–0.98). Risk of stroke was comparable, while risk of nonmajor bleeding was lower in DOAC users compared with VKA users (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88–0.97). We did not observe any evidence for an impact of polypharmacy on the relative risk of major bleeding between VKA and DOAC across our predefined three strata of concomitant drug use ( p -value for interaction = 0.65). For mortality, however, risk of mortality was highest among DOAC users, increasing with polypharmacy and independent of the type of DOAC prescribed ( p -value for interaction <0.01). Conclusion In this large observational, population-wide study of AF patients, risk of bleeding, and ischemic stroke were comparable between DOACs and VKAs, irrespective of the number of concomitant drugs prescribed. In AF patients with increasing polypharmacy, our data appeared to suggest an unexplained yet increased risk of mortality in DOAC-treated patients, compared with VKA recipients.

Practice-derived data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy to complement observations from randomized trials.

Anticoagulation is fundamental in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aims to provide a comparative review of the major phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) from reliable, high-grade Phase IV studies that assess the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Observational studies based on nationwide or health insurance database records on the use of NOACs vs. VKAs in patients with AF were included. We performed a comparison of the efficacy and safety characteristics associated with NOACs vs. VKAs in RCTs and RWD. Although RCTs provide strong support for evidence-based practice, RWD may be used to reflect the broader picture of various clinical settings, provide supplementary insight and fulfil knowledge gaps. Both study types confirmed the safety and efficacy of NOACs in preventing stroke and thromboembolism in patients with AF. In comparison to VKAs, NOACs were associated with reduced risk of ischaemic events and lower rates of adverse events such as major bleeding or intracranial haemorrhage. Administration of NOACs might be associated with increased risk of dose-related gastrointestinal bleeding and myocardial ischaemic events, especially in the early treatment period after switching from VKAs. Special care should be taken in challenging clinical situations like severe renal or hepatic impairment when the treatment regimen needs to be considered individually. Randomized clinical trial and RWD studies are complementary and present comparable findings, affirming that NOACs are safe and effective for anticoagulation of patients with AF in daily clinical practice.

Intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes in patients using direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists: a meta-analysis

Background: The objective of this paper is to assess the clinical outcomes between non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH) in patients using direct oral anticoagulants(DOAC) versus vitamin K antagonists(VKA) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We also evaluated the predictors of the poor post-ICH outcomes.Methods: We have performed pooled meta-analysis to assess long-term clinical outcomes in patients with DOAC-ICH as compared to those with VKA-ICH. A systematic literature search was conducted by searching the full-text English literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for observational studies reporting outcomes on interest. MOOSE guidelines were used to collect data till December 31, 2019 and random effects analysis was carried out to account for heterogeneity. For outcomes, risk ratios(RR) and the mean differences were pooled using a random-effects model and weighted mean differences (WMDs), respectively.Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 25,354 patients; DOAC-ICH arms = 5,631; VKA-ICH arm = 19,273). Patients with DOAC-ICH had smaller hematoma volumes (WMD=-9.59; 95%CI=-15.33--3.85; I2 = 68.6%) and reduced mortality rate at discharge (RR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.71-0.96; I2 = 9.4%). There was no significant difference between the two groups in rate of hematoma expansion (RR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.56-1.11; I2 = 50.9%), unfavorable functional outcome(Modified Rankin Scale) at discharge (RR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.56-1.18; I2 = 80.2%), unfavorable outcome at 3-months (RR = 0.77; 95%CI = 0.56-1.06; I2 = 63.9), and mortality at 3-months (RR = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.73-1.10; I2 = 35∙8%). Multivariate meta-regression revealed that the average age of patient population had a significantly negative correlation with(RR=-0.202; p = 0.017) hematoma expansion.Conclusion: We conclude that use of DOAC is associated with reduced hematoma volume and mortality rate at discharge. Age is a predictor of the poor outcome of hematoma expansion.

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been a favored option for the patient who suffered from symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for post-TAVI patients are still controversial. This meta-analysis aims at comparing the clinical outcome and safety of NOACs and VKA in the patients after receiving TAVI.MethodWe searched literature articles in all reachable databases, and observational study as well as randomized controlled trial would be included in order to perform a comprehensive analysis. All-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, disabling or nondisabling stroke were main pooled outcome measures. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were adopted to explore heterogeneity. Assessment of bias was performed under the suggestion of Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool.ResultsWe collected 3841 non-duplicate citations from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov, and eventually 7 studies were included for this meta-analysis. As a result, VKA showed priority against NOACs in the field of anti-thromboembolism (4435 participants, RR:1.44, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.99, I2 = 0%, P = 0.02).ConclusionWith corroborative analysis of severe complications, VKA is shown to be more protective on post-TAVI patients in disabling or nondisabling stroke scenario but not in mortality or bleeding event.

Real-world use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: A meta-analysis.

Several studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver disease. Herein, we conducted a meta‐analysis to compare the effect of NOACs with VKAs in patients with AF and liver disease. We also conducted a subsidiary analysis to compare the risk of liver injury between NOACs and VKA in AF patients. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases from January 2009 to May 2020 for the relevant studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were selected and pooled using a random‐effects model. A total of six cohorts were included. Compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49‐0.93), all‐cause death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63‐0.75), and intracranial bleeding (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40‐0.59), whereas the outcomes of major bleeding (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51‐1.01) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.51‐1.36) were not significantly different between groups in AF patients with liver disease. Moreover, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with a reduced risk of liver injury (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61‐0.84) in AF patients. Compared with VKAs, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism, all‐cause death, and intracranial bleeding in AF patients with liver disease, and associated with a reduced risk of liver injury in AF patients.

The risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality with edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: A meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials

IntroductionEdoxaban is a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with proven antithrombotic effects. However, the risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in patients with edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is unclear. MethodsWe systematically searched all published studies of edoxaban versus VKAs. PubMed, CENTRAL databases and www.clinicaltrial.gov were searched for relevant articles published from January 1966 to 20 February 2020. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality in patients with edoxaban versus VKAs were included in our meta-analysis. Both random- and fixed-effects models were used to pool data across phase III RCTs. ResultsWe included four trials that met our inclusion criteria (n = 33,077). They included patients with atrial fibrillation (3 trials, n = 24,847), venous thromboembolism (VTE) or pulmonary embolism (PE) (1 trial, n = 8240). Edoxaban was associated with reduced risks of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNM) events (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68–0.89), any bleeding events (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72–0.80), and intracranial bleeding events (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.29–0.48). They had a similar risk of gastro-intestinal bleeding (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79–1.13), death from any cause (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.80–1.19), stroke (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88–1.14) and systemic embolic events (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.57–1.51) between edoxaban and VKAs. ConclusionsCompared to VKAs, edoxaban is safe as a direct oral anticoagulant, with respect to reduced risk of major or CRNM, intracranial bleeding events, and similar risk of gastro-intestinal bleeding events and all-cause mortality.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Updated Analysis by Adding Observational Studies.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2009 to July 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A random-effects model was applied in the pooled analysis. A total of 14 studies (4 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies) were included. Based on the randomized clinical trials, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with decreased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Based on the observational studies, compared with VKAs, the subgroup analysis showed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding. Based on current data, the use of NOACs is at least non-inferior to the use of VKAs in AF patients for secondary stroke prevention irrespective of NOAC type.

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) for Atrial Fibrillation with Elective or Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis with a Particular Focus on Combination Type.

Background: Our study aims to perform a meta-analysis of benefits and risks associated with the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a particular focus on the combination type: dual vs. dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: NOAC + single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. DAT: VKA + SAPT), dual vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (DAT: NOAC + SAPT vs. TAT: VKA + dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)) or triple vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: NOAC+DAPT vs. TAT: VKA+DAPT). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing antithrombotic regimens. Four randomized studies (n = 10.969; PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, AUGUSTUS, and ENTRUST-AF PCI) were included. The primary outcome was the composite of major bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) and clinically relevant bleeding requiring medical intervention (CRNM). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and stent thrombosis (ST). Results: Combination strategies with NOACs were associated with reduced risk of major bleeding events across different combination strategies as compared to VKA, with the most significant risk reduction when DAT was compared with TAT, namely DAT with NOAC + SAPT was associated with a 37% relative risk reduction (RRR) of major bleeding events as compared to TAT with VKA + DAPT (RR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50–0.80). The reduction of major bleeding risks is a class effect of NOACs. Combination strategies of NOACs vs. VKAs resulted in a comparable risk of MACE, MI, stroke, ST, or death. Conclusions: Antithrombotic combinations of NOACs (as DAT or TAT) are safer than VKAs with respect to bleeding risk and result in a satisfactory efficacy with no increase of ischemic or thrombotic events in patients undergoing PCI.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-k antagonists in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis protocol.

BackgroundCurrent evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the elderly with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains scarce. Based on the emerging evidence from real-world studies (RWSs) associated with DOACs, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from RWSs and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effectiveness, safety and cost of DOACs versus Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in elderly patients with AF.MethodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases will be systematically searched until June 30, 2019 for eligible RWSs and RCTs that reported the clinical outcomes between DOACs and VKAs in elderly patients with AF. The effectiveness outcome is stroke or systemic embolism (SE), and the safety outcomes are major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model will be used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for RWSs and relative risks (RRs) for RCTs, separately. The interaction analysis and the ratio of HRs (RHRs) will be applied to compare the treatment effect difference between RWSs and RCTs. A Markov model will be constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs versus VKAs in elderly AF patients in real-world setting.DiscussionThis study will summarize all available evidences from RWSs and RCTs for a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review on the effectiveness and safety associated with DOACs, as well as perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the price performance of DOACs among elderly AF patients in real clinical setting.Trial registrationPROSPERO register platform (CRD42019142881, www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID =142881).

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE VERSUS VITAMIN K ANTAGONIST FOR TREATMENT OF ACUTE VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE: RECOVERY DVT/PE PROSPECTIVE GLOBAL COHORT STUDY

RE-COVERY DVT/PE is a multicenter, international, observational study of patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE), comparing outcomes with dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The main outcomes were International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or

Lower Major Bleeding Rates with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: an Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important rhythm control strategy for patients with drug-refractory AF. We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as uninterrupted anticoagulation in patients undergoing AF ablation to assess safety and efficacy of DOAC, after the publication of recent data on edoxaban in CA of AF. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs enrolling patients undergoing AF ablation. We assessed Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs for thromboembolic events, major bleeding (MB), and non-major bleeding (NMB). A total of 2118 patients have been included in the analysis. Compared with patients receiving VKA, patients receiving DOACs had a lower, although non-significant, risk of thromboembolic events (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.09-1.76; P = 0.23). MB rates in patients treated with DOACs were statistically significantly lower than VKA (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.93, P = 0.02). The incidence of NMB was not significantly different (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.57, p n.s.). In a meta-analysis of RCTs, an uninterrupted DOACs strategy for CA of AF appears to be superior to uninterrupted VKA in terms of safety; a non-significant trend favoring DOACs in terms of efficacy is also evident.

Real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists in the context of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in France.

ObjectiveThe objective was to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban, versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) from a French national health insurance perspective.MethodsA Markov model was developed with a lifetime horizon and cycle length of 3 months. All inputs were drawn from real-world evidence (RWE) studies: data on baseline patient characteristics at model entry were obtained from a French RWE study, clinical event rates as well as persistence rates for the VKA treatment arm were estimated from a variety of RWE studies, and a meta-analysis provided comparative effectiveness for rivaroxaban compared to VKA. Model outcomes included costs (drug costs, clinical event costs, and VKA monitoring costs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years (LY) gained, incremental cost per QALY, and incremental cost per LY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model and to better understand the results drivers.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, the incremental total cost was €714 and the total incremental QALYs and LYs were 0.12 and 0.16, respectively. The resulting incremental cost/QALY and incremental cost/LY were €6,006 and €4,586, respectively. The results were more sensitive to the inclusion of treatment-specific utility decrements and clinical event rates.ConclusionsAlthough there is no official willingness-to-pay threshold in France, these results suggest that rivaroxaban is likely to be cost-effective compared to VKA in French patients with AF from a national insurance perspective.

Real-life safety of atrial flutter ablation in the era of NOACs. The French Global Flutter Study

Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered a first-line therapy to achieve rhythm control in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFL). Determine the incidence and risk factors for developing bleeding complications in patients takingnon-vitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and undergoing an atrial flutter catheter ablation in everyday clinical practice. It is a multicenter, observational, prospective study of patients with AFL undergoing a CTI RFA. Eligible patients had been taking apixaban (2.5 or 5 mg twice daily), rivaroxaban (15 or 20 mg once daily), dabigatran (110 or 150 twice daily) or VKA for ≥ 3 weeks before the procedure, and were followed for 30 days afterwards. A total of 477 patients, 69,7 ± 10.9 [interquartile range 29, 96] years, 80% male, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.4 ± 1.5 were enrolled at 25 academic/nonacademic centres in France. 84 patients (17.6%) were receiving rivaroxaban (68 patients on 20 mg/day, and 16 patients on 15 mg/day). 89 (18.6%) patients were receiving dabigatran 65 patients on 300 mg/day and 24 on 220 mg/day. 244 (51.15%) patients were receiving apixaban (210 on 10 mg/day, and 34 patients on 5 mg/day). 60 (12.57) patients were receiving VKA. The mean INR before procedure was 2.7 ± 1.8. The most prevalent concomitant disorders were hypertension (53%), diabetes (20%) and vascular disease 87 (18%). Mean creatinine concentration was 98 ± 45micromol/L, median weight was 84 ± 18 kg and mean creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) was 80 ± 33 mL/min. Overall, 28 patients were switched to unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin. The median duration of switch was 6 ± 14 hours. Complications were reported at 30 days, and included only 1 (1.6%) bleeding event in patient receiving VKA (hematoma). Every day practice of AFL ablation in patients receiving NOACs is safe. No complications were reported in these patients on NOACs.

Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies and 440 281 patients.

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral antagonists (NOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and indirectly compare NOACs in this population. MEDLINE, Cochrane, ISI Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS were searched for randomized or adjusted observational studies comparing NOACs vs. VKAs for stroke prevention in AF patients ≥75 years. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes of this meta-analysis were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings, respectively. Other secondary outcomes were also analysed. The analysis included 22 studies enrolling 440281 AF patients ≥ 75 years. The risk of SSE was significantly lower with NOACs vs. VKAs [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.89], whereas no differences were found for major bleedings (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.85-1.05). NOACs reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.38-0.58), haemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.79) and fatal bleeding (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30-0.72) but increased gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.30-1.65), compared to VKAs. The adjusted indirect comparison showed no significant differences in term of SSE between NOAC agents. Conversely, the risk of major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.39-2.08) and edoxaban (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.67), and for dabigatran vs. apixaban (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.18-1.85). In elderly patients with AF, NOACs are associated to a lower risk of SSE, intracranial bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke and fatal bleeding than VKAs, but increase GI bleedings. In this analysis, the safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different.

Clinical Benefit of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

PurposeThe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bioprosthetic heart valve is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of treatment with DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with AF and a bioprosthetic heart valve in clinical practice. MethodsData for this study were sourced from the multicenter, prospectively maintained AF Research Database (NCT03760874), which includes all patients with AF undergoing follow-up at participating centers through outpatient visits every 3–6 months. The rates of occurrence of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism), major bleed, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were assessed. These data were used for quantifying the net clinical benefit (NCB) of DOACs versus VKAs, in accordance with the following formula: (Thromboembolic events incidence rate with VKAs – Thromboembolic events incidence rate with DOACs) – Weighting factor × (ICH rate with DOACs – ICH incidence rate with VKAs). The database was retrospectively queried for patients with AF who were prescribed a DOAC or VKA and had a history of bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. FindingsA total of 434 patients with AF (DOACs, n = 211; VKAs, n = 223) were identified. Propensity score matching identified 130 patients prescribed DOACs (apixaban, 55.4%; rivaroxaban, 30.0%; dabigatran, 13.1%; edoxaban, 1.4%) and the same number of VKA recipients (warfarin, 89.2%; acenocoumarol, 10.8%). The mean (SD) duration of follow-up was 26.8 (2.3) months. The incidence rates of thromboembolic events were 1.3 per 100 person-years in the DOAC group versus 2.0 per 100 person-years in the VKA group (P = 0.14). The incidence rates of major bleed events were 2.6 per 100 person-years in the DOAC group versus 4.9 per 100 person-years in the VKA group (P = 0.47). The incidence rates of ICH were 0.38 per 100 person-years in the DOAC group versus 1.16 in the VKA group (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.05–2.34; P = 0.3). A positive NCB of DOACs over VKAs of +1.87 was found. ImplicationsAccording to these data from clinical practice, DOACs seem to be associated with a greater NCB versus VKAs in patients with AF with a bioprosthetic heart valve, primarily due to lower rates of both major bleeds and thromboembolic events.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study

BackgroundWe aimed to compare effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving dialysis.MethodsBy using personal identification numbers, we cross-linked individual-level data from Danish administrative registries. We identified every citizen with a prior diagnosis of AF and CKD who initiated NOAC or VKA (2011–2017). An external analysis of 727 AF patients with CKD (no dialysis) was performed to demonstrate level of kidney function in a comparable population. Study outcomes included incidents of stroke/thromboembolisms (TEs), major bleedings, myocardial infarctions (MIs), and all-cause mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine associations between oral anticoagulant treatment and outcomes.ResultsOf 1560 patients included, 1008 (64.6%) initiated VKA and 552 (35.4%) initiated NOAC. In a comparable population we found that 95.3% of the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 59 mL/min. Patients treated with NOAC had a significantly decreased risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio (HR): 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26–0.84) compared to VKA. There was not found a significant association between type of anticoagulant and risk of stroke/TE (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.39–1.78), MI (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.18–1.11), or all-cause mortality (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.77–1.26).ConclusionNOAC was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding in patients with AF and CKD compared to VKA. No difference was found in risk of stroke/TE, MI, and all-cause mortality.