You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Ureter (including Pyeloplasty) and Bladder Reconstruction (including fistula), Augmentation, Substitution, Diversion II (MP53)1 Sep 2021MP53-16 UROLOGICAL INTERVENTION DURING HEMIPELVECTOMY FOR PELVIC MALIGNANCY: EXPERIENCE FROM A COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER Jas Singh, Thomas G. Smith, and O. Lenaine Westney Jas SinghJas Singh More articles by this author , Thomas G. SmithThomas G. Smith More articles by this author , and O. Lenaine WestneyO. Lenaine Westney More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002083.16AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Hemipelvectomy (HP) is used in the multimodality management of primary neoplasms of the bony pelvis as well as locally invasive soft-tissue sarcomas and carcinomas. Collaborative multidisciplinary operative intervention is often required for successful extirpation. The aim of this study was to characterize urological involvement in patients undergoing management for pelvic malignancy with internal (IHP) and external (EHP) HP. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed for all cases of internal (limb sparing) and external (limb amputation) HP performed at a comprehensive cancer center from January 2011 to July 2020. All patients were 18 years of age or older. Data gathered included age, gender, surgical laterality, primary tumor type, resection type, history of chemoradiation, neural manipulation, urological procedure and postoperative complications. Resection type was classified as: type 1 (iliac wing), type 2 (periacetabular), type 3 (pubic rami). RESULTS: In total, 221 cases of HP were queried for urological intervention. Ureteral stents were placed in 208 (94%) patients. Eighteen patients (IHP; n=12, EHP; n=6) were identified who required surgery based on involvement of urological structures. Mean age and follow up were 55 years and 12 ± 16 months, respectively. The most common primary tumor type was soft-tissue sarcoma. Type 3 resection most commonly required urological intervention. Type of urological intervention included: bladder, prostate, urethral mobilization (56%), cystorrhaphy (39%), cystectomy and diversion (22%), ureteral reimplant (22%), ureterolysis (11%), urethral repair (11%), corporal repair (11%), and partial cystectomy in 6%. Urological complication rate was 75% for IHP and 50% for EHP. Additional urological procedures were required in 8 (44%) patients. Low-grade complications included urinary tract infection, urinary retention, and erectile dysfunction while complications that required intervention included hematuria, urinary leak, urinary obstruction, urinary incontinence and bladder fistulae. CONCLUSIONS: HP is uncommon and urological involvement during surgical resection is infrequent. Intervention is most frequently required during resection of the pubic rami. The most common intervention involves some degree of bladder, prostate or urethral mobilization. The rate of reoperation related to urological complications after the initial surgery is high. Patients should be counseled that they may require multiple procedures if the urinary tract is affected. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e945-e945 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jas Singh More articles by this author Thomas G. Smith More articles by this author O. Lenaine Westney More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Read full abstract