Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery Research Articles

Effect of Peri-Operative Hyperoxygenation on Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The rationale for hyperoxygenation in controlling surgical site infection (SSI) has been described in many studies yet has not been defined clearly. Some studies in colorectal surgery have reported beneficial effects, whereas studies in gynecologic surgery have reported either no effect or a deleterious effect. This study assessed the effectiveness of hyperoxygenation on the reduction of SSI in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were assigned randomly to two groups (study group, 80% oxygen or control group, 30% oxygen). The patients in the study group received 80% oxygen and the patients in the control group received 30% oxygen intra-operatively and for two hours after surgery. Arterial blood gas analysis was done after resuscitation, at the end of the surgery, and at two hours after extubation. All patients were assessed for SSI, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and respiratory complications. Patients were followed post-operatively for 14 days. Surgical site infection was diagnosed according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Infection (CDC) criteria and by aerobic wound cultures. Results: After exclusion, 85 patients in the control group and 93 patients in the study group were analyzed. There was no difference for baseline, intra-operative, and post-operative characteristics between the two groups, except for higher oxygen saturation at closure and two hours post-operatively, in the 80% group (p = 0.01). Surgical site infection occurred in 29 patients (34.11%) in 30% fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) group and in 19 patients (20.43%) in 80% FIO2 group (p = 0.04). The risk of SSI was 59% lower in the 80% FIO2 group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.88 vs. the 30% FIO2 group). There were no differences in post-operative nausea and vomiting and respiratory complications between the two treatment groups. Conclusions: Administration of 80% peri-operative hyperoxygenation in emergency abdominal surgery reduces SSI and is a cost-effective method.

Post-Operative All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Abdominal Emergency Surgery: Role of Charlson Comorbidity Index

(1) Background: The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score has been shown to predict 10-year all-cause mortality, but its validity is a matter of debate in surgical patients. We wanted to evaluate CCI on predicting all-cause mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery (EAS); (2) Methods: This retrospective single center study included all patients aged 65 years or older consecutively admitted from January 2017 to December 2019, who underwent EAS and were discharged alive. CCI was calculated by using of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Our outcome was all-cause death recorded during the 20.8 ± 8.8 month follow-up; (3) Results: We evaluated 197 patients aged 78.4 ± 7.2 years of whom 47 (23.8%) died. Mortality was higher in patients who underwent open abdominal surgery than in those treated with laparoscopic procedure (74% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), and in those who needed colon, small bowel, and gastric surgery. Mean CCI was 4.98 ± 2.2, and in subjects with CCI ≥ 4 survival was lower. Cox regression analysis showed that CCI (HR 1.132, 95% CI 1.009–1.270, p = 0.035), and open surgery (HR 10.298, 95%CI 1.409–75.285, p = 0.022) were associated with all-cause death independently from age and sex; (4) Conclusions: Calculation of CCI, could help surgeons in the preoperative stratification of risk of death after discharge in subjects aged ≥65 years who need EAS. CCI ≥ 4, increases the risk of all-causes mortality independently from age.

Impact of Inter-Hospital Transfer on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Tertiary Referral Center\u2019s Perspective

BackgroundIn trauma patients, the impact of inter-hospital transfer has been widely studied. However, for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery (EAS), the effect of inter-hospital transfer on outcomes is largely unknown.MethodsThis is a single-center, retrospective observational study. Outcomes of transferred patients undergoing EAS were compared to patients primarily admitted to a tertiary care hospital from 01/2016 to 12/2018 using univariable and multivariable analyses. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.ResultsSome 973 patients with a median (IQR) age of 58.1 (39.4–72.2) years and a median body mass index of 25.8 (22.5–29.3) kg/m2 were included. The transfer group comprised 258 (26.3%) individuals and the non-transfer group 715 (72.7%). The population was stratified in three subgroups: (1) patients with low surgical stress (n = 483, 49.6%), (2) with hollow viscus perforation (n = 188, 19.3%) and (3) with potential bowel ischemia (n = 302, 31.1%). Neither in the low surgical stress nor in the hollow viscus perforation group was the transfer status associated with mortality. However, in the potential bowel ischemia group inter-hospital transfer was a predictor for mortality (OR 3.54, 95%CI 1.03–12.12, p = 0.045). Moreover, in the hollow viscus perforation group inter-hospital transfer was a predictor for reduced hospital length of stay (RC -10.02, 95%CI −18.14/−1.90, p = 0.016) and reduced severe complications (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18–0.77, p = 0.008).ConclusionOther than in patients with low surgical stress or hollow viscus perforation, in patients with potential bowel ischemia inter-hospital transfer was an independent predictor for higher mortality. Taking into account the time sensitiveness of bowel ischemia, efforts should be made to avoid inter-hospital transfer in this vulnerable subgroup of patients.

Ischaemic vascular disease and long-term mortality in emergency abdominal surgical patients: A population-based cohort study.

Emergency abdominal surgery carries a high mortality, as patients are often frail with significant comorbidity. We aimed to evaluate the association between co-existing ischaemic vascular disease (IVD) and long-term mortality in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. We included adult emergency abdominal surgical patients operated on 13 Danish hospitals between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010. Appendectomies were excluded. Data were retrieved from the National Patient Registry (NPR) and the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Preoperative IVD status was retrieved from NPR. We used crude and adjusted Cox regression analysis. The primary outcome was mortality within eight years. The secondary outcome was mortality within 30days. We included 4864 patients, of which 2584 (53.7%) died within 8years. Some 20.9% (1019/4864) had preoperative IVD. The adjusted association between preoperative IVD and mortality within 8years was hazard ratio (HR) 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.20; P=.045). At 30days, this association was HR 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84-1.13). In adult major emergency abdominal surgical patients, preoperative IVD was prevalent and associated with a 10% relative increase in long-term mortality, but not in short-term mortality.

O33: PROSPECTIVE RISK ASSESSMENT ALONE DOES NOT IMPROVE 30-DAY MORTALITY IN EMERGENCY LAPAROTOMY PATIENTS

Abstract Introduction Emergency laparotomy still carries a high mortality risk. According to the latest National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) report, half of the patients without pre-operative risk scoring had a higher observed than predicted mortality. Data from Perth, Australia also suggests that pre-operative scoring improves mortality. The aim of this study was to determine if a prospective risk assessment has an independent favourable effect on outcomes. Method A retrospective review of all emergency abdominal surgeries meeting NELA inclusion criteria undertaken at four different-sized Australian surgical centres was performed between April 2015 and December 2018. A predicted and observed mortality was assessed in prospectively and retrospectively risk-stratified patients. Result There were 852 patients charts reviewed during the study period. Patient demographics included 404 males (47.4%), mean age: 69 years, median American Society of Anaesthesiologists score: 3, mean length of stay: 14.0 days and mean ICU length of stay: 1.8 days. There were 72 patients who died within 30 days (8.5%). Median preoperative P-POSSUM score was 6.9%, median preoperative NELA score – 5.2%. A total of 27/133 (20.3%) patients who were scored prospectively died within 30 days; 45/719 (6.3%) retrospectively scored patients died within 30 days. Neither of these rates was very different from the predicted. Conclusion 30-day mortality in emergency laparotomy patients in Hunter New England region, Australia, compares favourably with the latest mortality figures reported by NELA. However, contrary to other publications, prospective scoring alone did not have any beneficial effect on 30-day mortality in our cohort Take-home message Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery require preoperative risk assessment to improve outcomes. However, just the fact of assigning a risk score preoperatively alone does not help to improve mortality.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Control Study.

Introduction There is established evidence on the role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in elective surgeries but its effectiveness in emergency surgeries has been nominally studied. We aimed at studying the feasibility and effectiveness of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for intestinal perforation and small bowel obstruction and compare their surgical outcomes with conventional care. Materials and methods This prospective randomized study was performed for a period of 16 months. A total of 100 patients presenting either with intestinal perforation or acute small bowel obstruction were recruited; 50 each in the ERAS and the conventional care groups. The primary outcomes studied were the postoperative length of stay and 30-day morbidity and mortality. Results It was seen that the median (interquartile range) of the duration of hospital stay in the ERAS group was 4 (1) days while it was 7 (3) days in the conventional care group, which was statistically significant (W = 323.000, p ≤ 0.001). Similarly, postoperative morbidities like a chest infection and surgical site infections) were significant in the conventional care group. Conclusion The ERAS protocols are safe and effective in emergency surgeries and result in a better postoperative outcome.

Clinical-pathological features and treatment of acute appendicitis in the very elderly: an interim analysis of the FRAILESEL Italian multicentre prospective study.

Emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly represents a global issue. Diagnosis of AA in old patients is often more difficult. Appendectomy remains the gold standard of treatment and, even though it is performed almost exclusively with a minimally invasive technique, it can still represent a great risk for the elderly patient, especially above 80years of age. A careful selection of elderly patients to be directed to surgery is, therefore, fundamental. The primary aim was to critically appraise and compare the clinical-pathological characteristics and the outcomes between oldest old (≥ 80years) and elderly (65-79years) patients with Acute Appendicitis (AA). The FRAILESEL is a large, nationwide, multicentre, prospective study investigating the perioperative outcomes of patients aged ≥ 65years who underwent emergency abdominal surgery. Particular focus has been directed to the clinical and biochemical presentation as well as to the need for operative procedures, type of surgical approach, morbidity and mortality, and in-hospital length of stay. Two multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess perioperative risk factors for morbidity and mortality. 182 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean age, ileocecal resection, OAD and ASA score ≥ 3 were related with both overall and major complication. The multivariate analysis showed that MPI and complicated appendicitis were independent factors associated with overall complications. OAD and ASA scores ≥ 3 were independent factors for both overall and major complications. Age ≥ 80years is not an independent risk factor for morbidities. POCUS is safe and effective for the diagnosis; however, a CECT is often needed. Having the oldest old a smaller functional organ reserve, an earlier intervention should be considered especially because they often show a delay in presentation and frequently exhibit a complicated appendicitis.

The effect of comorbidity on mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Background/aimWith the increase in the elderly population, the elderly proportion needing emergency surgery is also increasing. Despite medical advances in surgery and anesthesia, negative postoperative outcomes and high mortality rates are still present in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Comorbidities are described as the main determining factors in poor outcomes. In this metaanalysis, it was aimed to investigate the effect of comorbidity on mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Materials and methodsThe studies published between 2010-2019 were scanned from databases of Google Scholar, Cinahl, Pub Med, Medline and Web of Science. Quality criteria proposed by Polit and Beck were used in the evaluation of the included studies. Interrater agreement was calculated by using the Kappa statistic, effect size by using the odds ratio, and heterogeneity among studies by using the Cochran’s Q statistics. Kendall’s Tau-b coefficient and funnel plot were used to determine publication bias. ResultsA total of 9 studies were included in the research. There was a total of 1330 cases in the studies. The total mortality rate was 21% (n = 279), the total rate of having a comorbid factor was 83.6% (n = 1112), and the rate of having a comorbid factor in mortality was 89.2% (n = 249). According to the fixed effects model, the total effect size of comorbid factors on causing mortality was not statistically significant with a value of 1.296 (C.I; 0.84-1.97; P > 0.05). ConclusionOur study revealed that comorbidity had no significant effect on causing mortality in geriatric patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. There are controversial results in the literature, and in order to reach more precise results, studies involving wider groups of patients and further studies examining the specific effect of certain comorbid conditions are needed.

Inflammatory response, fluid balance and outcome in emergency high-risk abdominal surgery.

The main disease etiologies requiring emergency high-risk abdominal surgery are intestinal obstruction and perforated viscus and the differences in immune response to these pathologies are largely unexplored. In search of improvement of patient assessment in the perioperative phase, we examined the inflammatory response in this setting, focusing on potential difference in pathophysiology. The electronic medical records of 487 patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery from year 2013-2015 for intestinal obstruction and perforated viscus were reviewed. We evaluated the relationship between pre- and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) trajectory, fluid balance, and perioperative morbidity and mortality according to type of surgery, intervention, and surgical pathology. A total of 418 patients were included. Pre- and postoperative absolute CRP values were significantly higher in patients with perforated viscus (n=203) than in intestinal obstruction (n=215) (P<.0001). Relative changes at hour 6 and POD 1 were non-significant (P=.716 and P=.816 respectively). There was significant association between both pre- (quartile 1 vs 4, OR 5.11; P<.01) and postoperative (quartile 1 vs 4, OR 4.10; P<.001) CRP and adverse outcome, along with fluid balance and adverse outcome in patients with obstruction but not in those with perforation. Fluid balance and CRP had statistically significant positive correlation in patients with obstruction. In this explorative study, a high pre- and postoperative CRP and a high positive fluid balance were associated with worse outcome in patients with intestinal obstruction, but not in patients with perforated viscus. Future studies should address the different inflammatory and fluid trajectories in these specific pathologies.

Early Oral Feeding Compared With Traditional Postoperative Care in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer.

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries with promising outcomes. However, the use of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated. This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via early oral feeding compared to regular postoperative care in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.Materials and methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial at the Surgical Unit 1 Benazir Bhutto Hospital from August 2018 to December 2019. A total of 42 patients presenting to the emergency department with peritonitis secondary to suspected perforated duodenal ulcer were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A patients followed an ERAS protocol for early oral feeding, and Group B received regular postoperative care (i.e., delayed oral feeding). Our primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, the severity of pain (via the visual analog scale), and postoperative ileus duration. Results were analyzed via IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). and chi-square and independent t-tests were applied.ResultsPatients who received early oral feeding (Group A) showed a shorter length of hospital stay, lower pain scores, and shorter postoperative ileus duration than patients in the traditional postoperative care group. Also, we noted no duodenal repair site leak in the early oral feeding group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsBased on our results, ERAS protocols that promote early oral feeding can be applied in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for perforated duodenal repair. Early oral feeding in emergency surgery patients can reduce the patient burden on hospitals. In addition, early oral feeding can promote better outcomes and reduced economic burden for patients. Keywords: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, postoperative ileus.

Emergency abdominal surgeries remain unchanged in the COVID-19 affected environment: A single-center experience at a community hospital in Japan.

AimThis study assessed whether emergency abdominal surgeries were changed in the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19)‐affected environment at a community hospital in Japan, with the goal of planning and preparing hospital resources against the further spread of COVID‐19.MethodsA total of 179 patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery over 4 months during the pandemic (1 March, 2020 to 30 June, 2020) and a control period (1 March, 2019 to 30 June, 2019) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, hospital visiting patterns (visit time, ambulance transport, and duration of symptom onset to hospital visit), severity of patients’ condition, and surgical characteristics were compared between the two periods.ResultsThe number of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery during the pandemic did not decrease in comparison to the control period (89 patients versus 90 patients). The duration of symptom onset to hospital visit during the pandemic was not prolonged compared to the control period. Other hospital visiting patterns, severity of patients’ condition, and surgical characteristics were also similar in both periods.ConclusionAlthough the situation of the pandemic was different between countries and regions, the number of emergency surgeries in our hospital remained unchanged, and those patients visited the emergency room no later than usual.

Preventive abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with risk factors of eventration undergoing emergency abdominal surgery

To prevent eventration via preventive abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with risk factors of eventration undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Treatment results in 120 patients with risk factors of eventration undergoing emergency abdominal surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups by 60 people. In the first group, traditional layer-by-layer suturing of the abdominal wall was performed. Preventive abdominal wall reconstruction with a standard polypropylene prosthesis was applied in the second group. We assessed postoperative complications and mortality. The following risk factors of eventration were detected: elderly and senile age (82.5%), long laparotomy (72.5%), decompensated comorbidities (62.5%), widespread peritonitis (52.5%), intestinal obstruction (42.5%), severe internal bleeding (12.5%), disseminated cancer (12.5%), obesity grade 3-4 (10%). In the first group, postoperative morbidity and mortality were 61.7% (n=37) and 13.3%, in the second group - 25% (n=15) and 8.3%, respectively. Preventive abdominal wall reconstruction is advisable in patients with risk factors of eventration.

The Role of Nutritional Access in Malnourished Elderly Undergoing Major Surgery for Acute Abdomen: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

About 50% of the elderly undergoing emergency abdominal surgery are malnourished. The role of timely surgical nutritional access in this group of patients is unknown. We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2009 through the first three-quarters of 2015 of patients aged ≥65years who were malnourished and underwent major abdominal surgery for the acute abdomen within the first 2days of hospital admission. Of 3246721 patients analyzed, 4311 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, only 507 (11.8%) patients had surgical nutritional access (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) (group I), while 3804 patients (88.2%) did not (group II). In the propensity score-matched population, there were 482 patients in each group. The patients in group I had lower odds of mortality and postoperative gastrointestinal complications (paralytic ileus, anastomotic dehiscence, and intestinal fistulae) (P-value <.01, respectively). Elderly who receive surgical nutritional access have lower rates of gastrointestinal complications and mortality.

Surgical-site infections in emergency abdominal paediatric surgeries at a tertiary-care hospital in Pakistan.

A retrospective chart review was carried out in children (neonates to 18 years) who underwent acute surgical abdominal exploration during 2012-2016 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, to evaluate the postoperative surgical site infection rates in emergency paediatric abdominal surgery. Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) was estimated. P-value was calculated, chisquare and non-parametric tests were performed by comparing pre-surgical and post-surgical procedure pathogen occurrence and pre-procedure wound status. Pathogen occurrence related to time-trend of 98 paediatric patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery was plotted. Of the 94 who were discharged in stable condition, it was found that there was no significant difference between pre- and postsurgical pathogens. Escherichia coli (n=10) was found to be the most common pathogen. Contaminated wounds were associated with higher SSI (p=0.036, OR 1.95 95% CI 0.7-5.4). The study found that pre-surgery wound status could be an indicator for risk of SSI in a post-operative scenario.

Noninvasive assessment of fluid responsiveness for emergency abdominal surgery in dogs with pulmonary hypertension: Insights into high-risk companion animal anesthesia.

ObjectiveOptimizing cardiac stroke volume during high-risk surgical anesthesia is of particular interest with regard to a therapeutic target to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. However, intensive fluid management in critically ill small animals with pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been empirically performed, and thus it can be challenging. Stroke volume variation (SVV) has been used as a dynamic preload predictor of fluid responsiveness. We hypothesized that if SVV exhibited robust reliability in the setting of hemodynamically unstable condition, it would provide more precise information on fluid resuscitation to translate it into veterinary anesthesia. Thus the aim of this study was to investigate the utility of SVV measured by the electrical velocimetry (EV) method for predicting fluid responsiveness in dogs with PH.MethodsSixteen dogs undergoing emergency abdominal surgery and diagnosed with PH secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) on preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram were included. Dogs were randomly assigned to 2 groups with and without inotropic cardiac support with dobutamine. Hemodynamic measurements including stroke volume and SVV derived from the EV device were performed under general anesthesia before (baseline) and after surgery (fluid challenge with a colloid solution defined by a SV increase of ≥ 10%).ResultsIn both groups, SVV elevated significantly after abdominal surgery compared with baseline. In dobutamine infused group, the SVV values decreased significantly after fluid challenge (P < 0.05) with a greater number of responders than saline infused control group (P < 0.01). Receiver operating curve analysis of SVV confirmed high positive predictive value for dogs during dobutamine infusion (P < 0.05; cut-off value of 15%; specificity 90%, sensitivity 82%).ConclusionsNoninvasive EV monitoring may be useful for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in critically ill dogs with left-sided heart failure-related PH. This normalization of dynamic preload indices, which could be achieved more precisely under inotropic support, may prevent further detrimental consequence of fluid loading.

Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer in the Elderly: An Interim Analysis of the FRAILESEL Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

The number of elderly patients requiring emergency surgical intervention has increased dramatically. Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) complications, such as perforation, have remained relatively stable and associated morbidity remains between 10% and 20%. Advances in perioperative care have greatly improved the outcomes of laparoscopic emergency surgery, allowing increasing numbers of patients, even the elderly, to undergo safe repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of laparoscopic gastric repair in the elderly using the database of the FRAILESEL (Frailty and Emergency Surgery in the Elderly) study. This is a retrospective analysis carried out on data of the FRAILESEL study. Data on all the elderly patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery for PPU from January 2017 to December 2017 at 36 Italian surgical departments were analyzed. Patients who underwent PPU repair were further divided into a laparoscopic gastroduodenal repair (LGR) cohort and an open gastroduodenal repair (OGR) cohort, and the clinicopathologic features of the patients in both the groups were compared. Sixty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Thirty-three patients (47.8%) underwent LGR. The LGR patients had less blood loss and shorter postoperative stay, even if the difference was not statistically significant. The mean operative time was significantively higher in the OGR (OGR 96.5±27.7 vs. LGR 78.6±16.3 P=0.000). The rate of death after laparoscopic surgery was similar to the rate of the open surgery. Multivariate analysis indicated that only age (P=0.018), admission haemoblogbin (Hb) level (P=0.006), platelet count (P=0.16), lactate level (P=0.47), and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (P=0.18) were independent variables associated with the risk of overall mortality. LGR is safe and feasible in elderly patients with PPU and it is associated with better perioperative outcomes. However, patient selection and preoperative frailty evaluation in the elderly population are the key to achieving better outcomes.

Biologic mesh implantation is associated with serious abdominal wall complications in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery: A randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Open, emergency abdominal surgery is associated with a high incidence of fascial dehiscence and incisional hernia. Implantation of biologic meshes potentially reinforces the abdominal wall and therefore decreases such complications. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcome after prophylactic intraperitoneal implantation of a biologic Strattice mesh (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) with standard abdominal closure in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. A two-arm randomized clinical trial was performed in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery at Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland, from April 2016 to March 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to prophylactic implantation of a biological intraperitoneal mesh using Strattice, Allergan (mesh group), or standard abdominal closure using a single, continuous running suture (no-mesh group). Because of safety concerns, patient enrollment was closed prematurely. Eligibility for inclusion was assessed in 61 patients. A total of 48 patients were randomized (21 in the mesh group, 28 in the no-mesh group). No differences in baseline characteristics were found. Abdominal wall complications requiring reoperations were more frequent in the mesh group compared to the no-mesh group (5 [83.3%] of 13 vs. 1 [14.3%] of 13 patients, p = 0.026). Mesh-associated abdominal wall complications included nonintegration of the mesh into the abdominal wall, dissolution of the mesh, and mesh-related infections. In patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, intraperitoneal biologic Strattice mesh implantation is associated with significantly more frequent abdominal wall complications requiring reoperation. Therefore, the use of such meshes cannot be recommended in the contaminated environment of emergency abdominal surgery. Therapeutic, level I.

Long-term mortality in the Intermediate care after emergency abdominal surgery (InCare) trial-A post-hoc follow-up study.

Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery are at high risk of post-operative complications. Although post-operative treatment at an intermediate care unit may improve early outcome, there is a lack of studies on the long-term effects of such therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effect of intermediate care versus standard surgical ward care on mortality in the Intermediate Care After Emergency Abdominal Surgery (InCare) trial. We included adult patients undergoing emergency major laparoscopy or laparotomy with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 10 or more, who participated in the InCare trial from October 2010 to November 2012. In the InCare trial, patients were randomized to either post-operative intermediate care or standard surgical ward care. The primary outcome was time to death within 6years after surgery. We assessed mortality with Coxregression analysis. A total of 286 patients were included. The all-cause 6-year landmark mortality was 52.8% (76 of 144 patients) in the intermediate care group and 47.9% (68 of 142 patients) in the ward care group. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality risk between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.76-1.47), P=.73). We found no statistically significant difference in 6-year mortality between patients randomized to post-operative intermediate care or ward care after emergency abdominal surgery. However, we detected an absolute mortality risk reduction of 5% in favour of ward care, possibly due to random error.

Indications for Emergency Abdominal Surgeries in Older Patients: 7-Year Experience of a Single Centre

The majority of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy are older adults that carry the highest mortality. More research into the development of targeted interventions is required. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyse the indications for emergency abdominal surgery in patients aged ≥ 65 admitted to the Department of General Surgery. The study included consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 who underwent emergency abdominal surgery within 48 h after admission at one institution. In 2010–2017, 986 patients were enrolled in the study (female 57%, male 43%). Patients were divided into three age groups, 65–70, 71–84 and ≥ 85, with 255 patients (25.9%), 562 patients (57.0%) and 169 patients (17.1%) in each group, respectively. In the first and second age groups, the most common indications for surgery were acute cholecystitis, non-malignant ileus, colorectal cancer complications and acute appendicitis. In the oldest patients, the most common indications were complications of colorectal cancer, acute cholecystitis, non-malignant ileus and complications of diverticulosis. In the women, the biggest differences in indications between age groups were colorectal cancer (p = 0.025) and peptic ulcer disease complications (p = 0.005); in the men, the biggest difference was seen for complicated diverticulitis (p = 0.001). The most frequent comorbidities were heart diseases (81.0%), followed by endocrine (33.6%) and vascular diseases (22.7%). The three most common indications for emergency surgery in older patients at our institution were acute cholecystitis, colorectal cancer complications and non-malignant bowel obstruction, affecting 59.5% of this group of patients. Elective surgery and endoscopic screening have the potential to prevent major part of these acute diseases. However, further prospective research is necessary on this field, particularly among frail, older patients.

AB067. Frailty and emergency abdominal surgery: a systematic review

Background: At present, patients aged ≥65 years account for approximately 50% of all emergent operations and 75% of post-operative mortality. In the emergency setting, there is often no time for the detailed treatment of comorbidities, changes in medication or preoperative rehabilitation. Studies have reported on the use of frailty as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing elective surgery. To date, similar data does not exist for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.