BackgroundHepatitis C (HCV) infection affects more than 2.2 million people in the United States and is associated with liver cirrhosis and gallstone formation. However, cholecystectomy outcomes of patients with and without HCV infection are not well studied. This study aimed to examine the differences in cholecystectomy outcomes among patients with untreated, treated, and no HCV infection history. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution that included data of more than 12 years. Patients were excluded if they had a previous chronic hepatitis B or HIV diagnosis. Patients without HCV infection were matched to patients with HCV infection based on age, sex (male or female), and race/ethnicity. ResultsThis study identified 66 patients with untreated HCV infection and 33 patients with treated HCV infection. Furthermore, 324 patients without HCV infection were matched to the cohort HCV infection. The overall postoperative complication rate was 10.9%. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complication rates between the groups (P = .71). There was no significant difference in the level of intervention required to treat these complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (P = .97), postoperative intensive care unit admission (P = .43), or reoperation rate (P = .45). ConclusionDespite having a longer mean length of stay and increased risk of intraoperative blood product transfusion, both patients with untreated HCV infection and those with treated HCV infection had similar rates of postoperative complications and complication severity compared with controls. Our findings suggest that patients with HCV infection tolerate cholecystectomy at a comparable level to patients without HCV infection. The lack of difference in postoperative complication rates between patients with untreated and treated HCV infection indicates that lack of antiviral treatment should not delay cholecystectomy.
Read full abstract