Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Group Research Articles

Comparison of ECMO, IABP and ECMO + IABP in the Postoperative Period in Patients with Postcardiotomy Shock

Background: This study aims to assess the outcomes and complications of patients who received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support after cardiac surgery at Ankara University Heart Center between 2000 and 2023. Methods: We have carried out a retrospective analysis that included 255 patients. Among them, 98 received IABP, 103 received VA-ECMO, and 54 received both VA-ECMO and IABP. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were carried out, including evaluations of left ventricular function and serum creatinine levels. Primary outcomes included 30-day survival and successful VA-ECMO weaning. Complications such as bleeding, sepsis, liver failure, wound infection, and peripheral ischemia were also assessed. Results: The weaning rate from VA-ECMO was significantly higher in the combined VA-ECMO and IABP group (81.4%) compared with the other groups (p = 0.004). One-year survival was also higher in the combined group (75.9%) (p = 0.002). Complications or renal function did not differ significantly among the groups. The primary indication for mechanical support was coronary artery bypass grafting. Conclusions: In conclusion, the combined use of VA-ECMO and IABP therapy led to improved weaning and survival rates without increasing the risk of complications. These findings suggest that a combined approach may be beneficial for selected patients with severe cardiac dysfunction post surgery.

Custo-Efetividade da Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea Venoarterial no Choque Cardiogênico Refratário: Um Estudo na Perspectiva Brasileira

Abstract Background Refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality rates, and the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a therapeutic option has generated discussions. Therefore, its cost-effectiveness, especially in low- and middle-income countries like Brazil, remains uncertain.Objectives: To conduct a cost-utility analysis from the Brazilian Unified Health System perspective to assess the cost-effectiveness of VA-ECMO combined with standard care compared to standard care alone in adult refractory CS patients. Methods We followed a cohort of refractory CS patients treated with VA-ECMO in tertiary care centers located in Southern Brazilian. We collected data on hospital outcomes and costs. We conducted a systematic review to supplement our data and utilized a Markov model to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and per life-year gained. Results In the base-case analysis, VA-ECMO yielded an ICER of Int$ 37,491 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses identified hospitalization cost, relative risk of survival, and VA-ECMO group survival as key drivers of results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis favored VA-ECMO, with a 78% probability of cost-effectiveness at the recommended willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusions Our study suggests that, within the Brazilian Health System framework, VA-ECMO may be a cost-effective therapy for refractory CS. However, limited efficacy data and recent trials questioning its benefit in specific patient subsets highlight the need for further research. Rigorous clinical trials, encompassing diverse patient profiles, are essential to confirm cost-effectiveness and ensure equitable access to advanced medical interventions within healthcare systems, particularly in socio-economically diverse countries like Brazil.

Cost-Utility of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: A Brazilian Perspective Study.

Refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality rates, and the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a therapeutic option has generated discussions. Therefore, its cost-effectiveness, especially in low- and middle-income countries like Brazil, remains uncertain.Objectives: To conduct a cost-utility analysis from the Brazilian Unified Health System perspective to assess the cost-effectiveness of VA-ECMO combined with standard care compared to standard care alone in adult refractory CS patients. We followed a cohort of refractory CS patients treated with VA-ECMO in tertiary care centers located in Southern Brazilian. We collected data on hospital outcomes and costs. We conducted a systematic review to supplement our data and utilized a Markov model to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and per life-year gained. In the base-case analysis, VA-ECMO yielded an ICER of Int$ 37,491 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses identified hospitalization cost, relative risk of survival, and VA-ECMO group survival as key drivers of results. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis favored VA-ECMO, with a 78% probability of cost-effectiveness at the recommended willingness-to-pay threshold. Our study suggests that, within the Brazilian Health System framework, VA-ECMO may be a cost-effective therapy for refractory CS. However, limited efficacy data and recent trials questioning its benefit in specific patient subsets highlight the need for further research. Rigorous clinical trials, encompassing diverse patient profiles, are essential to confirm cost-effectiveness and ensure equitable access to advanced medical interventions within healthcare systems, particularly in socio-economically diverse countries like Brazil.

Left ventricular unloading via percutaneous assist device during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest.

A feared complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is cardiac arrest (CA). Even if return of spontaneous circulation is achieved, cardiogenic shock (CS) is common. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) supports patients with CS and is often used in conjunction with an Impella device (2.5 and CP) to off-load the left ventricle, although limited evidence supports this approach. The goal of this study was to determine whether a mortality difference was observed in VA-ECMO alone versus VA-ECMO with Impella (ECPELLA) in patients with CS from AMI and CA. A retrospective chart review of 50 patients with AMI-CS and CA and were supported with VA-ECMO (n = 34) or ECPELLA (n = 16) was performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6-months from VA-ECMO or Impella implantation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and complication rates between both cohorts and intensive care unit data. Baseline characteristics were similar, except patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were more likely to be in the VA-ECMO group (p = 0.044). The ECPELLA cohort had significantly worse survival after VA-ECMO (SAVE) score (p = 0.032). Six-month all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the cohorts, even when adjusting for SAVE score. Secondary outcomes were notable for an increased rate of minor complications without an increased rate of major complications in the ECPELLA group. Randomized trials are needed to determine if a mortality difference exists between VA-ECMO and ECPELLA platforms in patients with AMI complicated by CA and CS.

Veno-arterial ECMO ventricular assistance as a direct bridge to heart transplant: A single center experience in a low-middle income country.

The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a direct bridge to heart transplantation (BTT) is not common in adults worldwide. BTT with ECMO is associated with increased early/mid-term mortality compared with other interventions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where no other type of short-term mechanical circulatory support is available, its use is widespread and increasingly used as rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) as a direct bridge to heart transplantation (HT). To assess the outcomes of adult patients using VA-ECMO as a direct BTT in an LMIC and compare them with international registries. We conducted a single-center study analyzing consecutive adult patients requiring VA-ECMO as BTT due to refractory CS or cardiac arrest (CA) in a cardiovascular center in Argentina between January 2014 and December 2022. Survival and adverse clinical events after VA-ECMO implantation were evaluated. Of 86 VA-ECMO, 22 (25.5%) were implanted as initial BTT strategy, and 52.1% of them underwent HT. Mean age was 46 years (SD 12); 59% were male. ECMO was indicated in 81% for CS, and the most common underlying condition was coronary artery disease (31.8%). Overall, in-hospital mortality for VA-ECMO as BTT was 50%. Survival to discharge was 83% in those who underwent HT and 10% in those who did not, p<.001. In those who did not undergo HT, the main cause of death was hemorrhagic complications (44%), followed by thrombotic complications (33%). The median duration of VA-ECMO was 6 days (IQR 3-16). There were no differences in the number of days on ECMO between those who received a transplant and those who did not. In the Spanish registry, in-hospital survival after HT was 66.7%; the United Network of Organ Sharing registry estimated post-transplant survival at 73.1%±4.4%, and in the French national registry 1-year posttransplant survival was 70% in the VA-ECMO group. In adult patients with cardiogenic shock, VA-ECMO as a direct BTT allowed successful HT in half of the patients. HT provided a survival benefit in listed patients on VA-ECMO. We present a single center experience with results comparable to those of international registries.

Bridge-to-transplant temporary mechanical circulatory support and risk of allosensitization.

Since the 2018 change in the US adult heart allocation policy, more patients are bridged-to-transplant on temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). Previous studies indicate that durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) may lead to allosensitization. The goal of this study was to assess whether tMCS implantation is associated with changes in sensitization. We included patients evaluated for heart transplants between 2015 and 2022 who had alloantibody measured before and after MCS implantation. Allosensitization was defined as development of new alloantibodies after tMCS implant. A total of 41 patients received tMCS before transplant. Nine (22.0%) patients developed alloantibodies following tMCS implantation: 3 (12.0%) in the intra-aortic balloon pump group (n=25), 2 (28.6%) in the microaxial percutaneous LVAD group (n=7), and 4 (44.4%) in the veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation group (n=9)-p=.039. Sensitized patients were younger (44.7±11.6 years vs. 54.3±12.5 years, p=.044), were more likely to be sensitized at baseline - 3 of 9 (33.3%) compared to 2 out of 32 (6.3%) (p=.028) and received more transfusions with red blood cells (6 (66.6%) vs. 8 (25%), p=.02) and platelets (6 (66.6%) vs. 5 (15.6%), p=.002). There was no significant difference in tMCS median duration of support (4 [3,15] days vs. 8.5 [5,14.5] days, p=.57). Importantly, out of the 11 patients who received a durable LVAD after tMCS, 5 (45.5%) became sensitized, compared to 4 out of 30 patients (13.3%) who only had tMCS-p=.028. Our findings suggest that patients bridged-to-transplant with tMCS, without significant blood product transfusions and a subsequent durable LVAD implant, have a low risk of allosensitization. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and determine whether risk of sensitization varies by type of tMCS and duration of support.

Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry inJapan.

Temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock after the revision of guideline recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use and the approval of the Impella require further investigation, because their impact remains uncertain. Using the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (J-PCI) registry database from 2019 to 2021, we identified 12 171 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock under mechanical circulatory support. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) IABP alone, (2) Impella, and (3) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO); the VA-ECMO group was further stratified into (3a) VA-ECMO alone, (3b) VA-ECMO in combination with IABP, and (3c) VA-ECMO in combination with Impella. The quarterly prevalence and outcomes were reported. The use of IABP alone decreased significantly from 63.5% in the first quarter of 2019 to 58.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021 (P for trend=0.01). Among 4245 patients requiring VA-ECMO, the use of VA-ECMO in combination with IABP decreased significantly from 78.7% to 67.3%, whereas the use of VA-ECMO in combination with Impella increased significantly from 4.2% to 17.0% (P for trend <0.001 for both). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk difference in the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the first quarter of 2019 for in-hospital mortality was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]). Our study revealed substantial changes in the use of different mechanical circulatory support modalities in acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock, but they did not significantly improve the outcomes.

Abstract 381: Simultaneous Use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA) Improves Mid-Term Mortality in Patients With Refractory Cardiac Arrest or Cardiac Shock Who Required VA-ECMO

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is an effective therapy to rescue patients with refractory cardiogenic shock, including cardiac arrest. VA-ECMO increase damaged left ventricular (LV) afterload. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been often used as the additional circulatory support for LV unloading. However, the effectiveness of combining VA-ECMO with IABP has not been definitively established. The Impella , a percutaneous micro-axial pump, can reduce damaged LV preload with circulatory support, which may have significant effect on clinical outcome by concomitant use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA). Objective: This single-site cohort study aimed to assess the impact of ECPELLA compared to VA-ECMO with or without IABP in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who received VA-ECMO treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 275 consecutive patients who received VA-ECMO from January 2012 through December 2022 in our institute. The patients were divided into two groups, ECEPLLA (n = 81) and VA-ECMO with or without IABP (n = 194). The primary outcome of this study was the 180-day all-cause mortality rate. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender ratio, prevalence of coronary risk factors, serum lactate levels at the emergency room (ER), the rate of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR), and instances of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between the groups. The ECPELLA groups had a significantly higher rate of acute coronary syndrome and a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 180-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ECPELLA group compared to the VA-ECMO group (p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27 [10 years increase]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.42, p &lt; 0.001), E-CPR (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04), lactate level at ER (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10, p &lt; 0.001), and ECPELLA (HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.40-0.76, p &lt; 0.001) were significantly associated with the 180-day all-cause mortality. Conclusion: ECPELLA was associated with improvement of mid-term mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who received VA-ECMO.

Autopsy Histopathologic Lung Findings in Patients Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in the treatment of respiratory and cardiac failure, but data describing lung histopathology in ECMO recipients are limited. To examine pulmonary histopathologic findings in patients who underwent venovenous (VV) ECMO for pulmonary reasons or venoarterial (VA) ECMO for cardiac indications shortly before death, and to determine if the pulmonary changes provided insights into therapy that may prevent complications and improve outcome. We conducted a retrospective study of lung autopsies, from VV and VA ECMO recipients and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and non-ECMO treatment, between 2008 and 2020 in Silesia Center for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, Poland. Among 83 ECMO patients (42-64 years; men, 57 [68.7%]), the most common histopathologic findings were bronchopneumonia (44 [53.0%]), interstitial edema (40 [48.2%]), diffuse alveolar damage (DAD; 32 [38.6%]), hemorrhagic infarct (28 [33.7%]), and pulmonary hemorrhage (25 [30.1%]). DAD was associated with longer ECMO treatment and longer hospital stay. The use of VV ECMO was a predictor of DAD in patients with ARDS and undergoing ECMO, but it also occurred in 21 of 65 patients (32.3%) in the VA ECMO group, even though VA ECMO was used for heart failure. Although DAD was significantly more common in lung autopsies of VV ECMO patients, one-third of VA ECMO patients had histopathologic changes characteristic of ARDS. The presence of DAD in lung autopsies of patients treated with VA ECMO indicates that in these patients, protective lung ventilation should be considered.

Venovenous Versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy, complication, and mortality of patients who were supported by venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and venoarterial (VA) ECMO for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). This study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study between 2014 and 2022. We evaluated to indication of ECMO support, ECMO type, patients' demographic features, complications, and children's outcomes supported by ECMO for PARDS. Twenty-two patients with PARDS, 12 (54%) with VV, and 10 (46%) with VA ECMO were selected. The median number of days to be intubated before ECMO cannulation was 5 (0-16) days. The distribution of intubated days before the patients underwent ECMO was as follows: 0-1 days, 7 (31.8%) patients; 2-3 days, 2 (9.1%) patients; 4-7 days, 7 (31.8%) patients; 8-14 days, 5 (22.8%) patients; >14 days, 1 (4.5%) patient. The median ECMO cannulation day after admission to the pediatric intensive care unit was 3 (range, 1-9) days in the VV ECMO patient group, whereas it was 8 (range, 0-19) days in the VA ECMO group (P = .02). Considering hospital survival, 4 (45%) patients who underwent double-lumen VV ECMO, 1 (33%) patient who underwent VV ECMO, and 3 (30%) patients who supported by VAECMO survived. There was no difference between the groups in terms of hospital discharge rates. The highest survival rate was found in the VV ECMO patient group established with double-lumen cannulas, similar to the literature. There was no difference in mortality between the groups whose intubation time before ECMO was 14 days or less.

Initial experience and outcomes with a hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for lung transplantation

BackgroundThe utilization of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for intraoperative support during lung transplantation has increased over the past decade. Although veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has recently emerged as the preferred modality over cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), many centers continue to use both forms of ECLS during lung transplantation. Our novel hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit allows for seamless transition from VA-ECMO to CPB at a significant cost savings compared to a standalone VA-ECMO circuit. This study describes our initial experience and outcomes in the first 100 bilateral lung transplantations using this novel hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit. MethodsMedical records from September 2017 to May 2021 of the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation with intraoperative hybrid VA-ECMO support were examined retrospectively. We excluded patients with single lung transplants, retransplantations, preoperative ECLS bridging, and veno-venous (VV) ECMO and those supported with CPB only. Perioperative recipient, anesthetic, perfusion variables, and outcomes were assessed. ResultsOf the 100 patients supported with VA-ECMO, 19 were converted intraoperatively to CPB. Right ventricular dysfunction was seen in 37% of patients, and the median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 28 mm Hg. No oxygenator clotting was observed with a median heparin dose of 13,000 units in the VA-ECMO group. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours was observed in 10.1% of all patients and observed 1-year mortality was 4%. ConclusionsThe use of a hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit in our institution allows for rapid conversion to CPB with acceptable outcomes across a diverse recipient group at a significantly reduced cost compared to standalone VA-ECMO circuits.

Effect of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation timing on tricuspid valve surgery outcomes

ObjectivesTricuspid valve surgery is associated with high rates of shock and in-hospital mortality. Early initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after surgery may provide right ventricular support and improve survival. We evaluated mortality in patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery based on the timing of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. MethodsAll consecutive adult patients undergoing isolated or combined surgical tricuspid valve repair or replacement from 2010 to 2022 requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use were stratified by initiation in the operating room (Early) versus outside of the operating room (Late). Variables associated with in-hospital mortality were explored using logistic regression. ResultsThere were 47 patients who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: 31 Early and 16 Late. Mean age was 55.6 years (standard deviation, 16.8), 25 (54.3%) were in New York Heart Association class III/IV, 30 (60.8%) had left-sided valve disease, and 11 (23.4%) had undergone prior cardiac surgery. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 60.0% (interquartile range, 45-65), right ventricular size was moderately to severely increased in 26 patients (60.5%), and right ventricular function was moderately to severely reduced in 24 patients (51.1%). Concomitant left-sided valve surgery was performed in 25 patients (53.2%). There were no differences in baseline characteristics or invasive measurements immediately before surgery between the Early and Late groups. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated 194 (23.0-840.0) minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass in the Late venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group. In-hospital mortality was 35.5% (n = 11) in the Early group versus 68.8% (n = 11) in the Late group (P = .037). Late venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 4.00; 1.10-14.50; P = .035). ConclusionsEarly postoperative initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after tricuspid valve surgery in high-risk patients may be associated with improvement in postoperative hemodynamics and in-hospital mortality.

Discussion

Discussion

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves survival in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been widely used in high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with promising outcomes. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unknown and a VA-ECMO animal model has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to establish a VA-ECMO model in AMI rats and evaluate long-term cardiac function. We first established AMI in 20 Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery, while five rats underwent a thoracotomy to form the sham group. VA-ECMO was established after 30mins of AMI in 10 rats through the right jugular vein for venous drainage and right femoral artery for arterial infusion. Arterial blood pressure was monitored using a catheter in the left femoral artery, blood gas parameters were measured using a blood gas analyzer, while myocardial enzymes were detected using an ELISA Kit. Cardiac function was assessed through echocardiography on day 15. Masson staining and Western Blot were used for evaluating myocardial fibrosis, while histological injury was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining. VA-ECMO support stabilized blood pressure, decreased the levels of myocardial enzymes including cTnI, cTnT, CK-MB, and was associated with a higher survival rate. In the long term, the VA-ECMO group showed improved cardiac function, significantly increased EF and FS but significantly decreased EDV and ESV compared to the AMI group. Furthermore, VA-ECMO significantly alleviated pathological damage and myocardial fibrosis. We established an economical, reliable, and reproducible VA-ECMO animal model in AMI rats, and demonstrated that VA-ECMO support prevents deteriorated cardiac function.

Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of death in the first 30 days after lung transplantation and is also associated with worse long-term outcomes. Outcomes of patients with PGD grade 3 requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support after lung transplantation have yet to be well described. We sought to describe short- and long-term outcomes for patients with PGD grade 3 who required ECMO support. This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung transplantation. We stratified patients with PGD grade 3 into non-ECMO, venoarterial (VA) ECMO, and venovenous (VV) ECMO groups after transplantation. We then compared the outcomes between the groups. Of 773 lung transplant recipients, PGD grade 3 developed in 204 (26%) at any time in the first 72 hours after lung transplantation. Of these, 13 (5%) required VA ECMO and 25 (10%) required VV ECMO support. The 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival in the VA ECMO group was 62%, 54%, and 43% compared with 96%, 84%, and 65% in the VV ECMO group and 99%, 94%, and 71% in the non-ECMO group. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that VA ECMO was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.06-5.28; P= .04). Patients who required VA ECMO support for PGD grade 3 have significantly worse survival compared with those who did not require ECMO and those who required VV ECMO support. This suggests that VA ECMO treatment of patients with PGD grade 3 after lung transplantation can be a predictable risk factor for mortality.

Peripherally inserted concomitant surgical right and left ventricular support, the Propella, is associated with low rates of limb ischemia, with mortality comparable with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BackgroundMechanical circulatory support effectively treats adult cardiogenic shock. Whereas cardiogenic shock confers high mortality, acute limb ischemia is a known complication of mechanical circulatory support that confers significant morbidity. We compared our novel approach to peripheral mechanical circulatory support with a conventional femoral approach, with a focus on the incidence of acute limb ischemia. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with mechanical circulatory support between January 1, 2015 and December 5, 2021 at our institution. Patients receiving any femoral peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were compared with those receiving minimally invasive, peripherally inserted, concomitant right and left ventricular assist devices. These included the Impella 5.0 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) left ventricular assist device and the ProtekDuo (LivaNova, London, UK) right ventricular assist device used concomitantly (Propella) approach. The primary outcome was incidence of acute limb ischemia. The baseline patient characteristics, hemodynamic data, and post–mechanical circulatory support outcomes were collected. Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to estimate overall survival probabilities and survival experience, respectively. ResultsFifty patients were treated with mechanical circulatory support at our institution for cardiogenic shock, with 13 patients supported with the novel Propella strategy and 37 with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The baseline characteristics, including patient organ function and medical comorbidities, were similar among the groups. Nine patients suffered mortality in ≤48 hours of mechanical circulatory support initiation and were excluded. Twenty patients (69%) suffered acute limb ischemia in the peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group; 0 patients receiving Propella suffered acute limb ischemia (P < .001). The percentages of patients surviving to discharge in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Propella groups were 24% and 69%, respectively (P = .007). ConclusionPatients treated with the Propella experienced a lower incidence of acute limb ischemia compared with patients treated with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Treatment with Impella and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiac arrest on survival in a multicenter cohort

Abstract Background International organisations advocate the use of extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in selected patients with therapy-refractory cardiac arrest [1–3]. Although VA-ECMO allows for full circulatory support, it is inherent to increased left ventricular (LV) pressure due to retrograde aortic perfusion, which may hamper myocardial recovery and aggravate pulmonary oedema. In order to mitigate these negative sequelae, adjunct LV unloading with an Impella microaxial flow pump may be considered. The effects of concomitant treatment with VA-ECMO and Impella (ECMELLA) in patients with therapy-refractory cardiac arrest due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear. Objectives To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to investigate whether treatment with ECMELLA is associated with improved 30-day mortality rate in patients with therapy-refractory cardiac arrest caused by AMI, compared to treatment with VA-ECMO alone. Methods Patients treated with ECMELLA were propensity score (PS)-matched to patients receiving VA-ECMO based on age, electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythm, cardiac arrest location (out-of-hospital or in-hospital) and Survival After Veno-Arterial ECMO (SAVE) score. Cox proportional-hazard and Poisson regression models were used to analyse 30-day mortality rate (primary outcome), hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (secondary outcomes). Multiple sensitivity analyses on patient demographics and cardiac arrest parameters were performed. Results 95 adult patients from three tertiary care centers were included, out of whom 34 pairs were PS-matched. ECMELLA treatment was associated with 47% decreased 30-day mortality risk [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.31–0.91, P=0.021], 71% prolonged hospital [95% CI 1.50–1.95, P&amp;lt;0.001] and 81% prolonged ICU LOS [95% CI 1.57–2.08, P&amp;lt;0.001]. Kaplan-Meier analyses (Figure 1) and multiple sub-group analyses (age, sex, initial ECG rhythm, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, SAVE score, cardiac arrest location, lactate and pH levels) confirmed survival benefits in the ECMELLA group. Especially patients with prolonged low-flow time and high initial lactate benefited from ECMELLA therapy. Moreover, LV ejection fraction strongly improved in the ECMELLA group between ICU admission and ICU discharge from 15% to 40%, compared 15% and 20% in the VA-ECMO group. Conclusion In this multicenter propensity score-matched cohort of patients with ECPR during therapy-refractory cardiac arrest caused by AMI, treatment with ECMELLA was associated with improved survival compared to treatment with VA-ECMO alone. These findings support current guideline recommendations on early evaluation of ECPR in well selected patients with therapy-refractory cardiac arrest. A clinical trial is urgently needed to further evaluate the role of LV unloading in patients with therapy-refractory cardiac arrest. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Impella versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: Despite an increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), there is currently no randomised data directly comparing the use of Impella and veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods: Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched in November 2021. Studies directly comparing the use of Impella (CP, 2.5 or 5.0) with VA-ECMO for AMI-CS were included. Studies examining other modalities of MCS, or other causes of cardiogenic shock, were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: No randomised trials comparing VA-ECMO to Impella in patients with AMI-CS were identified. Six cohort studies (five retrospective and one prospective) were included for systematic review. All studies, including 7093 patients, were included in meta-analysis. Five studies reported in-hospital mortality, which, when pooled, was 42.4% in the Impella group versus 50.1% in the VA-ECMO group. Impella support for AMI-CS was associated with an 11% relative risk reduction in in-hospital mortality compared to VA-ECMO (risk ratio 0.89; 95% CI 0.83–0.96, I2 0%). Of the six studies, three studies also adjusted outcome measures via propensity-score matching with reported reductions in in-hospital mortality with Impella compared to VA-ECMO (risk ratio 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.86, I2 35%). Pooled analysis of five studies with 6- or 12-month mortality data reported a 14% risk reduction with Impella over the medium-to-long-term (risk ratio 0.86; 95% CI 0.76–0.97, I2 0%). Conclusions: There is no high-level evidence comparing VA-ECMO and Impella in AMI-CS. In available observation studies, MCS with Impella was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital and medium-term mortality as compared to VA-ECMO.

Changes in haemodynamics during single lung transplantation under venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVESThe objective of the present study was to examine the effect of venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use on the haemodynamics during single lung transplantation (SLT) and postoperative course.METHODSForty-seven patients who underwent SLT for end-stage lung diseases in our lung transplant centre between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this study. The recipients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of intraoperative ECMO. No type of ECMO was intra-operatively used in the patients of the no use of ECMO (NO ECMO) group. The patients in the venoarterial (VA) and VV ECMO groups were put on VA and VV ECMO during the surgery, respectively. The data were compared among the 3 groups.RESULTSThere were 13 SLT cases in the NO ECMO group, 23 SLT cases in the VA ECMO group and 11 SLT cases in the VV ECMO group. Re-exploration for bleeding was performed in 3 (13.0%) recipients in the VA ECMO group. No recipients required re-exploration in the other groups. In the NO ECMO group, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) was significantly elevated during the main pulmonary artery clamp on the SLT side and it was decreased in the VA ECMO group because of the bypass flow. Interestingly, systolic PAP was significantly decreased in the VV ECMO group as well.CONCLUSIONSVV ECMO decreases the PAP during SLT, which could be a choice for extracorporeal life support during lung transplant surgery for patients, even those with pulmonary hypertension.

The Early Introduction of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock Does Not Improve 30-Day Mortality Rates in Low-Volume Centers.

Background and objectivePostcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) is one of the most critical conditions observed in cardiac surgery. Recently, the early initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been recommended for PCS patients to ensure end-organ perfusion, especially in high-volume centers. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of earlier initiation of VA-ECMO for PCS in low-volume centers.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed patients admitted in two of our related facilities from April 2014 to March 2019. The patients who underwent VA-ECMO during peri- or post-cardiac surgery (within 48 hours) were included. We divided the patients into two groups according to the timing of VA-ECMO initiation. In the early initiation of VA-ECMO group, the “early ECMO group,” VA-ECMO was initiated when patients needed high-dose inotropic support with high-dose catecholamines, such as epinephrine, without waiting for PCS recovery. In the late initiation of VA-ECMO group, the “late ECMO group,” VA-ECMO was delayed until PCS was not controlled with high-dose catecholamines, with the intent of avoiding severe bleeding complications.ResultsA total of 30 patients were included in the analysis (early ECMO group/late ECMO group: 19/11 patients). Thirty-day mortality in the entire cohort was 60% (n=18), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (early ECMO group/late ECMO group: 64%/55%, p=0.712). Thirteen and six patients died without being weaned off in the early ECMO (43%) and late ECMO groups (55%), respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.696). The median duration of ECMO support was five days (IQR: 1.5-6.5).ConclusionsThe early initiation of ECMO did not contribute to patients’ 30-day outcomes in low-volume centers. To improve outcomes of ECMO therapy in patients with PCS, centralization of low-volume centers may be required.