Validity Of Scale Research Articles

Evaluation of childbirth readiness and its associated factors and consequences in pregnant women referring to health centers in Tabriz, Iran and providing strategies to promote childbirth readiness: a sequential explanatory mixed method study protocol.

Childbirth readiness encompasses interventions conducted during pregnancy that encourage pregnant women, their families and communities to plan for a healthy pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum period. It enhances women's childbirth experience and diminishes maternal mortality rates. This study seeks to assess the level of childbirth readiness, relevant factors and outcomes among pregnant women who have completed 37 or more weeks of gestational age and are attending health centres in Tabriz, Iran. The objective is to offer strategies for enhancing childbirth readiness. This sequential explanatory mixed-method study comprises three phases. The initial quantitative phase involves a descriptive-analytical longitudinal study focusing on pregnant women at 37 weeks of gestation or beyond. The quantitative data will be gathered by the sociodemographic and obstetric information questionnaire, the childbirth readiness scale, the pregnancy experience scale, the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire (version A) (W-DEQ-Version A), the childbirth experience questionnaire-2, the childbirth outcome checklist, the Edinburgh's postnatal depression scale (EPDS), the postpartum specific anxiety scale research short-form, the next pregnancy desire questionnaire and the exclusive breastfeeding checklist. In the subsequent qualitative phase, purposive sampling will be employed, and data will be collected through individual, in-depth and semi-structured interviews featuring open-ended questions. Data analysis will be conducted using conventional content analysis techniques. In the final mixed-method phase, strategies to enhance childbirth readiness will be formulated by integrating findings from the quantitative and qualitative studies, a comprehensive literature review, and employing the Delphi method. This study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Tabriz, Iran (code number: IR.TBZMED.REC.1401.557). All participants will provide written informed consent before taking part in the study. The outcomes will be shared through articles published in journals, presentations at medical conferences, the validation of a reliable scale for assessing the level of childbirth readiness in pregnant women and the development of a policy brief outlining supportive strategies to improve childbirth readiness. These resources will be valuable for healthcare providers.

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Nursing Clinical Facilitators Questionnaire

Background: Translation and adaptation of English-language tools for use in communities speaking other languages is a facilitating factor for conducting nursing and health-related research. Aim: To test the validity and reliability of the Nursing Clinical Facilitators Questionnaire (NCFQ) for Turkish society. Methods: The study was carried out on 316 students between September 2022 and April 2023. The results were tested with validity and reliability analyzers such as factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and item-total score analysis. Results: The scale comprised 22 items including three subdimensions. In both exploratory and confirmatory factor tests, the overall factor loading was greater than 0.30. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all the goodness of fit indexes were greater than 0.87, and the root mean square error of approximation was less than 0.07. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.92, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging between 0.55 and 0.88 for the subscales. Conclusion: NCFQ was found to be a valid and reliable scale for the Turkish population.

Oxford Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (OVHS): a UK-based and US-based online mixed-methods psychometric development and validation study of an instrument to assess vaccine hesitancy

ObjectivesTo describe the development, validation and reliability of the Oxford Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (OVHS), a new instrument to assess vaccine hesitancy in the general population.DesignCross-sectional validation study.SettingInternet-based study with participants...

Courage Measure (CM) – Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties for Brazilian Adolescents

Abstract: The objective of the study was to adapt the Courage Scale and estimate validity evidence based on content and internal structure. The study included 510 young people, between 14 and 19 years old. The results of the content validity coefficient suggested the adequacy of the content. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test three factor models, namely one-factor, two-factor, and the random intercept model. The results indicated that it is possible to measure courage through a factor, when the acquiescent response style is controlled, corroborating the theoretical perspective, given that the random intercept model adjusted well to the sample data. In other words, the findings indicate that the scale is capable of measuring courage in the Brazilian context and that acquiescence control is an important method in evaluating the construct.

Psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the diabetes empowerment scale, long and short form, among the slovenian adults with type 2 diabetes

AimsTo determine the psychometric properties of the Slovenian versions of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES), both the long form (S-DES-LF) and the short form (S-DES-SF). MethodsBetween April and September 2023, we recruited adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using convenient sampling in five primary health centres. We examined internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the fit of the one-and three-factor models for S-DES-SF and S-DES-LF, respectively. ResultsThe results of 288 individuals, with a mean age of 67 ± 9.2 years, including 132 men and 156 women, showed excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability for both the S-DES-LF (Cronbach’s α=0.90; ICC=0.95) and S-DES-SF (α=0.91; ICC=0.92). Criterion validity of the S-DES-LF was confirmed through known-groups validity, with higher education (p=0.016) and absence of comorbid hypertension (p=0.034) associated with greater empowerment. Discriminant validity was demonstrated by the lack of significant correlations between the S-DES-LF and S-DES-SF scores with age or gender. CFA confirmed a good fit for the S-DES-SF's one-factor model but not for S-DES-LF three-factor model. ConclusionsS-DES-LF and S-DES-SF are valid and reliable tools for assessing diabetes empowerment in Slovenian people with T2D. Future research should further explore the convergent validity of scales.

Validation of the Chinese Version of Quality of Life Instrument (QUALIDEM-C) for People With Dementia in Long-Term Care Home.

To validate and examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of QUALIDEM (QUALIDEM-C). The psychometric properties of the Chinese QUALIDEM were tested in a sample of 150 residents in long-term care homes. Concurrent validity, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability and factor structure were determined. QUALIDEM-C demonstrated good semantic equivalence with original version and good content validity. QUALIDEM-C showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbachs' alpha=0.895), inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.970) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.942). Acceptable concurrent validity was showed by consistently moderate correlations of QUALIDEM-C with generic and disease specific quality of life measures. QUALIDEM-C is reliable and valid scales to measure quality of life of residents in long-term care home. Its applicability across residents with different levels of cognitive function favors its use over other measures in this context. It is potentially an effective tool, rather by multiple measures, to evaluate quality of life in future long-term care home research.

Guilt, shame, and/or both? Further validation of the White Racial Affect Scale.

In this study we assessed the construct validity of the recently published White Racial Affect Scale (Grzanka et al., 2020). Specifically, we assessed the convergent, criterion-related, and incremental evidence for construct validity of the White guilt, White shame, and White defensiveness (called "White negation" in the original article) factors. We used a video stimulus to trigger state guilt and shame in participants as part of the construct validity investigation. White adults in the United States signed up for the study online (N = 262) and watched a 5-min video stimulus and completed questionnaires before and after the video. Results of this study replicated many of the findings from the original White Racial Affect Scale validation study (Grzanka et al., 2020). We found strong evidence of construct validity for the White guilt and White defensiveness factors and mixed evidence for the White shame factor. We discuss directions for future research and implications for potential interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Mabrouk's Measure of Adolescent Optimism: Development and Validation of a New Scale of Adolescent Optimism.

Several measures of adolescent optimism exist. However, none of these measures have been developed in the African setting, and only a few of the available measures have been validated for use in this setting. We aimed to develop and validate a culturally appropriate measure for this context. We employed an exploratory sequential mixed methods design using a five-step approach to tool development, comprising literature reviews, construct clarification, item development, piloting, and scale evaluation. We constructed a six-item scale, the Mabrouk's Measure of Adolescent Optimism (MMAO). In a sample of 1616 adolescents from Kenya, the MMAO demonstrated adequate internal consistency (both Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega > 0.80) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.46). Factor analysis supported a unidimensional scale with adequate criterion and divergent validity as well as measurement invariance across sex, age (younger vs. older adolescents), residence (rural vs. urban), schooling status (in-school vs. out-of-school adolescents), and language of administration (Swahili vs. English). We report on the development and validation of a new scale of adolescent optimism that can be used to assess optimism among adolescents in Kenya and similar contexts. Preliminary evidence shows support for this new measure's reliability and validity, although additional tests are needed.

Validation of the Teachers AI-TPACK Scale for the Indian Educational Setting

Educators work in extremely dynamic and complex classroom environments where they must continuously alter and update their understanding. Specifically, possession of rich, organised, and integrated knowledge from various domains including knowledge on subject-matter, knowledge of students' thinking and learning, and, increasingly, knowledge of technology is essential. By integrating these three aspects, Mishra and Koehler developed the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework in 2006 which offers a thorough and comprehensive method for incorporating technology into the education setting. On the parallel, use of information technology has rapidly increased in the field of education, especially with the introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Thus, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework needed to be updated to reflect the growing incorporation of AI into educational standards. Hence, investigator Ning and colleagues in the year 2024 built a framework for incorporating AI into TPACK and developed a robust scale titled Teachers AI-TPACK Scale that measures the teachers competencies in incorporating AI into their teaching environment. The objective of this work was to test the validity of the scale in the Indian educational setting. With a sample size of 660 teaching faculties in universities and colleges across India, this study followed the routine stages such as construct validity analysis in the form of Exploratory Factor Analysis using SPSS V27, followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis in AMOS software. The original scale with 39 items across seven dimensions were retained throughout the validation process and resulted in a high reliability score of 0.907. This provides compelling evidence for the validity and reliability of the teachers AI-TPACK scale in measuring Indian educators' knowledge and skills at the juncture of AI with pedagogy, technology and content. This is currently the only scale available to measure this construct in India.

Identifying predictors of malingering in psychiatric emergency room settings and evaluating intervention strategies to reduce unnecessary er utilization. Literature review

Malingering in psychiatric emergency room (ER) settings presents a significant challenge, leading to unnecessary healthcare resource utilization and potentially compromising patient care. This literature review examines predictors of malingering and evaluates intervention strategies aimed at reducing unnecessary ER visits. The review identifies a range of predictors, including demographic factors, clinical presentations, historical elements, and motivational aspects, that may indicate malingering. Tools such as structured interviews, validity scales, and behavioral observations are highlighted for their effectiveness in identifying malingering behaviors in psychiatric ERs. The review also explores various intervention strategies, including early identification protocols, staff training programs, and collaborative care models, which have shown promise in mitigating the impact of malingering on healthcare systems. These strategies are important in ensuring that resources are appropriately allocated while maintaining high standards of patient care. However, ethical considerations, particularly the balance between detecting malingering and providing genuine patient care, remain critical challenges. Addressing these issues is essential for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of emergency psychiatric care and ensuring that patients receive appropriate and timely care.

Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Professionalism in Nursing.

Background and Purpose: Evaluation of professionalism in nursing has proven challenging as no objective measurement tool exists. The purpose of this study was to develop and test the Professionalism in Nursing Scale (PNS) for reliability and validity, which will facilitate evaluation of the constructs of professionalism in nursing. Participants were senior nursing students and registered nurses with at least a baccalaureate degree and a minimum of 3 years of experience working either in academia at an accredited university or in a practice setting in a Magnet hospital. Methods: Methodological research was used to design an instrument that measures professionalism in nursing. Phase 1 included item development, scaling, and evaluation of the content validity index, using 10 content experts. Phase 2 included pilot and field testing using participants meeting the inclusion criteria. Questionnaires were sent electronically to evaluate the relevance of each attribute of professionalism using a Likert scale. Phase 3 was scale evaluation, including reliability and validity of the PNS. Results: Final results of exploratory factor analysis supported a 33-item five-factor model. The factors were named Ethics and Interprofessional Collaboration, Excellence, Professional Engagement, Caring, and Self-Awareness. The overall reliability rate of the PNS was 0.97. Findings demonstrated the reliability and validity of the PNS for measuring professionalism in academic and clinician nurses and nursing students. Conclusions: Measuring professionalism in nursing can assist driving improvement of patient care, accountability, and team collaboration. A discussion of the PNS within the context of academia and clinical practice, along with implications for research, practice, education, and policy will be presented.

Development and initial validation of the online risk-taking scale

This study aims to develop and validate the Online Risk-Taking Scale. Based on the results of expert opinions and a trial application, a 20-item draft form was created. This scale includes 20 questions about behaviors that are considered risky and have been performed in the last six months. The scale was administered to 214 secondary school students as an online questionnaire, and data were collected. Validity and reliability studies were conducted using these final data. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to determine the validity levels of the scale. Cronbach's α coefficient and McDonald's Omega (ω) coefficient were analyzed to assess the reliability levels. The scale demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability. As a result, a valid and reliable measurement tool that will contribute to the literature by determining the online risk-taking levels of secondary school students has been obtained.

Scientific Validation of Student Competency Scale (SCS) Questionnaire for Assessing the Impact of Happiness Curriculum in Indian Government Schools

The education systems are experiencing a crisis globally as it is no longer enough for students to develop reading and numeracy skills alone. On the other end, the Happiness Index of India, 2024, showcases a poor stand universally, which has been proven to have a detrimental effect on academic performance and the holistic development of learners. In this line, the Happiness Curriculum (HC) was launched in Delhi, 2018, a first step in broadening the traditional public education system to embrace attention to the wholesome development of its students. This soon branched into Uttarakhand, a state ranked one among the three unhappiest states in the nation, under the name "Anandam Pathyacharya". Later, to measure student competencies developed through HC implementation, Brookings, 2020, developed and validated Student Competency Scale (SCS), a tool with 14 items across four subscales, namely Decision Making, Focus, Empathy and Relationships. Here, the scale was adopted and validated among 140 upper primary students in Uttarakhand, India, by incorporating standardised validation procedures such as Bartletts Test of Sphericity, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Cronbach’s Alpha calculation using SPSS AMOS v26. Sample adequacy was confirmed (0.921). CFA confirmed the scales’ four-dimensional structure with strong factor loadings and model fit indices, while the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was high (0.927). Thus, this validation endeavour establishes the scale as a reliable tool to gauge student competencies in the context of the HC. By highlighting the SCS's scientific foundations and how it might be applied to India's educational system, the study offers a scope to measure HC's impact on learners' development.

Nursing Principles Practice Basic Competencies Scale – Turkish Adaptation Study

Objective: The main objectives of clinical education in nursing education are to develop the student’s competences in cognitive, affective and psychomotor areas. Reliable measurement tools are needed for the evaluation of these competences that begin to be gained with the first clinical practice. This methodological study investigated the cultural and Turkish validity of the Core Competence in Basic Nursing Practice Scale (CCFNPS) for undergraduate nursing students. Methods: A methodological research has been carried out on the cultural validation and adaptation of the scale. The construct’s validity was examined using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 466 students. The scale’s internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed using a dependent sample t-test and intraclass correlation with a sample of 30 students. Results: The scale’s content validity index was 0.98. The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure similar to the original scale, the variance explained was 69.62%, but four items were removed from the scale due to low factor loading. Confirmatory factor analysis results (fit indices values) applied to the twenty – one items and five sub-dimensional structure were found to be acceptable. Scale Cronbach’s alpha values were above 0.70. Conclusion: The 21-item Turkish version of CCFNPS was found to be a valid and reliable scale for measuring the competencies acquired by students after their first clinical training.

Adolescent Agency in Collectivist Cultures: Development and Validation of Personal Agency in Adolescence Scale (PAAS) among Indian School Students

Adolescents exercise personal agency as they plan their life, set goals, make decisions, and perform various actions that define their life course. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a scale measuring the personal agency of adolescents in a collectivist culture, namely, India. Moreover, we integrated key concepts from the existing literature and considered the sociocultural experiences. The newly constructed scale’s psychometric properties were tested on two samples of adolescents aged between 14 and 17 from rural and urban areas. The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) conducted on sample 1 (N = 571) demonstrated that the proposed six-factor model of the Personal Agency in Adolescence Scale (PAAS) was relevant to measure adolescent personal agency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) performed on sample 2 (N = 499) showed that the six-factor model had good construct validity and that the 23-item scale could adequately measure the construct. The results also supported the internal consistency and reliability of the scale. Further, the scale’s concurrent validity with other agency scales was established. Bivariate analysis showed moderate and positive correlations with other related scales. PAAS was also moderately correlated with adolescents’ self-esteem and psychological well-being. The findings show that PAAS is a valid and reliable scale that can be employed to assess adolescents’ agency. This tool can be used by those in education, counselling, and research to measure the adolescents’ exercise of personal agency and its relations to other psychological constructs.

군 병사의 부대 적응 척도 타당화 연구

The purpose of this study was to accurately measure the extent of unit adjustment in a context where policies related to unit adjustment of military personnel are being implemented and interest in unit adjustment is high. To this end, the suitability of the unit adjustment scale developed by Stouffer et al. (1949), translated by Lee Yoon-hee (1963), and modified by Shin Tae-soo (1981) for the Korean military was verified. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, 10 items were removed from the original 26 items, and based on the reliability analysis, the reliability value was highest when all 16 modified items were used. Next, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on these items to present the revised Korean Army Soldiers' Unit Adjustment Scale. The scale was composed of four subfactors as in the original scale. Three of the items, mental and physical condition, willingness to perform duties, and job position and job satisfaction, were the same as the original scale, but for the last factor, attitude toward the military organizational environment, the items were reviewed with the exception of the items that were deleted through the validity analysis, and it was found that it was appropriate to have one factor consisting of perceptions of military officers rather than overall attitudes toward the organizational environment. This study is significant in that it empirically validated the unit adaptation scale with military soldiers in a situation where validation of scales related to unit adaptation is lacking, and it is significant in that it deleted inappropriate items and revised the scale to fit the current military situation.

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Symptom Assessment Scale for Turkish Children with Cancer

Objective: The present study was conducted to developed the Symptom Assessment Scale for Children with Cancer (SAS-CC) and assessed its reliability and validity for Turkish children. Methods: This research was conducted among in 497 children with cancer who were between 7 and 18 years old. The data were collected with a demographic form and SAS-CC. Descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: The mean age of children with cancer was 12.02 +3.38 years. The scale consists of 16 items and 3 sub-dimensions. Total factor loads were more than 0.30 in factor analyses. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed all fit indexes as higher than 0.91, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was less than 0.080. Cronbach’s alpha values of total was 0.96. According to the split-half analysis, α values of the first and second halves were 0.94 and 0.93, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that SAS-CC is the first study to develop and test and a valid scale to evaluate symptoms in children with cancer. Effective strategies of coping with symptoms in children with cancer are required to improve prognosis, increase survival, and improve the quality of life. Therefore, assessing symptoms and their frequency in children with cancer is an majority initiative of nurses working in the pediatric oncology clinic.

Teacher Observation Skills Scale: Validity and Reliability

The present research aims to develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure teacher observation skills. The research was conducted during the 2023-2024 academic year with a total of 648 teachers. Data were collected through online survey methods. Expert opinion was consulted for the content and face validity of the scale in the research. Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor (CFA) analyses were performed to assess the construct validity of the scale. Based on the results, it was found that the scale had a structure consisting of two dimensions and 18 items. It was determined that the factor loadings of the items in the scale were between .70 and .93. Considering the relevant literature, it was decided to name these dimensions as "natural observation skill" (NOS) and "scientific observation skill" (SOS). The Cronbach Alpha for the scales were both .95. As a result of the research, a valid and reliable scale that can determine the level of teachers' observation skills was developed.

Psychometric properties of the Death Reflection Scale - Indian version

Contemplation of mortality often helps people to become more mindful of their living, cherishing relationships, experiences and opportunities. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the validity of the Death Reflection Scale within the Indians. A non-clinical sample of 381 participants age ranges from 19 to 90 years participated in this study. The Death Reflection Scale is a widely recognized tool to gauge positive aspects on reflecting about mortality. The scale's validity and reliability throughout the German population was demonstrated to be appropriate and relevant. Given the shared cultural similarities among diverse Eastern ethnicities, this validation offers the potential for application across various countries. However, it is crucial to research its validity and reliability using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the Indian population. The validity of the scale was confirmed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), yielding a CFI of 0.951. The Goodness Fit Index of 0.929 and RMSEA of 0.07 indicating a reasonably good fit. The scale's discriminant, convergent, and factorial validity were all proven by the results, which also showed its reliability (α =0.92). These results imply that the Death Reflection Scale's Indian validation satisfies the fundamental requirements for psychological evaluations, proving its appropriateness for use in scholarly research.•Quantitative method used in validating the questionnaire.•Cultural validation has been done to ensure cultural relevance and appropriateness.•Reliability and consistency have been established.

Detecting Narcissistic Grandiosity in a Job Interview: The Validation of the Narcissism Interview Scale for Employment

Although employee selection is typically oriented toward the assessment of knowledge, skills, and abilities to identify employees who will complement such an environment, it is perhaps equally important to distinguish employees with the potential to disrupt it. Workers high in narcissistic grandiosity tend to abuse their power and control for personal gain, engage in abusive behaviors toward others, and disobey organizational policies. Across four studies, we sought to develop the Narcissism Interview Scale for Employment (NISE) to assess narcissistic grandiosity. Study 1 created interview questions that elicited responses with narcissistic grandiosity content, structured as both behavioral/situational and work-specific. Study 2 identified the best performing items and developed rating materials. Study 3 demonstrated the NISE is associated with traditional survey assessments of narcissistic grandiosity and predicted interpersonal aggression. Study 4 demonstrated that applicants are likely to perceive the NISE at least as favorably as other popular interview questions. Overall, the results showed that the NISE may be incorporated into the interview process to assess applicant narcissistic grandiosity tendencies, but additional research is needed to further establish the construct validity of the instrument, clarify applicant reactions to its use, and assess its predictive utility across a variety of work contexts.