This study was based on analysis of records of gestation length, prolificacy, multiple birth, body weight and total birth weight for 7,083 ewes of the Arcotts (Canadian, Outaouais and Rideau; three synthetic strains developed at the Animal Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada), Suffolk and Finnish Landrace (Finnsheep) breeds. Sheep were housed indoors, in a controlled environment. Ewes divided into two flocks with equal contribution of genetic material were bred in January, May and September months at the end of a period of short days, to lamb alternately at 4-month intervals under an 8-month breeding cycle. Breed, prolificacy, year and breeding season has significant effects on gestation length of the ewe. The Canadian Arcott and Suffolk ewes, both meat-type sire breeds, had gestation lengths of 147 and 146 days, respectively, compared to 145 days for Outaouais and Rideau Arcott ewes and 144 days for Finnsheep ewes, all fecund-type dam breeds. There was a progressive reduction of gestation length within breed as prolificacy increased from ewes bearing single to quintuplet lambs. Though significant, the magnitude of the breeding season effects was negligible. Sex of lamb, age and body weight of the ewe had no influence on gestation length ( P>0.05). Heritability based on paternal half-sib estimates for both gestation length and prolificacy was 0.18. The estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlations between gestation length and prolificacy were 0.09 and 0.06, respectively. Although the frequency of multiple birth is highly variable, its heritability estimate of 0.04 and its positive genetic correlation with gestation length of 0.43, indicates multiple birth would not be a useful selection criterion for reducing gestation length. Selection for prolificacy, despite its 40–43% variability, would have little effect on gestation length because of the poor correlation between the two traits. Therefore, to reduce a 21-week gestation length by one week, despite the 2% variability in gestation length, direct selection for shorter gestation appears to be the best option. It is doubtful that there would be any economic advantage in reducing gestation length by selection in view of the limited reduction achievable.
Read full abstract