Abstract A general method for constructing permutation tests for various experimental designs follows from invariance and sufficiency. In this framework, randomization (or rerandomization) tests are just special cases of permutation tests. The methodology extends the applicability of permutation tests: An example demonstrates a test for an interaction effect in a factorial experiment, a problem thought to be unapproachable by permutation or randomization methods. Tests are constructed as follows. The modeling of block and treatment effects closely parallels classical analysis of variance (ANOVA). The ANOVA assumptions of iid normal random errors are replaced, however, by the much weaker assumption of exchangeability of subsets of random errors. Distributional dependences on the unknown nuisance parameters for blocks, covariates, and untested treatments and on the unknown error distribution are eliminated by invariance and sufficiency, respectively. Initial reduction of the data by invariance appears to extend considerably the applicability of permutation tests. Because of the assumed exchangeability of the errors, the sufficiency step leads to data permutations when computing the test. The method also addresses some philosophical problems associated with randomization tests. For instance, in this article's framework, it is the design, and not the data, which is always regarded as fixed, so ancillarity of the design causes no difficulty.
Read full abstract