Ventral Capsule/ventral Striatum Research Articles

A Low-Intensity Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Parameter Exploration Study of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum

ObjectivesDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) is effective for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD); however, DBS is associated with neurosurgical risks. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a newer form of noninvasive (ie, nonsurgical) stimulation that can modulate deeper regions, such as the VC/VS. tFUS parameters have just begun to be studied and have often not been compared in the same participants. We explored the effects of three VC/VS tFUS protocols and an entorhinal cortex (ErC) tFUS session on the VC/VS and cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit (CSTC) in healthy individuals for later application to patients with OCD. Materials and MethodsTwelve individuals participated in a total of 48 sessions of tFUS in this exploratory multisite, within-subject parameter study. We collected resting-state, reward task, and arterial spin-labeled (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging scans before and after ErC tFUS and three VC/VS tFUS sessions with different pulse repetition frequencies (PRFs), pulse widths (PWs), and duty cycles (DCs). ResultsVC/VS protocol A (PRF = 10 Hz, PW = 5 ms, 5% DC) was associated with increased putamen activation during a reward task (p = 0.003), and increased VC/VS resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) with the anterior cingulate cortex (p = 0.022) and orbitofrontal cortex (p = 0.004). VC/VS protocol C (PRF = 125 Hz, PW = 4 ms, 50% DC) was associated with decreased VC/VS rsFC with the putamen (p = 0.017), and increased VC/VS rsFC with the globus pallidus (p = 0.008). VC/VS protocol B (PRF = 125 Hz, PW = 0.4 ms, 5% DC) was not associated with changes in task-related CSTC activation or rsFC. None of the protocols affected CSTC ASL perfusion. ConclusionsThis study began to explore the multidimensional parameter space of an emerging form of noninvasive brain stimulation, tFUS. Our preliminary findings in a small sample suggest that VC/VS tFUS should continue to be investigated for future noninvasive treatment of OCD.

480 Effect of Chronic DBS on Ventral Capsule Ventral Striatum-Specific Circadian Rhythm in Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) improves symptoms in ∼66% of patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, a common adverse effect of VC/VS DBS is hypomania, marked by decreased need for sleep and increased risk-taking behaviors. Modern DBS devices have enabled 24-hour collection of neural data, allowing for tracking of circadian rhythms reflected by VC/VS local field potentials (LFPs). METHODS: We implanted six patients with treatment-resistant OCD with a DBS device configured for constant VC/VS stimulation and recording. Spectral power in the 9 ± 2.5 Hz band was estimated onboard the device every 10 minutes for a median of 249 days (range 77-608). We assessed the rhythmicity of power in this spectral band by fitting 7-day retrospective rolling windows of per-day normalized LFP power to cosine functions using least-squared regression. Output metrics included acrophase (time of peak activity), amplitude, and fit significance. We quantified trends in acrophase over time using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: All six patients demonstrated consistent 24-hour cyclic LFP activity bilaterally. Two of the six had diurnal peaks which shifted significantly earlier across the study period. The remaining four patients had nocturnal peaks, all shifting significantly later over time. Notably, a patient in the latter group experienced three days of hypomania after DBS initiation associated with circadian disruptions even after clinical symptom resolution. Only after clinical DBS adjustment 2 weeks later did circadian rhythm rapidly return to pre-hypomanic levels. CONCLUSIONS: Study patients demonstrated evolving circadian VC/VS LFP activity across the course of DBS therapy, usually independent of cyclic whole-brain activity (i.e. sleep). Conversely, disruptions to these circadian patterns, as observed here during hypomania, may serve as biomarkers of region-specific stimulation side effects.

482 Identification of Candidate Neural Biomarkers of Obsessive-compulsive Symptom Intensity and Response to DBS

INTRODUCTION: Despite the success of DBS for the treatment of refractory OCD, there are currently no robust neural signatures for obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms or initial mood and energy improvements associated with DBS. This gap may be due to limited opportunities available for conducting intracranial electrophysiological recordings during natural symptom fluctuations. Recently available DBS platforms offer a way over this hurdle, allowing for streaming of intracranial local field potentials (LFP) at home and in the clinic. METHODS: We conducted longitudinal intracranial recordings in 10 patients with refractory OCD implanted with recording-capable DBS devices targeted to ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS). Five of the 10 were additionally implanted with ECoG strip electrodes over the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). We captured LFP at home during naturalistic exposures to OCD triggers and in the clinic during variations in stimulation amplitude. RESULTS: All 5 participants who have completed the study so far are clinical responders to DBS therapy. Using the intracranial data collected during OCD exposures, we identified low delta-band power as a candidate neural biomarker of OC symptom intensity during symptom provocations (left VC/VS: R = -0.59, p = 0.01; right VC/VS: R = -0.56, p = 0.04). Electrophysiological analysis of acute response to stimulation revealed a narrow band increase in 30 Hz power specific to lateral OFC that was associated with increased talkativeness and approach behaviors that are typical harbingers of clinical response CONCLUSIONS: These signals have potential utility for classification of symptom intensity and increased mood and energy to enable adaptive DBS systems for OCD. Our data suggest that the neural biomarkers of these two clinical features might be separable, thus possibly allowing for simultaneous optimization of both.

Prefrontal network engagement by deep brain stimulation in limbic hubs.

Prefrontal circuits in the human brain play an important role in cognitive and affective processing. Neuromodulation therapies delivered to certain key hubs within these circuits are being used with increasing frequency to treat a host of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the detailed neurophysiological effects of stimulation to these hubs are largely unknown. Here, we performed intracranial recordings across prefrontal networks while delivering electrical stimulation to two well-established white matter hubs involved in cognitive regulation and depression: the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS). We demonstrate a shared frontotemporal circuit consisting of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and lateral orbitofrontal cortex where gamma oscillations are differentially modulated by stimulation target. Additionally, we found participant-specific responses to stimulation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and demonstrate the capacity for further tuning of neural activity using current-steered stimulation. Our findings indicate a potential neurophysiological mechanism for the dissociable therapeutic effects seen across the SCC and VC/VS targets for psychiatric neuromodulation and our results lay the groundwork for personalized, network-guided neurostimulation therapy.

Artifact characterization and mitigation techniques during concurrent sensing and stimulation using bidirectional deep brain stimulation platforms.

Bidirectional deep brain stimulation (DBS) platforms have enabled a surge in hours of recordings in naturalistic environments, allowing further insight into neurological and psychiatric disease states. However, high amplitude, high frequency stimulation generates artifacts that contaminate neural signals and hinder our ability to interpret the data. This is especially true in psychiatric disorders, for which high amplitude stimulation is commonly applied to deep brain structures where the native neural activity is miniscule in comparison. Here, we characterized artifact sources in recordings from a bidirectional DBS platform, the Medtronic Summit RC + S, with the goal of optimizing recording configurations to improve signal to noise ratio (SNR). Data were collected from three subjects in a clinical trial of DBS for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Stimulation was provided bilaterally to the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) using two independent implantable neurostimulators. We first manipulated DBS amplitude within safe limits (2-5.3 mA) to characterize the impact of stimulation artifacts on neural recordings. We found that high amplitude stimulation produces slew overflow, defined as exceeding the rate of change that the analog to digital converter can accurately measure. Overflow led to expanded spectral distortion of the stimulation artifact, with a six fold increase in the bandwidth of the 150.6 Hz stimulation artifact from 147-153 to 140-180 Hz. By increasing sense blank values during high amplitude stimulation, we reduced overflow by as much as 30% and improved artifact distortion, reducing the bandwidth from 140-180 Hz artifact to 147-153 Hz. We also identified artifacts that shifted in frequency through modulation of telemetry parameters. We found that telemetry ratio changes led to predictable shifts in the center-frequencies of the associated artifacts, allowing us to proactively shift the artifacts outside of our frequency range of interest. Overall, the artifact characterization methods and results described here enable increased data interpretability and unconstrained biomarker exploration using data collected from bidirectional DBS devices.

Imaging versus electrographic connectivity in human mood-related fronto-temporal networks

BackgroundThe efficacy of psychiatric DBS is thought to be driven by the connectivity of stimulation targets with mood-relevant fronto-temporal networks, which is typically evaluated using diffusion-weighted tractography. ObjectiveLeverage intracranial electrophysiology recordings to better predict the circuit-wide effects of neuromodulation to white matter targets. We hypothesize strong convergence between tractography-predicted structural connectivity and stimulation-induced electrophysiological responses. MethodsEvoked potentials were elicited by single-pulse stimulation to two common DBS targets for treatment-resistant depression – the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VCVS) – in two patients undergoing DBS with stereo-electroencephalographic (sEEG) monitoring. Evoked potentials were compared with predicted structural connectivity between DBS leads and sEEG contacts using probabilistic, patient-specific diffusion-weighted tractography. ResultsEvoked potentials and tractography showed strong convergence in both patients in orbitofrontal, ventromedial prefrontal, and lateral prefrontal cortices for both SCC and VCVS stimulation targets. Low convergence was found in anterior cingulate (ACC), where tractography predicted structural connectivity from SCC targets but produced no evoked potentials during SCC stimulation. Further, tractography predicted no connectivity to ACC from VCVS targets, but VCVS stimulation produced robust evoked potentials. ConclusionThe two connectivity methods showed significant convergence, but important differences emerged with respect to the ability of tractography to predict electrophysiological connectivity between SCC and VCVS to regions of the mood-related network. This multimodal approach raises intriguing implications for the use of tractography in surgical targeting and provides new data to enhance our understanding of the network-wide effects of neuromodulation.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Decade of Clinical Follow-Up.

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) that has shown variable efficacy. This report describes long-term outcomes of DBS for TRD.Methods: A consecutive series of 8 patients with TRD were implanted with ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) DBS systems as part of the Reclaim clinical trial. Outcomes from 2009 to 2020 were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Demographic information, MADRS scores, and data on adverse events were collected via retrospective chart review. MADRS scores were integrated over time using an area-under-the-curve technique.Results: This cohort of patients had severe TRD-all had failed trials of ECT, and all had failed a minimum of 4 adequate medication trials. Mean ± SD follow-up for patients who continued to receive stimulation was 11.0 ± 0.4 years (7.8 ± 4.3 years for the entire cohort). At last follow-up, mean improvement in MADRS scores was 44.9% ± 42.7%. Response (≥ 50% improvement) and remission (MADRS score ≤ 10) rates at last follow-up were 50% and 25%, respectively. Two patients discontinued stimulation due to lack of efficacy, and another patient committed suicide after stimulation was discontinued due to recurrent mania. The majority of the cohort (63%) continued to receive stimulation through the end of the study.Conclusions: While enthusiasm for DBS treatment of TRD has been tempered by recent randomized trials, this small open-label study demonstrates that some patients achieve meaningful and sustained clinical benefit. Further trials are required to determine the optimal stimulation parameters and patient populations for which DBS would be effective. Particular attention to factors including patient selection, integrative outcome measures, and long-term observation is essential for future trial design.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00837486.

Double blind randomized controlled trial of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Clinical trial design

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a leading cause of disability, affects ~1–2% of the population, and can be distressing and disabling. About 1/3 of individuals demonstrate poor responsiveness to conventional treatments. A small proportion of these individuals may be deep brain stimulation (DBS) candidates. Candidacy is assessed through a multidisciplinary process including assessment of illness severity, chronicity, and functional impact. Optimization failure, despite multiple treatments, is critical during screening. Few patients nationwide are eligible for OCD DBS and thus a multi-center approach was necessary to obtain adequate sample size. The study was conducted over a six-year period and was a NIH-funded, eight-center sham-controlled trial of DBS targeting the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) region. There were 269 individuals who initially contacted the sites, in order to achieve 27 participants enrolled. Study enrollment required extensive review for eligibility, which was overseen by an independent advisory board. Disabling OCD had to be persistent for ≥5 years despite exhaustive medication and behavioral treatment. The final cohort was derived from a detailed consent process that included consent monitoring. Mean illness duration was 27.2 years. OCD symptom subtypes and psychiatric comorbidities varied, but all had severe disability with impaired quality of life and functioning. Participants were randomized to receive sham or active DBS for three months. Following this period, all participants received active DBS. Treatment assignment was masked to participants and raters and assessments were blinded. The final sample was consistent in demographic characteristics and clinical features when compared to other contemporary published prospective studies of OCD DBS. We report the clinical trial design, methods, and general demographics of this OCD DBS sample.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Real World Experience Post-FDA-Humanitarian Use Device Approval.

Background: While case series have established the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), it has been our experience that few OCD patients present without comorbidities that affect outcomes associated with DBS treatment. Here we present our experience with DBS therapy for OCD in patients who all have comorbid disease, together with the results of our programming strategies.Methods: For this case series, we assessed five patients who underwent ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) DBS for OCD between 2015 and 2019 at the University of Colorado Hospital. Every patient in this cohort exhibited comorbidities, including substance use disorders, eating disorder, tic disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. We conducted an IRB-approved, retrospective study of programming modifications and treatment response over the course of DBS therapy.Results: In addition to patients' subjective reports of improvement, we observed significant improvement in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (44%), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (53%), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (27%), and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating scales (34.9%) following DBS. With respect to co-morbid disease, there was a significant improvement in a patient with tic disorder's Total Tic Severity Score (TTSS) (p = 0.005).Conclusions: DBS remains an efficacious tool for the treatment of OCD, even in patients with significant comorbidities in whom DBS has not previously been investigated. Efficacious treatment results not only from the accurate placement of the electrodes by the surgeon but also from programming by the psychiatrist.

Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Toward a Unified Connectomic Target for Deep Brain Stimulation?

IntroductionObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is among the most disabling chronic psychiatric disorders and has a significant negative impact on multiple domains of quality of life. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment option for severe therapy-resistant OCD. ObjectiveTo provide a detailed clinical description and treatment outcome analysis in a cohort of eight refractory OCD patients receiving ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) stimulation with the intention to validate discriminating fiber bundles previously associated with clinical response. Materials and MethodsThe primary outcome measure (the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS]) and secondary outcomes depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality of life were retrospectively analyzed. DBS leads were warped into standard stereotactic space. A normative connectome was used to identify the neural network associated with clinical outcome. ResultsWith a median stimulation duration of 26 months, patients exhibited a mean Y-BOCS reduction of 10.5 resulting in a response rate of 63%. Modulation of a fiber bundle traversing the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) was associated with Y-BOCS reduction. This fiber bundle connected the frontal regions to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and was functionally identified as the hyperdirect pathway of the basal ganglia circuitry. ConclusionOur findings show that in VC/VS stimulation, the neural network associated with clinical outcome shows overlap with that of previously described for other targets namely the anterior limb of the internal capsula, the nucleus accumbens, or the STN, which supports the evolvement from the concept of an optimal gray matter target to conceiving the target as part of a symptom modulating network.

Invasive and Non-invasive Neurostimulation for OCD.

It becomes increasingly clear that (non-)invasive neurostimulation is an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In this chapter we review the available evidence on techniques and targets, clinical results including a meta-analysis, mechanisms of action, and animal research. We focus on deep brain stimulation (DBS), but also cover non-invasive neurostimulation including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Data shows that most DBS studies target the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS), with an overall 76% response rate in treatment-refractory OCD. Also TMS holds clinical promise. Increased insight in the normalizing effects of neurostimulation on cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical (CSTC) loops - through neuroimaging and animal research - provides novel opportunities to further optimize treatment strategies. Advancing clinical implementation of neurostimulation techniques is essential to ameliorate the lives of the many treatment-refractory OCD patients.

Case Report of Dual-Site Neurostimulation and Chronic Recording of Cortico-Striatal Circuitry in a Patient With Treatment Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

Psychiatric disorders are increasingly understood as dysfunctions of hyper- or hypoconnectivity in distributed brain circuits. A prototypical example is obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), which has been repeatedly linked to hyper-connectivity of cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) loops. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and lesions of CSTC structures have shown promise for treating both OCD and related disorders involving over-expression of automatic/habitual behaviors. Physiologically, we propose that this CSTC hyper-connectivity may be reflected in high synchrony of neural firing between loop structures, which could be measured as coherent oscillations in the local field potential (LFP). Here we report the results from the pilot patient in an Early Feasibility study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03184454) in which we use the Medtronic Activa PC+ S device to simultaneously record and stimulate in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS). We hypothesized that frequency-mismatched stimulation should disrupt coherence and reduce compulsive symptoms. The patient reported subjective improvement in OCD symptoms and showed evidence of improved cognitive control with the addition of cortical stimulation, but these changes were not reflected in primary rating scales specific to OCD and depression, or during blinded cortical stimulation. This subjective improvement was correlated with increased SMA and VC/VS coherence in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands, signals which persisted after correcting for stimulation artifacts. We discuss the implications of this research, and propose future directions for research in network modulation in OCD and more broadly across psychiatric disorders.

A brief demonstration of frontostriatal connectivity in OCD patients with intracranial electrodes

Closed-loop neuromodulation is presumed to be the logical evolution for improving the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment protocols (Widge et al., 2018). Identifying symptom-relevant biomarkers that provide meaningful feedback to stimulator devices is an important initial step in this direction. This report demonstrates a technique for assaying neural circuitry hypothesized to contribute to OCD and DBS treatment outcomes. We computed phase-lag connectivity between LFPs and EEGs in thirteen treatment-refractory OCD patients. Simultaneous recordings from scalp EEG and externalized DBS electrodes in the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) were collected at rest during the perioperative treatment stage. Connectivity strength between midfrontal EEG sensors and VC/VS electrodes correlated with baseline OCD symptoms and 12-month posttreatment OCD symptoms. Results are qualified by a relatively small sample size, and limitations regarding the conclusiveness of VS and mPFC as neural generators given some concerns about volume conduction. Nonetheless, findings are consistent with treatment-relevant tractography findings and theories that link frontostriatal hyperconnectivity to the etiopathogenesis of OCD. Findings support the continued investigation of connectivity-based assays for aiding in determination of optimal stimulation location, and are an initial step towards the identification of biomarkers that can guide closed-loop neuromodulation systems.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Towards an Individualized Approach.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder featuring repetitive intrusive thoughts and behaviors associated with a significant handicap. Of patients, 20% are refractory to medication and cognitive behavioral therapy. Refractory OCD is associated with suicidal behavior and significant degradation of social and professional functioning, with high health costs. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed as a reversible and controllable method to treat refractory patients, with meta-analyses showing 60% response rate following DBS, whatever the target: anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC), ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS), nucleus accumbens (NAcc), anteromedial subthalamic nucleus (amSTN), or inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP). But how do we choose the “best” target? Functional neuroimaging studies have shown that ALIC-DBS requires the modulation of the fiber tract within the ventral ALIC via the ventral striatum, bordering the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and connecting the medial prefrontal cortex with the thalamus to be successful. VC/VS effective sites of stimulation were found within the VC and primarily connected to the medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) dorsomedial thalamus, amygdala, and the habenula. NAcc-DBS has been found to reduce OCD symptoms by decreasing excessive fronto-striatal connectivity between NAcc and the lateral and medial prefrontal cortex. The amSTN effective stimulation sites are located at the inferior medial border of the STN, primarily connected to lateral OFC, dorsal anterior cingulate, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Finally, ITP-DBS recruits a bidirectional fiber pathway between the OFC and the thalamus. Thus, these functional connectivity studies show that the various DBS targets lie within the same diseased neural network. They share similar efficacy profiles on OCD symptoms as estimated on the Y-BOCS, the amSTN being the target supported by the strongest evidence in the literature. VC/VS-DBS, amSTN-DBS, and ALIC-DBS were also found to improve mood, behavioral adaptability and potentially both, respectively. Because OCD is such a heterogeneous disease with many different symptom dimensions, the ultimate aim should be to find the most appropriate DBS target for a given refractory patient. This quest will benefit from further investigation and understanding of the individual functional connectivity of OCD patients.

Stereotactic ablative surgery versus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a review of clinical efficacy

Introduction: For the most severe cases of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), stereotactic lesions may be placed in the anterior cingulum bundle and/ or internal capsule to ameliorate symptoms of depression. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG) or in the ventral capsule/ ventral striatum (VS/VS) has been proposed as a reversible, titratable alternative to lesioning. The aim of this review is to summarize findings from stereotactic ablative surgery and DBS trials for TRD.

Deep brain stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: A review of results by anatomical target.

Studies suggest deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment modality for the refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear where to place the DBS. Various sites are proposed for placement with the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) among the most studied. Herein, we aim to summarize both quantitative Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) data and qualitative descriptions of the participants’ symptoms when given. A literature search conducted via PubMed yielded 32 articles. We sought to apply a standard based on the utilization of YBOCS. This yielded 153 distinct patients. The outcome measure we focused on in this review is the latest YBOCS score reported for each patient/cohort in comparison to the location of the DBS. A total of 32 articles were found in the search results. In total, 153 distinct patients’ results were reported in these studies. Across this collection of papers, a total of 9 anatomic structures were targeted. The majority of studies showed a better response at the last time point as compared to the first time point. Most patients had DBS at nucleus accumbens followed by VC/VS and the least patients had DBS at the bilateral superolateral branch of the median forebrain bundle and the bilateral basolateral amygdala. The average YBOCS improvement did not seem to directly correlate with the percentile of patients responding to the intervention.Well-controlled, randomized studies with larger sample sizes with close follow up are needed to provide a more accurate determination for placement of DBS for OCD.

Deep brain stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: A review of results by anatomical target

Studies suggest deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment modality for the refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It is unclear where to place the DBS. Various sites are proposed for placement with the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) among the most studied. Herein, we aim to summarize both quantitative Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) data and qualitative descriptions of the participants' symptoms when given. A literature search conducted via PubMed yielded 32 articles. We sought to apply a standard based on the utilization of YBOCS. This yielded 153 distinct patients. The outcome measure we focused on in this review is the latest YBOCS score reported for each patient/cohort in comparison to the location of the DBS. A total of 32 articles were found in the search results. In total, 153 distinct patients' results were reported in these studies. Across this collection of papers, a total of 9 anatomic structures were targeted. The majority of studies showed a better response at the last time point as compared to the first time point. Most patients had DBS at nucleus accumbens followed by VC/VS and the least patients had DBS at the bilateral superolateral branch of the median forebrain bundle and the bilateral basolateral amygdala. The average YBOCS improvement did not seem to directly correlate with the percentile of patients responding to the intervention. Well-controlled, randomized studies with larger sample sizes with close follow up are needed to provide a more accurate determination for placement of DBS for OCD.

S174. Remotely Programmed Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Capsule/Ventral Striatum for Intractable Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling condition. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum(VC/VS) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness for severe, chronic, treatment-resistant OCD. However, programming is a crucial aspect of DBS that requires laborious titration to set optimal parameters.

The intranuclear length of the electrode trajectory according to the ‘port’ model for deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens

I read the article by Zhang et al . (1), on deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disease, with great interest. They describe the development of a new electrode for simultaneous and independently programmed stimulation of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) based on the anatomical features of the VC/VS (1). The purpose of this communication is to comment on some aspects of the anatomy of the NAc as reported by Zhang et al . (1).

A systematic review and meta-analysis of deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) has been applied in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) as a putative intervention targeting different brain regions. However, the antidepressant effects of DBS for TRD in recent clinical trials remain controversial. MethodsWe searched Scopus, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and PsycINFO for all published studies investigating the efficacy of DBS in TRD up to Feb 2017. Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) scores and Montgomery–Asberg depression rating scale (MARDS) scores were compared between baseline levels and those after DBS using the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled response and remission rates were described using Risk Difference with 95% CIs. ResultsWe identified 14 studies of DBS in TRD targeting the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG), ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS), medial forebrain bundle (MFB), and nucleus accumbens (NAcc). The overall effect sizes showed a significant reduction in HDRS after DBS stimulation in these four regions, with a standardized mean difference of −3.02 (95% CI=−4.28 to −1.77, p<0.00001) for SCG, −1.64 (95% CI=−2.80 to −0.49, p=0.005) for VC/VS, −2.43 (95% CI=−3.66 to −1.19, p=0.0001) for MFB, and −1.30 (95% CI=−2.16 to −0.44, p=0.003) for NAcc. DBS was effective, with high response rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12months. Some adverse events (AEs), especially some specific AEs related to targeting regions, occurred during the DBS treatment. ConclusionsDBS significantly alleviates depressive symptoms in TRD patients by targeting the SCG, VC/VS, MFB, and NAcc. Several adverse events might occur during DBS therapy, although it is uncertain whether some AEs can be linked to DBS treatment. Further confirmatory trials are required involving larger sample sizes.