A critical analysis of relationships has been carried out concerning the modulated thermogravimetric methods (MTGA methods) for evaluation of activation energy of heterogeneous processes, which exhibit the advantage of using a single thermogravimetric curve recorded under sinusoidal modulated temperature program. Results reported in the literature have shown that for some heterogeneous processes there are large differences between the value of activation energy determined by a MTGA method and that determined by the an isoconversional method which use thermogravimetric data recorded at several heating rates, as well as the fact that the value of the activation energy determined by an MTGA method depends on the parameters of the sinusoidal modulated temperature program (period, amplitude, underlying heating rate). To find the causes of these findings, MTGA methods were applied for simulated data performed for five different modulated sinusoidal temperature programs, which, unlike the experimental data, are not affected by inherent experimental errors. These data have been also used to evaluate activation energy by three multi-heating isoconversional methods that are applicable for arbitrary temperature programs. It has been obtained that also for the simulated data there are large differences between activation energy values obtained by all considered MTGA methods and that obtained by isoconversional methods, which deliver the correct values of the activation energy. Also, some dependencies of activation energy values obtained by MTGA methods on the parameters of modulated temperature programs are put in evidence. The analysis of the obtained results shows that these findings are due to the assumption made in derivation of relationship underlying each MTGA method, according to which the ratio between two values of the differential conversion function corresponding to two close values of conversion degree which are specific for each MTGA method can be approximated by 1. This approximation is necessary because the differential conversion function cannot be determined using a single MTGA curve. In conclusion, these all show that MTGA methods are not a viable alternative to multi-heating isoconversional methods.
Read full abstract