Tubo-ovarian Serous Carcinoma Research Articles

Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors: Hereditary Aspects.

The topic of hereditary gynecologic malignancies readily evokes associations between Lynch syndrome and endometrial adenocarcinoma, or between BRCA mutations and tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma, but other familial associations are less well-known. Two hereditary syndromes are known to be related to uterine mesenchymal tumors: hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome and the tuberous sclerosis complex. In the following review, we describe the current literature on these syndromes, summarizing their clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic data. It is possible that the surgical pathologic diagnosis is the first indication of a familial syndrome, thus emphasizing the importance of a pathologist's familiarity with these potentially suggestive lesions.

Two cases of high grade tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma with extensive clear cell carcinoma-like morphology, possibly accentuated in the neoadjuvant setting

Two cases of high grade tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma with extensive clear cell carcinoma-like morphology, possibly accentuated in the neoadjuvant setting

Should All Cases of High-Grade Serous Ovarian, Tubal, and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomas Be Reclassified as Tubo-Ovarian Serous Carcinoma?

The dualistic theory of ovarian carcinogenesis proposes that epithelial "ovarian" cancer is not one entity with several histological subtypes but a collection of different diseases arising from cells of different origin, some of which may not originate in the ovarian surface epithelium. All cases referred to the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre with an ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer between April 2006 and April 2012 were identified from the West Midlands Cancer Registry. Tumors were classified into type I (low-grade endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, and low-grade serous) and type II (high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, and undifferentiated) cancers. Ovarian (83.5%), tubal (4.3%), or primary peritoneal carcinoma (12.2%) were diagnosed in a total of 583 woman. The ovarian tumors were type I in 134 cases (27.5%), type II in 325 cases (66.7%), and contained elements of both type I and type II tumors in 28 cases (5.7%). Most tubal and primary peritoneal cases, however, were type II tumors: 24 (96.0%) and 64 (90.1%), respectively. Only 16 (5.8%) of the ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas were stage I at diagnosis, whereas 240 (86.6%) were stage III+. Overall survival varied between the subtypes when matched for stage. Stage III low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinomas had a significantly better survival compared to clear cell and mucinous cases, P = 0.0134. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the high-grade serous ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinomas when matched for stage (stage III, P = 0.3758; stage IV, P = 0.4820). Type II tumors are more common than type I and account for most tubal and peritoneal cancers. High-grade serous carcinomas, whether classified as ovarian/tubal/peritoneal, seem to behave as one disease entity with no significant difference in survival outcomes, therefore supporting the proposition of a separate classification of "tubo-ovarian serous carcinoma".