Variety Of Solid Fuels Research Articles

Bulk and molecular-level composition of primary organic aerosol from wood, straw, cow dung, and plastic burning

Abstract. During the past decades, the source apportionment of organic aerosol (OA) in ambient air has been improving substantially. The database of source retrieval model-resolved mass spectral profiles for different sources has been built with the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS). However, distinguishing similar sources (such as wildfires and residential wood burning) remains challenging, as the hard ionization of the AMS mostly fragments compounds and therefore cannot capture detailed molecular information. Recent mass spectrometer technologies of soft ionization and high mass resolution have allowed for aerosol characterization at the molecular formula level. In this study, we systematically estimated the emission factors and characterized the primary OA (POA) chemical composition with the AMS and the extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF) for the first time from a variety of solid fuels, including beech logs, spruce and pine logs, spruce and pine branches and needles, straw, cow dung, and plastic bags. The emission factors of organic matter estimated by the AMS and hydrocarbon gases estimated by the total hydrocarbon analyzer are 16.2 ± 10.8 g kg−1 and 30.3 ± 8.5 g kg−1 for cow dung burning, which is generally higher than that of wood (beech, spruce, and pine), straw, and plastic bag burning (in the range from 1.1 to 6.2 g kg−1 and 14.1 to 19.3 g kg−1). The POA measured by the AMS shows that the f60 (mass fraction of m/z 60) varies from 0.003 to 0.04 based on fuel types and combustion efficiency for wood (beech, spruce, and pine) and cow dung burning. On a molecular level, the dominant compound of POA from wood, straw, and cow dung is C6H10O5 (mainly levoglucosan), contributing ∼ 7 % to ∼ 30 % of the total intensity, followed by C8H12O6 with fractions of ∼ 2 % to ∼ 9 %. However, as they are prevalent in all burning of biomass material, they cannot act as tracers for the specific sources. By using the Mann–Whitney U test among the studied fuels, we find specific potential new markers for these fuels from the measurement of the AMS and EESI-TOF. Markers from spruce and pine burning are likely related to resin acids (e.g., compounds with 20–21 carbon atoms). The product from the pyrolysis of hardwood lignins is found especially in beech log burning. Nitrogen-containing species are selected markers primarily for cow dung open burning. These markers in the future will provide support for the source apportionment.

Insight into the Primary and Secondary Particle-Bound Methoxyphenols and Nitroaromatic Compound Emissions from Solid Fuel Combustion and the Updated Source Tracers.

Methoxyphenols and nitroaromatic compounds (NACs) have strong atmospheric radiative forcing effects and adverse effects on human health. They are emitted from the incomplete combustion of solid fuels and are secondarily formed through photochemical reactions. Here, an on-site study was conducted to determine the primary emission and secondary formation of particulate phase products from a variety of solid fuels through a potential aerosol mass-oxidation flow reactor. Emission factors for total quantified methoxyphenols and NACs (i.e., EF∑Methoxyphenols and EF∑NACs) varied by 2 orders of magnitude among different fuels, which were greatly influenced by volatile matter, incomplete combustibility, flame intensity, and combustion temperature. Guaiacol and 4-nitro-2-vinylphenol were used as tracers for primary organic aerosol due to the low aged-to-fresh ratios (0.21-0.97), while 4-methyl-guaiacol, 4-ethyl-guaiacol, eugenol, 4-methyl-syringol, isoeugenol, acetovanillone, syringaldehyde, homovanillin acid, vanillin acid, and syringic acid were identified as secondary organic aerosol (SOA) (aged-to-fresh ratios between 1.90 and 4.20). During simulated aging, the -CHO group reacted with the hydroxyl radical (•OH) to form the -COOH group, but there was no correlation between syringol and 4-nitrosyringol, implying that •OH is the main reactant rather than the nitriate radical (•NO3) in the atmospheric aging processes of methoxyphenols. Aging caused substantially different emission profiles due to variable photochemical reaction properties. The fresh EFs for guaiacol emitted from the biomass burning ranged from 3.80 ± 0.44 to 26.2 ± 5.40 mg·kg-1, which were much higher than those in coal combustions (of 0.03 ± 0.01 to 1.42 ± 0.28 mg·kg-1). However, the aged EFs (EFaged) for guaiacol was 1.02 ± 0.06 to 1.61 ± 0.11 mg·kg-1 in most biomass combustions, which were comparable with those of the bituminous chunk (1.20 ± 0.16 mg·kg-1). Therefore, guaiacol, a traditional biomass marker, is not an ideal tracer for aged PM2.5 emitted from biomass burning. Indeed, the syringol/guaiacol and syringol/4-nitrosyringol ratios were found to be more suitable and efficient to be used in source characterization.

Indoor Nitrogen Dioxide And Sulfur Dioxide Exposures From Burning Solid Fuels For Cooking And Heating In Yunnan Province, China

Background: Little information is available regarding household exposure to NO2 and SO2 due to burning solid fuels such as coal and biomass in China. We characterized indoor NO2 and SO2 levels in relation to solid fuel use and stove ventilation in Yunnan, China, where a variety of solid fuels, including smoky (bituminous) coal, smokeless (anthracite) coal, and wood is used. Methods: Thirty villages were selected and 163 participants were enrolled in Xuanwei and Fuyuan Counties. Indoor 24-hour NO2 and SO2 samples were collected in each household over two consecutive days. Tukey's honest significant difference and analysis of variance tests were used to compare indoor NO2 levels (continuous) and logistic regression and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare indoor SO2 levels (detected or non-detected) among different fuel types and stove designs. Linear and logistic mixed models were used to identify determinants of indoor NO2 and SO2 respectively. Results: Compared to smoky coal, smokeless coal was associated with higher NO2 (geometric mean=132.1µg/m3 for smokeless coal and 111.2µg/m3 for smoky coal, P=0.065) and SO2 (percentage detected=85.7% for smokeless coal and 38.9% for smoky coal, P