An allozyme electrophoretic study was conducted on different life cycle stages of 3 Australian tick species, Amblyomma limbatum Neumann, 1899, Aponomma hydrosauri (Denny, 1843), and Ixodes holocyclus Neumann, 1899. Sixteen enzymes encoding a presumptive 19 loci were of sufficient staining intensity and resolution to identify accurately the 3 species at either the larval, nymphal, or adult stage of the life cycle. For each species, the larvae, nymphs, and adults all had alleles in common at all 19 loci. However, fixed genetic differences were detected among the 3 species at 15 or 16 of the 19 enzyme loci examined. The large number of genetic markers that have been established from a limited sample volume (e.g., individual unfed larvae) allows accurate identification of the species at each life cycle stage. Data presented show that the technique of allozyme electrophoresis can provide genetic evidence for the identification of species at any life cycle stage even where life cycle stages are morphologically quite different. A major problem facing researchers in parasitology and indeed pest control management is the inability to identify confidently, by morphological characters, life cycle stages of many parasite taxa. Different parasites often have evolved along lines that culminate in remarkable morphological similarity between disparate species. Inability to detect and use morphological characters to assign individuals to a species with confidence is compounded when within a species there are marked differences in the structure at various stages in the life cycle and where morphological changes occur during feeding on the host. Electrophoretic studies have revealed the existence of morphologically similar but genetically distinct (i.e., cryptic) parasite species (e.g., Bull et al., 1984; Baverstock et al., 1985; Andrews et al., 1989), demonstrating that conventional morphological classifications are not always adequate for species recognition. It is surprising that few investigators have applied the technique to assist in the identification of species at different life cycle stages. Insufficient numbers of enzyme loci have been established for species identification due to the small volume of sample available for electrophoresis. Species of ticks often are diagnosed on the basis of slight morphological differences, host specificity, and/or the geographical locality from which they were collected. However, morphological characters sometimes are insufficient to identify unequivocally the species to which specimens belong. For example, the tick known to transmit Lyme disease in America, Ixodes dammini Spielman, Clifford, Piesman, and Corwin, 1979, is difficult to distinguish morphologically from the closely related species Ixodes scapularis Say, 1821, in areas where they coexist (Oliver, 1988). Similarly, Ixodes holocyclus Neumann, 1899, has been implicated as the vector of Lyme disease in Australia (Munro and Dickeson, 1989), and yet morphological characters are insufficient to distinguish it from other closely related ixodid species (Arundel and Sutherland, 1988). Furthermore, ticks feeding on hosts undergo structural changes and are particularly difficult to identify using morphological characters. Moreover, the identification of larvae and nymphs of many species requires laboratory culture until they engorge to repletion and molt to the adult stage. In view of the significant morphological changes between different life cycle stages, the accurate identification of larvae, nymphs, and adults to a given species by the use of diagnostic genetic markers would be of taxonomic and systematic value. Allozyme electrophoresis has been used to distinguish several tick species worldwide (Bull et al., 1984; Hunt and Hilburn, 1985; Hilburn et al., 1989), but no comprehensive genetic study has been conducted to identify and characterize larvae and nymphs of any of these species. For the present study we selected 3 morphologically distinct species, 2 reptile ticks, Amblyomma limbatum Neumann, 1899, and Aponomma hydrosauri (Denny, 1843), and 1 mammal tick, I. holo-
Read full abstract