Uncomplicated Parapneumonic Effusions Research Articles

Management of Pleural Infection: A Historical Review and Updates

Pleural infection, including empyema, continues to have a high morbidity. A deep understanding of the pathobiology and appropriate medical management is crucial to avoid complications and progression to the need for surgery. Over the last several decades, we have learned much about the pathophysiology, microbiology, and epidemiology of pleural infections. Management has changed considerably over the years with more recent clinical practices favoring minimally invasive interventions over surgery. Here we discuss in detail the pathophysiology of parapneumonic effusions as they progress from uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions to empyema and how this relates to their diagnosis and management. We review the microbiology and how it relates to recommended empiric antibiotic regimens. As intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy has become the cornerstone of management, we outline the literature on this topic dating back decades up to the most recent clinical trials and give our recommendations for management based on the literature.

The diagnostic value of interleukin-36 cytokines in pleural effusions of varying etiologies

BackgroundThe clinical management of pleural effusion (PE) poses challenges due to its diverse etiologies. The objective of this research was to investigate the concentrations of interleukin-36 (IL-36) cytokines in pleural fluid (PF) from different etiologies and assess their diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing the causes of PE. MethodsThis study enrolled 89 patients with confirmed PE, comprising 11 cases classified as transudate, 24 cases as malignant pleural effusion (MPE), 24 cases as tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), and 30 cases as parapneumonic pleural effusion (PPE). The PPE group was further subdivided into 20 cases of uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UPPE) and 10 cases of complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)/empyema. The concentrations of IL-36 cytokines in the PF of all 89 patients were quantified by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ResultsIL-36α exhibited excellent diagnostic accuracy in TPE, achieving a sensitivity of 91.7 % and specificity of 83.1 %, along with a cut-off value of 435.3 pg/ml. IL-36Ra also demonstrated relatively favorable diagnostic performance in PPE, with a sensitivity of 80.0 % and specificity of 76.3 %, along with a cut-off value of 390.8 pg/ml. Multivariable logistic regression models were successfully developed for both TPE and PPE, confirming their diagnostic utility. Furthermore, the levels of IL-36Ra were notably elevated in CPPE/empyema in comparison to UPPE. Moreover, in PF, IL-36γ exhibited positive associations with both IL-36α and IL-36Ra. ConclusionIL-36α and IL-36Ra may serve as novel biomarkers for diagnosing TPE and PPE, respectively. The multivariate models established significantly enhance the diagnostic efficacy of both TPE and PPE. Furthermore, IL-36Ra can function as an indicator for assessing the extent of pleural inflammation. Additionally, the interaction among IL-36 cytokines in PF may contribute to their expression modulation.

Could pleural fluid lactate level have an added diagnostic value in para pneumonic effusion?

Abstract Background Pleural effusion is the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, can be classified into transudative and exudative effusion. A parapneumonic effusion is a pleural effusion that forms adjacent to pneumonia. Para pneumonic effusion can be sub-typed into uncomplicated and complicated effusion. The aim of our work was to identify accuracy of pleural fluid lactate level to discriminate transudative from exudative effusion and uncomplicated from complicated parapneumonic effusion. Methods Thoracocentesis was done with subsequent evaluation of pleural fluid PH, protein, LDH, glucose and lactate.Also, gram stain, microbiological cultures, cytological examination was performed. Medical thoracoscopy was done whenever indicated. Results Our study included 52 males and 38 females with mean age 57.14 ± 11.69 years. Transudative effusions were detected in 22 patients (24.4%). Parapneumonic effusions accounted for 39 cases (43.3%), of these 23 cases were uncomplicated and 16 cases were complicated. The median pleural fluid lactate level in exudative effusion was significantly higher than transudative effusion (P value<0.001), in complicated parapneumonic effusion was significantly higher than uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (P value<0.001). Pleural fluid lactate cut-off value of 2.68 mmol/l or more yielded 97% sensitivity, 90.9% specificity for detection of exudative effusion (Auc 0.968). A cut of value of 6.22 mmol/l had 87.5% sensitivity, 91.3% specificity for detection of complicated parapneumonic effusion. (Auc 0.971). Conclusion The pleural fluid lactate level has a high accuracy to discriminate transudative from exudative pleural effusion and uncomplicated from complicated parapneumonic effusion.

A novel biomarker for pleural effusion diagnosis: Interleukin‐36γ in pleural fluid

Numerous studies have described the critical importance of interleukin (IL) -36γ in host defense against lung infections, but it is unknown whether it plays a role in infectious pleural effusion (IPE). This study aimed to examine the levels of IL-36γ in pleural effusions of different etiologies and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IL-36γ in the differential diagnosis of IPE. A total of 112 individuals was enrolled in this research. IL-36γ levels in pleural fluids of all 112 patients were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We also characterized these markers' diagnostic values across various groups. Patients with tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and parapneumonic effusion (PPE) had exhibited markedly higher IL-36γ levels in their pleural fluid than the malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and transudative effusion patients. Furthermore, the IL-36γ concentrations in TPE patients were evidently higher than in uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UPPE) patients but significantly lower than in complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)/empyema patients. Pleural fluid IL-36γ is a useful marker to differentiate TPE from UPPE, at a cut-off value for 657.5pg/ml (area under the curve=0.904, p < 0.0001) with 70.0% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity. The elevated IL-36γ in pleural effusion may be used as a novel biomarker for infectious pleural effusion diagnosis, particularly in patients with CPPE/empyema, and is a potentially promising biomarker to differentiate between TPE and UPPE.

Uncertainty-guided graph attention network for parapneumonic effusion diagnosis

Parapneumonic effusion (PPE) is a common condition that causes death in patients hospitalized with pneumonia. Rapid distinction of complicated PPE (CPPE) from uncomplicated PPE (UPPE) in Computed Tomography (CT) scans is of great importance for the management and medical treatment of PPE. However, UPPE and CPPE display similar appearances in CT scans, and it is challenging to distinguish CPPE from UPPE via a single 2D CT image, whether attempted by a human expert, or by any of the existing disease classification approaches. 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can utilize the entire 3D volume for classification: however, they typically suffer from the intrinsic defect of over-fitting. Therefore, it is important to develop a method that not only overcomes the heavy memory and computational requirements of 3D CNNs, but also leverages the 3D information. In this paper, we propose an uncertainty-guided graph attention network (UG-GAT) that can automatically extract and integrate information from all CT slices in a 3D volume for classification into UPPE, CPPE, and normal control cases. Specifically, we frame the distinction of different cases as a graph classification problem. Each individual is represented as a directed graph with a topological structure, where vertices represent the image features of slices, and edges encode the spatial relationship between them. To estimate the contribution of each slice, we first extract the slice representations with uncertainty, using a Bayesian CNN: we then make use of the uncertainty information to weight each slice during the graph prediction phase in order to enable more reliable decision-making. We construct a dataset consisting of 302 chest CT volumetric data from different subjects (99 UPPE, 99 CPPE and 104 normal control cases) in this study, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to classify UPPE, CPPE and normal cases using a deep learning method. Extensive experiments show that our approach is lightweight in demands, and outperforms accepted state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Code is available at https://github.com/iMED-Lab/UG-GAT.

Diagnostic value of pleural C-reactive protein levels in assessing severity of pediatric parapneumonic effusions

The immediate determination of complicated parapneumonic effusion is featured by instant remedial advantages. Consequently, we attempted to evaluate whether C-reactive protein (CRP) in pleural fluid can ameliorate the identification of cases with parapneumonic effusions that eventually require intervention. Patients and methods. A case-control study enrolled 43 patients with parapneumonic effusions from the inpatient ward and emergency room of Ain Shams Pediatric University Hospital, Egypt. Twenty of those patients had complicated effusions (complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion, CPPE), and 23 had uncomplicated parapneumonic pleural effusions (UCPPE). The differentiation characteristics of pleural fluid biochemical parameters as well as pleural CRP were estimated. Pleural fluid parameters were applied to classify cases of CPPE or UCPPE. ROC analysis established CRP setting to distinguish between both groups. Results. Pleural CRP was significantly higher in CPPE and empyema (48.97 mg/L) than in UCPPE (7.75 mg/L). The optimal cut-off point between CPPE and UCPPE in relation to pleural CRP was found to be 12.26 mg/L with a sensitivity of 95.00%, specificity of 95.65%, and AUC of 94.8%. Conclusion. Pleural fluid CRP can indeed be a beneficial spare test in pleural effusions and contribute to the differential diagnosis of CPPE and UCPPE. Key words: parapneumonic effusion, empyema, pleural CRP, pediatrics

Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase as a biomarker for the diagnosis of infectious pleural effusions

Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) has been reported to be involved in infectious diseases, but it is unknown whether it plays a role in infectious pleural effusions (IPEs). We observed the levels of NAMPT in pleural effusions of different etiologies and investigated the clinical value of NAMPT in the differential diagnosis of infectious pleural effusions. A total of 111 patients with pleural effusion were enrolled in the study, including 25 parapneumonic effusions (PPEs) (17 uncomplicated PPEs, 3 complicated PPEs, and 5 empyemas), 30 tuberculous pleural effusions (TPEs), 36 malignant pleural effusions (MPEs), and 20 transudative effusions. Pleural fluid NAMPT levels were highest in the patients with empyemas [575.4 (457.7, 649.3) ng/ml], followed by those with complicated PPEs [113.5 (103.5, 155.29) ng/ml], uncomplicated PPEs [24.9 (20.2, 46.7) ng/ml] and TPEs [88 (19.4, 182.6) ng/ml], and lower in patients with MPEs [11.5 (6.5, 18.4) ng/ml] and transudative effusions [4.3 (2.6, 5.1) ng/ml]. Pleural fluid NAMPT levels were significantly higher in PPEs (P < 0.001) or TPEs (P < 0.001) than in MPEs. Moreover, Pleural fluid NAMPT levels were positively correlated with the neutrophil percentage and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and inversely correlated with glucose levels in both PPEs and TPEs, indicating that NAMPT was implicated in the neutrophil-associated inflammatory response in infectious pleural effusion. Further, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed pleural fluid NAMPT was a significant predictor distinguishing PPEs from MPEs [odds ratio (OR) 1.180, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.052–1.324, P = 0.005]. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that NAMPT was a promising diagnostic factor for the diagnosis of infectious effusions, with the areas under the curve for pleural fluid NAMPT distinguishing PPEs from MPEs, TPEs from MPEs, and IPEs (PPEs and TPEs) from NIPEs were 0.92, 0.85, and 0.88, respectively. In conclusion, pleural fluid NAMPT could be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of infectious pleural effusions.

Management of complex pleural disease in the critically ill patient.

Disorders of the pleural space are quite common in the critically ill patient. They are generally associated with the underlying illness. It is sometimes difficult to assess for pleural space disorders in the ICU given the instability of some patients. Although the portable chest X-ray remains the primary modality of diagnosis for pleural disorders in the ICU. It can be nonspecific and may miss subtle findings. Ultrasound has become a useful tool to the bedside clinician to aid in diagnosis and management of pleural disease. The majority of pleural space disorders resolve as the patient’s illness improves. There remain a few pleural processes that need specific therapies. While uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions do not have their own treatments. Those that progress to become a complex infected pleural space can have its individual complexity in therapy. Chest tube drainage remains the cornerstone in therapy. The use of intrapleural fibrinolytics has decreased the need for surgical referral. A large hemothorax or pneumothorax in patients admitted to the ICU represent medical emergencies and require emergent action. In this review we focus on the management of commonly encountered complex pleural space disorders in critically ill patients such as complicated pleural space infections, hemothoraces and pneumothoraces.

A study of the proteomic expression in patients with complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion.

The present study aimed to investigate the differences in the proteomic expression between uncomplicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (UPPE) and complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE). There were 10 patients with UPPE and 10 patients with CPPE. These patients were combined due to the complication of pleural effusion and further divided into group A and group B. An LC-MS analysis was conducted with the extraction of high-abundance proteins, and proteins with 1.5-fold or higher difference multiples were identified as differential proteins. Then, gene ontology (GO) and KEGG analyses were conducted on the differential proteins between the groups. Compared with the UPPE group, there were 38 upregulated proteins and 29 downregulated proteins in the CPPE group. The GO analysis revealed that the CPPE group had enhanced expressions in monosaccharide biosynthesis, glucose catabolism, fructose-6-phosphate glycolysis, glucose-6-phosphate glycolysis, and NADH regeneration as well as reduced expressions in fibrinogen complexes, protein polymerization, and coagulation. Moreover, the KEGG analysis showed that the CPPE group had enhanced expressions in amino acid synthesis, the HIF-1 signalling pathway, and glycolysis/glycoisogenesis and decreased expressions in platelet activation and complement activation. In pleural effusion in patients with CPPE, there are enhanced expressions of proteins concerning glucose and amino acid metabolism, NADH regeneration, and HIF-1 signalling pathways together with decreased expressions of proteins concerning protein polymerization, blood coagulation, platelet activation, and complement activation.

Pleural cytokines MIF and MIP-3\u03b1 as novel biomarkers for complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema

Patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)/empyema have high morbidity and mortality, particularly when adequate management is delayed. We aimed to investigate novel dysregulated cytokines that can be used as biomarkers for infectious pleural effusions, especially for CPPE/empyema. Expression of 40 cytokines in parapneumonic effusions (PPE) was screened in the discovery phase, involving 63 patients, using a multiplex immunobead-based assay. Six cytokines were subsequently validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). We then used ELISA to further evaluate the diagnostic values and cutoff values of these cytokines as potential biomarkers in an expanded group that included 200 patients with uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UPPE), CPPE, empyema, transudates, other exudates, and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). The pleural levels of four cytokines (MIF, MIP-3α, IL-1β, ENA-78) were highest and significantly increased in CPPE/empyema compared with those in other etiologies. According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the four cytokines (MIF, MIP-3α, IL-1β, and ENA-78) had areas under the curve (AUCs) greater than 0.710 for discriminating parapneumonic pleural effusion from noninfectious pleural effusions. In a comparison of nonpurulent CPPE with UPPE, logistic regression analysis revealed that pleural fluid MIF ≥ 12 ng/ml and MIP-3α ≥ 4.3 ng/ml had the best diagnostic value; MIF also displayed the highest odds ratio of 663 for nonpurulent CPPE, with 97.5% specificity, 94.44% sensitivity, and an AUC of 0.950. In conclusion, our results show that elevated MIF and MIP-3α may be used as novel biomarkers for PPE diagnosis, particularly in patients with CPPE/empyema; the findings indicate that dysregulated cytokine expression may provide clues about the pathogenesis of pleural infection.

Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Discrimination between Uncomplicated and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion.

Objectives: The role of serum C-reactive protein (CRPs) and pleural fluid CRP (CRPpf) in discriminating uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UCPPE) from complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) is yet to be validated since most of the previous studies were on small cohorts and with variable results. The role of CRPs and CRPpf gradient (CRPg) and of their ratio (CRPr) in this discrimination has not been previously reported. The study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of CRPs, CRPpf, CRPr, and CRPg in discriminating UCPPE from CPPE in a relatively large cohort. Methods: The study population included 146 patients with PPE, 86 with UCPPE and 60 with CPPE. Levels of CRPs and CRPpf were measured, and the CRPg and CRPr were calculated. The values are presented as mean ± SD. Results: Mean levels of CRPs, CRPpf, CRPg, and CRPr of the UCPPE group were 145.3 ± 67.6 mg/L, 58.5 ± 38.5 mg/L, 86.8 ± 37.3 mg/L, and 0.39 ± 0.11, respectively, and for the CPPE group were 302.2 ± 75.6 mg/L, 112 ± 65 mg/L, 188.3 ± 62.3 mg/L, and 0.36 ± 0.19, respectively. Levels of CRPs, CRPpf, and CRPg were significantly higher in the CPPE than in the UCPPE group (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups for levels of CRPr (p = 0.26). The best cut-off value calculated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for discriminating UCPPE from CPPE was for CRPs, 211.5 mg/L with area under the curve (AUC) = 94% and p < 0.0001, for CRPpf, 90.5 mg/L with AUC = 76.3% and p < 0.0001, and for CRPg, 142 mg/L with AUC = 91% and p < 0.0001. Conclusions: CRPs, CRPpf, and CRPg are strong markers for discrimination between UCPPE and CPPE, while CRPr has no role in this discrimination.

MRSA COMPLICATING A PARAPNEUMONIC EFFUSION DESPITE TIMELY ANTIBIOTICS

TYPE: Case Report Publication TOPIC: Chest Infections INTRODUCTION: Parapneumonic effusions (PE) can be complicated by empyema or loculations and predicts worse morbidity and mortality. PE management is guided by fluid characteristics instead of organism. We present a case of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia causing uncomplicated PEs, which eventually developed into loculations despite timely long-term antibiotics. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old male presented for nausea, vomiting, and altered mentation. On admission, his blood pressure was 93/60 mmHg, heart rate 106/min, temperature 98 F, oxygen saturation 96%. White blood cells were 10.15 10E9/L, procalcitonin was 15.9 ng/mL, and both blood cultures were positive for MRSA. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed multifocal pneumonia. Blood culture cleared on hospital day (HD) 6 after intravenous (IV) vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Repeat chest CT on HD 10 showed bilateral PEs. Pleural fluid had pH 7.45, glucose 145 mg/dL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 475 U/L, and negative Gram-stain and culture; serum LDH 358 U/L. He was discharged with 6 weeks of IV vancomycin without chest tube placement. Six weeks later, he presented for nausea and vomiting. CT chest showed right pleural rim enhancement of a loculated effusion. He underwent thoracoscopic adhesiolysis, decortication, 2 lung wedge resections, and mechanical pleurodesis with subsequent resolution of symptoms. Tissue biopsy culture was negative. DISCUSSION: Complicated PE from MRSA is a well-documented complication due to the virulent pro-coagulant behavior of MRSA. Current guidelines do not specifically address the management of MSRA pneumonia related PE. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention or close monitoring of MRSA PE will need to be considered to reduce morbidity and mortality. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. KEYWORDS: Parapneumonic effusion, MRSA pneumonia

Predictive Value of Pleural Cytology in the Diagnosis of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema Thoracis.

Introduction Complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPE) are distinguished from uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions (UPE) by the ability to resolve without drainage. Determinants include pleural pH, pleural glucose, and pleural LDH, along with microbiologic cultures. Inflammation mediated by neutrophil chemotactic cytokines leads to fibrinous loculation of an effusion, and the degree of this inflammation may lead to a CPE. One role of the pathologist is to evaluate for the presence of malignancy in a pleural effusion; however, the ability of the pathologist to distinguish a CPE from UPE has not been evaluated. Materials and Methods A single-center retrospective study was performed on pleural cytology specimens from 137 patients diagnosed with a parapneumonic effusion or empyema over a five-year interval. Pleural cytology was characterized as either uncomplicated or complicated by two pathologists based on cellular composition and the presence or absence of fibrinous exudate in the fluid. Cohen's kappa was calculated for interobserver agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of cytologic diagnoses were calculated. Determinants of cytologic accuracy were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum test, unpaired t-test, and logistic regression. Results Kappa interobserver agreement between pathologists was 0.753. Pleural fluid cytology sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CPE/empyema were 76.0%, 95% CI [65.0, 84.9]; 50%, 95% CI [29.1, 70.9]; 83.3%, 95% CI [76.7, 88.4]; and 38.7%, 95% CI [26.5, 52.5], respectively. The presence of pleural bacteria, elevated pleural LDH, and reduced pleural pH were nonsignificant determinants of cytologic accuracy. Logistic regression was significant for the presence of pleural bacteria (p = 0.03) in determining a successful cytologic diagnosis. Conclusion Pleural cytology adds little value to traditional markers of distinguishing a UPE from CPE. Inflammation on pleural fluid cytology is suggestive of empyema or the presence of pleural fluid bacteria.

Features of Parapneumonic Effusions.

Abstract Introduction: Parapneumonic effusions, as a complication of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), usually have a good course, but they sometimes progress into complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) and empyema, thus becoming a significant clinical problem. Aim: To review clinical and radiological features, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic options in parapneumonic effusions. Material and methods: The analysis included 94 patients with parapneumonic effusion hospitalized at the University Infectious Diseases Clinic in Skopje during a 4 year period. Out of 755 patients with CAP, 175 (23.18%), had parapneumonic effusion. Thoracentesis was performed in 94 (53.71%) patients, 50 patients were with uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions (UCPPE) and 44 with complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE). Results: More patients (59.57%) were male; the average age was 53.82±17.5 years. The most common symptoms included: fever (91; 96.81%), cough (80; 85.11%), pleuritic chest pain (68; 72.34%), dyspnea (65; 69.15%). Alcoholism was the most common comorbidity registered in 12 (12.77%) patients. Macroscopically, effusion was yellow and clear in most cases (36; 38.29%). Localization of pleural effusion was often in the left costophrenic angle (53; 56.38%) and ultrasonographic non-septated complex. Between the two groups of effusions there was a significant difference between the ERS, WBC and CRP in serum and CRP in pleural fluid. Statistical difference existed in terms of days of hospitalization with a longer hospital stay for patients with CPPE (p &lt;0.0001). Conclusion: Patients with parapneumonic effusion have the symptoms of acute respiratory infection and frequent accompanying diseases. Future diagnostic and therapeutic treatment depends on pleural fluid features and imaging lung findings.

Prevalence, causes, and clinical implications of pleural effusion in pulmonary ICU and correlation with patient outcomes

IntroductionPleural effusion is common in medical ICU (MICU) patients, and it may develop owing to different causes and may affect patients outcomes.ObjectiveThe aim of this work was to study the prevalence and causes of pleural effusion in MICU and its effect on patient outcomes.Patients and methodsA total of 90 patients admitted to MICU in Abbaseia Chest Hospital were included in the present study. The patients initially had pleural effusion or effusion developed during their ICU stay.ResultsOverall, 66 patients were males and 24 were females, and their mean age was 51.5±18.6 years. The prevalence rate of pleural effusion in our MICU during 1-year period was 12.7%. Pleural effusion was found to be exudates in 77.7% of cases and transudates in 22.3%. Uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion was the most common cause (36.7%), followed by heart failure (17.8%). The cause of pleural effusion did not significantly affect the patient outcome or duration of ICU stay. No significant reduction in duration of ICU stay or ICU mortality was seen in patients who received therapeutic aspiration or tube drainage compared with patients who received no specific management for effusion.ConclusionThe commonest cause of pleural effusion in MICU is parapneumonic effusion, and chest ultrasonography is the best method of fluid detection. Different methods of management do not significantly affect patient outcomes.

Pleural Effusions and Pneumothoraces.

1. Katherine Cashen, DO* 2. Tara L. Petersen, MD† 1. *Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 2. †Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin/The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI * Abbreviations: BTS: : British Thoracic Society CHF: : congestive heart failure CT: : computed tomography VATS: : video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery 1. Clinicians should be aware of the causes and clinical presentation of pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. 2. Clinicians should understand the current role of diagnostic tests, imaging modalities, and timing of minimally invasive treatments. After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Describe the pathogenesis of pleural fluid accumulation. 2. Identify the most likely causes of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. 3. Understand the basic clinical presentation, diagnostic tests, and management of pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. 4. Differentiate between transudative and exudative pleural effusions. 5. Understand the natural history of spontaneous pneumothorax. The pleural space is created by the parietal and visceral pleura that line the chest wall and the lung surface, respectively. Normally, only a small amount (0.3 mL/kg) of hypotonic fluid is present within the pleural space due to homeostatic balances in physiologic fluid production and absorption. Various infectious and noninfectious processes can lead to pathologic filling of the pleural space with fluid (effusion) or air (pneumothorax). Such pathologic changes create a true space that can interfere with normal lung mechanics and, in severe cases, cardiac function. Although much less common in pediatric than adult populations, pleural effusions and pneumothoraces in both groups can lead to substantial complications, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality if unrecognized or untreated. Overall, the cause of pleural effusions and pneumothoraces differs in children compared to adults. In adults, congestive heart failure (CHF) and malignancy account for a substantial number of pleural effusions, but these are uncommon causes in children. Infectious pleural effusions in the setting of pneumonia (parapneumonic effusions) remain the most common cause of effusions in both children and adults. Unlike the adult population, children experience spontaneous …

The Role of Serum Coagulation Factors in the Differential Diagnosis of Patients with Pneumonia and Parapneumonic Effusion.

The aim of this study was to identify the participations of the serum coagulations and fibrinolysis factors that contribute to the differential diagnosis of the patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) without effusion, uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UCPPE) and complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE). The coagulations system is fundamental for the maintenance of homeostasis, and contributes to the inflammatory process responsible for CAP and the parapneumonic effusion. The factors of coagulations and fibrinolysis participate in the cellular proliferation and migration as in the synthesis of the inflammatory mediators. We evaluated the laboratory profile of coagulations and fibrinolysis in the serum of 148 patients with CAP without effusion, 50 with UCPPE and 44 with CPPE. We determined the test of the coagulation cascade which measures the time elapsed from the activation of the coagulation cascade at different points to the fibrin generation. As a consequence, there is an activation of the fibrinolytic system with the increased D-dimer levels measured in the plasma in the three groups. The patients were with mean age ± SD (53,82 ± 17,5) min - max 18-93 years. A significantly higher number of thrombocytes was in the group with CPPE with median 412 × 109/L (rank 323-513 × 109/L). The extended activation of the prothrombin time (aPTT) was significantly higher in the same group of patients with median of 32 sec. (rank 30-35 sec). The mean D-dimer plasma level was 3266,5 ± 1292,3 ng/ml in patients with CPPE, in CAP without effusion 1646,6 ± 1204 ng/ml and in UCPPE 1422,9 ± 970 ng/ml. The coagulations system and the fibrinolysis play important role in the development and pathophysiology of CAP and the parapneumonic effusions.

Factors influencing pleural drainage in parapneumonic effusions

ObjectiveThe identification of parapneumonic effusions (PPE) requiring pleural drainage is challenging. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiological and pleural fluid findings in discriminating between PPE that need drainage (complicated PPE (CPPE)) and those that could be resolved with antibiotics only (uncomplicated PPE (UPPE)). Subjects and methodsA retrospective review of 641 consecutive PPE, of which 393 were categorized as CPPE and 248 as UPPE. Demographics, radiological (size and laterality on a chest radiograph) and pleural fluid parameters (pus, bacterial cultures, biochemistries) were compared among groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine variables useful for predicting chest drainage, and receiver-operating characteristic curves assisted in the selection of the best cutoff values. ResultsAccording to the likelihood ratios (LR), findings increasing the probability of chest tube usage the most were: effusions occupying ≥1/2 of the hemithorax (LR 13.5), pleural fluid pH ≤7.15 (LR 6.2), pleural fluid glucose ≤40mg/dL (LR 5.6), pus (LR 4.8), positive pleural fluid cultures (LR 3.6), and pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase >2000U/L (LR 3.4). In the logistic regression analysis only the first two were selected as significant predictors of CPPE. In non-purulent effusions, the effusion's size and pleural fluid pH retained their discriminatory properties, in addition to a pleural fluid C-reactive protein (CRP) level >100mg/L. ConclusionLarge radiological effusions and a pleural fluid pH ≤7.15 were the best predictors for chest drainage in patients with PPE. In the subgroup of patients with non-purulent effusions, pleural fluid CRP also contributed to CPPE identification.

Clinical, Laboratory and Radiographic Features of Patients with Pneumonia and Parapneumonic Effusions.

BACKGROUND:Parapneumonic effusions complicating pneumonia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.AIM:To determine the role of the clinical, laboratory and radiographic features to the differential diagnosis of patients with community- acquired pneumonia (CAP) without effusion, uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UCPPE) and complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE).MATERIAL AND METHODS:We analysed 148 patients with CAP without effusion, 50 with UCPPE and 44 with CPPE. In three groups of patients, the majority was male patients (58.11%, 58%, 61.36%) consequently.RESULTS:The chronic heart failure was the most common comorbidity in a group with CAP (28; 18.92%) and UCPPE (7; 14%), alcoholism (12;12.77%) in a group with CPPE. Patients with CPPE had significantly longer fever compared to patients with CAP without effusion (p = 0.003). Pleuritic chest pain (86.36%) and dyspnea (88.64%) were the most common symptoms in CPPE, then to group with UCPPE (60%; 52%), and in CAP without effusion (25.68%; 47,97%). Diffuse pulmonary changes were detected more frequently in the group with CAP without effusion compared with the group with CPPE (64.86 % vs. 27.27 %), while the segment lung changes were more common in patients with CPPE (50% vs. 20.27%). Patients with CPPE were significant with higher erythrocytes sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cells (WBC) and serum C- reactive protein (CRP) than it the other two groups (p = 0.00090, p = 0.01, p= 0.000065).CONCLUSION:Proper analysis of clinical, laboratory and radiographic features of patients with CAP and parapneumonic effusion can prevent mismanagement in these patients and will reduce morbidity and mortality.

Factors influencing pleural drainage in parapneumonic effusions

ObjectiveThe identification of parapneumonic effusions (PPE) requiring pleural drainage is challenging. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiological and pleural fluid findings in discriminating between PPE that need drainage (complicated PPE (CPPE)) and those that could be resolved with antibiotics only (uncomplicated PPE (UPPE)). Subjects and methodsA retrospective review of 641 consecutive PPE, of which 393 were categorized as CPPE and 248 as UPPE. Demographics, radiological (size and laterality on a chest radiograph) and pleural fluid parameters (pus, bacterial cultures, biochemistries) were compared among groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine variables useful for predicting chest drainage, and receiver-operating characteristic curves assisted in the selection of the best cutoff values. ResultsAccording to the likelihood ratios (LR), findings increasing the probability of chest tube usage the most were: effusions occupying ≥1/2 of the hemithorax (LR 13.5), pleural fluid pH ≤7.15 (LR 6.2), pleural fluid glucose ≤40mg/dL (LR 5.6), pus (LR 4.8), positive pleural fluid cultures (LR 3.6), and pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase >2000U/L (LR 3.4). In the logistic regression analysis only the first two were selected as significant predictors of CPPE. In non-purulent effusions, the effusion's size and pleural fluid pH retained their discriminatory properties, in addition to a pleural fluid C-reactive protein (CRP) level >100mg/L. ConclusionLarge radiological effusions and a pleural fluid pH ≤7.15 were the best predictors for chest drainage in patients with PPE. In the subgroup of patients with non-purulent effusions, pleural fluid CRP also contributed to CPPE identification.