Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitors Research Articles

Cardiovascular risks associated with Janus kinase inhibitors: peering outside the black box.

Considerable controversy related to the cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) has arisen following the results of the ORAL Surveillance trial. In this trial of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) ≥ 50years with at least one prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, tofacitinib was not found to be non-inferior to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) with regards to the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), venous thromboembolism (VTE) or malignancy. Following the results of ORAL Surveillance, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) issued a boxed warning regarding increased risks of MACE, VTE and malignancy with tofacitinib, baricitinib or upadacitinib in inflammatory arthritis or ulcerative colitis. Analysis of data from other trials (including long-term follow-up studies) of tofacitinib in RA, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases suggests an overall similar risk of MACE or VTE with tofacitinib when compared with TNFi. In specific patient populations with risk factors for or prior history of MACE or VTE, the risk of subsequent MACE or VTE with tofacitinib use is considerably heightened. Post-hoc analyses from ORAL Surveillance presented at the recent EULAR meeting further help to delineate patients with RA at increased risk of MACE/VTE with tofacitinib. Based on the available literature from trials and long-term follow-up studies of baricitinib and upadacitinib, there exists insufficient evidence to extend the warning of MACE/VTE with tofacitinib to these drugs. Ongoing post-marketing surveillance studies of JAKinibs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases should help clarify CVD risk with JAKinibs.

Infliximab as a second-line therapy for children with refractory Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Infliximab is a tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor that is used to treat children with refractory Kawasaki disease (KD). Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and impact of infliximab versus intravenous immunoglobulins on the incidence of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) and treatment resistance in children with refractory KD. The Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinical trials registries were searched to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing infliximab as second-line therapy to a second dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in children with refractory KD, reported in abstract or full text, were included. Studies were selected and assessed for risk of bias by two reviewers. Data were extracted and pooled using conventional random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. A total of 199 participants from four RCTs were included. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for the incidence of treatment resistance in patients treated with infliximab was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.64). For incidence of CAAs RR was 1.20 (95% CI 0.54-2.63), the incidence of adverse effect "infusion reactions" RR was 0.48, (95% CI 0.12-1.92) and for "infections" RR was 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.12). Overall, the GRADE strength of evidence for the primary outcomes was low. Evidence on the duration of fever and inflammatory biomarkers was sparse, heterogeneous and inconclusive. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that infliximab may reduce the incidence of treatment resistance in children with refractory KD. However, the limited strength of evidence warrants further research.

Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis - Insights into Upadacitinib.

Although the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) has still not been elucidated our options to treat SpA have definitely improved in the last decades. There are two main types of SpA: (i) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), also covering the classical ankylosing spondylitis (AS) which is largely equivalent to radiographic (r)-axSpA but different from non-radiographic (nr)-axSpA, and (ii) peripheral SpA (pSpA) also covering psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as the main subtype. The subtype nr-axSpA has historically developed because the approval of drugs for AS did not cover forms without structural changes in the sacroiliac joints which is mandatory in the 1984 New York criteria. The definitions for axSpA are based on the 2009 Assessments in AxSpA International Society (ASAS) classification criteria. Several biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) such as the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi) and the interleukin-17-inhibitors (IL-17i) are approved mostly for the whole spectrum of SpA including axSpA and PsA but L-17i does not work in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs cover mainly the janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitors which have recently been developed to inhibit inflammation in several rheumatic and other immune mediated diseases such as IBD. Indeed, the physiologic mechanism of JAK-mediated signal transduction has been recognized as an important target because the inhibition of its actions was shown to successfully work as a therapeutic mechanism. There are now 4 small molecule JAK inhibitors (JAKi) that currently play a role in rheumatology with variable selectivity for the four different JAK isoforms: tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib. In this review, we summarize current clinical trial data and evaluate the use of the JAK1 selective inhibitor upadacitinib in the treatment of axSpA, including nr-axSpA and r-axSpA. Even though the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over shorter periods of time has been convincing to date, long-term trials are needed to fully establish its performance and also evaluate the safety at higher doses, and its use in PsA.

Autoimmune disorders and thyroid function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after biological treatment

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and autoimmune diseases of the thyroid gland (AITD) often occur together. As autoimmune diseases, they share common pathological pathways, reflecting the fact that the treatment of the underlying disease can influence the course of thyroid disorders. The pharmacotherapy of RA is based on the supply of disease-modifying anti-inflammatory drugs with an increasing focus on biologics. This article aims to review the available literature describing the effects of biological treatments on thyroid function. The use of biological drugs may have the potential benefit of regulating the level of anti-thyroid antibodies. On the other hand, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) inhibitors are not indifferent to thyroid function and may increase the incidence of subacute thyroiditis. The coexistence of AITD and RA prompts consideration of the need for routine thyroid screening in RA patients and for RA screening in patients with thyroid disease who report joint problems.

Drug-related immune-mediated myelopathies.

Iatrogenic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders of the spinal cord are an uncommon but potentially severe complication of drug therapy for several human diseases. Particularly the introduction of novel biological agents in the treatment of systemic inflammatory disorders and cancer immunotherapy have led to a significant increase in immune-related adverse events of the central nervous system (CNS). The use of Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors in rheumatic and inflammatory bowel diseases has been associated with demyelinating and other inflammatory CNS conditions, including myelitis. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of several human malignancies has led to an increase in drug-induced immune-related adverse events including in the CNS. Other drugs that have been associated with immune-mediated myelitis include tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T Cell therapy. A high degree of suspicion is necessary when diagnosing these conditions, as early diagnosis and treatment is crucial in preventing further neurological damage and disability. The treatment of drug-induced inflammatory myelitis typically involves administration of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids, however additional immunosuppressive agents may be required in severe or refractory cases. While most cases are monophasic and remit following discontinuation of the offending agent, chronic immunosuppressive therapy may be indicated in cases with a progressive or relapsing disease course or when a diagnosis of a specific underlying neuro-inflammatory disorder is made. Outcomes are generally favorable, however depend on the specific therapeutic agent used, the clinical presentation and patient factors. In this review we aim to describe the clinical characteristics, imaging findings and management for the most common forms of iatrogenic immune-mediated myelopathies.

Immunogenicity and safety of the booster BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with biological disease-modifying drugs.

BackgroundVaccination confers relatively short-term protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), indicating the need for booster doses. Immunocompromised individuals, including those with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), may have pronounced immune response waning. Vaccine-boosted humoral and T-cell responses minimize poor coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outcome without increasing adverse events (AE). There is limited evidence of third-dose vaccination in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients. We investigated immune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity and safety after the BNT162b2 booster vaccination.MethodsThis prospective observational study enrolled an AxSpA cohort treated with interleukin-17 (IL-17) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors. Serum SARS-CoV-2-specific and virus-neutralizing antibodies for humoral response and flow cytometric detection of intracellular cytokines following SARS-CoV-2-specific peptide-based stimulation for T-cell immune responses were assessed, and safety was evaluated via a clinical questionnaire.ResultsFifteen male AxSpA patients treated with TNFα (73·3%) or IL-17 (26·7%) inhibitors were enrolled and had humoral response persistence at 6 months: 905·6 ( ± 186·1 SD) and 409·1 ( ± 335·7) U/mL. Specific antibody concentrations further increased after booster vaccination to 989·7 ( ± 12·62) and 1000 U/mL and T-cell responders from 53·3% to 80%, with no differences between AxSpA (including “vaccination only” and “hybrid immunity” subgroups) and healthy control (HC) cohorts. No severe AE occurred; the AE spectrum was comparable to that of the general population.ConclusionImmune-response persistence after primary vaccination and immunogenicity after booster vaccination were unaffected by anti-IL17 or anti-TNFα therapy with similar AE as in the general population.

Travel related histoplasmosis – a diagnostic challenge in a patient with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy

IntroductionIn a non-endemic setting, disseminated histoplasmosis is a rare travel-related health problem of immunosuppressed returnees from endemic regions.MethodsWe describe the case of a 68-year-old man with rheumatoid arthritis and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor treatment-related immunodeficiency, who suffered from disseminated histoplasmosis after traveling to Brazil. Based on this case, we discuss challenges and pitfalls associated with the diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis in a non-endemic setting.ResultsThe disease mimicked a hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) like syndrome. Histoplasma capsulatum was microscopically detected in bronchoalveolar fluid and bone marrow aspirate smears, but was initially misclassified as Leishmania spp., another class of pathogens, which may cause HLH like syndromes in immunocompromised individuals.DiscussionSince the clinical symptoms of histoplasmosis are nonspecific and physicians in non-endemic regions might not be familiar with this disease pattern, there is a risk of delayed diagnosis of travel related cases. Taking a thorough travel history is key in unclear cases of illness in immunocompromised patients.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Consequences of Human Alphaherpesvirus Infections in Patients With Psoriasis Who Initiate Methotrexate or Biologic Agents.

Immunosuppressive agents may increase the risk of infections with human alphaherpesviruses. We included all adult patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who initiated methotrexate (MTX) or biologic agents in a retrospective cohort study. An episode of alphaherpesviruses infection was defined as filling a prescription for systemic acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir. Using nationwide registries, we determined the incidence, risk factors, 180-day hospital contacts, and 30-day mortality following infection. We included 7294 patients; 4978 (68%) received MTX, and 2316 (32%) biologic agents. The incidence rates (95% confidence intervals) of alphaherpesviruses were 23 (20-27), 26 (19-35), 17 (11-27), and 6.7 (1.3-21) per 1000 person-years of follow-up in patients on MTX, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, interleukin 12/23 (IL-12/23) inhibitors, and interleukin 17 (IL-17) inhibitors, respectively. Males had an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.47 (P < .001) for alphaherpesvirus infection. Patients on IL-17 inhibitors had an adjusted HR of 0.24 (P = .048) compared to TNF-α inhibitors. Within 180 days after infection, 13%, 7.5%, and <0.5% of patients on MTX, TNF-α inhibitors, and IL-12/23 or IL-17 inhibitors, respectively, had hospital contacts, and the 30-day mortality for all groups was <0.5%. The incidence and risk of alphaherpesvirus infections were comparable between patients on MTX and TNF-α inhibitors, whereas use of IL-17 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk.

Correction to: Discontinuation and Switchback After Non-Medical Switching from Originator Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF) Inhibitors to Biosimilars: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies from 2012 to 2018

Correction to: Discontinuation and Switchback After Non-Medical Switching from Originator Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF) Inhibitors to Biosimilars: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies from 2012 to 2018

Latest combination therapies in psoriasis: Narrative review of the literature.

Biological therapies revolutionized the treatment of many chronic inflammatory skin diseases, first of all psoriasis, thanks to their high efficacy and the reduced number of side effects. However, the use of a single biologic drug does not always provide complete control of the disease or associated comorbidities over time. The first biological drugs used for the treatment of psoriasis, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, have long been used in combination with traditional topical and systemic therapies to induce a complete remission of the disease that could not be achieved with innovative drug alone. Even with the advent of new biological therapies with more precise molecular targets, the challenge of using combination therapies remained. Psoriatic patients often have major comorbidities, such as arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, uveitis or have other concomitant conditions such as chronic spontaneous urticaria and atopic dermatitis, which may require different biologic treatments than those indicated in psoriasis. The objective of this article is, through a comprehensive revision of the literature, to analyze in which cases the use of the combination of the latest therapies for psoriasis may be useful.

Latent and Active Tuberculosis Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Latent tuberculosis (TB) infections (LTBI) impose clinical challenges in terms of the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially in TB-endemic areas. While steroids and biologics have become increasingly useful in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe IBD, the risk of reactivation or developing TB is increased due to their potent immunosuppressive effects. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibition may result in the activation of a latent TB infection, and most cases manifest as more severe forms of disseminated TB. All potential users of immunosuppressive therapy should be screened for LTBI, and appropriate measures for the management of latent and active TB should be undertaken with immediate initiation of anti-TB treatment. Biologics should be withheld during TB treatment, and the proper timing for the resumption of IBD therapy during or after TB treatment should be individualized. This review summarizes the latest knowledge on the risk assessment, detection, and management of latent and active TB infections in patients with IBD.

PHARAO study: drug treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Guideline-conform treatment with biologics follows availability of biosimilars

With the introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors, the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) has undergone afundamental change. Several of the originally high-priced biologics are now accessible as lower cost biosimilars, removing asignificant impediment to prescription. The present study investigated whether the availability of biosimilars is associated with an improvement in the care of IRD. Moreover, the subjective acceptance of biosimilars by physicians and patients was investigated and compared with objectifiable parameters. Pseudonymized claims data of the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians from 2014 to 2019 as well as apaper and pencil survey of patients and rheumatologists formed the data basis of the study. During the observation period, the proportion of diagnosed patients receiving drug therapy increased from 38.5% to 43.2%. Also, the care changed in terms of the prescribed agents. Conventional drug therapy declined overall and, in particular, glucocorticoid prescriptions decreased from 39.3% in 2014 to 34.3% in 2019. At the same time, the proportion of targeted treatments increased from 12.3% to 20.4%. The median duration of basic treatment before first-time bDMARD use dropped from 3.15years in 2014 to 2.17years in 2019. Over the observation period, in which three biosimilars entered the market, the care of patients with IRD improved both quantitatively and qualitatively. The market share of biosimilars increased in parallel with this development. With an overall high acceptance of biosimilars, the assessment of the disease course by physicians and patients indicates aslight subjectively perceived advantage of therapy with originals compared to biosimilars, which, however, is not confirmed when standardized scores are applied. Apossible explanation for this might be anocebo effect, which could be minimized by suitable communication strategies.

Highlighting adalimumab as a treatment option for systemic treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: A case series from a tertiary specialised burns centre.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome describe a spectrum of severe cutaneous skin reactions constituting a medical emergency, and no formal treatment guidelines exist to direct systemic immunosuppressive therapy although referral to a burns unit and wound management remains a mainstay of treatment. We performed a retrospective chart review on all patients at a single centre with TEN between 2017 to 2021 to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of those treated with the tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor adalimumab against non-TNF-α immunosuppressants such as glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin and cyclosporine. All patients treated with adalimumab had successful resolution of their TEN, resulting in a mean duration of hospital admission of 22.5 days compared to 33 days for patients treated with non-TNF-α inhibitors. We highlight adalimumab as a promising systemic immunomodulator in the treatment of TEN with efficacy comparable to other immunosuppressive agents and associated with a shorter duration of hospital admission.

Incidence of dementia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and association with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs – Analysis of a national claims database

ObjectiveTo evaluate the risk of incident dementia associated with the use of biologics or targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARD) compared to conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDS only in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MethodsWe analyzed claims data from the Center for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) from 2006-2017. Patients with RA were identified as adults ≥40 years old and two RA diagnoses by a rheumatologist > 7 and < 365 days apart. Patients with a prior diagnosis of dementia were excluded. Use of cs/b/tsDMARDs was the exposure of interest. Person-time was classified as either: 1) b/tsDMARD exposed, which included tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi)-bDMARDs, non-TNFi-bDMARDs or tsDMARDs with or without csDMARDs; 2) csDMARD-exposed: any csDMARD without b/tsDMARD. Patients could contribute time to different exposure groups if they changed medications. Incident dementia was defined as: 1 inpatient OR 2 outpatients ICD-9-CM or ICD-10 claims for dementia, OR prescription of a dementia-specific medication (rivastigmine, galantamine, memantine, donepezil, tacrine). Age-adjusted incident rates (IR) were calculated, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsWe identified 141,326 eligible RA patients; 80% female and 75.3% white, median age 67 years and mean (SD) exposure time of 1.1 (1.5) years. There were 233,271 initiations of c/b/tsDMARDS and 3,794 cases of incident dementia during follow up. The crude IR of dementia was 2.0 (95% CI 1.9-2.1) per 100 person-years for patients on csDMARDs and 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.4) for patients on any b/tsDMARD. Patients on b/tsDMARDs had an adjusted 19% lower risk for dementia than patients on csDMARDs [HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.87)]. Subgroup analysis found comparable risk reductions between TNFi, non-TNFi, and tsDMARDs. on the risk of dementia. Conclusions and RelevanceThe incidence of dementia in patients with RA was lower in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs when compared to patients on csDMARD only. No differences were observed between different classes of b/tsDMARDs, suggesting that decreased risk is possibly explained by the overall decrease in inflammation rather than a specific mechanism of action of these drugs.

The long-term persistence of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with moderate to severe immune-mediated rheumatic diseases: A nation-wide, population-based real-world study.

We aimed to compare the long-term persistence between different tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis) with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD). This study can potentially provide insights into the real-world evidence regarding safety and effectiveness of TNFi treatment in a Chinese population. We enrolled newly diagnosed IMRD patients in this active comparator, retrospective cohort study by using National Taiwan insurance claim datasets. The drug survivals of first-line TNFi agents, including etanercept, golimumab, and adalimumab were compared. Propensity score matching was conducted to control the confounding effect from the observed covariates. The cumulative proportion of discontinuation was calculated over 5 years. The multiple-variable regression and propensity score analysis was used for confounding adjustment. After propensity score matching, there were 2267 patients identified in each etanercept, golimumab, and adalimumab group. We observed the 5-year cumulative proportion of discontinuation was 52.80%, 45.85%, and 56.86% in etanercept, golimumab, and adalimumab, respectively. Compared with golimumab, increase of 31% (95% CI: 20-43) and 38% (95% CI: 26-50) risk of discontinuation were observed in etanercept and adalimumab. The factors including female gender, increasing age, long hospital stays, without co-medication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or methotrexate were associated were discontinuation of first-line TNFi treatment. Golimumab had better drug survival than etanercept or adalimumab over 5 years of observation in Asian IMRD patients. Gender, age, longer hospital stays, concomitant use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were associated with survival with TNFis.

Predictors of ASDAS-CRP inactive disease in axial spondyloarthritis during treatment with TNF-inhibitors: Data from the EuroSpA collaboration

ObjectivesIn patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) initiating their first tumor necrosis factor alpha-inhibitor (TNFi), we aimed to identify common baseline predictors of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS-CRP) inactive disease (primary objective) and clinically important improvement (CII) at 6 months, and drug retention at 12-months across 15 European registries. MethodsBaseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Outcomes were investigated per registry and in pooled data using logistic regression analyses on multiply imputed data. ResultsThe consistency of baseline predictors in individual registries justified pooling the data. In the pooled dataset (n = 21,196), the 6-month rates for ASDAS inactive disease and ASDAS CII were 26% and 51%, and the 12-month drug retention rate 65% in patients with available data (n = 9,845, n = 6,948 and n = 21,196, respectively). Nine common baseline predictors of ASDAS inactive disease, ASDAS CII and 12-month drug retention were identified, and the odds ratios (95%-confidence interval) for ASDAS inactive disease were: age, per year: 0.97 (0.97–0.98), men vs. women: 1.88 (1.60–2.22), current vs. non-smoking: 0.76 (0.63–0.91), HLA-B27 positive vs. negative: 1.51 (1.20–1.91), TNF start year 2015–2018 vs. 2009–2014: 1.24 (1.06–1.45), CRP>10 vs. ≤10 mg/l: 1.49 (1.25–1.77), one unit increase in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ): 0.77 (0.58–1.03), one-millimeter (mm) increase in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) fatigue and spinal pain: 0.99 (0.99–1.00) and 0.99 (0.99–1.99), respectively ConclusionCommon baseline predictors of treatment response and adherence to TNFi could be identified across data from 15 European registries, indicating that they may be universal across different axSpA populations.

The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor in steven johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) management: a systematic review

Background. Steven Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis are dermatologic emergencies with high mortality rates characterized by extensive skin involvement. TNF-α has a role in inducing the production of granulysin that enhances keratinocyte cell death. Thus, the use of TNF-α inhibitors such as etanercept and infliximab is promising to halt the disease progression. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of TNF-α inhibitor in SJS/TEN management. Method. A systematic review using an online database was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studied about the role of TNF-α inhibitor in SJS/TEN management. The exclusion criteria were a letter to the editor, commentary report, review, meta-analysis, study not used humans as a study subject, not available in full text and not in English or Bahasa Indonesia. Result. Fourteen studies are included in this systematic review consisting of ten case reports, three cohort retrospective studies, and one randomized controlled trial. TNF-α inhibitors such as etanercept and infliximab are beneficial for SJS/TEN management because they accelerate skin healing time and re-epithelization, reduce in-hospital duration and mortality rate, and minimal complications and side effects. TNF-α inhibitors should be given quickly after the disease onset, and combination with other immunosuppressive agents should be avoided to prevent the excessive immunosuppressive effect. Conclusion. TNF-α inhibitors such as etanercept and infliximab promise therapy to halt SJS/TEN progression.

Presentation and clinical course of pediatric-onset versus adult-onset Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a less common large-vessel vasculitis which can occur in either children or adults. However, differences between pediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK have not been systematically analyzed. We undertook a systematic review (pre-registered on PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022300238) to analyze differences in clinical presentation, angiographic involvement, treatments, and outcomes between pediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK. We searched PubMed (MEDLINE and PubMed Central), Scopus, major recent international rheumatology conference abstracts, Cochrane database, and clinicaltrials.gov, and identified seven studies of moderate to high quality comparing pediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK. Meta-analysis of 263pediatric-onset and 981 adult-onset TAK suggested that constitutional features (fever, and in subgroup analyses, weight loss), hypertension, headache, and sinister features of cardiomyopathy, elevated serum creatinine, and abdominal pain were more frequent in pediatric-onset TAK, whereas pulse loss/pulse deficit and claudication (particularly upper limb claudication) were more frequent in adult-onset TAK. Hata's type IV TAK was more common in pediatric-onset TAK, and Hata's type I TAK in adult-onset TAK. Children with TAK also appeared to require more intense immunosuppression with more frequent use of cyclophosphamide, biologic DMARDs, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors, and, in subgroup analyses, tocilizumab in pediatric-onset TAK than in adult-onset TAK. Surgical or endovascular procedures, remission, and risk of mortality were similar in both children and adults with TAK. No studies had compared patient-reported outcome measures between pediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK. Distinct clinical features and angiographic extent prevail between pediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK. Clinical outcomes in these subgroups require further study in multicentric cohorts.

Prevalence of iatrogenic CNS inflammation at a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic

BackgroundVarious vaccines, tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFAIs), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and other immunomodulators have been linked to inflammatory CNS events. The prevalence of iatrogenic events in the neuroimmunology clinic is unknown. ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of iatrogenic CNS inflammation in a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic. MethodsWe analyzed 422 consecutive patients seen over five years at a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic who were systematically screened for exposure to vaccines, TNFAIs, ICIs, or other immunomodulators. In patients with suspected iatrogenic events, the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was used to score the probability of iatrogenicity. ResultsIn total, 27 potential iatrogenic events were observed, accounting for 6.4% of all new referrals. The average Naranjo score was 5.78 +/− 1.65 with 74% of the cases scored as probable and 26% scored as possible. The clinical phenotypes included MS relapses (37%); autoimmune encephalitis (30%); NMOSD attacks (15%); transverse myelitis (11%); optic neuritis (4%); and MOGAD attacks (4%). A monophasic course was observed in 44% of cases while 41% had a relapsing course. All patients stopped or interrupted treatment with the offending agent. In addition, 41% of the iatrogenic events were fully responsive to corticosteroids; 22% were partially responsive; and 15% resolved spontaneously. The most common potential triggers were vaccines (37%) followed by TNFAIs (33%) then ICIs (26%). A significantly higher number of probable iatrogenic events were observed among the ICI and vaccine groups compared to a higher number of possible events among the TNFAI group. The latter group also had a significantly longer interval since exposure. The ICI group was more likely to present with monophasic autoimmune encephalitis. ConclusionIatrogenic CNS inflammation is rare and typically involves steroid-responsive monophasic events. A subset of iatrogenic events can unmask or worsen relapsing disorders. The probability of iatrogenicity was higher in vaccine and ICI-related events compared to TNFAI-related events.

Evaluation of active inflammation, chronic structural damage, and response to treatment of sacroiliitis in axial spondyloarthritis using the Spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada scoring system

BackgroundAxial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. To investigate whether there are differences in inflammatory and chronic structural damages, as assessed by a semiquantitative MRI scoring method, between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with active inflammation at baseline, and to evaluate the treatment response in these patients after 3 months of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor treatment.MethodsFifty-eight axSpA patients with active inflammation were included in the study. The patients were divided into nr-axSpA group and AS group. MRI examinations of the sacroiliac joints were performed before and after treatment. Inflammatory and structural damages in these patients were assessed using the established Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) inflammation and sacroiliac joint structural (SSS) scoring methods, which are two MRI-based scoring methods. The SPARCC score, SSS score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level were compared between the two groups.ResultsAt baseline, SPARCC scores for patients in the nr-axSpA and AS groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05); however, SSS scores for fat metaplasia, erosion, and backfill for patients in the AS group were significantly higher (P < 0.001). Compared with baseline, SPARCC scores were significantly decreased in both groups after treatment (P < 0.001); however, after treatment, no statistically significant difference was found regarding SPARCC scores between the AS and nr-axSpA groups. Compared with baseline, a significant increase in the SSS scores for fat metaplasia and backfill (P < 0.001) and a significant decrease in the SSS scores for erosion (P < 0.001) were observed in all axSpA patients. Changes in the SPARCC score was inversely correlated with the changes in the SSS score for fat metaplasia (r = − 0.634, P < 0.001). Changes in the SSS score for backfill were positively correlated with the changes in the SSS score for fat metaplasia (r = 0.277, P < 0.05) and inversely correlated with those for erosion (r = − 0.443, P < 0.001).ConclusionThe SPARCC and SSS scoring systems can be used to assess inflammatory and chronic structural damages as well as treatment responses in patients with axSpA. More severe structural damages were seen in AS patients. TNF-α inhibitor treatment for 3 months could effectively reduce inflammation in axSpA patients.