Use Of Elderly Donors Research Articles

Implication of advanced donor age on the outcome of liver transplantation.

Historically, age has been considered to be a relative contraindication for organ donors. The use of elderly donors for liver transplantation remains controversial due to the fear of inferior outcome. According to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data, the proportion of older donors has been increasing annually. This study describes the short- and long-term outcomes for transplantation of elderly donor livers. Three hundred and seventy-four primary liver transplantations, which had been performed at the University of Virginia Health System from 7 February 1988 to 31 December 1998, were included. Graft survival, incidence of primary non-function, and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after transplantation according to the different age groups of liver donors were analyzed. Cases were analyzed by donor age (group I, n = 106: aged < 20 yr; group II, n = 217: aged between 20 and 49 yr; group III, n = 51: aged > or =50 yr), and by donor age in comparison with recipient age (group IV, n = 65: recipients transplanted with organs from donors within 5 yr of their age; group V, n = 266: recipients from donors > 5 yr younger than their age; group VI, n = 43: recipients from donors > 5 yr older than their age). Group III or VI (group of advanced donor age) and group II or V (control group) were compared by age, gender, race, body weight, height, pre-transplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) status of the recipients donors, cause of brain death of donors, total or warm ischemic time, ABO matching, and degree of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching. No significant difference in 5 yr graft survival was found between the groups by donor age (p = 0.604) and by donor age compared with recipient age (p = 0.567). Moreover, no significant differences in the incidence of primary non-function and HAT after transplantation were found between the groups by donor age and by donor age compared with recipient age. Older donors were more likely to be women and to have antibodies to CMV, as well as to have died by cerebrovascular causes. Race, body weight, height of both recipients and donors, total or warm ischemic time of grafts, ABO matching, and degree of HLA mismatching were not significantly different between the groups. We conclude from this study that advanced donor age is not a contraindication to liver transplantation if careful assessment of donors is made on a case-by-case basis. There is a need to maintain an open mind with regard to the use of livers from older donors due to the current situation of serious organ shortages.

The vanishing importance of age in renal transplantation.

The growing number of patients awaiting a kidney transplant raises questions about allocation of kidneys to the elderly and about the use of elderly donors. In all reported studies analyzing the influence of age on the outcome after renal transplantation, age is investigated as a categorical variable. We studied age both as a categorical (Kaplan-Meier) and as a continuous (Cox) variable in a total of 509 cyclosporine-treated recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney graft who underwent transplantation between July 1983 and July 1997. For the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the population was divided into three comparably sized age groups: 17-43 years (n=171), 44-55 years (n=169), and 56-75 years (n=169). Patient survival was better and graft survival censored for death was worse in the younger patients. Overall graft survival (end point was death or graft failure) was not significantly influenced by age. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, transplantation year turned out to be an important, independent variable influencing all end points. Because the influence was not linear, three periods were defined in which the relative risk remained stable: 1983-1990, 1991-1993, and 1994-1997. In the second period, the relative risk for transplant failure or death was 49% of that in the first period. In the third period, the relative risk had decreased to 22% of that in the first period. Recipient age and donor age were significant predictors of overall transplant failure. There was no interaction between these variables and transplantation year. Within each transplantation period, an increase in recipient age by 1 year increased the relative risk for overall graft failure by only 1.44%. The influence of donor age followed a J-shaped curve with a minimum at 30 years. The influence of increasing either recipient or donor age was counteracted by the improving results over time. Considering the improving results over time, there are, at this moment, no arguments for an age restriction for kidney transplant recipients or donors.

The 10 years single center experience of using elderly donors for living related kidney transplantation.

The use of elderly donors has been advocated to expand the organ donor pool because of increased needs and organ shortage. The aim of the study was to analyse whether old age of donors affects the outcome of renal transplantation and the long term safety of retrieval for the donors. We present data of 335 consecutive living related kidney transplants, performed in our centre the last 10 years, where in 174 patients the donor was less than 60 years of age, while in the rest 161 patients the donor was more than 60 years of age. No statistical difference was noted in either group at the incidence of irreversible acute rejections, early acute tubular necrosis, vascular complications and patient deaths. The graft survival was 86.7%, 80.4% and 78.1% for the 3rd, the 5th and the 8th year for the younger group of donors, while it was 83.6%, 78.2% and 67.8% for the older group (p = 0.13). Patient survival of the younger group was 95.9%, 94.7% and 94.7%, while for the older was 94.4%, 92.0% and 89.2% for the 3rd, the 5th, and the 8th year post transplantation (p = 0.24). Functional rehabilitation and quality of life were good in donors and recipients of both groups. These results suggest that renal transplantation from elderly donors offers comparable results from those obtained from younger donors.