This study was initiated to examine the role of cyclic nucleotides in the regulation of the expression of the Ly-6E cell surface Ag by IFN. As a model system, we used the YAC T cell lymphoma where this Ag is constitutively absent but is highly induceable by both IFN-γ and IFN- α β . Treatment with cAMP or cGMP analogs did not cause Ly-6E expression in the absence of IFN. However, treatment with cAMP analogs, but not with cGMP analogs, markedly altered Ly-6E expression triggered by IFN, both at the mRNA and at the cell surface protein levels. Interestingly, these effects depended on whether Ly-6E induction was mediated by IFN-γ or IFN- α β . Thus, the response to IFN-γ was enhanced up to tenfold, whereas the response to IFN- α β was suppressed by 90–95%. Similar differential modulations of Ly-6E induction were also exerted by forskolin and cholera toxin, which are known to elevate intracellular cAMP concentration through distinct mechanisms. A YAC cell variant (C10) was isolated, where cAMP analogs or cAMP inducers could not modify Ly-6E induction. Although resistant to the biological effect of cAMP, the C10 mutant exhibited normal IFN-mediated Ly-6E responses. Moreover, in this mutant, Ly-6E induction was still affected by the PKC activator PMA, as in wild-type YAC cells. Altogether, our data demonstrate that cAMP (and cGMP) is not directly involved as second messenger in Ly-6E induction mediated by IFNs. However, a rise of cAMP modulates in an opposite fashion the Ly-6E-inducing actions of IFN-γ and IFN- α β , which suggests that the two types of IFN utilize separate biochemical pathways to regulate Ly-6E expression.