Triplet Chemotherapy Research Articles

Comparison between different treatment regimens of vascular targeting drug to malignant pleural effusion in patients with lung cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background:The presence of malignant pleural effusion in lung cancer patients often suggests a poor prognosis. We plan to investigate which regimen of vascular targeting drug is preferable to control the malignant pleural effusion in such patients.Methods:Two investigators dependently searched and screened for randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from the database inception to August 2022. R software was applied to build a network model in Bayesian method. Objective response rate of malignant pleural effusion is the primary outcome measure. Besides, the incidence of 3 adverse events were compared, including gastrointestinal reaction, leukopenia and hypertension. Due to the disconnection of network, we analysis and discuss the short-term treatment (3–4 weeks) and long-term treatment (6–12 weeks) respectively.Results:31 studies with 2093 patients were identified. Four targeting drugs contain bevacizumab (Bev), anlotinib, apatinib and Endostar. Two administration routes include intracavity perfusion (icp) and intravenous injection. Based on the current evidence, for short-term treatments, compared with single-agent chemotherapy (CT), Bev_icp + CT, anlotinib + CT, Bev_icp and anlotinib + endorstar_icp present better objective response, and no statistical significance was found in objective response between Bev_icp + CT, anlotinib + CT and Bev_icp. For long-term treatments, compared with doublet or triplet chemotherapy (2CT or 3CT), Bev_icp + 2CT, apatinib + 2CT, Bev_icp + 3CT, and Bev_intravenous injection + 2CT are more effective option, but no statistical significance was found in objective response between the 4 combination regimens with chemotherapy.Conclusion:Our findings suggest that no statistical significance between above vascular targeting regimens. Pathological type of lung cancer may affect the effect of bevacizumab intracavity infusion plus chemotherapy. The influence of different administration routes of vascular targeting drugs on efficacy remains to be investigated. There are some concerns with the quality of the studies, and some limitations should be considered when interpreting these results, which includes limited geographical region and sample size of studies. Despite these limitations, this study may inform vascular targeting therapy choice in such a patient population.

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with BRAF V600E mutation: A multicenter real-world study in China

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with BRAF V600E mutation: A multicenter real-world study in China

Najnoviji stavovi o prednostima primjene neoadjuvantne terapije kod pacijenata s uznapredovalim rakom želuca

Treatment for gastric cancer has multiple approaches and options across the world. Standard treatment for the Asian population comprises D2-gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in Europe and North America, clinical trials have shown that perioperative chemotherapy, given to patients before surgery, could improve resection and survival rates significantly. Most recent studies have also discussed the advantages of doublet vs. triplet chemotherapy regimens. Furthermore, researchers have been comparing the effects of perioperative chemoradiotherapy as opposed to chemotherapy alone. The specific advantages of previously stated therapy options, as well as any novel treatments, should be researched more thoroughly in the future.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOXIRI for locally advanced rectal cancer to transform effectively EMVI and MRF from positive to negative: results of a long-term single center phase 2 clinical trial

PurposeChemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This phase 2 clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in LARC.Patients and methodsThe patients with LARC (the lower edge more than 5 cm from the anal verge) received up to 5 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess the baseline and postchemotherapy TN stage. Radical resection was performed within 4–6 weeks from the last dose of chemotherapy if the tumor shrank or remained stable. Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 or XELOX was recommended. Postoperative radiation was planned for R1 resection, ypT4b, ypN2 and a positive CRM. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate.ResultsFrom February 2016 to March 2019, 50 patients were enrolled. Forty-eight (96%) were clinically node-positive, 28 (56.5%) with MRF invasion and 39 (78.4%) were EMVI positive. The median cycle of neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was 5 (range,1–5). A total of 46/50 (92%) patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, all with R0 resection. The pCR rate was 4.3% (2/46). Twenty-three of 46 (50%) patients with cN + achieved a pathological node-negative status. The proportions of pathologically positive CRM and EMVI were 2.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 14/46 (30.4%) patients. The most common Grade 3 or > toxicities included neutrocytopenia (50%), leukopenia (14%) and diarrhea (12%) during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy period. Clinically meaningful postoperative complications included pneumonia (n = 1), pelvic infection (n = 1) and anastomotic fistula (n = 1). With a median follow-up time of 51.2 months, local recurrences and distant metastases were confirmed in 3 (6.5%) and 9 (19.6%) of cases, respectively. The 3-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)rates were 75.8% and 86.8%.ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI yielded a significant down-staging effect and seemed to be effective in eliminating EMVI and transforming the positive MRF to negative in LARC. The survival results are promising. The long-term follow-up showed promising DFS and OS rates accompanied by a favorable safety profile.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03443661, 23/02/2018.

FOLFOXIRI Plus Cetuximab or Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment of BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized Phase II FIRE-4.5 (AIO KRK0116) Study.

BRAFV600E mutation is associated with a poor outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This clinical trial investigated the efficacy of triplet chemotherapy (fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) combined with either cetuximab or bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. In this controlled, randomized, open-label phase II trial, 109 patients were randomly assigned, 107 of whom were included into the full analysis set (FAS). Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab in the experimental arm (n = 72) or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in the control arm (n = 35). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1., evaluated in patients treated according to protocol (ATP population). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and feasibility were analyzed as secondary end points. Eighteen patients discontinued study treatment before the first tumor assessment, thus resulting in the ATP population of 89 patients. In these patients, ORR was 51% (30/59) in the cetuximab-based experimental arm and 67% (20/30) in the bevacizumab-based control arm (odds ratio, 1.93; 80% CI, 1.06 to 3.52; P = .92 [one-sided]). In the full analysis set, median PFS was significantly inferior in the experimental arm (6.7 months v 10.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; P = .006). Median OS analyzed at an event rate of 64.5% showed a trend toward shorter survival in cetuximab-treated patients (12.9 months v 17.1 months; HR, 1.4; P = .20). To our knowledge, FIRE-4.5 is the first prospective and randomized study investigating first-line treatment of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab does not induce a higher ORR when compared with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in first-line treatment of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy remains the preferable first-line treatment of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

Modified FOLFOX plus/minus nivolumab and ipilimumab vs FLOT plus nivolumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction: The randomized phase 2 IKF-S628 Moonlight trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).

4050 Background: FOLFOX plus nivolumab has become standard of care for first-line therapy of patients (pts) with esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGA). The AIO-STO-0417 trial (Moonlight) is a multi-cohort treatment optimization trial that evaluates the combination of FOLFOX alone (Arm B) vs FOLFOX plus nivolumab (nivo) and ipilimumab (ipi) administered in parallel (Arm A/A1) or sequentially (Arm A2) and FLOT plus nivolumab administered in parallel (Arm C) for 1L-treatment of metastatic or advanced inoperable Her-2 negative EGA. The aim is to generate signals whether a. dual checkpoint inhibition or b. a triplet chemotherapy is beneficial in the context of nivolumab therapy for this disease. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to Arm A (mFOLFOX q2w plus nivo 240 mg q2w + ipi 1 mg/kg q6w administered in parallel) or B (mFOLFOX alone). In a subsequent phase pts were randomized 1:2 to Arm A1 (identical to Arm A) or A2 (three cycles of mFOLFOX followed by nivo q2w + ipi q6w, with optional repetition). In a final phase, all pts were allocated to single Arm C (FLOT q2w + nivo q2w). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) based on the ITT population for Arm A vs Arm B and PFS rate at 6 months (PFS@6) for Arms A2 and C. Main secondary endpoints were PFS and ORR. Here, we present results for Arms A/A1, A2 and B. Results: A total of 262 pts were enrolled, Arm A (n=60), Arm B (n=60), Arm A1 (n=30), Arm A2 (n=60) and Arm C (n=52, results presented elsewhere). Baseline characteristics were comparable in all arms. Overall PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥1) was low with 41% and balanced between Arms A/A1, A2 and B. Analysis of pooled Arms A/A1 (n=90) showed an increase in toxicity (pts with AEs grade ≥3 88% vs 65% in Arm B and 75% in Arm A2, treatment related SAEs grade ≥3 A/A1 41% vs B 18% vs A2 17%) but not in activity. Arm A/A1 compared with Arm A2 was more effective in terms of PFS@6 (48% vs 30%), median PFS 5.8 vs 4.0 months and objective response rate (ORR) 46% vs 30%. Conclusions: Albeit the small number of pts in each cohort we conclude that in the first-line setting of metastatic EGA. a) Chemo plus dual checkpoint inhibition administered in parallel is associated with an increase in toxicity but not activity. b) Although associated with lower toxicity the use of sequential chemo followed by IO monotherapy is insufficient. The relatively low numbers of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 may have impacted these results. Clinical trial information: NCT03647969 .

VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer.

3596 Background: The need for safe and effective therapies for untreated, BRAF V600E-mutated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer remains unmet. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the VIC (Vemurafenib/Irinotecan/Cetuximab) regimen versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line setting in Asian patients. Methods: In the single-center prospective cohort study, 78 untreated, BRAF V600E-mutant, locally advanced or metastatic CRC patients were enrolled. Every two weeks, the VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus doublet or triplet chemotherapy are administered. We evaluated the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and the conversion resection rate. In progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, the Kaplan-Meier method was utilized (OS). Results: In the evaluable population, 32 patients received VIC regimen and 35 patients received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The ORR and DCR in the VIC group were significantly higher than in the bevacizumab-therapy group (ORR: 68.8% versus 40.0%, P = 0.018; DCR: 100.0% versus 80.0%, P = 0.023). The VIC regimen was significantly superior to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for PFS (median, 11.9 vs 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48, 95% CI, 0.27-0.87; P = 0.012) and OS (median, 24.5 vs 14.4 months; HR = 0.36, 95% CI, 0.16-0.78; P = 0.007). In the VIC group, the conversion resection rate for liver metastases was 42.1% (8 of 19 patients), and for local CRC it was 66.7% (6 of 9 patients with initially unresectable local CRC). Rates of treatment-related adverse events of Grade 3 to 4 were 32.4% and 31.1% for the VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: Among Asian patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced CRC, the VIC regimen was superior to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of tumor response and oncological survival, with a tolerable and manageable toxicity profile in the first-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT05540951 .

Alliance A022104/NRG-GI010: A randomized phase II trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy to achieve clinical complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer—The Janus Rectal Cancer trial.

TPS3640 Background: Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients (pts) with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated it as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and pt groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation and improve quality of life for pts. Methods: In this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology randomized phase II trial (1:1), up to 312 pts with microsatellite stable LARC, clinical stage T4N0, any T, N+ or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N+ vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Pts will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long course CRT (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks (w) + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Pts will undergo assessment 8-12 w post-TNT completion for the primary endpoint of cCR per previously validated criteria and recommended WW and surveillance if cCR is achieved or TME if an incomplete response is noted. Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (disease-free and overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse effects. Statistical power, based on cCR, incorporates a one-sided alpha = 0.048 and power = 90% yielding 312 patients (156 per arm). Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, matched / normal blood samples and serial rectal MRI will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and is actively recruiting. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG); Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163 Clinical trial information: NCT05610163 .

P-155 Surufatinib plus doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) or triplet (FOLFOXIRI) chemotherapy as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): First-stage results of a randomized, open-label phase II trial

P-155 Surufatinib plus doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) or triplet (FOLFOXIRI) chemotherapy as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): First-stage results of a randomized, open-label phase II trial

Exploring the prognostic and predictive impact of genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

3576 Background: Genomic LOH consists in the loss of chromosomal regions and is associated with the homologous recombination repair (HRR) system deficiency (dHRR). In ovarian cancer, LOH-high predicts benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. In mCRC, the role of LOH has been poorly investigated. Methods: An NGS-based assay (FoundationOne CDx; Foundation Medicine, Inc. Cambrige, MA) was used to determine the percentage of genomic LOH and the presence of pathogenetic mutations in HRR-related genes in archival chemo-naïve tumor tissues of mCRC patients included in a real-world registry and in the AtezoTRIBE (NCT03721653) and AVETRIC (NCT04513951) studies. Both these trials assessed the combination of an anti-PDL1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) with the triplet FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or cetuximab. The prespecified cut-off of ≥14.08 for LOH-high described for mCRC (Sokol et al., JCO Precis Oncol 2020) was adopted. Tumors with at least one biallelic alteration in any of the 27 genes involved in the HRR pathway (Riaz et al., Nat Commun 2017) included in the FoundationOne CDx panel (BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD52, RAD54L, RBBP8, XRCC2, ABL1, ATM, ATR, BAP1, CDK12, DNMT3A, ERCC4, FANCA, FANCC, FANCG, FANCL, PARP1) were defined dHRR. Results: Overall, 196 samples were analysed. None of 7 MSI-H tumors were classified as LOH-high. Fourteen (7%) and 6 (3%) of 189 MSS tumors were classified as LOH-high and dHRR, respectively. In particular, in LOH-high subgroup, 3 (21%) tumors were defined dHRR, while 3 (50%) tumors were classified LOH-high among dHRR tumors. LOH-high tumors were more frequently BRAF mutated (p = 0.019) and dHRR (p = 0.006) compared to LOH-low. Among patients receiving triplet chemotherapy +/- biologic agent alone (N = 55) or with an anti-PDL1 (N = 58), an interaction effect was shown between the effect of the addition of the checkpoint inhibitor and LOH with higher benefit in the LOH-high subgroup (N = 10) in terms of both PFS (pinteraction= 0.002) and OS (pinteraction< 0.001). In the cohort of patients not receiving the anti-PDL1, longer PFS was observed in patients with LOH-low (N = 125) respect to LOH-high (N = 6) tumors (12.1 vs 5.1 months, HR: 0.11, 95%CI: 0.04-0.26, p < 0.001). No differences in PFS or OS were reported between patients treated with first-line oxaliplatin- (N = 40) vs irinotecan-based doublets (N = 25) or with the triplet FOLFOXIRI (N = 55) vs doublets (N = 65) according to LOH status. No prognostic or predictive impact of HRR deficiency was shown. Conclusions: In MSS mCRC, LOH-high was associated with biallelic alterations in the HRR system, worse prognosis and higher benefit from the addition of anti-PDL1 agents to chemotherapy. Considering the low number of LOH-high tumors in our study, these results deserve confirmation in larger cohorts.

Real-world comparison of triplet- versus doublet-chemotherapy with bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

3574 Background: Meta-analysis of five randomized intensification trials in mCRC demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit of triplet chemotherapy (5FU/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (Triplet/Bev) compared to doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (Doublet/Bev) (HR 0.81). Guidelines recommend first-line Triplet/Bev for patients with excellent performance status and normal organ function who can withstand increased toxicity, but such patients are less represented in the real world. In this retrospective cohort study, we examine the real-world effectiveness of Triplet/Bev compared to Doublet/Bev in the U.S. Methods: We used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database, comprising de-identified patient-level structured and unstructured data curated via technology-enabled abstraction from ~ 280 cancer clinics. Included were mCRC patients treated with first-line Triplet/Bev or Doublet/Bev between 10/23/14 and 10/31/22. OS by treatment was assessed using the Kaplan Meier method and adjustment for confounding variables was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Pre-specified confounding variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, year of metastatic diagnosis, health insurance, practice setting, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation status, MMR/MSI status, synchronous/metachronous metastases, primary tumor sidedness, CEA, renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, and ECOG performance status. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation with chained equations. Results: Among 10,016 patients, 391 (3.9%) received Triplet/Bev and 9,625 (96.1%) received Doublet/Bev. Patients who received Triplet/Bev were younger (median age 52 vs 63 years) and were more likely to be treated at academic practices (27% vs 8%), to have synchronous metastatic disease (83% vs 65%), and to have KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type disease (30% vs 17%). In the univariate analysis, median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI 24.7 – 34.7) in the Triplet/Bev cohort versus 23.4 months (95% CI 22.8 – 24.1) in the Doublet/Bev cohort (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.62 – 0.85; p < 0.001). In Cox proportional hazards modeling with IPTW, there was no significant difference in hazard of death between Triplet/Bev and Doublet/Bev (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75 – 1.12; p = 0.4). Conclusions: In this large, national, real-world population of patients with mCRC, first-line treatment with Triplet/Bev was not associated with improved survival compared to Doublet/Bev after accounting for differences in baseline patient characteristics. The benefit to Triplet/Bev observed in randomized trials does not translate well to a more heterogeneous, real-world population. Sub-group analyses including by age, tumor sidedness, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status, and baseline CEA level will be performed.

Influence of levothyroxine concomitant treatment on treatment responses and outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.

e15593 Background: Hypothyroidism is the most common thyroid disorder and levothyroxine is the mainstay treatment. Levothyroxine is mainly used to restore the euthyroid clinical and biochemical status in the gland. Recent literature has correlated chronic hormonal treatment with adverse effects on bone and heart function, as well as correlated with an increased risk of tumor onset. Data available in the literature are controversial, therefore the aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between chronic levothyroxine intake and outcomes and response to first line treatments in patients affected by metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data from 139 patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, belonging to the Medical Oncology Department of the University Hospital of Cagliari from 2016 to 2019. All patients enrolled in the study had received metastatic first-line treatment with doublet or triplet chemotherapy associated with anti-VEGF or anti-EGR monoclonal antibody. Patients with ECOG PS ≤1 with no more than two relevant comorbidities were included in the study. The primary objective of the study was median overall survival (mOS) and secondary objectives were: median progression free progression (PFS), median overall survival (mOS) differences between RAS wild type and mutant tumour. BRAF mutant tumors were excluded from the evaluation. Results: Median age was 65 years (±10), 51% were male and 49% were female. 63% patients had an ECOG-PS 0, while 37% had an ECOG-PS 1. 67% developed from the left colon; 33% from the right colon and the transverse colon. All patients had synchronous metastases. 18% patients took levothyroxine and 82% patients did not take it. Among the patients receiving levothyroxine therapy, 64% had a RAS wild type and 36% a RAS mutated. Levothyroxine treated patients showed a significantly lower median OS than not treated patients (15 months versus not reached, p = 0,0001). Levothyroxine treated patients also showed a significantly lower median PFS than non treated patients (6 versus 8 months, p = 0,035). Within levothyroxine treated pts, no statistically significant differences were found in mOS and mPFS between RAS wt and RAS mut (mOS 15 versus 14 months, respectively, p = 0.9; mPFS 8 versus 7 months, respectively, p = 0,7). Conclusions: The results show a possible correlation between levothyroxine therapy and outcomes in mCRC. This would deserve further study to understand further biological-molecular aspects, to date partially explained by preclinical studies, in order to clarify some of the possible underlying mechanisms.

Real-world data of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) in private health system in Brazil.

e18830 Background: Incidence of EOCRC has been sharply rising in the past decades in the US and present distinct clinical features when compared to late-onset CRC (LOCRC). Data from other countries are scarce. We compared clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes between patients ≤45y (EOCRC) and ≥60y (LOCRC). Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with metastatic CRC treated at 5 Oncoclinicas centers in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The median OS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were evaluated via multivariate Cox Regression. Results: After excluding patients with ages between 46 and 59, 326 patients were identified. EOCRC was represented by 72 (22%) patients (median age 39) and LOCRC by 254 patients (median age 69). Median follow-up was 39.5m, with 231 deaths (71%). Median OS was 33.2m and 40.9m (p = 0.971), respectively. Likewise, stage IV at presentation was similar between the groups (68% vs 58%, p = 0.215), as well as the rate of dMMR status (4% vs 6%, p = 0.655). Clinical and treatment characteristics that were statistically different between the groups are described in Table 1. In multivariate analysis, presence of RAS mutations (HR:1.83), and undergoing triplet chemotherapy (HR:3.24), primary tumor resection (HR:0.40), and metastasectomy (HR:0.45) were the variables with prognostic effect on OS. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis of mCRC, EOCRC patients presented similar clinical presentation and OS, but they were more aggressively treated compared to the older patients. There is no evidence that more intensive treatments translate into superior clinical outcomes in young patients. Real-world data have been progressively adopted in clinical practice and should be considered before clinical decision making in order to offer treatments with minimal toxicity burden to the patients. Future studies with larger population are needed and may bring additional data. [Table: see text]

A case of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy for locally advanced colon cancer with mismatch repair enzyme proficiency

Patients with potentially resectable colon cancer and expected to have negative margins should undergo resection rather than neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Recent studies have suggested that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may be an option for tumors with mismatch repair enzyme deficiency (dMMR), but standard treatment for locally advanced colon cancer with mismatch repair enzyme proficiency (pMMR) is still unclear. A 37-year-old male patient was diagnosed with clinical stage IIIC (T4b N1a M0) transverse colon cancer. Mismatch repair proteins were proficient. After 3 cycles of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, day 1), irinotecan (150 mg/m2, IV, day 1), leucovorin (200 mg/m2, IV, day 1), and 5-fluorouracil (3000 mg/m2, 46 hours of continuous infusion initiating from day 1), there was a remarkable reduction in the tumoral mass on the abdominal computed tomography. A right hemicolectomy was performed. A pathologic complete response was obtained. Although there is no consensus on which patients are suitable for neoadjuvant therapy in pMMR locally advanced colon cancer, triplet chemotherapy may be a reasonable option in selected patients.

Abstract 168: Esophageal adenocarcinoma-on-a-chip; modeling patient specific disease progression and a step towards functional precision oncology

Abstract Introduction: Esophageal cancer causes sixth most cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a survival rate of <20%. Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) subtype has been rising (>60%) in North America. Systemic docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy represents the best standard of care, approx. 60% of patients showcasing innate chemo-resistance or developing acquired chemo-resistance. 3D organoids provide a robust and heterogeneous cell source but lack the stromal microenvironment. We established a high-fidelity, stromal-inclusive tumor-on-chip platform expanding on tumor heterogeneity with micro-physiological relevance and flexible complexity. Methods: A total of 8 (4 chemo-sensitive and 4 chemo-resistant) treatment naïve patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and matched fibroblasts were selected to develop syngeneic human esophageal microtissues (tumor and adjacent) on commercially available (Emulate), compartmentalized, porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane-based microfluidic device. Chips accommodate organoids-derived epithelial cells at the upper mucosal channel and matched fibroblasts at the bottom stromal channel. 3D-microtissue development on the chip and treatment-induced cytotoxicity were examined for up to 11 days. We followed the FLOT (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; 1:1.7:52) based chemotherapy regime on the chip and evaluated the recapitulation of patient-specific response. Epithelial barrier integrity, adenocarcinoma-associated cellular proteins, and level of cyfra 21-1 (circulating tumor biomarker) were determined on-chip grown microtissues. Results: Real-time brightfield microscopic observations revealed that the EA chips manifest mucin production, adequate tissue tight epithelial barriers, and distinct morphological characteristics that emerged with adenocarcinoma progression. Presence of pleomorphic cells (multiple shapes and sizes), establishment of tight epithelial barriers and formation of mature microvilli was observed via electron microscopy. Patient specific tumor tissue growth were observed for maximum 12 days under a physiologically relevant media flow. Perfusion of pharmacokinetically pertinent doses of triplet chemotherapeutic compounds performed through the stromal channel and each chip recapitulated level of chemosensitivity observed in the patient. Fluorescent probes and LDH assay also demonstrated patient-specific chemo response. Confocal imaging revealed differential expression of proliferation (ki67), epithelial (CK7, E-cadherin), and mesenchymal (Vimentin) markers in each patient-derived chip. Conclusions: Human esophageal adenocarcinoma-on-a-chip is a novel, most human-relevant biomimetic platform built on a microfluidic chip and a potential alternative to inadequate pre-clinical animal models in the future. Citation Format: Sanjima Pal, Elee Shimshoni, Salvador Flores-Torres, Julie Bérubé, Kulsum Tai, Iris Kong, Betty Giannias, Sean Hall, Nicholas Bertos, Veena Sangwan, Donald E. Ingber, Lorenzo Ferri. Esophageal adenocarcinoma-on-a-chip; modeling patient specific disease progression and a step towards functional precision oncology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 168.

Real‐world treatment and outcomes of patients with metastatic BRAF mutant colorectal cancer

BackgroundBRAF mutation occurs in 5%–10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs). Patients with BRAF mutant mCRC exhibit a specific metastatic pattern and poor prognosis. Survival outcomes are heterogeneous in cases of mCRC with a BRAF mutation. The optimal first‐line therapy is still controversial.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC between June 2010 and December 2021. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment and BRAF mutation testing results were collected. Patients with a BRAF mutation were included. Kaplan–Meier methods and log‐rank tests were used to analyze and compare survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to establish the predictive nomogram model.ResultsOf the 4475 mCRC, 261 have a BRAF mutation, including 240 V600E and 21 non‐V600E mutants. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months in the BRAF V600E mutant group versus 38.0 months in the non‐V600E mutant group (p = 0.022). ECOG score, tumor differentiation, liver metastasis, bone metastasis and primary tumor resection were independent prognostic factors for the OS of BRAF V600E mutant mCRC. A nomogram model was established using these factors. The median OS was 39.3 m, 18.2 m and 10.7 m for the low‐risk, intermediate‐risk and high‐risk groups defined by this model, respectively (p < 0.0001). Patients who received first‐line triplet chemotherapy ± bevacizumab had comparable progression free survival (PFS) and OS compared with those treated with doublets ± bevacizumab.ConclusionBRAF V600E mutant mCRCs exhibit unfavorable and heterogeneous prognosis. The first‐line intensive chemotherapy did not confer a marked impact on the PFS and OS.

Impact of Sarcopenia on Survival in Patients Treated with FOLFIRINOX in a First-Line Setting for Metastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma

Sarcopenia, defined as decreased muscle mass and strength, can be evaluated by a computed tomography (CT) examination and might be associated with reduced survival in patients with carcinoma. The prognosis of patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma is poor. The FOLFIRINOX (a combination of 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy regimen is a validated first-line treatment option. We investigated the impact of sarcopenia on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. Clinical data and CT examinations of patients treated with FOLFIRINOX were retrospectively reviewed. Sarcopenia was estimated using baseline CT examinations. Seventy-five patients were included. Forty-three (57.3%) were classified as sarcopenic. The median OS of non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic patients were 15.6 and 14.1 months, respectively (p = 0.36). The median PFS was 10.3 in non-sarcopenic patients and 9.3 in sarcopenic patients (p = 0.83). No differences in toxicity of FOLFIRINOX were observed. There was a trend towards a higher probability of short-term death (within 4 months of diagnosis) in sarcopenic patients. In this study, the detection of sarcopenia failed to predict a longer OS or PFS in selected patients deemed eligible by a physician for triplet chemotherapy and receiving the FOLFIRINOX regimen in a first-line setting, confirming the major importance of a comprehensive patient assessment by physicians in selecting the best treatment option.

Improving Outcome of Selected Patients With Non-Resectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer With Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Parallel Trial (COLT trial)

Improving Outcome of Selected Patients With Non-Resectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer With Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Parallel Trial (COLT trial)

Neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (KEEP-G 03): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BackgroundThe standard neoadjuvant treatments in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still have either poor safety or efficacy. Better therapies are needed in China.MethodsThis was an open-label, single-arm, phase...

Real-world outcomes with front-line doublet versus triplet chemotherapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

313 Background: Current guidelines recommend an upfront cytotoxic doublet with or without targeted therapy or immunotherapy for the management of patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (aGEA).While evidence for the superiority of combination chemotherapy over single agent chemotherapy has been well established, the comparison of two drug versus three drug regimens has been less definitive. This study analyzed a large real-world database to compare clinical outcomes between doublet and triplet approaches in the frontline setting. Methods: The nationwide de-identified Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived database was reviewed for patients with aGEA treated with a first line (1L) cytotoxic doublet or triplet irrespective of combination targeted therapy between 2011 and 2022. Patients who received non-standard chemotherapy combinations or did not have a visit or medication order within 90 days of advanced stage diagnosis were excluded. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival outcomes between groups. Overall survival was considered as time from the 1L therapy to death with censoring for loss to follow up. Results: 5375 patients with aGEA who met inclusion criteria, 4415 (82%) received doublet chemotherapy and 960 (17%) received triplet in the 1L. Median OS (mOS) for those receiving a doublet was 11 months (95%CI 10-11) similar to those receiving a triplet (11 months, 95% CI 10-12). A Cox proportional hazards model controlling for potential confounding variables of gender, race, smoking status, disease site, as well as HER2 and PDL1 status did not show a significant difference in outcomes between the two groups (HR 0.9, 95%CI 0.8-1). A subgroup analysis comparing FLOT with FOLFOX/CapeOx demonstrated an improved mOS with FLOT (13 mo vs 10 mo; 95%CI 11-15 vs 9-10). This benefit was sustained in a multivariable analysis which demonstrated an increased risk of death with FOLFOX/CapeOX compared to FLOT (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1-1.4). Conclusions: Consistent with prior studies, this real-world study did not identify a significant difference in survival outcomes with 1L triplet compared to doublet chemotherapy in aGEA. When limiting analysis to modern chemotherapy regimens however this data does suggest that a survival benefit may exist with the use of FLOT when compared to FOFOX/CapeOX. This finding would need to be further evaluated in prospective trials incorporating immunotherapy and targeted therapy prior to widespread recommendation.