Abstract Young children's thinking has frequently been dismissed as pre‐operational, magical, participatory, and irrational. This paper re‐examines children's understanding of thinking by placing it into the context of their experience and by taking it on its own terms. The forms of children's “wild” thinking are vindicated as a form of rationality, albeit one that has different parameters than the operational thinking that characterizes the western scientific thinker: young children's experience is marked by the absence of Cartesian dualisms. In the process, Husserl's concept of the lived world is reintroduced and reinterpreted within a hermeneutic framework, which in turn allows for a critique of and a constructive collaboration with experimental developmental psychologists.
Read full abstract