Use Of Endoscopy Research Articles

Endoscopic esophageal cancer survey in the western part of the Caspian Littoral.

After a hiatus of 30 years an attempt is now being made to re-assess the previously reported very high esophageal cancer incidence rates in the Caspian Littoral. The extraordinarily high incidence rates found in the eastern side of the Littoral, were re-confirmed five years ago for the Turkoman region, using esophageal balloon cytology supplemented by esophagoscopy of suspected cases. The focus this time was on the Ardabil province in the western side of the Caspian Littoral, where the rates reported 30 years ago were moderately high. A pilot chromoendoscopic screening program was scheduled for 650 asymptomatic adults from a randomly selected part of the city of Ardabil and adjoining villages, to evaluate the overall patterns of esophageal disease and to establish the utility of endoscopy as an esophageal cancer screening tool. 504 healthy volunteers, giving a compliance rate of 77.5%, submitted to esophagogastroscopy without any mishaps. Contrary to expectation, no dysplasia or esophageal cancer was found in 914 satisfactory biopsy specimens. Total absence of esophageal cancer or precursor dysplastic changes in the surveyed population in the western part of the Caspian Littoral was at variance with the cancer registry findings of three decades ago for the western part of the Littoral. A plausible explanation could be the improved socio-economic conditions and life style changes which have taken place in the recent past all along the Caspian Littoral, except in the Turkoman Plain.

Clinical utility of Capsule Endoscopy - a single center experience

Clinical utility of Capsule Endoscopy - a single center experience

Endoscopy in the pregnant patient with inflammatory bowel disease.

Although little data exist directly evaluating the utility and safety of endoscopy in the pregnant woman with IBD, it appears to be well tolerated by both mother and fetus, and provides useful clinical information. When performed to evaluate gastrointestinal bleeding, EGD has a high diagnostic yield, while EGD for nausea and vomiting is less informative. In the patient without IBD presenting with hematochezia, unexplained diarrhea, severe abdominal pain, or severe rectal pain, careful sigmoidoscopic examination is indicated, often leading to a diagnosis of new-onset or unsuspected IBD. Likewise, the pregnant IBD patient with worsening symptoms, despite appropriate medical therapy, may also benefit from sigmoidoscopy. Colonoscopy is less often indicated, but can be safely performed in the carefully selected pregnant patient. In all cases obstetrical consultation should be obtained prior to endoscopy, and the risks and benefits of endoscopy to both mother and child should be considered. Close attention should be paid to appropriate drug selection for conscious sedation, and sedation should be administered to provide patient comfort, while avoiding oversedation. Extrapolating from data obtained during endoscopic examination of the pregnant non-IBD patient, fetal monitoring is generally not indicated, although it should be considered for the high-risk or late third-trimester patient. Following these principles assures that endoscopy can be safely performed in the pregnant IBD patient with the best possible outcome for both mother and baby.

Gastroesophageal Reflux, Barrett Esophagus, and Esophageal Cancer

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, a rare cancer whose incidence is increasing. Adenocarcinoma may develop from Barrett esophagus, a metaplastic change of the esophageal epithelium from squamous to intestinalized columnar mucosa, which is associated with chronic reflux. Some have recommended that patients with chronic reflux symptoms undergo upper endoscopy to assess for Barrett esophagus and to screen for cancer. To review the evidence linking GERD and Barrett esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma and to examine the utility of upper endoscopy as a screening tool in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among individuals with GERD. A MEDLINE search was performed to identify all pertinent English-language reports about GERD, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett esophagus from 1968 through 2001. Reports were of randomized controlled clinical trials if available, case-control data if trials were unavailable, and cohort studies if case-control data were unavailable. Pertinent bibliographies were also reviewed to find reports not otherwise identified. Studies were selected by using the search terms gastroesophageal reflux, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett's esophagus, with subheadings for classification, complications, drug therapy, economics, epidemiology, mortality, surgery, and prevention and control. Clinical guidelines for the care of subjects with GERD and Barrett esophagus were retrieved and abstracted. Cohort studies demonstrate that symptoms of GERD occur monthly in almost 50% of US adults and weekly in almost 20%. Three large case-control studies demonstrate a positive association between reflux symptoms and risk of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, with more prolonged and severe symptoms accentuating this risk. However, because of the low incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the ubiquity of reflux symptoms, the risk of cancer in any given individual with reflux symptoms is low. No randomized trial data are available to demonstrate either decreased cancer incidence or increased life expectancy in subjects with GERD who undergo screening endoscopy. Strong evidence supports the association of GERD and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus; however, the risk of cancer in any given individual with GERD is low. Barrett esophagus appears to be a common precursor lesion to this cancer. Given the low absolute risk of cancer in those with GERD and the lack of demonstrated efficacy of endoscopic screening, insufficient evidence exists to endorse routine endoscopic screening of patients with chronic GERD symptoms.

Utility of intraoperative endoscopy: implications for surgical education.

The use of intraoperative endoscopy by surgeons can identify pathology and help determine the appropriate procedure to perform. However, residency training in endoscopy is often variable and unstructured. The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for and impact of intraoperative endoscopy performed at the time of general surgical procedures. The records of all patients who underwent intraoperative endoscopy from January 1998 to December 1999 were reviewed. The indications for endoscopy, endoscopic findings, the impact of these findings on the operation performed, complications, and whether the patient was spared from undergoing a second procedure on a separate date were noted. A total of 107 intraoperative endoscopic procedures were performed in 103 patients. Excluding breast, endocrine, central line, and peritoneal dialysis catheter cases, endoscopy was utilized in 5.1% of all general surgery procedures performed during this time period. In 91 patients (88%), the endoscopic procedure was planned preoperatively; in 13 (12%), intraoperative findings dictated its use. The most common indications for endoscopy were identification of lesions and determination of extent of resection (n = 27); evaluation of rectal bleeding (n = 21); colonic evaluation in patients with perianal infections (n = 13); evaluation of extent of injury in trauma cases (n = 8); evaluation of pain (n = 6); evaluation of intestinal tract hemorrhage (n = 6); performance of procedures such as placement of a biliary stent, placement of a nasojejunal tube, or polypectomy (n = 5); and surveillance of chronic disease (n = 5). In 37 patients (36%), the endoscopic findings affected the operation performed. Sixty-nine patients (67%) were spared an endoscopic procedure at a second date, which would have required additional sedation or anesthesia. There were no complications related to endoscopy. Intraoperative endoscopy is a valuable tool that can be performed safely for multiple indications and is frequently of value in determining the operation to be performed. Surgical residents should be trained in the indications for endoscopic evaluation as well as the competent performance of such procedures.

Virtual laryngotracheal endoscopy based on geometric surface modeling using spiral computed tomography data.

This prospective study describes the clinical utility of virtual endoscopy based on geometric surface modeling of the laryngotracheal lumen. Eighteen children with dyspnea related to either subglottic angioma (n = 5) or laryngotracheal stenosis (n = 13) were included. All patients underwent video-recorded operative endoscopy, spiral computed tomography, and 3-dimensional reconstruction of the laryngotracheal lumen. Modeling was achieved by contour detection on spiral computed tomographic images and reconstruction using a geometric shape-recognition algorithm. The generated surface was used for diagnosis and measurement using interactive and automatic tools. Findings of virtual endoscopy and operative endoscopy were compared. Virtual endoscopy confirmed narrowing of the airway in all cases. In 9 cases, high-grade stenosis prevented complete operative endoscopy, but virtual endoscopy allowed accurate assessment and measurement of the stenosis. The findings of operative and virtual endoscopy were concordant in 9 cases. We conclude that surface modeling provides valuable information for preoperative evaluation of laryngotracheal narrowing. The ability to assess extraluminal anatomy provides a clearer picture of overall disease involvement. In the future, virtual endoscopy will probably be used in conjunction with operative endoscopy for therapeutic decision-making. Noninvasive virtual endoscopy could become an alternative to traditional endoscopy under general anesthesia for therapeutic follow-up.

The indications, utilization and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly patient cohort.

In developed nations, increasing proportions of the population now reach advanced age. Physicians may be reluctant to refer such patients for non-critical diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, on the basis of perceived diminution of tolerance, safety and substantive benefits in these patients. We aimed to review the utility and safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy in an extremely elderly cohort. The study involved 214 consecutive participants aged 85 years or more, between 1995 and 1997. They were identified using a prospective database linked to the endoscopy reporting system. Procedure type, indication, use of sedation, complications, and outcomes were evaluated. The median age was 87 (85-94, sigma = 2). The female:male ratio was 3:2; 185 had undergone one procedure and 29 two or more; and 65% of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis. Of the inpatient procedures, 10% of all procedures were performed emergently, predominantly for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Midazolam was administered to 129 patients (60%), at a median dose of 2 mg (range 1-11); of these, 75 (35%) also received a median dose of 25 microg fentanyl (range 12.5-125). Colonoscopy (n = 95) was the most frequently performed procedure, followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (n = 64) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n = 21). There was no procedure-related mortality. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 5%, colonic perforation 1%, and cardiopulmonary complications in sedated patients, 0.6%. The majority underwent procedures which related to active management of ongoing medical problems, and procedures were performed for palliative indications in only 15 (7%) patients. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is extremely safe and well tolerated in extremely elderly patients. Age alone should not influence decisions relating to its utilization.

Adjunctive use of endoscopy during posterior fossa surgery to treat cranial neuropathies.

The objective of this study was to determine the utility and safety of rigid endoscopy as an adjunct during posterior fossa surgery to treat cranial neuropathies. A suboccipital craniotomy was performed for 19 patients with non-neoplastic processes involving the Vth, VIIth, and/or VIIIth cranial nerves. Ten patients with trigeminal neuralgia (n = 8), hemifacial spasm (n = 1), or intractable tinnitus (n = 1) underwent primarily microvascular decompression procedures. One patient with geniculate neuralgia underwent nervus intermedius sectioning combined with microvascular decompression. Eight patients underwent unilateral vestibular nerve neurectomies for treatment of Meniere's disease. A 0- or 30-degree rigid endoscope was used in conjunction with the standard microscopic approach for all procedures. All patients experienced resolution or significant improvement of their preoperative symptoms after posterior fossa surgery. The endoscope allowed improved definition of anatomic neurovascular relationships without the need for significant cerebellar or brainstem retraction. Cleavage planes between the cochlear and vestibular nerves entering the internal auditory canal and sites of vascular compression could not be microscopically observed for several patients; however, endoscopic identification was possible for all patients. There were no complications related to the use of the endoscope. The rigid endoscope can be used safely during posterior fossa surgery to treat cranial neuropathies, and it allows improved observation of the cranial nerves, nerve cleavage planes, and vascular anatomic features without significant cerebellar or brainstem retraction.

The utility of endoscopy in the management of acute ischemic colitis

The utility of endoscopy in the management of acute ischemic colitis

The utility of endoscopy in the management of acute ischemic colitis

The utility of endoscopy in the management of acute ischemic colitis

ADVANCES IN DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY

Endoscopy is extremely valuable in the evaluation of disorders of the luminal gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and biliary system. Endoscopy as a medical discipline continues to evolve and is becoming increasingly therapeutic in nature. Minimally invasive endoscopic intervention now is effective in a wide variety of disorders, including gastrointestinal hemorrhage, obstructive diseases of the intestinal or biliary tree, and early detection or prevention of neoplastic disease of the colon and esophagus. The development of EUS technology has expanded greatly the potential utility of endoscopy as a diagnostic and a therapeutic modality, and further technologic advances are anticipated.

The utility of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in the endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer

OBJECTIVETo clarify the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopy in the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early gastric cancer.Patients/Methods—EMR was performed in 61 patients with early gastric cancer over...

The utility of endoscopy in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

Objective: The utility of endoscopy in the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the impact of endoscopy on the subsequent management of patients with uncomplicated reflux symptoms. Methods: A total of 742 patients underwent endoscopy for symptoms of GERD. Endoscopists recorded the therapy before endoscopy, the findings of endoscopy, and the treatment recommendations after endoscopy. Results: There was no difference in pre-endoscopy therapy or grade of esophagitis in subjects undergoing endoscopy for failed therapy versus GERD symptoms alone. After endoscopy, the most common strategy for patients taking omeprazole was to maintain or increase the dose. For those taking an H 2 blocker before endoscopy, the most common outcome was to switch the patient to omeprazole, independent of the grade of esophagitis. Conclusions: Most patients undergoing endoscopy for symptoms of GERD were switched to omeprazole regardless of the endoscopic findings. No esophageal cancer was identified and the incidence of Barrett’s esophagus was low. It appears that endoscopy itself did not change the management of patients receiving H 2-blocker therapy. A trial of a proton pump inhibitor before endoscopy should be considered.

The utility of endoscopy in the management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

The utility of endoscopy in the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the impact of endoscopy on the subsequent management of patients with uncomplicated reflux symptoms. A total of 742 patients underwent endoscopy for symptoms of GERD. Endoscopists recorded the therapy before endoscopy, the findings of endoscopy, and the treatment recommendations after endoscopy. There was no difference in pre-endoscopy therapy or grade of esophagitis in subjects undergoing endoscopy for failed therapy versus GERD symptoms alone. After endoscopy, the most common strategy for patients taking omeprazole was to maintain or increase the dose. For those taking an H2 blocker before endoscopy, the most common outcome was to switch the patient to omeprazole, independent of the grade of esophagitis. Most patients undergoing endoscopy for symptoms of GERD were switched to omeprazole regardless of the endoscopic findings. No esophageal cancer was identified and the incidence of Barrett's esophagus was low. It appears that endoscopy itself did not change the management of patients receiving H2-blocker therapy. A trial of a proton pump inhibitor before endoscopy should be considered.

Orbital trauma.

In this review, a number of current issues on the management of orbital trauma are discussed including the indications for orbital exploration in zygomatic complex fractures, the utility of transantral endoscopy in orbital trauma surgery, and preferred implant materials in orbital reconstruction. We emphasize the need for a classification system to define some of the clinical terms used in describing orbital trauma, to improve communication between clinical services, and to standardize the clinical literature on orbital trauma.

Clinical utility of ultrathin endoscopy in adult patients

Clinical utility of ultrathin endoscopy in adult patients

Comparison of the Utilization of Endoscopy Units in Selected Teaching Hospitals Across Canada

There is no information on the number of endoscopic procedures performed at major teaching hospitals across Canada. The directors of endoscopy units at eight teaching hospitals from Halifax to Vancouver volunteered demographic information on the unit at their location. There was a very wide range of endoscopic utilization, with approximately comparable rates of out-patient versus in-patient procedures and of gastroscopies versus colonoscopies, but there was no obvious linking of the ratios of in-patients:out-patients versus total number of designated gastrointestinal beds or total number of hospital beds. Thus, the appropriateness of endoscopic procedures needs to be based on standards of practice and accepted indications. The number of endoscopies performed per endoscopy unit support staff varied widely (from 323.7 to 1065.3 per year), and it would be interesting to learn whether this represents an opportunity for cost-saving in some units.

The utility of endoscopy in the management of uncomplicated reflux symptoms: [formula omitted], JB Meddings, RJ Bailey, E Lalor, ABR Thomson, GMA Van Rosendaal, MJ Verhoef, LR Sutherland for the Alberta Endoscopy Project. Universities of Calgary and Alberta, Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

The utility of endoscopy in the management of uncomplicated reflux symptoms: [formula omitted], JB Meddings, RJ Bailey, E Lalor, ABR Thomson, GMA Van Rosendaal, MJ Verhoef, LR Sutherland for the Alberta Endoscopy Project. Universities of Calgary and Alberta, Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

SIMULTANEOUS UPPER AND LOWER ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTESTINAL GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE

Graft-versus-host disease in the upper gastrointestinal tract presents with anorexia, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. Because these symptoms are not specific, we have proposed that a diagnosis of upper GI GVHD requires histologic confirmation. However, the utility of upper endoscopy in the diagnosis of upper GI GVHD has not been examined. We report a retrospective analysis of 77 allogeneic bone marrow transplantation recipients who received simultaneous upper and lower GI tract biopsies. Upper GI GVHD was found in 44% of patients, of whom 59% also had a positive lower GI tract biopsy (P less than 0.001). Thirty-five percent of the patients with no clinical evidence of lower GI tract GVHD had symptomatic upper GI GVHD confirmed histologically. Patients with and without upper GI GVHD had no significant difference in their clinical symptoms or in their endoscopic findings. We found an association between upper GI and skin GVHD greater than stage I (P = 0.05), a trend to concordance between upper GI GVHD and clinical GVHD in the lower GI tract (P = 0.08), and with the overall clinical GVHD grade (P = 0.08) but no association with clinical liver involvement. Of these 77 patients, 16% had their treatment for acute GVHD changed to include systemic immunosuppression as a result of the upper GI endoscopic biopsy. In addition, 71% had other enteric pathology identified that required specific therapy. These data suggest that upper GI GVHD cannot be diagnosed accurately from its clinical presentation nor inferred from lower GI symptoms or from extraintestinal GVHD. Upper GI endoscopy with biopsy is an important tool in the diagnosis of intestinal GVHD.

Utility of upper endoscopy in the evaluation of noncardiac chest pain

The diagnostic yield of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal manometry, and Bernstein testing was assessed in 100 consecutive patients being evaluated for non-cardiac chest pain. Manometric studies revealed the nutcracker esophagus in 21 patients; non-specific esophageal motility disorders in 19 patients; a hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter in 4 patients; diffuse esophageal spasm in 2 patients; and normal motility in 54 patients. Endoscopy was normal in 38 patients; but revealed grades II to IV esophagitis in 24 patients; gastritis and/or duodenitis in 18 patients; a sliding hiatal hernia without evidence of esophagitis in 14 patients; and gastric or duodenal ulcers in 6 patients. Twenty-five individuals were found to have normal manometric studies in combination with a negative Bernstein test. Among these 25 patients, however, 7 patients had esophagitis (grade II or higher); 6 patients had gastritis and/or duodenitis; five patients had a sliding hiatal hernia without esophagitis; 1 patient had peptic ulcer disease; and only 6 patients had a normal endoscopic exam. Our results indicate that endoscopy can identify a significant number of patients with acid-peptic disease who present with non-cardiac chest pain, that would not have been otherwise diagnosed by esophageal manometry or Bernstein testing alone or in combination.